Compare ASUS ROG Keris II Ace vs SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless

ASUS ROG Keris II Ace

ASUS ROG Keris II Ace

Overall score 4.2 / 5

Based on 17 scored reviews

vs
SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless

Overall score 3.9 / 5

Based on 27 scored reviews

How we score

Scorata scores summarize analyzed review evidence on a 1–5 scale; they are not laboratory measurements or a simple average of customer star ratings. Feature scores summarize the reviews covering that feature. The overall score averages feature scores within each review, then combines review averages. When both expert and customer evidence are available, those two groups receive equal weight. Products can have different review coverage, so small score gaps do not establish a winner.

Recommendations prioritize important features for the category, with a score of at least 3.5, a gap of at least 0.25 points and at least two supporting reviews per product. Features with widely varying scores or broad connectivity contexts are excluded from recommendations. These safeguards do not establish statistical significance.

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

The review evidence points to a tradeoff: side button quality and button responsiveness versus software usability and wireless latency. Choose according to which strengths matter more to you; the overall score alone does not settle that choice.

Choose ASUS ROG Keris II Ace for side button quality and button responsiveness.

Choose SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless for software usability and wireless latency.

Why these recommendations?

ASUS ROG Keris II Ace

Where It Has the Edge

  • side button quality is 3.8 vs 2.5. Side button quality was mixed: several reviewers praised crisp placement, while others found them small, high, or stiff.
  • button responsiveness is 4.8 vs 3.8. Button responsiveness was praised for snappy, reliable, and fast actuation in several reviews.
  • sensor performance is 4.9 vs 4.5. Sensor performance was one of the best-reviewed areas, repeatedly described as accurate, top-tier, or flawless.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless

Where It Has the Edge

  • software usability is 3.9 vs 2.9. Software usability was mixed-positive overall, with several reviewers calling it easy or intuitive and others finding it bloated...
  • wireless latency is 4.8 vs 4.1. Wireless latency was praised by reviewers who reported no noticeable lag or latency problems.
  • Accuracy and tracking precision is 5.0 vs 4.5. Reviewers praised the Aerox 3 Wireless for accurate, precise aim and responsive targeting in shooters.
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace 4.2 overall score
SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless 3.9 overall score

Compare features

Scores are out of 5. Missing scores mean missing review evidence, not a missing feature.

Scored on both products

Battery and charging

Battery life
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2

Battery life was generally praised as good to excellent, with caveats that high polling rates and active use drain it faster.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.8

Battery life was the most context-dependent attribute, ranging from excellent to disappointing depending on RGB, Bluetooth, and 2.4GHz use.

Charging convenience
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.8

Charging and dongle convenience were mixed: USB-C and cable placement helped, but the booster/dongle setup could feel chunky.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.6

Charging convenience was a clear strength thanks to USB-C, fast charging, and easy wired use while charging.

Other features

Connection stability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
5.0

Connection stability was strongly praised, with reviewers reporting no dropouts, hiccups, or interference.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
2.8

Connection stability was mixed: some had no lag or drops, while others reported disconnects, wake delays, or 2.4GHz reconnection issues.

Glide smoothness
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Glide smoothness was consistently praised across stock PTFE feet and multiple surfaces.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.4

Glide smoothness was highly split across versions and reviewers, from effortless and smooth to scratchy or uneven feet.

Grip texture
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.4

Grip texture was the most divided attribute, ranging from non-slip praise to strong complaints about slippery coating.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.1

Grip texture and coating were generally liked for feeling good, grippy, and resistant to smudges or sweat.

Balance and weight distribution
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Weight distribution was usually praised as well balanced, though one reviewer found the mouse slightly forward-balanced.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.0

Balance opinions were split: several reviewers liked the balance, while another found it back-heavy.

Wireless latency
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.1

Wireless latency was praised in 2.4GHz mode but Bluetooth was criticized as too latent for competitive gaming.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.8

Wireless latency was praised by reviewers who reported no noticeable lag or latency problems.

Left and right click quality
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2

Left and right click quality was mostly positive, with praise for consistency and similar actuation between sides.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.6

Left and right clicks ranged from excellent and tactile to unstable with wobble or sideplay on some units.

Acceleration control
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

The acceleration spec was only scored where a reviewer connected the 50g capability to confident fast maneuvers in FPS play.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.0

One reviewer found acceleration and deceleration behavior well controlled.

Cable flexibility
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

The cable was usually praised as flexible, free-flowing, and low-friction, with one reviewer calling it a bit stiff.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.0

Cable flexibility was mostly praised for soft, low-drag use, though one reviewer disliked the included cable.

MMO gaming suitability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

MMO suitability had limited but positive evidence from FFXIV/raid use and button mapping comments.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.5

MMO suitability had limited but positive evidence from one reviewer who tested Final Fantasy XIV and reported strong performance.

Scroll wheel quality
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.6

Scroll wheel quality was mixed, ranging from excellent and distinct to average, light, or prone to overscrolling.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.3

Scroll wheel feedback varied widely, with some reviewers praising tactility and others calling it dull, low, loud, or unreliable.

Click latency
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Click latency was praised as very low or competitive, including measured or perceived fast response.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.8

Click latency drew strong praise from reviewers who measured or felt quick response.

Cross-platform compatibility
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Cross-platform use was praised through Bluetooth multi-device pairing and easy movement between PCs, laptops, tablets, and handhelds.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility was supported through Bluetooth use for everyday and cross-device scenarios.

DPI range
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

The DPI ceiling was seen as technically impressive, but one reviewer found very high DPI practically unusable.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.3

Reviewers found the available CPI/DPI range more than sufficient, with high ceilings available for users who want extreme sensitivity.

Motion consistency
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Motion consistency was praised through comments about precise recognition, consistent tracking, and polling stability.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.8

Motion consistency was generally praised for smooth, accurate tracking without spinouts or tracking loss.

FPS gaming suitability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

FPS suitability was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for competitive aiming, speed, and esports performance.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.6

FPS suitability was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising flicks, fragging, precision, and shooter performance.

RGB features
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

RGB was generally appreciated as a rare lightweight-mouse touch, though a few reviewers disliked the implementation.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.6

RGB lighting was widely liked for its vivid underglow, internal glow, and strong customization, though it affects battery use.

Premium feel
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.5

Premium feel was mixed: some found the mouse premium, while others felt the coating or hollow shell hurt the premium impression.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.4

Premium feel was inconsistent, with some reviewers calling it premium or top-tier and others saying it lacked a premium feel.

Switch feel
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.1

Switch feel was mixed but often positive, with some crisp/punchy praise and some dull or mushy complaints.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.9

Switch feel was usually crisp and tactile, though some reviewers noted post-travel or less consistent feel versus premium alternatives.

Polling rate
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Polling rate support was widely praised, especially 4K wireless and included booster access, with some debate over 8K usefulness.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.3

Polling-rate control was treated as important and useful, especially for high-refresh-rate or gaming use.

Weight
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.9

Weight was consistently praised as very light, impressive, and control-friendly.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.8

Weight was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling the mouse extremely light and easy to move.

Surface compatibility
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.9

Surface compatibility was strongly praised, including glass, mouse pads, tables, and varied surfaces.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
5.0

Surface compatibility was praised where the mouse glided well across mousepads and even nontraditional surfaces.

Lift-off distance
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.8

Lift-off distance was mixed: one reviewer liked the low setting, while another found low too low and high too high.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.8

Lift-off distance was mostly seen as low or good, but one reviewer experienced jumpy movement when lifting the mouse.

2.4GHz connectivity
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Reviewers discussed the 2.4GHz receiver mainly as part of the broader wireless setup, with praise for low-latency use when paired with the booster.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.5

2.4GHz connectivity was valued for accuracy and seamless gaming use, though some reviews reported reliability issues elsewhere.

Handedness options
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.0

Handedness scored low because reviewers repeatedly noted the right-handed ergonomic shape and lack of a left-handed option.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
2.0

Handedness was a drawback because the ambidextrous-style shell still is not truly left-handed friendly.

Portability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Portability was supported by dongle storage, Bluetooth, and multi-device/travel use.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.5

Portability was a strength, with reviewers calling it bag-friendly, travel-safe, and useful for laptop gamers.

Comfort and build

Palm grip comfort
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2

Palm grip comfort was positive for average or compatible hands, though not universal for larger hands.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
2.0

Palm grip was a weak fit in the available evidence, with one reviewer saying it felt weird.

Switch durability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Switch durability was scored where reviewers linked optical switches to double-click prevention, hot-swapping, or durability.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.3

Switch durability evidence was mixed, ranging from double-click prevention praise to long-term sticking and durability concerns.

Skate durability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Skate durability had limited evidence, but one reviewer said the skates held up well on glass.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
5.0

Skate durability was praised in one review after the larger PTFE feet were described as feeling great across surfaces.

Long-session comfort
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Long-session comfort was strongly positive where reviewers mentioned low strain, no hand pain, or reduced fatigue.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.0

Long-session comfort was split between reviewers who avoided fatigue and reviewers who experienced cramping.

Build quality
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Build quality was mostly strong, with repeated praise for rigidity and lack of flex, though one reviewer reported average build with creaking.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.9

Build quality was polarized: some units felt solid and rigid, while others showed flex, creak, or cheap-feeling construction.

Durability over time
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Long-term durability was not directly tested, but switch durability and repairability evidence supported limited durability scoring.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.6

Durability over time was mixed, with praise for sturdy construction and long-term use balanced by worries about longevity.

Fingertip grip comfort
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.3

Fingertip grip comfort was mixed; some found it possible, while others found the ergonomic shell awkward for fingertip use.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.7

Fingertip grip feedback was mixed, ranging from comfortable and natural to poor for larger hands.

Ergonomic design
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

The ergonomic design was broadly praised for right-handed comfort, while left-handed users were consistently excluded.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.8

Ergonomics were praised in reviews that liked the smaller, comfortable, lightweight shape.

Materials quality
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Materials quality was scored through reviewer judgments about the nylon/PBT shell, coating, and perceived premium or slippery feel.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.8

Materials quality was usually positive, especially the braided cable and textured shell material.

Shape comfort
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2

Shape comfort was generally praised, especially for right-handed ergonomic users, but hand size and finger length created caveats.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.1

Shape comfort was highly divisive, praised by claw/small-hand users but painful or cramp-inducing for others.

Claw grip comfort
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Claw-grip comfort was generally positive, especially relaxed claw, though hand size affected comfort.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.3

Claw grip support was frequently positive, with several reviewers finding the shape natural or comfortable for claw users.

Controls and connectivity

Side button quality
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.8

Side button quality was mixed: several reviewers praised crisp placement, while others found them small, high, or stiff.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
2.5

Side buttons were the most consistent control complaint, often described as too slim, cheap-feeling, mushy, or easy to misclick.

Software usability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.9

Software usability was the clearest weakness, with repeated complaints about Armoury Crate being bloated, slow, or needing improvement.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.9

Software usability was mixed-positive overall, with several reviewers calling it easy or intuitive and others finding it bloated or annoying.

Software stability
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Software stability had limited evidence, with Armoury Crate Gear praised for not affecting system performance.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.0

Software stability varied: one reviewer had no issues, while another saw the software hang more than expected.

Button responsiveness
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Button responsiveness was praised for snappy, reliable, and fast actuation in several reviews.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.8

Main button responsiveness was mixed: several reviewers liked the clicks, while others found resistance or shell behavior distracting.

Bluetooth support
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Bluetooth was viewed as a useful convenience for work, travel, and multi-device use, not as the preferred competitive mode.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.0

Bluetooth support was useful for fallback, travel, and cross-device use, but at least one reviewer found Bluetooth responsiveness laggy.

Button customization
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Customization was considered adequate to strong where reviewers described remapping, DPI, and profile tools as straightforward or sufficient.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.5

Button and sensitivity customization were praised as deep, useful, and easy to tune.

Programmable buttons
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Programmable buttons were considered competitive and sufficient for this class, though not extensive like MMO mice.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.0

Programmable-button usefulness was supported through broader praise for customization options aimed at serious gamers.

Tracking and training

Accuracy and tracking precision
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Reviewers consistently praised tracking accuracy and precision, with only one reviewer warning that extreme DPI values became irregular.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
5.0

Reviewers praised the Aerox 3 Wireless for accurate, precise aim and responsive targeting in shooters.

Performance

Sensor performance
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.9

Sensor performance was one of the best-reviewed areas, repeatedly described as accurate, top-tier, or flawless.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.5

Sensor impressions were broadly positive, with reviewers repeatedly calling tracking accurate or responsive, though a few saw it as merely adequate.

Wireless performance
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Wireless performance was repeatedly praised as low-latency, stable, and responsive.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.4

Wireless performance was generally strong in active use, with multiple reviewers reporting no lag or drops, despite isolated wake/connectivity complaints elsewhere.

Click noise
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2

Click noise impressions were mixed, from quiet and pleasant to fairly loud, depending on reviewer and switch comparison.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.0

Click noise was relatively positive in the available evidence because the main buttons were described as quieter than another SteelSeries line.

Ownership and support

Value for money
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.6

Value was mixed: reviewers praised the feature set but often called the price expensive or hard to justify.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
3.5

Value was heavily price-dependent: many liked it on sale, while others rejected the full-price value because of QC, controls, or competition.

Evidence available for one product

Other features

Dock compatibility
ASUS ROG Keris II AceNo score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
2.5

Dock compatibility was a minor weakness because reviewers wished for a charging dock or wireless charging option.

Ecosystem integration
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Ecosystem integration was praised where reviewers used the Omni receiver or Aura Sync-style setup without delays.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 WirelessNo score yet
Onboard memory
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Onboard control and memory features were praised when reviewers could change settings or avoid software.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 WirelessNo score yet
Profile switching
ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.3

Profile switching was mixed, with praise for onboard switching but criticism of the underside DPI/profile button placement.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 WirelessNo score yet
Water and dust resistance
ASUS ROG Keris II AceNo score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
4.7

Water and dust resistance was consistently treated as a useful reassurance for the perforated shell and exposed design.

Ownership and support

Firmware reliability
ASUS ROG Keris II AceNo score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless
1.3

Firmware reliability was a concern in reviews that described crashing, looping, or a failed update.

Other Top Gaming Mice to Consider

#1 ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Choose the ROG Harpe II Ace for ultralight FPS play, precise tracking, smooth glide, and web-based tuning. Skip it if you need palm-grip support, MMO buttons, onboard profiles, or long...

Pros: glide smoothness, weight

Cons: handedness options

#2 Razer Viper V4 Pro
4.4

Best for ultra-light, competition-focused speed, precise tracking, stable wireless, and long battery life. Skip it if you need quieter clicks, left-handed support, Bluetooth, more buttons, or better value for casual...

Pros: value for money, weight

Cons: click noise, RGB features

#3 Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.4

Choose it if you want a premium MMO/productivity mouse with 12 adjustable side buttons, strong battery life, and Stream Deck integration. Skip it if you need an ultralight FPS mouse,...

Pros: button customization, MMO gaming suitability

Cons: FPS gaming suitability

#4 MSI Versa 300 Wireless 8K
4.4

Best for precise wireless tracking, smooth glide, strong battery life, and unusually good 8K value. Skip it if you need polished software, quiet snappy clicks, true left-handed controls, or gentle...

Pros: software usability, sensor performance

Cons: RGB features, scroll wheel quality