If you want better Maximum volume clarity
Choose Sony WF-C510 Earbuds. It scores 4.7 vs 2.3 for Maximum volume clarity, with a 3.9 overall score.
LG xboom Buds by will.i.am Earbuds Review
Bottom Line
Choose the LG xboom Buds for strong ANC, long battery life, rich bass, and a highly useful app. Skip them if sound clarity, long-session comfort, premium codecs, or best-in-class value matter most.
Best for
Best for commuters and feature-focused buyers who want strong ANC, long battery life, app-based tuning, secure fit options, and bass-forward sound at a moderate price.
Not for
Not for listeners who want the clearest sound, premium codec support, spacious instrument separation, or guaranteed comfort during long sessions.
Verdict
The LG xboom Buds land as feature-rich, affordable noise-canceling earbuds with strong ANC, useful app tools, solid battery life, and bass that can be enjoyable after tuning. The tradeoff is that the same bass-forward tuning often hurts clarity, separation, and spaciousness, while several reviewers found the rounded design bulky or uncomfortable for longer sessions. Call quality and stability are generally dependable, and Auracast adds an uncommon extra, but codec support and sound refinement trail several named rivals. The evidence points to capable commuter earbuds with real feature appeal, not a consistently convincing pick for listeners who prioritize sonic detail or long-wear comfort.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
41 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.04 (10%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.412 (29%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.415 (37%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.49 (22%)
-
Very negative below 1.51 (2%)
Pros highlights
-
Battery life receives broad praise, with reviewers calling the figures strong, competitive, or impressive for the price.
-
Noise cancellation is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers praising how effectively it dulled or blocked low-frequency and everyday noise for the price.
-
The companion app is mostly praised for customization, fit testing, ANC controls, and clarity, though one short review criticized it.
-
Auracast is repeatedly framed as a useful, uncommon, or unique feature that adds value if nearby broadcasts matter to the user.
-
EQ customization is useful and can improve the sound, though reviewers agreed it does not fully erase the underlying tuning problems.
-
Call microphone quality ranges from usable to excellent, with one reviewer reporting exceptionally clear call sound and others noting some tinniness.
Cons highlights
-
Comfort is sharply split: multiple reviewers found the rounded, bulky fit poor for long sessions, while others reported a comfortable fit.
-
Sound quality is the most divisive area: some reviewers heard enjoyable or even stellar audio, while others found it muddy, unclear, or below rivals.
-
Value for money is highly split: the buds bring ANC, battery, and features at a moderate price, but several reviewers preferred cheaper or clearer-sounding rivals.
-
Bass is a mixed strength: reviewers heard impact, depth, and fun energy, but several also connected the tuning to muddiness or reduced clarity.
-
Design and aesthetics are consistently weak, with reviewers calling the buds boring, bulky, not sleek, or visually uninteresting.
-
Midrange clarity improves with tuning but can become muddy when bass dominates.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Earbuds, this product is above average in Auracast support, Software/setup simplicity, Integrated microphone, near average in Stability, Battery, below average in Design and Aesthetics, Volume output, LDAC.
Comparison summary
41 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher5 (12%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts10 (24%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower26 (63%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design and Aesthetics | 2.2 | 4.1 | -1.9 |
| Volume output | 2.0 | 4.0 | -2.0 |
| LDAC | 1.5 | 3.4 | -1.9 |
| aptX | 1.0 | 2.8 | -1.8 |
| Soundstage width | 2.4 | 4.1 | -1.8 |
| Maximum volume clarity | 2.3 | 4.0 | -1.7 |
| Instrument separation | 2.5 | 4.3 | -1.8 |
| Codec support | 2.0 | 3.7 | -1.7 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Sound leakage
Choose Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4 Earbuds. It scores 4.7 vs 2.0 for Sound leakage, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better Volume output
Choose Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds. It scores 4.6 vs 2.0 for Volume output, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better LDAC
Choose Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds. It scores 4.5 vs 1.5 for LDAC, with a 4.3 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: sonic performance What Hi-Fi? treated the Sony WF-C710N as the stronger class-leading benchmark in this price range.
- Compared: price bracket and competing noise-canceling earbuds Tom's Guide positioned the Sony WF-C710N as a same-price competitor.
- Worse: touch control sensitivity Tom's Guide found the xboom Buds' touch controls less overly sensitive than the EarFun OpenJump open-ear earbuds.
- Compared: budget alternative What Hi-Fi? listed the Sony WF-C510 as a cheaper non-ANC alternative.
FAQ
Are the LG xboom Buds good at noise cancellation?
Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised ANC as effective for the price, especially against low-frequency traffic, office noise, and general background rumble.
How do the LG xboom Buds sound?
Sound quality is mixed. Reviewers liked the bass and said EQ tuning can improve the balance, but several complained about muddiness, harsh treble, weak separation, or rivals sounding clearer.
Are they comfortable for long listening sessions?
Comfort is one of the most divided areas. Some reviewers found the fit secure or comfortable, while others said the rounded, bulky shape made long sessions unpleasant.
Is the LG xboom Buds app useful?
Mostly yes. Reviewers praised the app for EQ, ANC adjustment, fit testing, and touch-control customization, though one short review said the app leaves a lot to be desired.
How is battery life?
Battery life is a strength. Reviewers called the figures strong or impressive, and one review said real-world testing confirmed the claimed numbers held up.
Are they good for calls?
Call quality is generally decent to strong. One reviewer said they had never sounded clearer on a call, while others heard enough clarity with some tinniness or higher-frequency background noise.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Savage Reviews
- Review score
- 3.2
Article Reviews
techradar.com
- Review score
- 3.1
Top Earbuds to Consider
Best for detailed, natural wired sound, three connector options, and standout value around $99. Skip it if you need wireless features, stronger bass, softer treble, or a compact fit for...
Pros: Value for money, Multi-platform compatibility
Choose these for excellent, balanced sound, a comfortable redesign, deep EQ tools and uniquely replaceable batteries. Skip them if you need class-leading ANC, consistently great calls or the smoothest treble...
Pros: User-replaceable batteries, Overall satisfaction
Cons: Auracast support, Sensors
Choose the AirPods 5 for strong open-ear ANC, clearer sound, easy Apple-device switching, and excellent value. Skip them if you need all-day battery, a very secure workout fit, or full...
Pros: Overall satisfaction, Sound quality
Cons: Battery, Eartips fit
Choose the JBL Tour Pro 3 if you want feature-packed earbuds with strong sound, ANC, LDAC and a genuinely useful smart case. Skip them if you have smaller ears, want...
Pros: Sound quality, Carry case quality
Cons: Portability/foldability, Button control usability