Compare Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX vs Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2

Battery life was widely praised as long-lasting, often exceeding expectations, though high polling rates were noted to drain it faster.

Battery life was generally praised as long-lasting, though reviewers noted it drops with higher polling rates.

Charging convenience was strong when using USB-C or Powerplay, though one reviewer criticized the full recharge time.

Charging convenience was praised for USB-C, faster charging, and fewer desk cables.

Cross-platform compatibility was limited by the lack of Bluetooth and multi-device switching, making it less flexible than generalist mice.

Cross-platform compatibility was praised through G Hub support for both Windows and macOS.

Lift-off options were inconsistent across reviews: one reviewer could set LOD, another disliked the lack of millimeter values, and another found no adjustment.

Lift-off distance control was viewed as useful and noticeably adjustable, especially for players who fine-tune mouse behavior.

Handedness options were a drawback because the DEX is strongly right-handed and several reviewers warned left-handers away.

Handedness support was mixed because the symmetrical shape helps lefties, but the side buttons remain left-side only.

The DPI ceiling was treated as extremely high and impressive, with fine adjustment praised by reviewers who used G Hub.

DPI coverage was seen as technically strong and granular, but one reviewer felt the extreme ceiling is more marketing than everyday value.

MOBA gaming suitability had limited, mixed evidence, with one reviewer saying DOTA2 did not reveal much difference.

MOBA suitability was weaker because one reviewer found the heavier clicks worse for spam-click games.

Scroll wheel feedback was generally usable and often quiet or tactile, but several reviewers noted rattle, mushiness, or weaker click feel.

Scroll wheel feedback was mixed, with some praise for tactility but repeated criticism that it felt stiff, mushy, vague, or less precise.

Onboard memory was valued for saving profiles and reducing dependence on G Hub, with reviewers noting multiple memory slots or dongle/profile convenience.

Onboard memory was supported by the ability to save multiple profiles, though evidence was more about usefulness than enthusiasm.

Grip texture was mixed: some liked the dry or grippy coating, while others found it too smooth, sticky over time, or in need of tape.

Grip texture was well received, with reviewers praising the grippy surface, recessed sides, or usefulness for clammy hands.

FPS gaming suitability was strong overall, with praise for shooters, responsiveness, and control; negative reports centered on hand-size/shape fit rather than sensor performance.

FPS suitability was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for speed, responsiveness, and competitive first-person shooter use.

Click/input latency was mostly praised as immediate, responsive, or low, with one measured latency result landing only mid-pack despite still being usable.

Click latency was praised as very low by some reviewers, though one technical reviewer found it merely good rather than flagship-leading.

Acceleration control was positively judged where tested, with movement described as consistent and free of acceleration or smoothing.

Acceleration feel received direct praise in one review, where the reviewer enjoyed its smoothness in Diablo IV.

Portability was excellent because the compact receiver and onboard storage make the high-polling setup easy to pack.

Portability was supported by the dongle-storage cover, which one reviewer framed as essential for esports travel.

Premium feel was mixed: one reviewer initially found it budget-like due to lightness, while another praised the in-hand quality.

Premium feel was positive overall, with reviewers saying the mouse feels sturdy, premium, and high quality.

Weight tuning evidence was limited to modding; removing components lowered weight but hurt the reviewer’s sense of balance.

Weight tuning was weakly received because the swappable cover options were seen as features most people would not find useful.

The 8K wireless polling rate impressed reviewers for speed and smoothness, though several called it overkill or battery-hungry outside competitive play.

Polling-rate opinions were mixed: several reviewers felt clear responsiveness gains, while others saw 2,000Hz as fine but not industry-leading.

RGB absence was mostly framed as acceptable or even beneficial for battery and subtle looks, though it makes the mouse less flashy.

The lack of RGB was generally accepted as a worthwhile tradeoff for battery life, weight, and the mouse’s clean look.

Dock compatibility was valued through Powerplay support, with reviewers praising continuous charging or easy mat integration despite cost caveats.

PowerPlay compatibility was viewed positively, though one reviewer called the accessory expensive.

Surface compatibility was adequate but not universal, with one reviewer preferring padded surfaces and another reporting no glass-pad tracking issues.

Surface compatibility was mixed, with good results across many surfaces but complaints on softer pads and warnings to tune surface modes.

Profile switching was a recurring weakness because reviewers missed a physical DPI/profile button and disliked leaving games to change settings.

Profile behavior was mixed: app-linked settings were useful, but onboard-profile handling was described as confusing in G Hub.

Switch feel was mostly praised for crisp, tactile Lightforce clicks, though some reviewers found them inconsistent, loud, or merely satisfactory.

Switch feel split reviewers: many loved the crisp, tactile Lightforce feel, while others found the clicks heavier or too tactile.

Connection stability was positive where tested, with no issues on Windows, reliable wireless impressions, and supportive receiver setup comments.

Connection stability was praised in one review for not faltering even in a difficult RF environment.

Ecosystem integration was strong where mentioned, especially G Hub plus Logitech hardware features that set the mouse apart.

Ecosystem integration was praised for Logitech presets, backward compatibility, and community/profile support.

Main click quality was usually strong, with repeated praise for tactile, crisp, snappy clicks, though a few reviewers wanted a sharper or more premium feel.

Left and right clicks were praised for satisfying tactility, light rapid tapping, and improved main-button feel.

Motion stayed consistent in fast movements, with reviewers reporting no acceleration, smoothing, or loss of tracking while sliding quickly.

Motion consistency was described positively, with reviewers calling motion smooth, sharp, and accurate.

2.4GHz connectivity was praised for stable, speedy Lightspeed/2.4GHz operation and high polling without a bulky receiver.

The 2.4GHz connection was praised through an instant, fast connection experience with the included dongle.

Wireless latency was praised as low or highly responsive, helping several reviewers feel comfortable using it wirelessly for serious gaming.

Wireless latency was praised directly, with reviewers reporting no latency issues or seemingly no latency at all.

Balance was mostly praised as well distributed and fatigue-free, though one reviewer felt the rear-heavy balance hurt lift-offs.

Weight distribution received positive evidence from a reviewer who specifically praised the balance.

Weight was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as feather-light, ultra-light, or impressively low for its size.

Reviewers strongly praised the low weight, calling it excellent, effortless, and well balanced for the mouse size.

Glide smoothness was mixed: some praised effortless movement and PTFE feet, while many enthusiasts disliked the stock skates and wanted replacements.

Glide smoothness was highly mixed: some reviewers praised effortless glide, while others disliked stock-skate drag or control-heavy movement.

Cable flexibility was a repeated complaint, with reviewers calling the cable bad, not ultralight, or unsuitable for wired use.

Cable quality was a recurring complaint, with reviewers criticizing drag, resistance, and the dated rubber cable.

Fingertip comfort was generally weak because the larger hump and body interfered with finger micro-adjustments, with only one reviewer finding it workable.

Fingertip grip comfort was praised by reviewers who found the shape comfortable for fingertip use.

Palm grip comfort was usually strong, with reviewers praising the larger ergonomic rear and palm support; one source still advised some palm users toward a rival.

Palm grip comfort was limited by one review saying palm-grip players may be better served elsewhere.

Skate durability was mixed: one reviewer valued long-lasting skates, while others recommended replacement or noted wear concerns.

Skate durability was a repeated concern, with reviewers calling the PTFE feet thin, meh, or unlikely to last long.

Claw grip comfort was mixed, working for relaxed claw or some users while feeling too large or high for others.

Claw grip comfort was broadly positive, with reviewers calling the mouse comfortable or easy to use for claw grip.

Long-session comfort was generally positive thanks to low weight and ergonomics, though awkward grip demands caused fatigue for one reviewer.

Long-session comfort was strongly positive in one review that reported almost no hand fatigue after long sessions.

Ergonomic design was a major positive overall, with reviewers praising the hand support, contoured right-handed form, and FPS-friendly ergonomic balance.

Ergonomics were generally positive for comfort and contouring, but one review noted large hands may find the shape less ergonomic.

Shape comfort split reviewers: many loved the ergonomic, right-handed shape, while several found it too bulky, awkward, or hand-size dependent.

Shape comfort was broadly praised as safe, familiar, and very comfortable, though a few reviewers disliked the rounded shape personally.

Switch durability evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no double clicks or related issues during testing.

Switch durability evidence centered on optical-switch reliability and reduced double-click concerns, with reviewers treating it as a meaningful benefit.

Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers reporting sturdy construction, no flex, no rattle, and solid fit despite the low weight.

Build quality was repeatedly praised as solid, squeak-free, well put together, and elite despite the light shell.

Durability over time had limited evidence but one month of use showed the coating had not decayed.

Durability over time had limited but positive evidence from a longer-use reviewer whose unit remained rock solid.

Materials quality was praised as premium and well assembled in the few reviews that explicitly judged the materials.

Materials quality was praised for a cool, soft matte plastic feel.

Software stability was mixed to poor, led by a PC Gamer report of freezes, crashes, and reinstall trouble despite another reviewer finding basics usable.

Software stability had limited but positive evidence from one review calling the G Hub interface stable.

Programmable button evidence was mixed: G Hub assignment was useful, but the five-button layout and lack of extra controls limited flexibility.

Programmable side buttons were useful to one reviewer for DPI adjustment, especially because the mouse lacks a dedicated DPI button.

Button responsiveness was one of the stronger areas, with many reviewers calling clicks tactile, immediate, snappy, or super responsive.

Button responsiveness was mostly praised for tactile, responsive clicks, though one reviewer disliked the heavier actuation for spam clicking.

Button customization was strong in software, especially drag-and-drop remapping, but constrained by the DEX's simplified button layout.

Customization drew positive comments for granular controls and strong software-hardware integration, though it still depends heavily on G Hub.

Side buttons were the most divisive control: some found them easy and great in game, while many criticized mushiness, high placement, or extra travel.

Side button quality was the most contested control area, ranging from well-placed and improved to repeatedly described as mushy.

Software usability was generally good when G Hub worked, with useful profiles, remapping, macros, and calibration; memory use and interface speed drew criticism.

Software usability was split sharply: some reviewers found G Hub easy and powerful, while others called it unintuitive or frustrating.

Macro support was useful through G Hub, but the limited button count reduced how far reviewers could take macro-heavy setups.

Macro support was praised for an easy-to-use macro tool that guides users through setup.

Value for money was the most common strategic concern because reviewers liked the performance but repeatedly called the price high or premium.

Value was mixed: reviewers praised the performance tier but often questioned the price and upgrade value from the original Superlight.

Click noise was a caveat: main clicks were often loud or high-pitched, though some found the noise acceptable or preference-based.

Click noise was mixed: some liked the satisfying click sound, while others found it loud or high-pitched.

The Hero 2 sensor was repeatedly described as top-tier, flawless, or working perfectly, with only isolated uncertainty around real-world need for the highest specs.

The HERO 2 sensor was widely praised as crisp, precise, fast, and close to flawless, though some reviewers framed the higher specs as incremental.

Wireless performance was consistently excellent, with reviewers reporting fast, stable, lag-free, high-performance wireless use.

Wireless performance was praised as seamless and flawless, with no cable-related compromise in use.

Reviewers generally found tracking and aiming precise, with praise for pinpoint pixel work, fast shooters, and smooth control; one reviewer struggled mainly because the shape hurt aim.

Reviewers consistently described the mouse as accurate in games, with especially strong praise for tracking, pointer accuracy, and shot control.

Bluetooth support was a weakness because it is absent, though some reviewers accepted the tradeoff for weight and responsiveness.

Drag click support had limited positive evidence from one reviewer who called drag clicking pretty awesome.