Compare Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 vs SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2

Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2

Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2

Overall score 4.0 / 5

Based on 23 scored reviews

vs
SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2

Overall score 4.3 / 5

Based on 16 scored reviews

How we score

Scorata scores summarize analyzed review evidence on a 1–5 scale; they are not laboratory measurements or a simple average of customer star ratings. Feature scores summarize the reviews covering that feature. The overall score averages feature scores within each review, then combines review averages. When both expert and customer evidence are available, those two groups receive equal weight. Products can have different review coverage, so small score gaps do not establish a winner.

Recommendations prioritize important features for the category, with a score of at least 3.5, a gap of at least 0.25 points and at least two supporting reviews per product. Features with widely varying scores or broad connectivity contexts are excluded from recommendations. These safeguards do not establish statistical significance.

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

The review evidence points to a tradeoff: battery life and grip texture versus cable flexibility and scroll wheel quality. Choose according to which strengths matter more to you; the overall score alone does not settle that choice.

Choose Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 for battery life and grip texture.

Choose SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 for cable flexibility and scroll wheel quality.

Why these recommendations?

Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2

Where It Has the Edge

  • battery life is 4.7 vs 4.2. Battery life was generally praised as long-lasting, though reviewers noted it drops with higher polling rates.
  • grip texture is 4.4 vs 3.6. Grip texture was well received, with reviewers praising the grippy surface, recessed sides, or usefulness for clammy hands.
  • weight is 4.7 vs 4.2. Reviewers strongly praised the low weight, calling it excellent, effortless, and well balanced for the mouse size.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2

Where It Has the Edge

  • cable flexibility is 4.6 vs 2.0. Cable flexibility was praised for the Super Mesh or braided cable, with reviewers finding it smooth, flexible, and...
  • scroll wheel quality is 4.4 vs 3.0. Scroll wheel feedback was broadly positive, with reviewers praising tactile bumps, grippier texture, responsiveness, and quieter operation.
  • value for money is 4.1 vs 3.1. Value was mixed-positive: many reviewers saw competitive mid-range pricing, while a few thought cheaper or lighter rivals make...
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 4.0 overall score
SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2 4.3 overall score

Compare features

Scores are out of 5. Missing scores mean missing review evidence, not a missing feature.

Scored on both products

Battery and charging

Battery life
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Battery life was generally praised as long-lasting, though reviewers noted it drops with higher polling rates.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.2

Battery life was broadly strong at 1K/Bluetooth, but reviewers consistently noted the 4K polling and RGB tradeoff.

Charging convenience
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.6

Charging convenience was praised for USB-C, faster charging, and fewer desk cables.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.2

Charging convenience was positive overall thanks to wired-use charging and long cables, though peak-performance polling requires more frequent charging.

Other features

Cable flexibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.0

Cable quality was a recurring complaint, with reviewers criticizing drag, resistance, and the dated rubber cable.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.6

Cable flexibility was praised for the Super Mesh or braided cable, with reviewers finding it smooth, flexible, and useful on the desk.

Profile switching
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.0

Profile behavior was mixed: app-linked settings were useful, but onboard-profile handling was described as confusing in G Hub.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.5

Profile switching was praised for game-specific saved settings and automatic profile changes that adjust DPI, macros, and polling behavior.

Scroll wheel quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.0

Scroll wheel feedback was mixed, with some praise for tactility but repeated criticism that it felt stiff, mushy, vague, or less precise.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.4

Scroll wheel feedback was broadly positive, with reviewers praising tactile bumps, grippier texture, responsiveness, and quieter operation.

Balance and weight distribution
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Weight distribution received positive evidence from a reviewer who specifically praised the balance.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
3.4

Balance impressions were split: one reviewer found it spot-on, while another felt the internals made the mouse rear-weighted.

Glide smoothness
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.5

Glide smoothness was highly mixed: some reviewers praised effortless glide, while others disliked stock-skate drag or control-heavy movement.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.5

Glide smoothness was consistently praised on mousepads and desks, with PTFE feet described as smooth, snag-free, and reliable.

Grip texture
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.4

Grip texture was well received, with reviewers praising the grippy surface, recessed sides, or usefulness for clammy hands.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
3.6

Grip texture was split: some found the rougher texture grippy and improved, while others found the sides slippery or not grippy enough.

Click latency
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.2

Click latency was praised as very low by some reviewers, though one technical reviewer found it merely good rather than flagship-leading.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.8

One reviewer specifically praised the click response as hair-trigger fast, supporting a strong click-latency score.

Weight
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Reviewers strongly praised the low weight, calling it excellent, effortless, and well balanced for the mouse size.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.2

Most reviewers liked the light 68g-class weight, but a few considered it heavier or less competitive by current ultralight standards.

Polling rate
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.1

Polling-rate opinions were mixed: several reviewers felt clear responsiveness gains, while others saw 2,000Hz as fine but not industry-leading.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.5

The 4K polling rate was widely treated as a major performance upgrade, especially for competitive play, though a few reviewers called it a nice-to-have for casual use.

Portability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Portability was supported by the dongle-storage cover, which one reviewer framed as essential for esports travel.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.1

Portability was strong for travel durability and Bluetooth use, but lack of onboard dongle storage hurt tournament/travel convenience.

Wireless latency
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Wireless latency was praised directly, with reviewers reporting no latency issues or seemingly no latency at all.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.6

Wireless latency was praised as low or unnoticeable at 2.4GHz/4K, although one reviewer personally could not feel the difference from 1K.

2.4GHz connectivity
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

The 2.4GHz connection was praised through an instant, fast connection experience with the included dongle.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.6

2.4GHz connectivity was praised for enabling the best polling experience and for reliable dongle placement close to the mouse.

DPI range
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.7

DPI coverage was seen as technically strong and granular, but one reviewer felt the extreme ceiling is more marketing than everyday value.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.0

The 26K DPI range was valued for flexibility and on-the-fly tuning, though several reviewers said extreme DPI levels could feel jumpy or unnecessary.

FPS gaming suitability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

FPS suitability was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for speed, responsiveness, and competitive first-person shooter use.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.7

FPS suitability was a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising shooter responsiveness, tracking, and competitive capability.

Left and right click quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.8

Left and right clicks were praised for satisfying tactility, light rapid tapping, and improved main-button feel.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.5

Main click quality was praised by reviewers who found the left/right clicks satisfying, solid, and consistent.

Onboard memory
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Onboard memory was supported by the ability to save multiple profiles, though evidence was more about usefulness than enthusiasm.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.3

Onboard memory was seen as practical because saved profiles can make settings easier to carry across systems without software.

Surface compatibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.8

Surface compatibility was mixed, with good results across many surfaces but complaints on softer pads and warnings to tune surface modes.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.1

Surface compatibility was mostly good across mousepads, desks, and mats, but one reviewer noted possible edge scratching under hard pressure.

Premium feel
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Premium feel was positive overall, with reviewers saying the mouse feels sturdy, premium, and high quality.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.2

Premium feel was mostly positive, with reviewers citing excellent updates, solid feel, and a premium impression, while one called it only decent.

Connection stability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Connection stability was praised in one review for not faltering even in a difficult RF environment.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.8

Connection stability was positive in the limited direct evidence, with reviewers reporting stable modes and reliable connection behavior.

Acceleration control
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Acceleration feel received direct praise in one review, where the reviewer enjoyed its smoothness in Diablo IV.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.3

Acceleration and precision controls were viewed as useful advanced tuning options, especially for players who want movement behavior matched to their style.

Switch feel
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.2

Switch feel split reviewers: many loved the crisp, tactile Lightforce feel, while others found the clicks heavier or too tactile.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.4

Switch feel was mostly praised as tactile, crisp, clicky, and satisfying, although some reviewers noted a louder or heavier mechanical character.

RGB features
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.3

The lack of RGB was generally accepted as a worthwhile tradeoff for battery life, weight, and the mouse’s clean look.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.4

RGB impressions were mostly positive for brightness, zones, style, and customization, though one reviewer found active lighting distracting.

Ecosystem integration
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Ecosystem integration was praised for Logitech presets, backward compatibility, and community/profile support.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.4

Ecosystem integration was positive where discussed, especially GG suite integration and coordinated SteelSeries setup styling.

Cross-platform compatibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility was praised through G Hub support for both Windows and macOS.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.5

Cross-platform evidence was positive but limited, tied to easy device connectivity and onboard profiles that simplify software-free use.

Motion consistency
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.8

Motion consistency was described positively, with reviewers calling motion smooth, sharp, and accurate.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.8

Motion consistency was praised in gaming and daily use, with reviewers reporting smooth movement and no missed tracking.

Comfort and build

Fingertip grip comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Fingertip grip comfort was praised by reviewers who found the shape comfortable for fingertip use.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
3.2

Fingertip comfort was divisive, with some reviewers grouping it with claw-friendly use and others finding the flared rear awkward.

Long-session comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Long-session comfort was strongly positive in one review that reported almost no hand fatigue after long sessions.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.3

Long-session comfort was generally positive due to low weight and comfort, though at least one reviewer reported hand or pinky discomfort.

Claw grip comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.6

Claw grip comfort was broadly positive, with reviewers calling the mouse comfortable or easy to use for claw grip.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.1

Claw grip comfort was the strongest grip-style fit, with several reviewers saying the shape comes alive or works best in claw grip.

Palm grip comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.5

Palm grip comfort was limited by one review saying palm-grip players may be better served elsewhere.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
3.0

Palm grip comfort was mixed-to-negative overall; smaller-hand palm use worked for one reviewer, but several said larger palm-grip users should look elsewhere.

Ergonomic design
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Ergonomics were generally positive for comfort and contouring, but one review noted large hands may find the shape less ergonomic.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.4

Ergonomic design was praised by reviewers with smaller hands and those who liked the flat symmetrical shape, but it is not universal.

Build quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.8

Build quality was repeatedly praised as solid, squeak-free, well put together, and elite despite the light shell.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.5

Build quality was generally praised for fit, finish, solid shell feel, no creaking, and improved construction.

Switch durability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Switch durability evidence centered on optical-switch reliability and reduced double-click concerns, with reviewers treating it as a meaningful benefit.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.5

Switch durability evidence was positive, with one reviewer noting consistent clicks over heavy use and another valuing the 80-million-click rating.

Shape comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.4

Shape comfort was broadly praised as safe, familiar, and very comfortable, though a few reviewers disliked the rounded shape personally.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.2

Shape comfort was polarizing, ranging from favorite-shape praise to criticism of the flared rear and grip-specific comfort issues.

Materials quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Materials quality was praised for a cool, soft matte plastic feel.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.6

Materials quality was positive where discussed, with reviewers calling out quality plastics and carefully assembled elements.

Durability over time
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Durability over time had limited but positive evidence from a longer-use reviewer whose unit remained rock solid.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.5

Durability was praised through drop resistance, rugged shell impressions, travel toughness, and confidence in daily abuse.

Controls and connectivity

Side button quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.6

Side button quality was the most contested control area, ranging from well-placed and improved to repeatedly described as mushy.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
3.9

Side button feedback was mixed: several reviewers liked the improved feel and reach, while others found them too long or easy to hit accidentally.

Software usability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.9

Software usability was split sharply: some reviewers found G Hub easy and powerful, while others called it unintuitive or frustrating.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.5

SteelSeries GG software was strongly praised for clean usability, sensitivity tools, customization depth, and practical profile/game tuning.

Button responsiveness
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Button responsiveness was mostly praised for tactile, responsive clicks, though one reviewer disliked the heavier actuation for spam clicking.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.6

Button responsiveness was generally strong, with reviewers describing the buttons as clicky, responsive, crisp, and easy to press.

Programmable buttons
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Programmable side buttons were useful to one reviewer for DPI adjustment, especially because the mouse lacks a dedicated DPI button.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.4

Programmable-button evidence was limited but positive, tied to useful side-button configuration for daily workflows.

Button customization
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Customization drew positive comments for granular controls and strong software-hardware integration, though it still depends heavily on G Hub.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.6

Button customization was praised through GG software, free configuration, remapping options, and practical use of side buttons in daily workflows.

Ownership and support

Value for money
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.1

Value was mixed: reviewers praised the performance tier but often questioned the price and upgrade value from the original Superlight.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.1

Value was mixed-positive: many reviewers saw competitive mid-range pricing, while a few thought cheaper or lighter rivals make it harder to recommend.

Macro support
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Macro support was praised for an easy-to-use macro tool that guides users through setup.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.4

Macro support was only clearly evaluated in one review, where automatic game profiles applying macros was treated as useful.

Performance

Click noise
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.3

Click noise was mixed: some liked the satisfying click sound, while others found it loud or high-pitched.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.1

Click noise drew mixed but mostly positive comments: one reviewer loved the sound, another found switches loud, and one noted a quieter scroll wheel.

Wireless performance
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Wireless performance was praised as seamless and flawless, with no cable-related compromise in use.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.7

Wireless performance was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers describing fast, responsive, reliable, smooth, and stutter-free behavior.

Sensor performance
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.9

The HERO 2 sensor was widely praised as crisp, precise, fast, and close to flawless, though some reviewers framed the higher specs as incremental.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.7

Sensor feedback was strongly positive: reviewers described the TrueMove 26K as precise, snappy, reliable, and consistently strong in games.

Tracking and training

Accuracy and tracking precision
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.9

Reviewers consistently described the mouse as accurate in games, with especially strong praise for tracking, pointer accuracy, and shot control.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.7

Reviewers repeatedly praised accurate tracking, precise headshots, and clean fast-flick behavior, with only high-DPI settings sometimes needing adjustment.

Evidence available for one product

Controls and connectivity

Bluetooth support
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2No score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.3

Bluetooth support was valued for versatility and travel, but reviewers noted advanced performance settings are limited outside 2.4GHz or wired mode.

Software stability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Software stability had limited but positive evidence from one review calling the G Hub interface stable.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2No score yet

Other features

Dock compatibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.3

PowerPlay compatibility was viewed positively, though one reviewer called the accessory expensive.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2No score yet
Handedness options
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.5

Handedness support was mixed because the symmetrical shape helps lefties, but the side buttons remain left-side only.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2No score yet
Lift-off distance
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.2

Lift-off distance control was viewed as useful and noticeably adjustable, especially for players who fine-tune mouse behavior.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2No score yet
MOBA gaming suitability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.5

MOBA suitability was weaker because one reviewer found the heavier clicks worse for spam-click games.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2No score yet
Water and dust resistance
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2No score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2
4.5

Water and dust resistance was praised as genuinely useful, especially for spill protection, IP54 protection, and the dunk-test survival evidence.

Weight tuning
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.0

Weight tuning was weakly received because the swappable cover options were seen as features most people would not find useful.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2No score yet

Ownership and support

Drag click support
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Drag click support had limited positive evidence from one reviewer who called drag clicking pretty awesome.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2No score yet

Comfort and build

Skate durability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.0

Skate durability was a repeated concern, with reviewers calling the PTFE feet thin, meh, or unlikely to last long.

SteelSeries Aerox 3 Wireless Gen 2No score yet

Other Top Gaming Mice to Consider

#1 ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Choose the ROG Harpe II Ace for ultralight FPS play, precise tracking, smooth glide, and web-based tuning. Skip it if you need palm-grip support, MMO buttons, onboard profiles, or long...

Pros: glide smoothness, weight

Cons: handedness options

#2 Razer Viper V4 Pro
4.4

Best for ultra-light, competition-focused speed, precise tracking, stable wireless, and long battery life. Skip it if you need quieter clicks, left-handed support, Bluetooth, more buttons, or better value for casual...

Pros: value for money, weight

Cons: click noise, RGB features

#3 Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.4

Choose it if you want a premium MMO/productivity mouse with 12 adjustable side buttons, strong battery life, and Stream Deck integration. Skip it if you need an ultralight FPS mouse,...

Pros: button customization, MMO gaming suitability

Cons: FPS gaming suitability

#4 MSI Versa 300 Wireless 8K
4.4

Best for precise wireless tracking, smooth glide, strong battery life, and unusually good 8K value. Skip it if you need polished software, quiet snappy clicks, true left-handed controls, or gentle...

Pros: software usability, sensor performance

Cons: RGB features, scroll wheel quality