Compare Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX vs Logitech G Pro Wireless

Durability over time had limited evidence but one month of use showed the coating had not decayed.

Durability over time was mixed: the shell and long-term use often held up, but double-click, middle-click, coating, and skate wear concerns appeared.

Cross-platform compatibility was limited by the lack of Bluetooth and multi-device switching, making it less flexible than generalist mice.

Cross-platform compatibility was only lightly covered but positively described when the software and OS range were mentioned.

Handedness options were a drawback because the DEX is strongly right-handed and several reviewers warned left-handers away.

Handedness options were consistently praised because the mouse is truly ambidextrous with swappable side buttons.

Switch durability evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no double clicks or related issues during testing.

Switch durability was sharply mixed: several reviewers had no double-clicking, while others reported or emphasized double-click failures.

Click noise was a caveat: main clicks were often loud or high-pitched, though some found the noise acceptable or preference-based.

Click noise was viewed favorably in the few reviews that addressed it, with comments about quiet or pleasant-sounding clicks.

Side buttons were the most divisive control: some found them easy and great in game, while many criticized mushiness, high placement, or extra travel.

Side button quality was highly praised for placement, click feel, modularity, and ambidextrous flexibility.

Lift-off options were inconsistent across reviews: one reviewer could set LOD, another disliked the lack of millimeter values, and another found no adjustment.

Lift-off distance was praised as low and unobtrusive where tested, though software adjustment was absent.

Profile switching was a recurring weakness because reviewers missed a physical DPI/profile button and disliked leaving games to change settings.

Profile and DPI switching were useful when remapped, but bottom placement made quick switching less convenient for some users.

MOBA gaming suitability had limited, mixed evidence, with one reviewer saying DOTA2 did not reveal much difference.

MOBA suitability received limited negative evidence because the mouse lacks extra buttons for that genre.

Cable flexibility was a repeated complaint, with reviewers calling the cable bad, not ultralight, or unsuitable for wired use.

Cable feedback was mixed: some liked its flexibility or quality, while others complained it dragged, felt sticky, or was heavy and stiff.

Surface compatibility was adequate but not universal, with one reviewer preferring padded surfaces and another reporting no glass-pad tracking issues.

Surface compatibility was positive where discussed, with calibration or pad testing producing strong sensor behavior.

Programmable button evidence was mixed: G Hub assignment was useful, but the five-button layout and lack of extra controls limited flexibility.

Programmable buttons were praised for useful remapping and G-Shift style layers, though minimalist button count limited some use cases.

Claw grip comfort was mixed, working for relaxed claw or some users while feeling too large or high for others.

Claw grip comfort was strong, with reviewers saying the mouse suited claw grips well and caused little discomfort during long play.

Materials quality was praised as premium and well assembled in the few reviews that explicitly judged the materials.

Materials quality was not strongly separated from build, but plastic material comments supported a mixed view of smooth lightweight materials versus limited premium finish.

Dock compatibility was valued through Powerplay support, with reviewers praising continuous charging or easy mat integration despite cost caveats.

PowerPlay or wireless-charging compatibility was treated as a useful convenience, though micro-USB charging itself felt dated to one reviewer.

Premium feel was mixed: one reviewer initially found it budget-like due to lightness, while another praised the in-hand quality.

Premium feel was mixed: some called it luxurious, while others felt the plain plastic design lacked polish for the price.

Fingertip comfort was generally weak because the larger hump and body interfered with finger micro-adjustments, with only one reviewer finding it workable.

Fingertip comfort was mixed, with some reviewers finding it tailor-made and others finding taper or size less ideal.

Value for money was the most common strategic concern because reviewers liked the performance but repeatedly called the price high or premium.

Value for money was mixed: many reviewers felt performance justified the price or sale value, but the premium launch price drew repeated criticism.

RGB absence was mostly framed as acceptable or even beneficial for battery and subtle looks, though it makes the mouse less flashy.

RGB features were usually considered basic or restrained, with some appreciating battery savings and others wishing for more or none at all.

Ecosystem integration was strong where mentioned, especially G Hub plus Logitech hardware features that set the mouse apart.

Ecosystem integration evidence was limited but positive where Logitech device lighting sync was demonstrated.

Weight tuning evidence was limited to modding; removing components lowered weight but hurt the reviewer’s sense of balance.

Weight tuning evidence was mixed, with one review wishing for added weights and another noting a 10g weight option.

Long-session comfort was generally positive thanks to low weight and ergonomics, though awkward grip demands caused fatigue for one reviewer.

Long-session comfort was repeatedly praised, with reviewers reporting no fatigue, cramping, or discomfort after extended sessions.

Palm grip comfort was usually strong, with reviewers praising the larger ergonomic rear and palm support; one source still advised some palm users toward a rival.

Palm grip comfort was strong for some hand sizes, though larger-hand palm users may not find the low profile ideal.

The DPI ceiling was treated as extremely high and impressive, with fine adjustment praised by reviewers who used G Hub.

DPI range and adjustment were praised as broad and easy to customize, even if bottom-button placement was divisive.

Glide smoothness was mixed: some praised effortless movement and PTFE feet, while many enthusiasts disliked the stock skates and wanted replacements.

Glide smoothness was mostly positive, though one reviewer found the stock feet less impressive than competitor PTFE skates.

Portability was excellent because the compact receiver and onboard storage make the high-polling setup easy to pack.

Portability was helped by receiver storage and travel-friendly design, which reviewers found convenient.

Software stability was mixed to poor, led by a PC Gamer report of freezes, crashes, and reinstall trouble despite another reviewer finding basics usable.

Software stability was mixed because G Hub was useful but described as buggy or needing fixes.

The 8K wireless polling rate impressed reviewers for speed and smoothness, though several called it overkill or battery-hungry outside competitive play.

Polling/report-rate evidence was positive where reviewers connected 1ms reporting with smooth, responsive cursor behavior.

Switch feel was mostly praised for crisp, tactile Lightforce clicks, though some reviewers found them inconsistent, loud, or merely satisfactory.

Switch feel evidence was very positive in the PvP review, emphasizing unusually light mechanical switches.

Scroll wheel feedback was generally usable and often quiet or tactile, but several reviewers noted rattle, mushiness, or weaker click feel.

Scroll wheel quality was generally positive, praised for tactile, quiet, precise steps, although one reviewer wanted more defined steps.

Reviewers generally found tracking and aiming precise, with praise for pinpoint pixel work, fast shooters, and smooth control; one reviewer struggled mainly because the shape hurt aim.

Tracking accuracy was a major strength across reviews, with reviewers calling it extremely accurate, outstanding, and precise in real gameplay.

Onboard memory was valued for saving profiles and reducing dependence on G Hub, with reviewers noting multiple memory slots or dongle/profile convenience.

Onboard memory was useful for carrying profiles and settings between computers or tournament setups.

Acceleration control was positively judged where tested, with movement described as consistent and free of acceleration or smoothing.

Reviewers who discussed acceleration were positive, repeatedly describing no acceleration or prediction and framing this as part of the sensor's clean competitive tracking.

Software usability was generally good when G Hub worked, with useful profiles, remapping, macros, and calibration; memory use and interface speed drew criticism.

Software usability was generally praised as easy, functional, and flexible for DPI, macros, lighting, and profiles.

FPS gaming suitability was strong overall, with praise for shooters, responsiveness, and control; negative reports centered on hand-size/shape fit rather than sensor performance.

FPS suitability was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers praising the mouse for fast-paced shooters, tracking, flicks, and competitive play.

Shape comfort split reviewers: many loved the ergonomic, right-handed shape, while several found it too bulky, awkward, or hand-size dependent.

Shape comfort was broadly praised as safe, comfortable, and adaptable, though a few reviewers wanted different hump, width, or taper details.

Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers reporting sturdy construction, no flex, no rattle, and solid fit despite the low weight.

Build quality drew strong praise for a light shell that still felt robust, solid, and free of flex, with a few durability caveats elsewhere.

Ergonomic design was a major positive overall, with reviewers praising the hand support, contoured right-handed form, and FPS-friendly ergonomic balance.

Ergonomic design was praised for a safe, adaptable shape that does not force one grip style.

Button customization was strong in software, especially drag-and-drop remapping, but constrained by the DEX's simplified button layout.

Button customization was a consistent strength thanks to removable side buttons and software remapping options.

Main click quality was usually strong, with repeated praise for tactile, crisp, snappy clicks, though a few reviewers wanted a sharper or more premium feel.

Left and right click quality was a standout strength, often described as crisp, satisfying, light, and precise.

Weight was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as feather-light, ultra-light, or impressively low for its size.

Weight was a major strength; most reviewers praised the 80g class as exceptionally light, though ultralight trends made it less dominant later.

Click/input latency was mostly praised as immediate, responsive, or low, with one measured latency result landing only mid-pack despite still being usable.

Click latency was consistently praised as imperceptible or effectively wired-like.

Wireless latency was praised as low or highly responsive, helping several reviewers feel comfortable using it wirelessly for serious gaming.

Wireless latency was consistently praised as wired-like, lag-free, or impossible to notice in play.

Grip texture was mixed: some liked the dry or grippy coating, while others found it too smooth, sticky over time, or in need of tape.

Grip texture was mixed: the matte plastic was comfortable and sometimes grippy enough, but several reviewers wanted more texture or noticed slipping.

Macro support was useful through G Hub, but the limited button count reduced how far reviewers could take macro-heavy setups.

Macro support was positively mentioned through Logitech software and G-Shift style customization.

Battery life was widely praised as long-lasting, often exceeding expectations, though high polling rates were noted to drain it faster.

Battery life was broadly praised as excellent for a rechargeable wireless gaming mouse, though one long-term reviewer found it needed charging too often.

The Hero 2 sensor was repeatedly described as top-tier, flawless, or working perfectly, with only isolated uncertainty around real-world need for the highest specs.

Sensor performance was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as flawless, high tier, accurate, and responsive.

Skate durability was mixed: one reviewer valued long-lasting skates, while others recommended replacement or noted wear concerns.

Skate durability had limited mixed evidence, with long-term wear or movement noted but replacements considered easy.

Button responsiveness was one of the stronger areas, with many reviewers calling clicks tactile, immediate, snappy, or super responsive.

Button responsiveness was rated highly, with reviewers repeatedly describing crisp, stable, light, and precise clicks.

Balance was mostly praised as well distributed and fatigue-free, though one reviewer felt the rear-heavy balance hurt lift-offs.

Weight distribution was generally praised as even, central, or perfectly balanced, supporting the mouse's light and controlled feel.

Charging convenience was strong when using USB-C or Powerplay, though one reviewer criticized the full recharge time.

Charging convenience was mostly positive, helped by fast charging, wired-use capability, and PowerPlay support, though micro-USB was viewed as dated.

Bluetooth support was a weakness because it is absent, though some reviewers accepted the tradeoff for weight and responsiveness.

Bluetooth support was a limitation where discussed; reviewers noted the mouse relies on its receiver and wished Bluetooth were included.

Wireless performance was consistently excellent, with reviewers reporting fast, stable, lag-free, high-performance wireless use.

Wireless performance was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly saying the connection felt flawless, responsive, and liberating.

Connection stability was positive where tested, with no issues on Windows, reliable wireless impressions, and supportive receiver setup comments.

Connection stability was usually excellent, with several reviewers reporting no stutter or dropouts, though one long-term owner noted past dropouts.

Motion stayed consistent in fast movements, with reviewers reporting no acceleration, smoothing, or loss of tracking while sliding quickly.

Motion consistency was excellent in testing, with reviewers reporting no spinouts and smooth, consistent tracking.

2.4GHz connectivity was praised for stable, speedy Lightspeed/2.4GHz operation and high polling without a bulky receiver.

MMO suitability was mixed-to-negative: extra functions are possible, but several reviewers said the limited button count is not ideal for MMO users.