Highguard

Highguard Review

Released: January 26, 2026
Updated: 2 months ago
2.8
Overall review score
400
Review insights
65
Scored features
59
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for crisp gunplay, fluid mount movement, and a genuinely fresh raid concept—especially with friends. Skip it if you hate downtime, sparse maps, limited launch content, or rough performance.

Best for

Best for competitive shooter players who enjoy coordinated objective play, fast movement, and unusual attack-and-defend matches, especially with a regular group.

Not for

Skip it if you want constant combat, rich solo play, a large content library, or consistently polished performance without waiting for post-launch refinement.

Verdict

Highguard has a genuinely interesting core: crisp shooting, fluid sliding and mounts, and a raid format that can turn Shieldbreaker fights and base assaults into tense, memorable swings. Its best moments explain why several players kept queuing, especially with coordinated friends. The problem is everything between those peaks. Oversized maps, repetitive looting and mining, long respawns, thin launch content, uneven Warden balance, and inconsistent performance make the game feel less finished than its gunplay. The 5v5 option improves the sense of activity for several reviewers, but opinions remain split on whether added chaos helps the tactical design. Rapid updates and a friendly free-to-play model give Highguard room to improve, yet the current package still asks players to tolerate too much downtime and roughness to reach its strongest firefights.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

65 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    7 (11%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    15 (23%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (20%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    23 (35%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    7 (11%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.1
    34 reviews low consensus
    fun factor: 4.1, 34 reviews, low consensus
    Even many critical takes admit Highguard can be genuinely fun, especially once the fighting starts; raids, mounts, and close engagements create its biggest highs.
  • 3.8
    32 reviews low consensus
    combat system: 3.8, 32 reviews, low consensus
    Gunplay is one of Highguard's clearest strengths, frequently described as crisp, smooth, tense, and satisfying, though a minority found it clunky or disconnected.
  • 4.3
    23 reviews low consensus
    movement feel: 4.3, 23 reviews, low consensus
    Movement is a standout strength. Sliding, traversal, ziplines, and instant mounts make crossing the battlefield fast and fluid.
  • 3.9
    21 reviews low consensus
    innovation: 3.9, 21 reviews, low consensus
    The raid-shooter concept is widely recognized as fresh and unusual even by critics who think the execution needs work.
  • 4.0
    9 reviews low consensus
    live-service support: 4.0, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Wildlight's rapid patches, updates, and ambitious roadmap inspire optimism, though some doubt whether long-term plans can be fully realized.
  • 3.6
    5 reviews low consensus
    learning curve: 3.6, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Highguard becomes easier to appreciate after several matches, but the initial complexity can be confusing or overwhelming.

Cons highlights

  • 1.6
    25 reviews moderate consensus
    originality: 1.6, 25 reviews, moderate consensus
    Highguard's mode is unusual, but its characters, aesthetics, and borrowed shooter ingredients often feel derivative, leaving its overall identity muddled.
  • 3.0
    21 reviews low consensus
    battle mode quality: 3.0, 21 reviews, low consensus
    Raid mode is the defining attraction, especially during tense sieges, but 3v3 often feels too sparse; several preferred the livelier 5v5 variant.
  • 3.0
    19 reviews low consensus
    art direction: 3.0, 19 reviews, low consensus
    Visual identity is divisive. Some loved the fantasy styling and striking environments, while many others found the characters and overall aesthetic generic or bland.
  • 1.7
    17 reviews low consensus
    performance optimization: 1.7, 17 reviews, low consensus
    Optimization is one of the most consistent technical complaints, particularly on PC where strong hardware can still struggle.
  • 2.2
    17 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 2.2, 17 reviews, low consensus
    Pacing is a major weakness. Exciting raids are separated by looting, mining, long respawns, and quiet travel that repeatedly drain momentum.
  • 1.6
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    map and navigation design: 1.6, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    Maps are repeatedly criticized as too large for 3v3, producing empty stretches and long travel even with fast mounts.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in grind level, monetization fairness, character development, near average in combat system, fun factor, below average in lore depth, world interactivity, haptic feedback integration.

Comparison summary

65 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    9 (14%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    13 (20%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    43 (66%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
lore depth 1.0 4.0 -3.0
world interactivity 1.0 3.9 -2.9
haptic feedback integration 1.0 3.9 -2.9
world-building 1.5 4.2 -2.7
originality 1.6 3.7 -2.1
performance optimization 1.7 3.8 -2.1
content variety 1.6 3.9 -2.3
exploration quality 1.5 3.9 -2.4

Consider This Instead

If you want better character roster

Choose EA Sports FC 27. It scores 5.0 vs 2.4 for character roster, with a 3.6 overall score.

Compare

If you want better performance optimization

Choose Arc Raiders. It scores 4.9 vs 1.7 for performance optimization, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better core gameplay loop

Choose Borderlands 4. It scores 4.9 vs 2.2 for core gameplay loop, with a 3.6 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Apex Legends

  • Similar: shield durability and time to kill The reviewer dislikes having to dump full magazines into shields, likening it to Apex Legends.
  • Similar: weapon feel Highguard's weapons are said to control, sound, and feel very similar to launch-era Apex Legends.
  • Worse: gunplay feel This reviewer prefers Highguard's smoother, more forgiving gunplay to Apex Legends.

Apex

  • Better: repetition and staying power Highguard is described as more repetitive and less able to sustain attention than Apex.

Deadlock

  • Better: overall quality The reviewer explicitly recommends Deadlock as the better title.

FAQ

Is Highguard's gunplay good?

Usually, yes. Gunplay is one of the most consistently praised parts, often described as crisp, responsive, smooth, and satisfying, though a minority found it clunky or disconnected.

Is Raid mode worth playing?

Raid mode creates Highguard's best moments, especially the Shieldbreaker fights and base sieges. Its biggest drawback is the slower looting and travel between those peaks.

Is 5v5 better than 3v3?

Several sources preferred 5v5 because the larger maps feel busier, while others thought 3v3 preserves more tactics. The larger mode helps activity but can add chaos.

Is Highguard beginner-friendly?

The basics become understandable after a few matches, but onboarding is a common weakness. New players can feel overwhelmed by the phases, objectives, and experienced opponents.

How is the free-to-play monetization?

The model is generally viewed favorably because spending is optional and cosmetics dominate the paid offerings. Some cosmetic prices still drew criticism.

How is performance and stability?

Results vary by platform and hardware. Console impressions include smooth play, while PC coverage repeatedly mentions optimization problems, frame drops, stutters, disconnects, and launch server trouble.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

gamingnexus.com

Go to GamingNexus.com for news and reviews on video games, consoles, and PCs.

Review score
4.7
thexboxhub.com

Pros: Strong gunplay Impressive and unique match structure Ambitious and stunning design Cons: Huge pacing issues Technical roughness that...

Review score
2.6

Top Video Games to Consider

#1 Well Dweller
4.7

Best for fluid traversal, rewarding exploration, striking art, and forgiving quality-of-life features. Skip it if you want deep combat, radical genre innovation, or consistently demanding bosses.

Pros: difficulty balance, boss design

Cons: innovation, sandbox freedom

#2 Hades II
4.6

Good if you want fast, tactical roguelite combat with huge progression depth, striking art, and standout music. Skip it if repetition, resource micromanagement, or a less emotionally satisfying sequel story...

Pros: combat system, progression system

Cons: originality

#3 Valheim
4.5

Good if you want a beautiful, demanding survival sandbox built around exploration, building, progression, and memorable co-op. Skip it if long resource runs, harsh death recovery, and deliberate pacing sound...

Pros: town-building system, exploration quality

Cons: grind level, fast travel convenience

#4 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.5

Best for joyful destruction, dense exploration, and a charming DK-Pauline adventure. Skip it if camera quirks, frame-rate dips, easy bosses, or premium Switch 2 pricing are dealbreakers.

Pros: fun factor, world interactivity

Cons: frame rate stability, boss design