Sony WF-C510 Earbuds

Sony WF-C510 Earbuds Review

Brand: Sony
Released: August 26, 2024
Updated: 5 months ago
3.9
Overall review score
381
Review insights
46
Scored features
18
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Sony WF-C510 if you want cheap, comfortable earbuds with clear sound, long in-bud battery life, strong passive isolation, and multipoint. Skip them if you need ANC, strong call noise reduction, premium case feel, or deeper bass.

Best for

Best for budget shoppers who want small, comfortable earbuds for music, podcasts, commuting, workouts, and easy multipoint use without paying for premium noise-cancelling features.

Not for

Not for buyers who need active noise cancellation, strong microphone noise reduction for frequent calls, deep bass emphasis, LDAC or aptX support, or a more premium charging case.

Verdict

The Sony WF-C510 earns its budget appeal by putting the basics first: clear sound, excellent comfort, long earbud battery life, strong passive isolation, multipoint, and useful app EQ. Reviewers repeatedly treat it as a bargain, especially for small, everyday earbuds. The tradeoff is that Sony cuts visible corners. There is no ANC, LDAC, aptX, wireless charging, or wear detection, and the case often feels cheaper than the buds. Call quality is the least reliable area, especially around background noise. The result is a simple, strong-value earbud for music, podcasts, commuting, and casual use rather than a feature-packed or call-first pair.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

46 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    14 (30%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    19 (41%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    7 (15%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    5 (11%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.7
    18 reviews strong consensus
    Value for money: 4.7, 18 reviews, strong consensus
    Value for money is the strongest consensus point: reviewers repeatedly frame the WF-C510 as a bargain or standout budget pick despite tradeoffs.
  • 4.5
    18 reviews strong consensus
    Sound quality: 4.5, 18 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently describe the WF-C510 as strong for the price, with clear, balanced, enjoyable sound; the main dissent is that some find it merely serviceable rather than exciting.
  • 4.7
    17 reviews strong consensus
    Comfort during long use: 4.7, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    Comfort is one of the strongest areas, with many reviewers saying the small, light buds are easy to wear for long sessions, though one had fit problems.
  • 3.6
    17 reviews moderate consensus
    Bass performance: 3.6, 17 reviews, moderate consensus
    Bass impressions are mixed: several reviewers praise controlled, punchy or well-rounded bass, while others say bass is light, not skull-rattling, or weaker than pricier Sony buds.
  • 4.4
    16 reviews moderate consensus
    Battery: 4.4, 16 reviews, moderate consensus
    Battery life is widely praised for long earbud runtime, often around 10-11 hours, but the case's single extra charge creates some battery-life caveats.
  • 3.8
    16 reviews moderate consensus
    Transparency mode quality: 3.8, 16 reviews, moderate consensus
    Transparency or Ambient Sound mode is usually considered useful and natural for awareness, but some reviewers find it mild, situational, or not enough for easy conversations.

Cons highlights

  • 1.5
    14 reviews strong consensus
    Active noise cancellation: 1.5, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    The WF-C510 does not provide active noise cancellation; reviewers often accept that tradeoff at the price, but ANC-focused buyers are repeatedly told to look elsewhere.
  • 3.0
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Codec support: 3.0, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Codec support is a common compromise: AAC and SBC are usually considered sufficient for streaming, but reviewers still flag the lack of higher-end codec options.
  • 3.3
    9 reviews low consensus
    Build quality: 3.3, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Build quality is split: some reviews call the buds solid or well built, while others emphasize cheap plastic, budget feel, or cut corners.
  • 1.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    LDAC: 1.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    LDAC support is absent and repeatedly cited as a compromise, though some reviewers say the omission is acceptable for the budget tier.
  • 2.6
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Microphone quality for calls: 2.6, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Call microphone quality is inconsistent: some hear clear voice pickup in quiet settings, but several reviews criticize noisy-call performance and background pickup.
  • 3.2
    6 reviews low consensus
    Audio-video sync accuracy: 3.2, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Video and gaming sync evidence is mixed: one reviewer found lip sync spot-on, while gaming-oriented comments note no low-latency mode or only limited gaming suitability.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Earbuds, this product is above average in Value for money, Multipoint connectivity reliability, Maximum volume clarity, near average in Sound quality, Equalizer customization, below average in Active noise cancellation, LDAC, aptX.

Comparison summary

46 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    16 (35%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    16 (35%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    14 (30%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Active noise cancellation 1.5 4.0 -2.5
LDAC 1.5 3.4 -1.9
aptX 1.0 2.8 -1.8
Sensors 1.9 3.6 -1.7
Microphone noise reduction 2.2 3.9 -1.7
Preset EQ profile quality 2.0 3.7 -1.7
Microphone quality for calls 2.6 3.9 -1.3
Audio-video sync accuracy 3.2 4.3 -1.2

Consider This Instead

If you want better Active noise cancellation

Choose Sony WF-C710N Earbuds. It scores 4.8 vs 1.5 for Active noise cancellation, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Compared: frequency response and tonal balance The reviewer compared the C510 frequency response to Linkbuds S and WF-1000XM5.
  • Compared: design resemblance PCMag noted the budget earbuds resemble Sony's flagship WF-1000XM5.
  • Alternative: ANC and codec alternative Gadgets360 named OnePlus Buds 3 as a slightly pricier alternative with ANC and LHDC.

EarFun Air Pro 4

  • Better: noise-cancelling option Trusted Reviews pointed to the EarFun Air Pro 4 for buyers prioritizing ANC.
  • Worse: same-price cheap earbud competition TechRadar tested Earfun's model at the same price and picked the Sony.
  • Better: advanced codecs and noise cancellation PCMag said the EarFun option adds codecs and noise cancellation for more money.

FAQ

Do the Sony WF-C510 earbuds have active noise cancellation?

No. Reviewers repeatedly note that they lack ANC, but many also say the snug in-ear seal provides surprisingly strong passive noise isolation.

How good is the sound quality?

Most reviewers praise the WF-C510 for clear, balanced, detailed sound at the price. Bass is more divisive, ranging from satisfying and punchy to too light for bass-heavy listeners.

Are they comfortable for long listening sessions?

Yes for most reviewers. The small, light design and secure tips are repeatedly praised, though one review struggled with fit and stability.

How long does the battery last?

Reviewers generally report strong earbud runtime around 10 to 11 hours. The main caveat is the case, which usually adds only one more full charge.

Is the microphone good for calls?

It is usable in quieter settings, but call quality is a recurring weak point. Several reviewers say background noise leaks through or noise gating can make voices harder to hear.

Does the app add useful features?

Yes. Reviews praise Sony's app for EQ, multipoint controls, ambient mode settings, and setup, although some find the EQ or control customization limited or confusing.

Are they good for workouts?

They are a practical workout option because reviewers praise the secure fit, light weight, and IPX4 splash resistance. They are not designed for swimming or heavy water exposure.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Earbuds to Consider

#1 Activo Scoop
4.7

Best for detailed, natural wired sound, three connector options, and standout value around $99. Skip it if you need wireless features, stronger bass, softer treble, or a compact fit for...

Pros: Value for money, Multi-platform compatibility

#2 Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 5
4.5

Choose these for excellent, balanced sound, a comfortable redesign, deep EQ tools and uniquely replaceable batteries. Skip them if you need class-leading ANC, consistently great calls or the smoothest treble...

Pros: User-replaceable batteries, Overall satisfaction

Cons: Auracast support, Sensors

#3 Apple AirPods 5
4.4

Choose the AirPods 5 for strong open-ear ANC, clearer sound, easy Apple-device switching, and excellent value. Skip them if you need all-day battery, a very secure workout fit, or full...

Pros: Overall satisfaction, Sound quality

Cons: Battery, Eartips fit

#4 JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Choose the JBL Tour Pro 3 if you want feature-packed earbuds with strong sound, ANC, LDAC and a genuinely useful smart case. Skip them if you have smaller ears, want...

Pros: Sound quality, Carry case quality

Cons: Portability/foldability, Button control usability