Asus ROG Cetra Open

Asus ROG Cetra Open Review

Brand: ASUS
Released: February 23, 2026
Updated: 2 months ago
3.8
Overall review score Expert score: 4.1 Customer score: 3.5
668
Review insights
57
Scored features
70
Total reviews
28 expert / 42 customer

Bottom Line

Choose these if you want open-ear comfort, strong awareness, secure fit, and low-latency gaming across devices. Skip them if you prioritize deep bass, isolation, seamless firmware, a compact case, or strong value at the asking price.

Best for

Gamers who dislike in-ear pressure or bulky headsets and want to hear family, traffic, doorbells, or room activity while keeping a low-latency gaming connection.

Not for

Buyers who want deep bass, strong isolation, effortless software reliability, a compact pocket case, or the best value for money.

Verdict

The ROG Cetra Open succeeds at the things that make open-ear gaming appealing: exceptional long-session comfort, excellent situational awareness, a secure fit, strong battery life, and genuinely low-latency play through the USB-C dongle. Dialogue, footsteps, and positional cues are usually clear, and the passthrough charging design is especially useful for handhelds. The tradeoff is that sound quality is inconsistent across listeners, with many complaints about weak sub-bass, sharp treble, coarse volume steps, and a less immersive presentation than sealed earbuds or headsets. Software is another dividing line: Gear Link offers useful EQ and customization, but firmware updates, multipoint behavior, and random disconnects cause real frustration for some owners. The unusually large case and premium price make the package harder to justify unless the open-ear gaming niche matches your needs closely.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

57 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    18 (32%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    21 (37%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    11 (19%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    5 (9%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (4%)

Pros highlights

  • 3.7
    63 reviews low consensus
    Overall satisfaction: 3.7, 63 reviews, low consensus
    Overall opinion is polarized but leans positive for the right niche. Fans love the comfort, awareness, and gaming responsiveness, while critics are pushed away by price, sound compromises, or software instability.
  • 4.0
    52 reviews low consensus
    Sound quality: 4.0, 52 reviews, low consensus
    Sound quality is good for many gaming-focused users, especially for dialogue and positional cues, but it is not a universal win. Some reviewers hear clean, detailed audio while others describe the presentation as thin, compressed, or harsh.
  • 4.4
    46 reviews low consensus
    Comfort during long use: 4.4, 46 reviews, low consensus
    Comfort is the product’s strongest consensus advantage. Most reviewers can wear the buds for hours without ear-canal pressure, though a minority experience cartilage pain or poor fit depending on ear shape.
  • 4.4
    31 reviews moderate consensus
    Battery: 4.4, 31 reviews, moderate consensus
    Battery life is usually strong, often lasting through long gaming sessions and in some tests approaching the advertised figures. Heavy use of RGB, Immersion Mode, Phantom Bass, or the mic can cut runtime substantially.
  • 3.7
    24 reviews low consensus
    Microphone quality for calls: 3.7, 24 reviews, low consensus
    Mic quality is mixed but generally usable. Many reviewers find voice chat clear and good for earbuds, while several customers report thin, robotic, or poor-sounding voice transmission.
  • 4.9
    19 reviews strong consensus
    Audio-video sync accuracy: 4.9, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    Low-latency gaming is one of the clearest strengths. The 2.4GHz dongle repeatedly delivers near-wired responsiveness and excellent sync for shooters, rhythm games, handhelds, and console play.

Cons highlights

  • 2.4
    33 reviews low consensus
    Value for money: 2.4, 33 reviews, low consensus
    Price is the most consistent purchasing objection. Even positive reviewers often call the $230 class price steep, and several experts say cheaper gaming earbuds or headsets offer better overall value.
  • 3.0
    31 reviews low consensus
    Bass performance: 3.0, 31 reviews, low consensus
    Bass is the most divisive part of the tuning. Phantom Bass can add useful punch, but many reviewers still hear weak sub-bass or thin impact compared with sealed earbuds, while a smaller group finds the low end surprisingly satisfying.
  • App
    3.4
    21 reviews low consensus
    App: 3.4, 21 reviews, low consensus
    Gear Link is polarizing: several reviewers love the browser/mobile flexibility and deep controls, while others find it buggy, hidden, web-dependent, or awkward during firmware setup.
  • 3.3
    19 reviews low consensus
    Volume output: 3.3, 19 reviews, low consensus
    The earbuds get very loud, but the volume curve is uneven. Several reviewers complain that even low settings are too loud, while others appreciate the strong headroom.
  • 2.1
    18 reviews low consensus
    Firmware/audio stability: 2.1, 18 reviews, low consensus
    Reliability is the biggest technical concern. Multiple customer reviews report disconnects, one-sided audio, distortion, failed updates, beeping, or erratic behavior, although some users find later firmware dramatically improves performance.
  • 2.8
    18 reviews low consensus
    Software/setup simplicity: 2.8, 18 reviews, low consensus
    Setup experiences vary sharply. Some users get simple plug-and-play operation, while others encounter hidden apps, multiple utilities, web-only controls, or convoluted firmware update steps.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Open-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Sensors, Cable quality, Touch control responsiveness, near average in Volume output, Stability, below average in Packaging condition, Value for money, Software/setup simplicity.

Comparison summary

52 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    17 (33%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    15 (29%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    20 (38%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Packaging condition 1.0 3.7 -2.7
Sensors 5.0 2.8 +2.2
Cable quality 4.5 2.4 +2.1
Value for money 2.4 4.0 -1.6
Software/setup simplicity 2.8 4.3 -1.5
Touch control responsiveness 5.0 3.3 +1.7
Portability/foldability 2.0 3.4 -1.4
Maximum volume clarity 1.8 3.3 -1.5

Consider This Instead

If you want better Value for money

Choose SoundPEATS Clip1. It scores 4.8 vs 2.4 for Value for money, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Packaging condition

Choose SoundPEATS UU2. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for Packaging condition, with a 4.6 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Portability/foldability

Choose EarFun Clip 2. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for Portability/foldability, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Software/setup simplicity

Choose Shokz OpenFit Pro. It scores 4.4 vs 2.8 for Software/setup simplicity, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: directional audio The Asus is good directionally, but the Audeze headset is judged better.
  • Better: overall gaming experience After a week with the Asus, the reviewer still prefers the Razer over-ear headset.

SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds

  • Better: value and versatility The SteelSeries option is expected to appeal more broadly thanks to price and conventional fit.
  • Worse: multipoint connectivity The Asus adds multipoint behavior the reviewer missed on the SteelSeries buds.
  • Cheaper: price The Asus carries a substantial premium over SteelSeries' premium gaming buds.

FAQ

Are they comfortable for long gaming sessions?

Usually yes. Comfort is the strongest consensus point, with many reviewers wearing them for hours, though some ear shapes develop pressure or cartilage soreness.

Are they good for competitive gaming?

The 2.4GHz USB-C dongle is repeatedly praised for very low latency, and footsteps and positional cues are usually easy to pick out.

How good is the bass?

It varies. Phantom Bass helps, but many reviewers still find sub-bass weaker than sealed in-ear or over-ear options.

Do they block outside noise?

Not much. Immersion Mode can soften steady background noise, but the open design intentionally keeps you aware of conversations, traffic, doorbells, and room activity.

Is the microphone good for Discord and calls?

Generally usable to good, with effective noise suppression in several tests, but some customers report robotic or poor voice quality during unstable connections.

Are they worth the premium price?

Only for buyers who specifically value open-ear comfort plus low-latency gaming. Price is one of the most consistent complaints, especially given the bulky case and software reliability issues.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Open-Ear Headphones to Consider

#1 SoundPEATS UU2
4.6

Choose the UU2 for unusually full open-ear sound, all-day comfort, strong battery life and excellent value. Skip it if you need sealed-bud isolation, consistently strong calls, or zero tolerance for...

Pros: Overall satisfaction, Sound quality

Cons: Spatial audio

#2 Cleer ARC 5
4.5

Best for all-day comfort, secure open-ear awareness, long battery life, and a genuinely useful touchscreen case. Skip it if deep bass, strong isolation, compact size, or consistently premium music quality...

Pros: Overall satisfaction, Carry case quality

#3 EarFun Clip 2
4.4

Best for lightweight all-day comfort, outstanding battery life, dependable physical controls, and premium features at a budget price. Skip it if you need deep bass, noise isolation, flawless high-volume sound,...

Pros: Overall satisfaction, Sound quality

Cons: Maximum volume clarity, Noise isolation (passive)

#4 SoundPEATS Clip1
4.4

Best for featherlight all-day comfort, secure workout fit, strong open-ear sound, and unusually rich features for the price. Skip it if you need ANC, deep sub-bass, high volume in noisy...

Pros: Comfort during long use, Sound quality

Cons: Carry case quality, Touch control responsiveness