Meze 99 Classics 2nd Gen

Meze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Feature Scores

Explore all 38 feature scores for Meze 99 Classics 2nd Gen, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

38 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    11 (29%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    26 (68%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    1 (3%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.6
    25 reviews strong consensus
    Detail retrieval: 4.6, 25 reviews, strong consensus
    Detail retrieval is strong for the price and markedly clearer than the first generation, even if it does not reach the most analytical competitors.
  • 4.6
    28 reviews strong consensus
    Sound quality: 4.6, 28 reviews, strong consensus
    The prevailing view is that the second generation sounds cleaner, more controlled, and more versatile than the original. A small dissenting group found the balance thin, bright, or unrewarding.
  • 4.4
    37 reviews low consensus
    Overall satisfaction: 4.4, 37 reviews, low consensus
    Most reviewers strongly enjoyed the second generation and considered it a worthwhile modernization. Two sharply negative assessments and a few measured takes keep the consensus from being universal.
  • 4.6
    19 reviews strong consensus
    Design and Aesthetics: 4.6, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    The walnut cups and gold-accented frame are widely described as distinctive and beautiful, though their conspicuous styling will not suit every setting.
  • 4.5
    27 reviews strong consensus
    Comfort during long use: 4.5, 27 reviews, strong consensus
    Most reviewers found them comfortable for hours, helped by the suspension strap and soft pads. A minority noted heat, ear contact, or fit quirks.
  • 4.4
    17 reviews strong consensus
    Imaging precision: 4.4, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    Improved driver matching supports precise, stable placement, and imaging is frequently singled out as one of the headphone's technical strengths.
  • 4.3
    30 reviews moderate consensus
    Midrange clarity: 4.3, 30 reviews, moderate consensus
    Midrange is commonly praised for natural vocals, clarity, and separation, though some heard a recessed, hollow, or occasionally shouty region.
  • 4.2
    34 reviews low consensus
    Bass performance: 4.2, 34 reviews, low consensus
    Bass is tighter, faster, and better controlled than before, with strong texture and punch. Bass-focused listeners may miss the original's heavier weight and deeper slam.
  • 4.5
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Instrument separation: 4.5, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Instrument separation is consistently strong, keeping dense arrangements organized and individual parts easy to follow.
  • 4.4
    15 reviews strong consensus
    Premium feel: 4.4, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Materials, finish, and hand feel give these headphones a convincingly premium character well beyond ordinary plastic closed-backs.
  • 4.2
    29 reviews moderate consensus
    Frequency response accuracy: 4.2, 29 reviews, moderate consensus
    Tuning moves toward a balanced, near-neutral presentation while retaining some warmth. That broader versatility costs some of the original model's bold coloration.
  • 4.4
    14 reviews strong consensus
    Build quality: 4.4, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality is a signature strength: reviewers repeatedly praise the metal-and-walnut construction, solid feel, and confidence-inspiring finish.
  • 4.4
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    Dynamic performance: 4.4, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Dynamics and transient control are lively and convincing, though a few reviews wanted more explicit shifts or stronger low-end impact.
  • 4.4
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Portability/foldability: 4.4, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Low weight, strong isolation, and easy drivability suit portable listening, but the non-folding frame and large case limit bag friendliness.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Dongle: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The bundled USB-C DAC is repeatedly praised as transparent, capable, and genuinely useful, adding immediate phone and laptop compatibility.
  • 4.3
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Noise isolation (passive): 4.3, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Passive isolation is one of the strongest points, often beating similarly priced closed-backs and making moderate background noise easy to ignore.
  • 4.3
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Ease of driving: 4.3, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    At 16 ohms and high sensitivity, these headphones are exceptionally easy to drive from phones, controllers, dongles, laptops, and portable players.
  • 4.0
    25 reviews low consensus
    Treble clarity: 4.0, 25 reviews, low consensus
    Treble is often called crisp, smooth, and detailed, but this is the most divisive part of the tuning: several reviewers heard excess energy, sibilance, or a 7–8 kHz peak.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Amplifier scaling: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    They do not require a powerful amplifier, but several reviewers heard added texture, space, or control from higher-quality sources and tube pairings.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Durability over time: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers trust the simple metal-and-wood construction for long ownership, drawing confidence from the original model's durability and the new model's serviceability.
  • 4.2
    9 reviews low consensus
    Channel matching: 4.2, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Tighter left-right driver matching is credited with more stable stereo reproduction and more reliable imaging.
  • 4.3
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Included accessories: 4.3, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The case, adapters, acoustic inserts, and USB-C dongle make the package unusually complete and ready for modern sources.
  • 4.1
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    Ear cup padding quality: 4.1, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    The larger, softer pads improve sealing and long-session comfort, but a few users still found the inner space tight or warm.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Gaming performance: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Neutralized bass, accurate imaging, controller-friendly efficiency, and optional boom-mic support make these versatile for immersive and competitive gaming.
  • 3.9
    21 reviews low consensus
    Soundstage width: 3.9, 21 reviews, low consensus
    Many reviewers heard an unusually spacious closed-back stage with convincing depth and layering. Others found it merely moderate, narrow, or concentrated into left-center-right zones.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Clamping force comfort: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Clamp is generally secure without becoming oppressive, and the spring-steel frame allows some adjustment; experiences vary with head shape.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Weight comfort: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Despite using wood and metal, the headphones remain light enough for extended wear, with reviewers finding the added second-generation weight largely inconsequential.
  • 4.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Cable quality: 4.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The longer Kevlar-sheathed cable is a major upgrade in handling, durability, and reduced microphonics, although its thinner upper sections drew some criticism.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Detachable cable convenience: 4.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Larger dual 3.5 mm sockets improve aftermarket cable compatibility, while the detachable layout supports easier ownership and replacement.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Stability: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Fit is stable for commuting and desk use, but it is not consistently secure enough for exercise or highly active wear.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Volume output: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    They reach generous—and sometimes uncomfortable—volume from modest sources, so extra amplification is unnecessary for loudness.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Sustainability and repairability: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Replaceable, screw-fastened parts and a glue-free approach make long-term repairability a standout advantage in a disposable-electronics market.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Sound leakage: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The closed cups keep outward leakage low enough for shared spaces, according to the reviewers who tested it.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Workout heat and sweat buildup: 3.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The sealed vegan-leather pads can retain heat and breathe less freely, particularly in warm climates or during active use.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Carry case quality: 4.0, 1 review
    The protective case is generally viewed as sturdy, practical, and better than average, though the headphones remain bulky to carry.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Glasses and hat compatibility: 4.0, 1 review
    The fit worked comfortably with glasses in the accounts that addressed it, without excessive clamping.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Maximum volume clarity: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Most listening stayed clean, but a few reviewers encountered oversaturation or distortion when volume or bass EQ was pushed too far.

Cons

  • 3.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    Replaceable earpads: 3.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    The six-clip pad system makes removal and swapping quick and repeatable, though proprietary mounting narrows third-party pad choices.