Compare End of Abyss vs Terrible Lizards

End of Abyss

End of Abyss

Overall score 3.8 / 5

Based on 21 scored reviews

vs
Terrible Lizards

Terrible Lizards

Overall score 4.0 / 5

Based on 18 scored reviews

How we score

Scorata scores summarize analyzed review evidence on a 1–5 scale; they are not laboratory measurements or a simple average of customer star ratings. Feature scores summarize the reviews covering that feature. The overall score averages feature scores within each review, then combines review averages. When both expert and customer evidence are available, those two groups receive equal weight. Products can have different review coverage, so small score gaps do not establish a winner.

Recommendations prioritize important features for the category, with a score of at least 3.5, a gap of at least 0.25 points and at least two supporting reviews per product. Features with widely varying scores or broad connectivity contexts are excluded from recommendations. These safeguards do not establish statistical significance.

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

The review evidence points to a tradeoff: camera behavior and performance optimization versus learning curve and writing quality. Choose according to which strengths matter more to you; the overall score alone does not settle that choice.

Choose End of Abyss for camera behavior and performance optimization.

Choose Terrible Lizards for learning curve and writing quality.

Why these recommendations?

End of Abyss

Where It Has the Edge

  • camera behavior is 5.0 vs 2.0. The fixed and shifting isometric camera is effective at making Cel feel small and vulnerable, and its framing...
  • performance optimization is 5.0 vs 2.0. Where raw performance is tested, optimization is a strength: high-end PC, PS5, PS5 Pro, and handheld runs all...
  • AI behavior is 4.5 vs 1.7. Enemy behavior supports tactical play: aggressive foes can be manipulated into groups, and one source specifically praises their...

Terrible Lizards

Where It Has the Edge

  • learning curve is 4.6 vs 3.3. The basic moves are generally easy to learn, with time to practice new mechanics before demanding escapes. A...
  • writing quality is 4.0 vs 2.8. The period setting and optional discoveries often support coherent, engaging writing. Repeated narrative reversals can eventually make the...
  • fun factor is 4.6 vs 4.1. Enthusiastic accounts describe the chases as exhilarating and the whole adventure as an unexpected pleasure. Awkward controls and...
End of Abyss 3.8 overall score
Terrible Lizards 4.0 overall score

Compare features

Scores are out of 5. Missing scores mean missing review evidence, not a missing feature.

Scored on both products

Performance

Performance optimization
End of Abyss
5.0

Where raw performance is tested, optimization is a strength: high-end PC, PS5, PS5 Pro, and handheld runs all receive positive reports.

Terrible Lizards
2.0

Performance problems include prolonged freezes, tuning difficulties, and severe drops in specific late-game sections. These interruptions are especially disruptive in a game built around continuous movement.

Marketing accuracy
End of Abyss
5.0

One source specifically praises the final graphics for matching the visual quality presented in the trailers.

Terrible Lizards
4.5

One review finds that the atmosphere fulfills the trailer's promise. The museum's nostalgic presentation and unsettling dinosaur horror translate successfully into the experience.

Soundtrack quality
End of Abyss
5.0

The score is consistently praised for being restrained, ominous, and responsive to action, reinforcing the industrial horror atmosphere without overwhelming it.

Terrible Lizards
4.5

The soundtrack receives enthusiastic praise in one review. Another values how the rising music communicates nearby danger without overwhelming the quieter atmosphere.

Other features

Camera behavior
End of Abyss
5.0

The fixed and shifting isometric camera is effective at making Cel feel small and vulnerable, and its framing contributes meaningfully to the game's mood.

Terrible Lizards
2.0

Running sway can make camera comfort a concern. One reviewer develops a headache and struggles with longer sessions, while another advises adjusting the available comfort settings.

AI behavior
End of Abyss
4.5

Enemy behavior supports tactical play: aggressive foes can be manipulated into groups, and one source specifically praises their behavior and variety as a combat strength.

Terrible Lizards
1.7

Enemy intelligence is a recurring weakness in the accounts that examine it. Dinosaurs get stuck, stop moving, or behave in ways that remove tension and obstruct progress.

Frame rate stability
End of Abyss
5.0

Performance reports are strong where frame rate is discussed, including smooth 60 FPS on PS5 hardware and solid results on a high-end handheld.

Terrible Lizards
2.3

A generally high frame rate does not guarantee smooth delivery. Reported problems range from regular hitches to final-level stretches that fall into single digits.

Content variety
End of Abyss
4.8

Optional rooms, secret bosses, upgrades, weapons, notes, and alternate-ending content give the campaign more to uncover than the main path initially suggests.

Terrible Lizards
2.6

Repeated caves, labs, stalking sections, and familiar puzzle structures can wear thin. Some still enjoy the underground spaces, but the museum's richer personality is often missed.

Movement feel
End of Abyss
2.0

Slow sprint speed makes repeated backtracking feel heavier than it needs to.

Terrible Lizards
4.2

Fast movement and generous air control often produce a satisfying flow. Excess momentum, floatiness, or inconsistent handling make the same system less comfortable for some players.

Animation quality
End of Abyss
5.0

Enemy animation helps sell the creatures as strange and dangerous, while Cel’s movement animation also receives specific praise.

Terrible Lizards
3.0

Some animation clipping is noticeable. The review discussing it treats the flaw as forgivable compared with more serious technical problems.

Onboarding experience
End of Abyss
2.0

The first boss can arrive before the aiming and control scheme feel natural, making the opening combat lesson harsher than it needs to be.

Terrible Lizards
4.0

Most accounts that discuss the introduction find the movement satisfying immediately and the toolset approachable. One review finds the opening level's overly open layout less effective than the tighter later areas.

Lore depth
End of Abyss
3.0

Environmental clues and hidden notes can sustain mystery, but the amount of concrete lore feels thin to players who want clearer answers about the facility and its events.

Terrible Lizards
4.4

Notes, tapes, and recordings deepen the family mystery and the history of the dig. These discoveries are a consistent reason to explore beyond the obvious route.

Learning curve
End of Abyss
3.3

Most players can adapt to the controls after a short adjustment, but the unusual aiming scheme remains a lasting obstacle for some and never fully clicks for the harshest critic.

Terrible Lizards
4.6

The basic moves are generally easy to learn, with time to practice new mechanics before demanding escapes. A hands-on preview found the toolset approachable across very different skill levels.

Polish
End of Abyss
1.6

Polish is the most repeated weakness after navigation. Numerous sources encountered map errors, collision problems, softlocks, crashes, audio glitches, or other prerelease issues that made the game feel less finished than its art direction suggests.

Terrible Lizards
2.9

Polish varies sharply between accounts, including two demo players impressed with the presentation. Other reviewers encounter enough collision, scripting, and AI trouble to make the roughness a major limitation.

Writing quality
End of Abyss
2.8

The understated writing can reinforce mystery and tone, but vague exchanges and delayed answers leave some players wanting clearer, more substantial storytelling.

Terrible Lizards
4.0

The period setting and optional discoveries often support coherent, engaging writing. Repeated narrative reversals can eventually make the protagonist's predicament feel hollow rather than dramatic.

Stealth mechanics
End of Abyss
2.0

The knife and occasional opportunities to approach enemies quietly feel underused; one source wanted smarter positioning to enable more meaningful stealth takedowns.

Terrible Lizards
3.1

Planning routes around roaming monsters can make the open arenas tense and rewarding. Other accounts find these sections repetitive or undermined by weak pursuit behavior and blocked hiding-place exits.

Art direction
End of Abyss
5.0

The blue-lit industrial horror aesthetic is a major strength, with striking lighting, shadows, grotesque creature imagery, and carefully staged spaces creating a distinctive look.

Terrible Lizards
4.1

The faded museum, retro signage, and deliberately cheesy 1990s styling give the game much of its charm. Some find that identity superficial or diminished once the adventure moves into caves.

Game length
End of Abyss
3.2

The main path commonly lands around a compact 10-13 hours, with optional exploration extending playtime. Some appreciate that it does not overstay its welcome, while others feel wandering pads the runtime or that the ending arrives just as momentum builds.

Terrible Lizards
4.1

Reported full-game completion times range from roughly six hours to eight or ten, depending on exploration and the account. The reviewers evaluating the length generally find it compact and satisfying rather than overstretched.

Difficulty balance
End of Abyss
3.3

Challenge is frequently rewarding and fair in regular play, but the curve is uneven. Early spikes, one notably punishing centipede boss, later bosses that become too easy, and upgrade-driven power swings can make progression feel inconsistent.

Terrible Lizards
4.3

Forgiving movement and manageable challenges make the parkour approachable without eliminating skill. The light puzzles rarely demand much effort, and mastering the movement still leaves room to improve.

Graphics quality
End of Abyss
5.0

Visual quality is consistently strong, with smooth presentation, striking lighting, grotesque creatures, and cinematic industrial spaces repeatedly singled out.

Terrible Lizards
4.2

The museum displays, lighting, and dinosaur exhibits usually make a good visual impression for the game's scale. One assessment finds the graphics ordinary even while admiring the set pieces.

Immersion
End of Abyss
4.8

Sound, lighting, environmental scale, minimal interface, and controller feedback can make the facility highly immersive, although loading screens and repetition occasionally break the spell.

Terrible Lizards
4.0

The museum's scale, authentic details, and distinctive equipment often draw players into the setting. Erratic enemy behavior can sharply break that immersion.

Pacing
End of Abyss
3.7

Pacing impressions are split: one source praises a tight, well-paced adventure, while another finds the plot slow to gain momentum and technical or navigation problems can stall progress.

Terrible Lizards
3.1

The strongest stretches build smoothly from exploration into frantic escapes. Overlong chapters, repeated setbacks, slower cave sections, and an abrupt ending are recurring pacing reservations.

Fun factor
End of Abyss
4.1

Overall enjoyment ranges from exceptional to uneven. The atmosphere and discovery loop frequently carry the experience, while bugs, navigation friction, repetition, and balance issues are the main reasons enthusiasm drops.

Terrible Lizards
4.6

Enthusiastic accounts describe the chases as exhilarating and the whole adventure as an unexpected pleasure. Awkward controls and technical failures substantially reduce that enjoyment for others.

Combat system
End of Abyss
4.0

Twin-stick combat is often tense, tactical, and satisfying, especially when dodging through crowded encounters. Its simplicity, repetitive enemies in reused routes, awkward arenas, and uneven weapon economy keep it from landing equally well for everyone.

Terrible Lizards
4.5

Removing combat keeps attention on escaping and maneuvering. Reviewers who discuss the choice favor chases over stopping the parkour to fight.

Dialogue quality
End of Abyss
3.5

The sparse dialogue approach divides opinion. One source finds character exchanges too vague to be useful, while another likes the short, concise subtitles and notes for keeping the game moving.

Terrible Lizards
4.0

One review finds Jordan's self-talk convincing as a way of psyching himself up. His conversations help maintain a lively narrative without feeling overdone in that account.

Visual effects quality
End of Abyss
5.0

Lighting is a standout visual effect, balancing deep darkness and visibility without requiring much manual brightness adjustment.

Terrible Lizards
4.5

The souvenir flashlight's dinosaur-jaw projection is a charming visual touch. A demo player specifically appreciates its custom shape.

World interactivity
End of Abyss
5.0

The scanner makes doors, objects, weak structures, and route information feel actively discoverable, rewarding players who deliberately inspect the environment.

Terrible Lizards
4.5

Dinosaur exhibits become useful climbing routes rather than passive scenery. That gives the museum a satisfying interactive role in progression.

Core gameplay loop
End of Abyss
3.8

The explore-scan-unlock-return loop can be highly addictive, but repetition and navigation friction make the same structure feel inconsistent when the map or combat starts getting in the way.

Terrible Lizards
4.2

The alternation between exploration, light puzzles, and urgent escapes usually keeps the adventure engaging. Technical interruptions can break the momentum that makes the formula work.

Atmosphere
End of Abyss
5.0

Atmosphere is the clearest consensus strength: the facility feels eerie, oppressive, isolated, and cinematic, with lighting and sound repeatedly making simple exploration feel ominous.

Terrible Lizards
4.6

The abandoned museum is the clearest atmospheric strength, combining faded family entertainment with the feeling that something is wrong. Its backstage spaces and detailed exhibits make the unease especially convincing.

Narrative quality
End of Abyss
3.5

The restrained, cryptic story suits the eerie setting and works well for players who enjoy piecing mysteries together. Others find the buildup too vague, the protagonist underexplored, or the strongest story beats delayed until very late.

Terrible Lizards
3.9

The family mystery and discoveries beneath the attraction engage many reviewers. Others find the central characters thin, repeated setbacks predictable, or the story's finish underdeveloped.

Bug frequency
End of Abyss
1.5

Technical reliability is a major concern in much of the pre-release coverage, including map-state errors, invisible barriers, stuck geometry, softlocks, broken interactions, and falls through the world. A smaller number of playthroughs reported few or no issues.

Terrible Lizards
1.9

Several accounts report stuck characters, broken chase triggers, clipping, and stalled enemies. Severity varies from a quickly recoverable demo glitch to repeated progress-blocking failures.

Originality
End of Abyss
4.6

Despite obvious inspirations, the combination of top-down sci-fi horror, Metroidvania exploration, and twin-stick combat develops a distinct identity that several sources feel stands out.

Terrible Lizards
4.3

Combining dinosaur horror with first-person parkour gives the game a distinctive identity. It borrows recognizable mechanics and horror tropes, so one reviewer values the execution more than any claim to reinvention.

Collectibles
End of Abyss
3.0

Optional collectibles can unlock an alternate ending and additional context, making thorough exploration worthwhile, though the unreliable map can make that hunt less inviting.

Terrible Lizards
3.3

Hidden items and backstory can make searching worthwhile. Long chapters and inconvenient return access make tracking down everything less comfortable than discovering items during the first run.

Checkpoint system
End of Abyss
4.0

Restoration pods are generally well spaced and create relief, strategy, and fast boss retries, though bug-related reloads can still cost meaningful progress.

Terrible Lizards
3.8

Several reviewers praise frequent, forgiving checkpoints that minimize repetition. One PlayStation 5 account reports the opposite experience, with restarts sending progress back several minutes and magnifying bugs.

Innovation
End of Abyss
4.3

The blend of cinematic horror, survival mechanics, twin-stick shooting, Souls-like ideas, and Metroidvania structure feels fresh to many sources, even when the pieces do not always fit together cleanly.

Terrible Lizards
4.4

The inventive element is the combination of weaponless dinosaur horror and energetic parkour. Reviewers usually admire how these familiar ingredients work together rather than claiming that every individual mechanic is new.

Gameplay mechanics
End of Abyss
4.4

The scanner is the standout mechanic, turning doors, objects, enemies, and map completion into an active exploration system. Its manual nature is engaging for some players but can cause major backtracking when an important object is missed.

Terrible Lizards
4.5

Running, swinging, sliding, bouncing, and wall-running combine into exciting escape sequences. Most assessments praise how the moves link together, although one demo player hopes for a broader range of mechanics in the full game.

Progression system
End of Abyss
4.4

Progression is most satisfying when new keys, tools, mods, and upgrades reopen old routes and make exploration pay off. In some runs, power growth eventually reduces combat tension or leaves certain systems underused.

Terrible Lizards
4.5

New bounce and wall-running opportunities arrive intermittently. Their gradual introduction keeps traversal interesting without requiring a conventional unlock tree.

Exploration quality
End of Abyss
4.1

Exploration is the game's biggest point of disagreement. Its interconnected routes, secrets, upgrades, and discovery loop can be deeply rewarding, but weak guidance, backtracking, dark visibility, and map problems can turn the same design into exhausting wandering.

Terrible Lizards
4.2

Exploring backstage areas, exhibits, and hidden corners often pays off with lore and a stronger sense of place. Fast traversal can also carry players past museum details they wanted to inspect.

Horror tension
End of Abyss
3.8

The opening hours create strong unease through darkness, sound, ambushes, and threatening spaces. Tension often fades once enemy placements repeat, the pistol becomes dominant, or progression makes combat too easy.

Terrible Lizards
3.9

The game often generates effective adrenaline through pursuit, reveals, and anticipation. Some reviewers want more menace and sustained dread, finding the fast action or less threatening encounters milder than expected.

Environmental detail
End of Abyss
4.3

The facility is visually rich and communicates decay, infection, scale, and former function through its spaces, though some areas can look too similar for reliable navigation.

Terrible Lizards
4.3

Large dinosaur exhibits, convincing scale, and small museum decorations create memorable spaces. Repeated cave interiors can feel sterile beside the attraction above.

Character development
End of Abyss
2.0

Cel is a deliberately quiet lead, but the limited personality leaves the protagonist underdeveloped for at least one critic.

Terrible Lizards
2.0

Jordan and Stella receive criticism for limited characterization. Their functions in moving the plot along are clearer than their emotional development.

Hint system
End of Abyss
2.0

The hands-off philosophy can go too far; missed scannable objects or subtle routes can lead to hours of wandering, and a light scanner cue or extra guidance would help.

Terrible Lizards
2.0

Jordan's frequent spoken directions can provide too much help. One review finds the extra hints excessive even though the visual route markings are welcome.

Comfort and build

Map and navigation design
End of Abyss
2.5

The map is both essential and one of the game's biggest risks. When it works, scanning and charting routes are satisfying; when doors fail to update, layers are hard to read, or cues are too vague, navigation becomes frustrating and time-consuming.

Terrible Lizards
4.1

Yellow markings usually keep high-speed routes legible and help players judge usable ledges. Slower open areas can lose that clarity, and one review views the extensive color guidance as a necessary compromise.

Level design
End of Abyss
4.1

The interconnected facility can be intricate, dense, and rewarding, with strong shortcuts and vertical layering. Less favorable impressions point to confusing flow, overly linear stretches, hidden progression cues, and areas that are hard to read.

Terrible Lizards
3.7

Directed chases and imaginative use of museum exhibits are frequent highlights. Opinions split over the opening's layout and the move into repeated underground spaces, with some preferring the caves' tighter platforming design.

World-building
End of Abyss
4.9

The derelict facility is a compelling character in its own right, with distinct sectors, infection, machinery, environmental clues, and spatial scale doing much of the storytelling.

Terrible Lizards
4.6

Dalton's Dinos is widely praised as a convincing roadside attraction rooted in its period. Museum films, backstage details, family history, and playful references give the setting a strong identity.

Boss design
End of Abyss
3.4

Boss quality varies sharply by source. Some praise creative grotesque designs and pattern-based fights, while others find several encounters repetitive, cramped, or poorly balanced across the campaign.

Terrible Lizards
3.5

Boss arenas can produce memorable, heart-pounding route planning around enormous predators. One account instead finds an Allosaurus encounter frustrating because its behavior prevents a clean exit from hiding.

Mission design
End of Abyss
2.0

Some later objectives feel mundane and overly dependent on activating chains of systems rather than introducing more meaningful tasks.

Terrible Lizards
2.0

The opening's repeated switch-flipping can feel like routine errands. That makes the approach to the first dinosaur encounter less exciting than the setting promises.

Sound design
End of Abyss
5.0

Sound design is one of the strongest areas, using distant clangs, wet creature noises, reverberation, weapon impact, and industrial ambience to make unseen threats and vast spaces feel tangible.

Terrible Lizards
5.0

Footsteps, roars, movement feedback, and restrained scare cues are carefully balanced in the account that examines the audio closely. The sound communicates danger without becoming loud or distracting.

Ownership and support

Replay value
End of Abyss
4.0

Secret areas, missed upgrades, alternate-ending collectibles, and route knowledge create reasons to return, although there is no New Game+ in the coverage that discusses it.

Terrible Lizards
2.5

Returning to collect missed items is less convenient than it could be. The inability to jump easily back into specific parts of long chapters limits the appeal of cleanup runs.

Save system reliability
End of Abyss
2.0

Sparse save points magnify the cost of crashes and softlocks, because technical failures can force large sections to be replayed.

Terrible Lizards
1.5

One account loses substantial progress after closing a frozen game and reloading. Recovery from technical failures is therefore an important concern in that experience.

Controls and connectivity

Protagonist appeal
End of Abyss
2.0

Cel's quiet, minimally defined personality leaves the lead less compelling than the world surrounding them.

Terrible Lizards
3.0

Jordan's commentary divides opinion: some appreciate his understandable frustration and nervous self-talk. Others find his motivation weak or his relaxed sarcasm ill suited to the danger.

Voice acting
End of Abyss
4.0

The invented, gibberish-style speech is surprisingly effective, with delivery conveying seriousness and intimidation even without a real spoken language.

Terrible Lizards
4.4

Voice performances are generally praised, especially the central cast and Jordan's delivery. One review singles out a cameo as a weaker link within an otherwise strong ensemble.

Controls responsiveness
End of Abyss
4.0

Movement and shooting generally feel responsive once learned, but the unusual aiming scheme can feel awkward on controller and creates a steeper adjustment period for some players.

Terrible Lizards
4.0

Most reviewers find the controls responsive and immediately enjoyable. A smaller but emphatic group reports awkward handling that makes the game's central activity frustrating.

Evidence available for one product

Other features

Accessibility options
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
4.5

Robust camera-shake and field-of-view adjustments are a useful comfort aid. Generous mantling and midair correction also help players with less platforming experience.

Aiming precision
End of Abyss
2.7

Aiming is one of the most divisive mechanics. Some found it manageable or skill-based after practice, while others struggled with touchy sticks, movement spread, a fussy laser, or shots that felt less predictable than they should.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Content completeness
End of Abyss
2.0

The game is packed with ideas, but at least one source felt several systems were not fully implemented or developed as far as they could have been.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Crafting system
End of Abyss
2.0

Crafting special ammunition can become tedious when a failed encounter consumes supplies and forces the player to make them again.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Crash stability
End of Abyss
2.3

Crash reports are inconsistent: some playthroughs were crash-free, while others suffered multiple hard crashes that interrupted progress.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Cutscene skippability
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
4.5

Story material is easy to skip. Players interested primarily in platforming can keep moving without sitting through the narrative scenes.

Cutscene visual quality
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
4.5

The museum's projected live-action film earns specific praise for being well shot. Its presentation helps sell the knowingly corny attraction.

Death mechanics
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
3.8

Several accounts appreciate low-cost failure and quick retries. Inconsistent fall detection and an inability to reset cleanly after bad collisions are the major exceptions.

Economy and resource balance
End of Abyss
2.0

Resource balance is uneven: early scarcity can encourage careful choices, but Fragments and crafting materials often become so plentiful that ammo tension and loot excitement fade. Other sources dislike being forced to farm when supplies do run dry.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Endgame content
End of Abyss
4.0

Optional sectors, alternate-ending collectibles, and extra narrative material give curious players meaningful content to pursue beyond the straightforward ending.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Enemy variety
End of Abyss
4.6

Enemy variety is broadly praised, with creatures and machines using distinct looks, attack patterns, and environmental themes. A few sources note derivative designs or behavior that becomes less threatening after repeated encounters.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Fast travel convenience
End of Abyss
1.3

The transit system helps connect sectors, but several sources still find backtracking too slow and wish travel between important safe areas were more convenient.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Field-of-view options
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
5.0

Field-of-view adjustment is specifically praised as robust. Together with shake reduction, it offers useful ways to tailor the first-person camera.

Grind level
End of Abyss
1.0

Resource recovery can become an unwelcome grind when failed boss attempts force players to revisit cleared areas for more crafting materials.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Handheld play suitability
End of Abyss
5.0

Handheld impressions are excellent, with strong reported performance on both MSI Claw 8 AI+ and Xbox Ally X hardware.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Haptic feedback integration
End of Abyss
4.0

DualSense haptics and adaptive-trigger support are appreciated as worthwhile immersion extras, even if they do not fundamentally change play.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
HUD clarity
End of Abyss
5.0

The minimal HUD earns praise for staying clean and keeping attention on the art rather than cluttering the screen.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Humor
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
4.6

Deliberately cheesy films, retro presentation, and B-movie camp are recurring sources of enjoyment. The humor often makes the strange premise more endearing.

Live-action cinematics
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
4.6

The live-action films are often highlights, delivering period FMV charm and deliberately campy storytelling. Museum introductions and video diaries are especially well received.

Load times
End of Abyss
2.0

Frequent loading screens between areas are called out for interrupting an otherwise immersive world.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Loot system
End of Abyss
2.0

Fragments become too common in several playthroughs, making glowing pickups and fragment-heavy rooms feel less rewarding than meaningful upgrades or supplies.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Mission variety
End of Abyss
2.0

Objective structure can become repetitive, especially when progression leans on successive activation tasks instead of more varied goals.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Narrative tone consistency
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
3.7

The mix of serious danger and B-movie silliness works very well for several reviewers. Others find the balance uneven, particularly when Jordan's relaxed quips clash with the frightening situation.

Overall quality
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
4.1

Most verdicts favor this unusual horror-platforming adventure for its museum setting and exciting movement. Technical reliability and control precision produce the strongest reservations, while the favorable demo verdicts remain provisional.

Platforming precision
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
3.2

Precision is one of the most divisive aspects: several players praise intuitive traversal, while others miss ledges after apparently correct jumps. Sliding, landing momentum, and wall-running can all expose inconsistencies.

Side character depth
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
2.5

Stella has moments of personal connection to the museum's history. However, one assessment finds that she mostly supplies codes and exposition rather than developing into a rounded supporting character.

Stamina management
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
4.0

A demo player welcomes the apparent lack of a stamina limit. Unrestricted running supports confident movement without another meter to manage in that session.

Survival mechanics
End of Abyss
2.7

The survival layer works best when secondary ammo is scarce and safe-room choices create pressure. Infinite pistol ammo, abundant materials, repeated respawns, or forced farming can undercut that tension.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Tutorial quality
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
4.5

New traversal mechanics come with useful time to learn and practice. That preparation helps players handle the later escape sequences with confidence.

Upgrade system
End of Abyss
3.8

Weapon and suit upgrades can make exploration feel valuable and materially change survival odds, but some sources find suit customization shallow and the upgraded pistol too dominant.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
VR implementation
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
4.5

One PC reviewer plays entirely in VR and finds that it works with little trouble and improves immersion. This is a positive individual experience rather than a broad compatibility assessment.

Weapon balance
End of Abyss
1.9

The infinite-ammo pistol is often too efficient, discouraging use of limited-ammo alternatives and weakening survival pressure. Several sources also find ammo economics or upgrade incentives skewed toward sticking with the starter weapon.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet

Comfort and build

Enemy design
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
4.7

The mutated dinosaurs are a major visual strength, with body-horror details and surprising reveals. Their frightening appearance often impresses even when other aspects of the game receive criticism.

Puzzle design
End of AbyssNo score yet
Terrible Lizards
3.0

Puzzles mostly provide simple progression tasks between parkour sequences. Some enjoy the modest thinking required, while others tire of repeated structures or find the larger puzzle spaces unclear.

User interface design
End of Abyss
3.5

The minimal HUD is praised for cleanliness, but the map interface can malfunction or fail to load, creating a sharp contrast between presentation and usability.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet

Ownership and support

Platform-specific feature support
End of Abyss
4.5

PS5-specific DualSense support is a welcome touch, with haptics and adaptive triggers adding texture to scanning and other actions.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet
Value for money
End of Abyss
5.0

Value impressions are strongly positive where discussed: the $29.99 price is considered excellent for the amount and quality of the experience.

Terrible LizardsNo score yet

Other Top Video Games to Consider

#1 Well Dweller
4.7

Best for fluid traversal, rewarding exploration, striking art, and forgiving quality-of-life features. Skip it if you want deep combat, radical genre innovation, or consistently demanding bosses.

Pros: difficulty balance, boss design

Cons: innovation, sandbox freedom

#2 Hades II
4.5

Best for superb combat, inventive builds, and richly voiced characters. Skip it if repeated runs, resource gathering, or visually busy battles outweigh the appeal of steady progress.

Pros: overall quality, combat system

Cons: pacing, grind level

#3 Valheim
4.5

Good if you want a beautiful, demanding survival sandbox built around exploration, building, progression, and memorable co-op. Skip it if long resource runs, harsh death recovery, and deliberate pacing sound...

Pros: town-building system, exploration quality

Cons: grind level, fast travel convenience

#4 Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
4.5

Choose Clair Obscur if you want a story-rich RPG with thrilling timed combat, gorgeous art, and standout music. Skip it if poor maps, tight parry timing, or occasional bugs and...

Pros: narrative quality, combat system

Cons: map and navigation design, menu usability