Bose QuietComfort (2nd Gen) Review

Brand: Bose
Released: August 13, 2026
Updated: 3 weeks ago
4.0
Overall review score
516
Review insights
76
Scored features
31
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose these for excellent ANC, lightweight comfort, easy physical controls and strong everyday sound. Skip them at full price if you want premium materials, marathon battery life, advanced wireless codecs or dependable outdoor call quality.

Best for

Frequent travelers, commuters and office listeners who prioritize strong ANC, low weight, simple physical controls and an easy everyday sound will get the most from them.

Not for

Skip them if you need premium materials, very long battery life, high-resolution wireless codecs, workout protection or consistently strong outdoor call quality.

Verdict

The QuietComfort (2nd Gen) gets the fundamentals right: noise cancellation is consistently near flagship level, the light folding design is exceptionally travel-friendly, and most reviewers found the sound more balanced and refined than earlier standard QuietComfort models. USB-C lossless playback, physical buttons and improved seal handling for glasses add practical value. The tradeoffs are unusually consistent too. The plastic construction often feels cheaper than the price suggests, the three-band EQ and software depth are limited, and roughly 24 hours of battery life now looks short. Call quality is also less dependable in wind and busy streets. At full price the value is debated, but the package becomes much easier to justify when discounted.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

76 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    35 (46%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    16 (21%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    12 (16%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    8 (11%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    5 (7%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.2
    28 reviews moderate consensus
    Overall recommendation: 4.2, 28 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most reviewers recommend the QuietComfort 2nd Gen, especially for comfort, ANC, travel, and simple daily use. The main hesitation is paying full launch price when discounted alternatives or the Ultra are close.
  • 4.8
    25 reviews strong consensus
    Active noise cancellation: 4.8, 25 reviews, strong consensus
    Noise cancellation is the clearest strength. Most reviewers place it near flagship level, praising how well it suppresses travel rumble, office noise, and city ambience, though a few rivals can still edge it out.
  • 3.5
    23 reviews low consensus
    Value for money: 3.5, 23 reviews, low consensus
    Value is highly price-dependent. Many reviewers think the full $359 launch price is awkward, but the package becomes very compelling around $299 or when compared with substantially pricier flagships.
  • 4.8
    21 reviews strong consensus
    Comfort during long use: 4.8, 21 reviews, strong consensus
    Comfort is one of the strongest areas overall. Most reviewers could wear the headphones for hours or full workdays, although a minority reported pressure or jaw fatigue from the firmer fit.
  • 4.6
    20 reviews strong consensus
    Sound quality: 4.6, 20 reviews, strong consensus
    Sound quality is a major success for this generation. Reviewers consistently call it good to excellent, with more balanced tuning and better detail than earlier standard QuietComfort models, though Ultra-level refinement remains slightly ahead.
  • 3.8
    18 reviews low consensus
    Immersive audio quality: 3.8, 18 reviews, low consensus
    Immersive Audio is the most polarizing feature. Some reviewers love the wider, speaker-like presentation for movies, while others find it flattening, distracting, or not worth the battery hit.

Cons highlights

  • 2.7
    20 reviews low consensus
    Battery: 2.7, 20 reviews, low consensus
    Battery life is the most repeated practical weakness. Around 24 hours is enough for ordinary use, but many reviewers consider it short for 2026, especially against 30- to 60-hour competitors.
  • 3.0
    14 reviews low consensus
    Equalizer customization: 3.0, 14 reviews, low consensus
    The three-band EQ is easy to understand but too limited for serious tuning. Casual users often find it sufficient, while enthusiasts repeatedly ask for more bands and finer control.
  • 2.3
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    Build quality: 2.3, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Build quality is a recurring concern: the lightweight plastic helps comfort, but many reviewers say it feels cheap, loose, or insufficiently premium for the price. A few units nevertheless held up well in use.
  • 2.8
    10 reviews low consensus
    Premium feel: 2.8, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Premium feel is inconsistent. Some reviewers like the softer padding and refined finish, but many say the plastic chassis feels cheaper than a $359 product should.
  • 2.8
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    Microphone quality for calls: 2.8, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Call quality is serviceable rather than class-leading. Quiet-room calls usually sound fine, but several reviewers report compressed voices, low volume, or mediocre intelligibility in noisy environments.
  • 2.9
    7 reviews low consensus
    Microphone noise reduction: 2.9, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Microphone noise reduction is inconsistent. Background and wind noise can leak through badly outdoors, though some tests found the newer processing improved voice isolation over the previous model.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Idle static noise, Wind noise handling, Portability/foldability, near average in Design and Aesthetics, Transparency mode quality, below average in Auto-play/wear detection, Battery, Wear detection auto-pause.

Comparison summary

76 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    34 (45%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    15 (20%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    27 (36%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Auto-play/wear detection 1.0 3.2 -2.2
Battery 2.7 4.5 -1.7
Wear detection auto-pause 1.0 3.2 -2.2
ANC effect on sound signature 1.5 3.7 -2.2
ANC sound impact on audio 1.5 3.7 -2.2
Build quality 2.3 4.2 -1.8
LDAC 1.3 3.3 -2.0
Volume output 2.0 4.0 -2.0

Consider This Instead

If you want better ANC sound impact on audio

Choose CMF Headphone Pro. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for ANC sound impact on audio, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Wear detection auto-pause

Choose JBL Live 780NC. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for Wear detection auto-pause, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: sound, ANC and calls Sony is slightly better in sound, ANC and voice calling overall.
  • Better: ANC, battery and wireless features The Sony offers stronger ANC, longer battery life, LDAC and a livelier presentation.
  • Cheaper: price and core performance Soundcore costs about half as much while matching Bose on comfort and ANC in this comparison.

FAQ

How good is the noise cancellation?

It is the strongest consensus feature. Most testers found it near flagship level for travel, office and city noise, though Bose's Ultra and some top rivals can still be slightly stronger.

Are they comfortable for long sessions?

Usually yes. The low weight and soft padding earned repeated praise, but a minority of reviewers felt clamp or earcup pressure after 90 minutes to several hours.

How long does the battery last?

Expect about 24 hours with ANC and roughly 18 hours with Immersive Audio. Reviewers generally found that usable but short compared with many current competitors.

Do they support lossless audio?

Yes, over USB-C at up to 24-bit/48kHz. Wireless playback is limited to basic codecs, with no aptX or LDAC support.

Is there a 3.5mm headphone jack?

No native analog jack is built in, but Bose includes a USB-C-to-3.5mm cable for sources such as airplane entertainment systems. Wired playback still requires the headphones to be powered.

How are they for phone calls?

Calls are generally fine in quiet rooms, but results are mixed outdoors. Several reviewers heard too much wind or ambient noise, compressed voice quality, or weaker intelligibility in busy environments.

Are they worth the full $359 price?

Opinions are mixed at full price because of the plastic build, short battery life and limited EQ. Several reviewers said the value becomes much stronger around $299 or when the Ultra is not heavily discounted.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider

#1 Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.5

Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...

Pros: Design and Aesthetics, Overall recommendation

Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Connectivity options

#2 Jabra Evolve3 85
4.5

Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...

Pros: Battery, Charging

Cons: Value for money, Codec support

#3 Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
4.5

Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...

Pros: Battery, Design and Aesthetics

Cons: Clamping force comfort, Soundstage width

#4 Tribit QuietPlus 81
4.4

Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.

Pros: Value for money, Sound quality

Cons: Button control usability, App