Compare Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 vs ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini

Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2

Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2

Overall score 4.0 / 5

Based on 23 scored reviews

vs
ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini

Overall score 4.2 / 5

Based on 14 scored reviews

How we score

Scorata scores summarize analyzed review evidence on a 1–5 scale; they are not laboratory measurements or a simple average of customer star ratings. Feature scores summarize the reviews covering that feature. The overall score averages feature scores within each review, then combines review averages. When both expert and customer evidence are available, those two groups receive equal weight. Products can have different review coverage, so small score gaps do not establish a winner.

Recommendations prioritize important features for the category, with a score of at least 3.5, a gap of at least 0.25 points and at least two supporting reviews per product. Features with widely varying scores or broad connectivity contexts are excluded from recommendations. These safeguards do not establish statistical significance.

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

The review evidence points to a tradeoff: fingertip grip comfort and wireless latency versus cable flexibility and side button quality. Choose according to which strengths matter more to you; the overall score alone does not settle that choice.

Choose Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 for fingertip grip comfort and wireless latency.

Choose ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini for cable flexibility and side button quality.

Why these recommendations?

Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2

Where It Has the Edge

  • fingertip grip comfort is 5.0 vs 4.5. Fingertip grip comfort was praised by reviewers who found the shape comfortable for fingertip use.
  • wireless latency is 5.0 vs 4.6. Wireless latency was praised directly, with reviewers reporting no latency issues or seemingly no latency at all.
  • wireless performance is 5.0 vs 4.6. Wireless performance was praised as seamless and flawless, with no cable-related compromise in use.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini

Where It Has the Edge

  • cable flexibility is 4.8 vs 2.0. Cable flexibility was strongly positive where mentioned, with reviewers praising the paracord as highly flexible and low-friction.
  • side button quality is 4.4 vs 2.6. Side button quality was generally praised, with reviewers noting satisfying side clicks, easy thumb access, and good in-game...
  • DPI range is 4.5 vs 3.7. DPI range was treated as a strength where reviewers evaluated sensitivity, especially versus smaller or older rivals.
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 4.0 overall score
ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini 4.2 overall score

Compare features

Scores are out of 5. Missing scores mean missing review evidence, not a missing feature.

Scored on both products

Battery and charging

Battery life
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Battery life was generally praised as long-lasting, though reviewers noted it drops with higher polling rates.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Battery life was one of the strongest consensus wins, repeatedly described as impressive, fantastic, accurate, or better than expected.

Charging convenience
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.6

Charging convenience was praised for USB-C, faster charging, and fewer desk cables.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Charging convenience had limited but positive evidence, especially around USB-C fast charging and quick top-ups.

Other features

Cable flexibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.0

Cable quality was a recurring complaint, with reviewers criticizing drag, resistance, and the dated rubber cable.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.8

Cable flexibility was strongly positive where mentioned, with reviewers praising the paracord as highly flexible and low-friction.

MOBA gaming suitability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.5

MOBA suitability was weaker because one reviewer found the heavier clicks worse for spam-click games.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

MOBA gaming suitability had limited positive evidence from one review that named MOBA use as a fit.

Glide smoothness
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.5

Glide smoothness was highly mixed: some reviewers praised effortless glide, while others disliked stock-skate drag or control-heavy movement.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Glide smoothness was a repeated strength, with PTFE feet and skates described as smooth, easy, or excellent.

Handedness options
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.5

Handedness support was mixed because the symmetrical shape helps lefties, but the side buttons remain left-side only.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.6

Handedness options were a weakness because multiple reviewers noted the right-hand-biased side-button layout and lack of true left-handed support.

DPI range
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.7

DPI coverage was seen as technically strong and granular, but one reviewer felt the extreme ceiling is more marketing than everyday value.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

DPI range was treated as a strength where reviewers evaluated sensitivity, especially versus smaller or older rivals.

Scroll wheel quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.0

Scroll wheel feedback was mixed, with some praise for tactility but repeated criticism that it felt stiff, mushy, vague, or less precise.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.8

Scroll wheel feedback was mixed-positive: several liked the resistance or easy actuation, while others found it stiff or soft.

Surface compatibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.8

Surface compatibility was mixed, with good results across many surfaces but complaints on softer pads and warnings to tune surface modes.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Surface compatibility scored well where tested, with reviewers praising calibration usefulness or trouble-free tracking across many surfaces.

2.4GHz connectivity
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

The 2.4GHz connection was praised through an instant, fast connection experience with the included dongle.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

2.4GHz connectivity was praised for easy setup, SpeedNova precision, reliable performance, and top-notch wireless behavior.

Connection stability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Connection stability was praised in one review for not faltering even in a difficult RF environment.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Connection stability was broadly positive across wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4GHz modes, with reviewers reporting easy, reliable, or trouble-free use.

Profile switching
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.0

Profile behavior was mixed: app-linked settings were useful, but onboard-profile handling was described as confusing in G Hub.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.5

Profile switching was useful in principle, but one reviewer found the onboard controls clunky.

Polling rate
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.1

Polling-rate opinions were mixed: several reviewers felt clear responsiveness gains, while others saw 2,000Hz as fine but not industry-leading.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.6

Polling feedback was mixed: 1000Hz was acceptable for many, but reviewers disliked needing a separate booster for easy 8000Hz.

Click latency
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.2

Click latency was praised as very low by some reviewers, though one technical reviewer found it merely good rather than flagship-leading.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Click latency was praised in the reviews that addressed it, especially around optical switches and low-latency performance.

Wireless latency
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Wireless latency was praised directly, with reviewers reporting no latency issues or seemingly no latency at all.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Wireless latency was praised where tested, especially for lag-free connectivity or low-latency performance.

Onboard memory
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Onboard memory was supported by the ability to save multiple profiles, though evidence was more about usefulness than enthusiasm.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Onboard memory had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer praising memory profiles for use on the go.

Balance and weight distribution
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Weight distribution received positive evidence from a reviewer who specifically praised the balance.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.2

Balance evidence was split: one reviewer felt rear weighting, while another said balance felt spot-on.

Left and right click quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.8

Left and right clicks were praised for satisfying tactility, light rapid tapping, and improved main-button feel.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Left and right click quality had limited but positive evidence from a reviewer who liked the click implementation.

FPS gaming suitability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

FPS suitability was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for speed, responsiveness, and competitive first-person shooter use.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

FPS gaming suitability was strongly supported by repeated esports, aiming, shooting-game, and competitive-player praise.

Switch feel
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.2

Switch feel split reviewers: many loved the crisp, tactile Lightforce feel, while others found the clicks heavier or too tactile.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Switch feel was viewed positively, especially for tactile optical switches and spam-click friendliness.

RGB features
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.3

The lack of RGB was generally accepted as a worthwhile tradeoff for battery life, weight, and the mouse’s clean look.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.0

RGB features were generally seen as tasteful and minimal, though the lighting is limited to subtle scroll-wheel effects.

Ecosystem integration
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Ecosystem integration was praised for Logitech presets, backward compatibility, and community/profile support.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Ecosystem integration was positively received where reviewers mentioned the Omni receiver and multi-device ASUS setup support.

Lift-off distance
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.2

Lift-off distance control was viewed as useful and noticeably adjustable, especially for players who fine-tune mouse behavior.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Lift-off distance received limited but positive evidence through one reviewer praising the software adjustment options.

Acceleration control
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Acceleration feel received direct praise in one review, where the reviewer enjoyed its smoothness in Diablo IV.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Acceleration behavior was positive in limited evidence, with reviewers saying it felt sufficient or showed zero unwanted acceleration.

Cross-platform compatibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility was praised through G Hub support for both Windows and macOS.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Cross-platform compatibility was positive in limited evidence, especially Windows/Mac Bluetooth use and flexible multi-platform operation.

Portability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Portability was supported by the dongle-storage cover, which one reviewer framed as essential for esports travel.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Portability was a clear advantage due to the compact, light design and travel-friendly use.

Grip texture
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.4

Grip texture was well received, with reviewers praising the grippy surface, recessed sides, or usefulness for clammy hands.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Grip texture was generally praised for coatings, ridges, grips, and grippy surfaces, with only minor reservations about finish marking.

Motion consistency
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.8

Motion consistency was described positively, with reviewers calling motion smooth, sharp, and accurate.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Motion consistency scored very well where tested, with reviewers describing reliable tracking and no acceleration or jitter.

Weight
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Reviewers strongly praised the low weight, calling it excellent, effortless, and well balanced for the mouse size.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Weight was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly praised as extremely light, flingable, and competitive.

Premium feel
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Premium feel was positive overall, with reviewers saying the mouse feels sturdy, premium, and high quality.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Premium feel was praised, with reviewers describing the mouse as not cheap, masterful, premium, or solid.

Controls and connectivity

Software stability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Software stability had limited but positive evidence from one review calling the G Hub interface stable.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.2

Software stability had limited but negative evidence from one reviewer who reported errors and restarts.

Side button quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.6

Side button quality was the most contested control area, ranging from well-placed and improved to repeatedly described as mushy.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Side button quality was generally praised, with reviewers noting satisfying side clicks, easy thumb access, and good in-game feel.

Button responsiveness
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Button responsiveness was mostly praised for tactile, responsive clicks, though one reviewer disliked the heavier actuation for spam clicking.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Button responsiveness was a repeated strength, with clicks described as satisfying, tactile, crisp, clear, and responsive.

Software usability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.9

Software usability was split sharply: some reviewers found G Hub easy and powerful, while others called it unintuitive or frustrating.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.5

Software usability was the most divided software attribute: some liked the simplified or clean app, while others found it clunky, difficult, or outdated.

Button customization
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Customization drew positive comments for granular controls and strong software-hardware integration, though it still depends heavily on G Hub.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Button customization was praised for easy programming and broad finetuning options.

Programmable buttons
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Programmable side buttons were useful to one reviewer for DPI adjustment, especially because the mouse lacks a dedicated DPI button.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.4

Programmable buttons were viewed as useful and easy to configure in the reviews that judged button programming.

Ownership and support

Macro support
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Macro support was praised for an easy-to-use macro tool that guides users through setup.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
2.8

Macro support had limited negative evidence because one reviewer disliked needing the large Armoury Crate suite for macros.

Value for money
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.1

Value was mixed: reviewers praised the performance tier but often questioned the price and upgrade value from the original Superlight.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.9

Value was mixed: reviewers liked the performance for the price, but the high base price and separate polling booster drew criticism.

Comfort and build

Palm grip comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.5

Palm grip comfort was limited by one review saying palm-grip players may be better served elsewhere.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.2

Palm grip comfort was acceptable for some reviewers with smaller hands, though evidence was less broad than for claw and fingertip use.

Materials quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Materials quality was praised for a cool, soft matte plastic feel.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.7

Materials quality was mostly positive for sturdy plastics, premium feel, and coating, but one reviewer criticized the finish marking and another questioned the material.

Durability over time
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.5

Durability over time had limited but positive evidence from a longer-use reviewer whose unit remained rock solid.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
3.9

Durability over time was mixed-positive: switches and build were praised, but one travel-use review criticized finish scuffing.

Fingertip grip comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Fingertip grip comfort was praised by reviewers who found the shape comfortable for fingertip use.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Fingertip grip comfort was positive in the few reviews that addressed it directly.

Build quality
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.8

Build quality was repeatedly praised as solid, squeak-free, well put together, and elite despite the light shell.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Build quality was consistently positive, with reviewers calling it sturdy, solid, well-built, and able to go the distance.

Long-session comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Long-session comfort was strongly positive in one review that reported almost no hand fatigue after long sessions.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Long-session comfort had limited but positive evidence for extended gaming sessions.

Switch durability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.7

Switch durability evidence centered on optical-switch reliability and reduced double-click concerns, with reviewers treating it as a meaningful benefit.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Switch durability evidence was positive, with optical switches framed as durable, long-lived, and safer against double-click concerns.

Ergonomic design
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Ergonomics were generally positive for comfort and contouring, but one review noted large hands may find the shape less ergonomic.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.1

Ergonomic design was context-dependent: the compact shape pleased smaller-hand users but was less ideal for large hands or ergonomic-specific preferences.

Shape comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.4

Shape comfort was broadly praised as safe, familiar, and very comfortable, though a few reviewers disliked the rounded shape personally.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.3

Shape comfort was mostly praised for smaller hands and compact preferences, but larger-hand comfort was a recurring limitation.

Claw grip comfort
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.6

Claw grip comfort was broadly positive, with reviewers calling the mouse comfortable or easy to use for claw grip.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Claw grip comfort was a major strength, repeatedly tied to the compact esports shape.

Performance

Wireless performance
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
5.0

Wireless performance was praised as seamless and flawless, with no cable-related compromise in use.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Wireless performance was well regarded, with reviewers describing reliable, flexible, lag-free, or top-notch wireless use.

Sensor performance
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.9

The HERO 2 sensor was widely praised as crisp, precise, fast, and close to flawless, though some reviewers framed the higher specs as incremental.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.6

Sensor feedback was strongly positive overall, with reviewers calling it potent, precise, reliable, stellar, rock-solid, or one of the best.

Tracking and training

Accuracy and tracking precision
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.9

Reviewers consistently described the mouse as accurate in games, with especially strong praise for tracking, pointer accuracy, and shot control.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.7

Reviewers consistently praised the mouse as accurate and precise, with only one review noting high-DPI jitter in unrealistic upper ranges.

Evidence available for one product

Controls and connectivity

Bluetooth support
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2No score yet
ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Bluetooth support was positively received for easy pairing, useful productivity support, and painless mode switching.

Performance

Click noise
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
3.3

Click noise was mixed: some liked the satisfying click sound, while others found it loud or high-pitched.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace MiniNo score yet

Other features

Dock compatibility
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.3

PowerPlay compatibility was viewed positively, though one reviewer called the accessory expensive.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace MiniNo score yet
MMO gaming suitability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2No score yet
ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

MMO gaming suitability had limited positive evidence from one review that named MMORPG use as a fit.

Weight tuning
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.0

Weight tuning was weakly received because the swappable cover options were seen as features most people would not find useful.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace MiniNo score yet

Ownership and support

Drag click support
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
4.0

Drag click support had limited positive evidence from one reviewer who called drag clicking pretty awesome.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace MiniNo score yet

Comfort and build

Skate durability
Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2
2.0

Skate durability was a repeated concern, with reviewers calling the PTFE feet thin, meh, or unlikely to last long.

ASUS ROG Harpe Ace MiniNo score yet

Other Top Gaming Mice to Consider

#1 ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Choose the ROG Harpe II Ace for ultralight FPS play, precise tracking, smooth glide, and web-based tuning. Skip it if you need palm-grip support, MMO buttons, onboard profiles, or long...

Pros: glide smoothness, weight

Cons: handedness options

#2 Razer Viper V4 Pro
4.4

Best for ultra-light, competition-focused speed, precise tracking, stable wireless, and long battery life. Skip it if you need quieter clicks, left-handed support, Bluetooth, more buttons, or better value for casual...

Pros: value for money, weight

Cons: click noise, RGB features

#3 Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.4

Choose it if you want a premium MMO/productivity mouse with 12 adjustable side buttons, strong battery life, and Stream Deck integration. Skip it if you need an ultralight FPS mouse,...

Pros: button customization, MMO gaming suitability

Cons: FPS gaming suitability

#4 MSI Versa 300 Wireless 8K
4.4

Best for precise wireless tracking, smooth glide, strong battery life, and unusually good 8K value. Skip it if you need polished software, quiet snappy clicks, true left-handed controls, or gentle...

Pros: software usability, sensor performance

Cons: RGB features, scroll wheel quality