Compare Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX vs Logitech G502 X Plus

The 8K wireless polling rate impressed reviewers for speed and smoothness, though several called it overkill or battery-hungry outside competitive play.

Polling rate was a limitation in one review because the mouse is capped at 1kHz with no higher-rate dongle option.

Profile switching was a recurring weakness because reviewers missed a physical DPI/profile button and disliked leaving games to change settings.

Profile switching had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer appreciating quick profile cycling in loading screens.

Cross-platform compatibility was limited by the lack of Bluetooth and multi-device switching, making it less flexible than generalist mice.

Cross-platform compatibility had limited positive evidence through onboard memory helping when using the mouse on multiple systems.

Programmable button evidence was mixed: G Hub assignment was useful, but the five-button layout and lack of extra controls limited flexibility.

Programmable buttons were widely valued for genre flexibility, productivity, and accessible control layouts.

2.4GHz connectivity was praised for stable, speedy Lightspeed/2.4GHz operation and high polling without a bulky receiver.

2.4GHz connectivity was mixed: setup through the dongle was easy, but one review disliked the rattly dongle storage.

Surface compatibility was adequate but not universal, with one reviewer preferring padded surfaces and another reporting no glass-pad tracking issues.

Surface compatibility evidence was positive, with reviewers noting smooth glide or hiccup-free performance across surfaces and environments.

Glide smoothness was mixed: some praised effortless movement and PTFE feet, while many enthusiasts disliked the stock skates and wanted replacements.

Glide smoothness was one of the strongest traits, with reviewers praising PTFE feet, low drag, and smooth movement on desks and pads.

Weight was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as feather-light, ultra-light, or impressively low for its size.

Weight opinions were mixed: some appreciated the lighter G502 refresh or balanced heft, while competitive-focused reviewers still found it heavy.

Fingertip comfort was generally weak because the larger hump and body interfered with finger micro-adjustments, with only one reviewer finding it workable.

Fingertip comfort was generally positive but size-dependent, with one reviewer warning fingertip users may prefer a less substantial mouse.

Materials quality was praised as premium and well assembled in the few reviews that explicitly judged the materials.

Materials quality was mixed: one review praised the plastics and rubber linings, while another disliked the slicker scroll-wheel material.

Lift-off options were inconsistent across reviews: one reviewer could set LOD, another disliked the lack of millimeter values, and another found no adjustment.

Lift-off distance tuning was a weakness in one review because adjustable lift-off distance was missing.

Handedness options were a drawback because the DEX is strongly right-handed and several reviewers warned left-handers away.

Handedness options were poor in the available evidence because the mouse is designed for right-handed users only.

Scroll wheel feedback was generally usable and often quiet or tactile, but several reviewers noted rattle, mushiness, or weaker click feel.

Scroll wheel quality was the most divisive feature, with some praising versatility and improved stability while others criticized stiffness, noise, wobble, backlash, or cheap feel.

Long-session comfort was generally positive thanks to low weight and ergonomics, though awkward grip demands caused fatigue for one reviewer.

Long-session comfort was strongly positive where mentioned, with reviewers praising multi-hour and extended-use comfort.

Onboard memory was valued for saving profiles and reducing dependence on G Hub, with reviewers noting multiple memory slots or dongle/profile convenience.

Onboard memory was useful for carrying profiles or avoiding software after setup, but one review criticized Logitech's implementation.

Portability was excellent because the compact receiver and onboard storage make the high-polling setup easy to pack.

Portability was positive in limited evidence, with reviewers liking receiver storage and easy bag carry.

MOBA gaming suitability had limited, mixed evidence, with one reviewer saying DOTA2 did not reveal much difference.

MOBA suitability was positive in limited evidence, with reviewers saying the controls worked well for MOBA play.

Balance was mostly praised as well distributed and fatigue-free, though one reviewer felt the rear-heavy balance hurt lift-offs.

Weight balance evidence was limited and mixed-positive, with one reviewer noting back-heaviness and another saying balance improved.

Dock compatibility was valued through Powerplay support, with reviewers praising continuous charging or easy mat integration despite cost caveats.

Dock compatibility was useful when paired with Powerplay, but reviewers criticized the extra cost or missing included puck.

Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers reporting sturdy construction, no flex, no rattle, and solid fit despite the low weight.

Build quality was rated highly, with reviewers calling it solid, sturdy, durable, and well-built.

Click/input latency was mostly praised as immediate, responsive, or low, with one measured latency result landing only mid-pack despite still being usable.

Click latency and response were viewed positively overall, with reviewers praising snappier timing, low-latency response, and instant-feeling switches.

Cable flexibility was a repeated complaint, with reviewers calling the cable bad, not ultralight, or unsuitable for wired use.

Cable flexibility was criticized in one review because the included cable felt basic compared with flexible braided alternatives.

Software stability was mixed to poor, led by a PC Gamer report of freezes, crashes, and reinstall trouble despite another reviewer finding basics usable.

Software stability had one negative report involving an apparent DPI-setting loop.

Switch durability evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no double clicks or related issues during testing.

Switch durability had limited evidence, but one reviewer reported no double-click issues during their testing period.

Macro support was useful through G Hub, but the limited button count reduced how far reviewers could take macro-heavy setups.

Macro support was positively received, with reviewers finding macro setup and assignment options useful despite broader software complaints.

Battery life was widely praised as long-lasting, often exceeding expectations, though high polling rates were noted to drain it faster.

Battery life was mostly positive and often praised as long, but RGB drain and one poor real-world result kept opinions from being unanimous.

The DPI ceiling was treated as extremely high and impressive, with fine adjustment praised by reviewers who used G Hub.

DPI control was generally praised for its wide range and fine increments, though one reviewer questioned the practical value of ultra-high DPI.

Reviewers generally found tracking and aiming precise, with praise for pinpoint pixel work, fast shooters, and smooth control; one reviewer struggled mainly because the shape hurt aim.

Reviewers consistently praised tracking accuracy, saying the mouse stayed precise, true, and hiccup-free across gaming and everyday use.

FPS gaming suitability was strong overall, with praise for shooters, responsiveness, and control; negative reports centered on hand-size/shape fit rather than sensor performance.

FPS suitability was mixed: accuracy, buttons, and DPI helped some reviewers, while weight made others reject it for serious competitive FPS.

Click noise was a caveat: main clicks were often loud or high-pitched, though some found the noise acceptable or preference-based.

Click noise had limited negative evidence, with one review saying the primary keys and especially the wheel were relatively loud.

Side buttons were the most divisive control: some found them easy and great in game, while many criticized mushiness, high placement, or extra travel.

Side button feedback was mixed: some reviewers liked the improved shapes and placement, while many complained about accidental presses or squeaks.

Bluetooth support was a weakness because it is absent, though some reviewers accepted the tradeoff for weight and responsiveness.

Bluetooth support was a repeated weakness because reviewers noted the mouse lacks Bluetooth and is less versatile for multi-device use.

Ergonomic design was a major positive overall, with reviewers praising the hand support, contoured right-handed form, and FPS-friendly ergonomic balance.

Ergonomic design was praised for refined comfort, natural hand fit, and better extended-use ergonomics.

Button customization was strong in software, especially drag-and-drop remapping, but constrained by the DEX's simplified button layout.

Button customization was a clear strength, with reviewers praising remapping, physical DPI-shift adjustability, and flexible control setups.

Wireless latency was praised as low or highly responsive, helping several reviewers feel comfortable using it wirelessly for serious gaming.

Wireless latency was strongly praised overall, though one review noted the 1kHz limit can feel subtly behind higher-polling mice in elite play.

Wireless performance was consistently excellent, with reviewers reporting fast, stable, lag-free, high-performance wireless use.

Wireless performance was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly describing it as excellent, stable, responsive, or effectively wired-like.

Button responsiveness was one of the stronger areas, with many reviewers calling clicks tactile, immediate, snappy, or super responsive.

Button responsiveness was consistently strong, with tactile, well-built, satisfying clicks and quick in-game response.

Grip texture was mixed: some liked the dry or grippy coating, while others found it too smooth, sticky over time, or in need of tape.

Grip texture was mostly praised for comfort, reliable hold, and premium-feeling rubber, though one reviewer disliked the sticky rubber sides.

RGB absence was mostly framed as acceptable or even beneficial for battery and subtle looks, though it makes the mouse less flashy.

RGB was praised for style, customization, and vivid lighting, but several reviewers noted battery drain or questioned whether the Plus model is worth it for RGB alone.

Connection stability was positive where tested, with no issues on Windows, reliable wireless impressions, and supportive receiver setup comments.

Connection stability was excellent in the scored evidence, with reviewers reporting no hiccups or meaningful slip-ups.

Ecosystem integration was strong where mentioned, especially G Hub plus Logitech hardware features that set the mouse apart.

Ecosystem integration was a strength, with praise for shared receivers, G Hub device management, Lightsync, and Logitech peripheral syncing.

Software usability was generally good when G Hub worked, with useful profiles, remapping, macros, and calibration; memory use and interface speed drew criticism.

Software usability split reviewers: some found G Hub easy or intuitive, while others called button programming complicated or the software poor.

Weight tuning evidence was limited to modding; removing components lowered weight but hurt the reviewer’s sense of balance.

Weight tuning was consistently viewed as a downgrade because the older adjustable weight system is gone.

Main click quality was usually strong, with repeated praise for tactile, crisp, snappy clicks, though a few reviewers wanted a sharper or more premium feel.

Left and right click quality was positive overall, with praise for satisfying primary clicks and pleasant pressure points.

Charging convenience was strong when using USB-C or Powerplay, though one reviewer criticized the full recharge time.

Charging convenience was generally positive thanks to USB-C and charge-while-playing, though one reviewer found the USB-C port fiddly.

Shape comfort split reviewers: many loved the ergonomic, right-handed shape, while several found it too bulky, awkward, or hand-size dependent.

Shape comfort was broadly positive, especially for larger hands and G502 fans, though a few reviewers found it cramped or size-dependent.

Switch feel was mostly praised for crisp, tactile Lightforce clicks, though some reviewers found them inconsistent, loud, or merely satisfactory.

Switch feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly praising crisp, tactile, clicky, premium-feeling hybrid switches.

Palm grip comfort was usually strong, with reviewers praising the larger ergonomic rear and palm support; one source still advised some palm users toward a rival.

Palm grip comfort was favorable, with reviewers saying the shape supports palm grip well.

Premium feel was mixed: one reviewer initially found it budget-like due to lightness, while another praised the in-hand quality.

Premium feel was mostly positive, with reviewers describing premium, stylish, polished qualities, though one said it could feel cheap.

Value for money was the most common strategic concern because reviewers liked the performance but repeatedly called the price high or premium.

Value for money was the biggest broad concern, with many reviewers calling the mouse expensive or questioning the Plus price premium.

The Hero 2 sensor was repeatedly described as top-tier, flawless, or working perfectly, with only isolated uncertainty around real-world need for the highest specs.

Sensor feedback was strongly positive; reviewers described the HERO sensor as snappy, smooth, precise, and still among the best they had used.

Claw grip comfort was mixed, working for relaxed claw or some users while feeling too large or high for others.

Claw grip comfort was mixed, with one review saying it suits claw or hybrid grips and another saying claw users may want a smaller mouse.

Motion stayed consistent in fast movements, with reviewers reporting no acceleration, smoothing, or loss of tracking while sliding quickly.

Motion consistency drew strong praise where tested, with reviewers reporting no stutter and true tracking during long use.

Acceleration control was positively judged where tested, with movement described as consistent and free of acceleration or smoothing.

One review praised the lack of smoothing or acceleration, tying it directly to accurate, predictable tracking.

Durability over time had limited evidence but one month of use showed the coating had not decayed.

Durability over time had limited but positive long-term evidence from an 18-month owner who remained satisfied.

MMO suitability was mixed, with enough controls for some MMO/RPG use but not enough buttons for dedicated MMO players.

Skate durability was mixed: one reviewer valued long-lasting skates, while others recommended replacement or noted wear concerns.

Tilt controls were criticized because side-scrolling could require extra force or cause accidental scroll-wheel side inputs.