Compare eufy Robot Vacuum Omni S1 Pro vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro

Ease of use was positive, with the app described as easy to use and well laid out.

The system is friendly to newcomers, with guided setup and an app that makes the core controls easy to understand before exposing deeper customization.

Wet-spill handling was a standout in some tests, but one reviewer warned against large wet spills because there is no mop-only mode.

Fresh spills are a clear weakness. Spinning pads tend to spread coffee or other liquids instead of extracting them, so larger wet messes are better handled manually.

Carpet hair pickup was weak in the pet-hair test, where it left the most hair tufts.

Cat-hair pickup averaged a respectable 87% across the standardized hard-floor and low-pile tests. Hair collection is good, though not quite as dominant as the robot's debris pickup.

Odor control had a maintenance caveat because residual dirty water could smell if the robot was not used daily.

Hot washing and heated drying keep mop pads noticeably fresher and help prevent mouldy or unpleasant smells. This is especially useful in homes that mop frequently.

The dock was praised as a brilliant use of space despite its unusual vertical form.

The rounded dock is wider and more visually prominent than some premium alternatives. It needs meaningful floor and overhead space, even if its styling works in modern rooms.

Maintenance was not fully hands-off because tanks, filters, and dirty-water parts still needed recurring attention.

The dock removes much of the routine work by auto-emptying dust, washing and drying mops, detecting dirt, and in some cases triggering repeat cleaning. Manual detergent dosing and occasional tank or bag service remain.

Streaking and residue control were major strengths, especially compared with spinning-pad systems.

Spinning pads can leave sticky smears or tacky residue after liquid spills, especially ketchup or coffee. On ordinary damp mopping, however, some tests found very clean, residue-free results.

Medium-pile carpet pickup was below average in one rice pickup test.

Medium-pile carpet also performs very well, with strong measured pickup and visibly more fine dust extracted than an older Curv in comparative use.

Tangle resistance was mixed: the vacuum brush tangled with long hair in one test, but another reviewer saw no mop-drive hair wrap.

The DuoDivide anti-tangle system is exceptionally effective with pet hair and long human hair. Multiple long-use tests reported little to no hair wrapped around the main brush.

Mop lifting was mixed, keeping medium-pile carpets dry in one test but raising too late over carpet corners in another.

Automatic lifting and dock-side mop removal are genuinely useful on carpet. They keep rugs and carpet fibers drier and reduce cross-contamination compared with simply dragging raised wet pads over fabric.

The detergent/liquid system was praised for removing the guesswork from premixing solution.

There is no automatic detergent dispenser, so solution must be measured into the clean-water tank manually. Some testers disliked the omission, while others considered it a minor, rational compromise.

Dried-on stain removal was a major strength across tests, with the S1 Pro leading or near-leading mopping stain results.

Performance on dried messes is inconsistent. Some tests removed dried jam or light dried residue after repeated passes, while others found persistent or sticky stains beyond what the spinning pads handle well.

Pet-readiness was supported by object avoidance around dog waste, though separate carpet hair pickup evidence was weaker.

Pet owners benefit from excellent anti-tangle hair handling, strong carpet suction, and pet-aware behaviors that can stop the brush or divert the route. It is especially well suited to homes with shedding animals.

Small rug handling was good in one review, with the mop lift clearing small rugs in testing.

Rugs and carpets are handled confidently thanks to chassis lift, strong suction, and the ability to raise or leave mop pads behind. That combination keeps fabric surfaces drier while preserving strong vacuuming performance.

Versatility was helped by easy switching between vacuum-only and vacuum-and-mop modes.

The Curv 2 Pro handles mixed homes well by combining strong vacuuming, hard-floor mopping, carpet adaptation, configurable passes, and smart-home controls. It is at its best when floors and furniture vary room to room.

Crevice and groove cleaning was positive overall, especially in plank joints, though one test called it only decent.

Concentrated airflow is strong enough to lift fine dust and debris from grout lines, giving the robot useful cleaning reach beyond the flat surface.

Stuck resistance was mixed: the low-profile design helped avoid getting stuck, but longer pile rugs caused at least one issue.

Most navigation tests found the robot difficult to strand, even under furniture and in tight gaps. A loose shoelace did manage to tangle the brush badly enough to stop one test unit.

Obstacle avoidance was one of the clearest strengths, including a rare perfect score and strong real-world avoidance.

Obstacle avoidance is the most divided area. Some tests saw excellent handling of cables, toys, and small cars, while others found the robot repeatedly hit low or tiny objects and even tangled on a shoelace.

Clogging was a caveat in a stress test where the S1 Pro was the only unit to clog at an extreme fluff load.

The single-sided brush layout can leave hair or debris where the opposite wheel catches it. That wheel-area buildup is a weak point despite otherwise strong suction.

Hard-floor pet-hair and debris pickup was described as effective in a flagship comparison.

Cat-hair pickup averaged a respectable 87% across the standardized hard-floor and low-pile tests. Hard-floor hair performance is solid, with the larger concern being occasional wheel-side accumulation.

Hard-floor fine pickup was praised as excellent in at least one comparison review.

Fine dust is lifted strongly from hard floors, helped by the high suction and concentrated airflow. This is one of the vacuuming strengths.

Large debris handling on hard floors was strong, with reviewers saying it picked up extra-large debris.

Cheerios and cat litter scored in the high 90s in standardized pickup testing, showing strong ability with chunky household debris.

The removable mop roller was judged easy to remove and reinstall.

Automatic mop removal makes switching between vacuum-only carpet cleaning and hard-floor mopping effortless. The feature proved more useful in practice than it may sound on paper.

The lower-profile design helped the robot reach under more furniture.

Low-clearance cleaning is exceptional. The retractable LiDAR lets the robot reach under sofas, beds, wardrobes, TV stands, and other furniture that blocks taller robots.

Weight was a drawback for the base station, which one review described as a bit heavy.

The robot is described as fairly hefty, which matters mainly when lifting or handling it manually rather than during autonomous cleaning.

Large hard-floor debris intake was strong, with reviewers reporting high pickup and broad debris handling.

Large mixed debris is picked up very well on hard floors, including a 98% result on vinyl in one test. Some scattering can still happen near edges because of the side brush.

Overall sentiment was very positive for mopping, design, navigation, and hard floors, with recurring caveats around carpet and edge performance.

The overall impression is strongly positive: this is an advanced, highly capable robot vacuum with standout carpet cleaning, navigation, and low-clearance reach. Its biggest tradeoffs are inconsistent spinning-pad mopping, small-object avoidance, dock size, and premium pricing.

Reviewers repeatedly framed the S1 Pro as innovative because of its roller mop, low-profile navigation, and distinctive dock design.

The retractable low-profile navigation, adaptive chassis, automatic mop handling, and hot dock cleaning make this feel meaningfully more advanced than older Curv models. The dynamic carpet-height adaptation is especially distinctive.

Mapping and path efficiency were praised for coverage, easy map editing, and reliable room division.

Mapping and navigation are generally excellent, with systematic paths and reliable dock returns. Room naming can need correction and an occasional route may be longer than necessary, but getting lost is uncommon.

The onboard dust bin was viewed as somewhat small.

Auto-emptying works well, but the dock's deep, narrow dust-bag chamber drew criticism for its awkward shape. Pet-heavy homes may also fill bags much faster than low-shedding households.

Emptying and mess control were strong, with the dock completely emptying the dust bin in testing.

The dock's auto-empty system is powerful enough to clear bins packed with pet hair, and the large bag keeps disposal infrequent. This meaningfully reduces hands-on mess handling.

Furniture navigation and maneuverability drew strong praise, including avoiding contact and understanding tight spaces well.

Movement is smooth, graceful, and confident through narrow spaces. The robot can thread between tight furniture and benefits from capable wheels and chassis control.

The clear front water tank made water level checks easy at a glance.

The dock's fresh-water capacity keeps refilling relatively infrequent in normal use, though owners still need to top it up and empty dirty water periodically.

The dual side brushes and floating main brush were praised for working well together.

The missing second side brush hurts coverage on the left side and can let debris escape into the wheel area. The core DuoDivide brush works well, but the asymmetric edge hardware is a compromise.

The low-profile design was praised for reducing height and improving access under furniture.

At roughly 8 cm tall with the LiDAR retracted, the robot reaches places many premium competitors cannot. The low body is a practical advantage under sofas, beds, TV units, and other tight furniture.

Reviewers consistently liked the futuristic, distinctive design and said it looked attractive in the home.

The robot itself is widely seen as compact, polished, and modern, while the rounded white dock divides opinion. Some find the igloo-like station stylish and distinctive; others consider it bulky or too noticeable.

Edge and baseboard mopping was a weak spot, with multiple reviewers noting it did not clean right up to baseboards or walls.

Extendable mop and brush hardware usually cleans close to skirting boards and furniture edges. Vacuum-only edge pickup can still leave scattered debris, so results are better than basic round robots but not flawless.

Corner cleaning was mixed: the square shape helped in theory, but cautious navigation and missed areas limited results.

Extending side hardware reaches corners better than many circular robots, and several tests found it very effective. The single-sided brush layout can still leave some debris in the opposite corner channel.

Noise was described as roughly average in one dock/vacuum sound test rather than unusually quiet or unusually loud.

Normal robot cleaning is generally acceptable to quiet, with one test citing about 58 dB and another calling it average on Normal mode. The robot itself is much less intrusive than the auto-empty dock.

Suction evidence was mixed: reviewers praised above-average suction and easy pickup on hard floors, while one comparison review called its suction a little low.

The 25,000Pa vacuum system is a core strength, repeatedly praised for strong pickup on hard floors and carpet. It has enough airflow to lift fine dust, large debris, embedded grit, and hair.

Mopping performance was the strongest consensus positive, with multiple reviewers calling it best-in-class or top-tier.

Everyday mopping ranges from good to excellent on footprints and light stains, but the spinning-pad design is less consistent on sticky spills and stubborn messes. Some testers loved the pressure and coverage; others preferred roller-mop systems.

The ozone/sanitizing water system was treated as a notable cleaning feature, though evidence was mostly tied to the water system rather than independent lab verification.

The 100°C mop-wash cycle is credited with reducing germs and leaving the pads cleaner. It adds a hygiene advantage for kitchens, bathrooms, and other frequently mopped areas.

Comparative performance was strong for cleaning innovation and mopping, though one ranking placed another robot ahead overall.

The Curv 2 Pro stands out for carpet cleaning, slim clearance, and automation, but it is not a universal upgrade over every nearby model. Roller-mop rivals can clean wet messes better, and some competitors are stronger at small-object avoidance or cost less.

The automated dock made ownership easier by handling major cleaning-cycle tasks with minimal user work.

The combination of strong vacuuming, automatic carpet adaptation, detailed scheduling, and a highly capable dock makes daily floor care unusually hands-off. The main manual exceptions are wet spills, detergent dosing, and periodic tank or bag service.

Dock drying noise was noticeable, especially when the roller rotated during drying.

The dock's auto-empty burst is clearly louder than normal robot cleaning and can exceed 70 dB, although it lasts only briefly. Mop drying is much quieter and generally unobtrusive.

The self-cleaning cycle impressed in dock washing tests and left the roller looking clean.

The dock is a major convenience feature, automatically washing and drying mop pads and in some cases re-washing or re-mopping dirtier areas. Mop maintenance is far less hands-on than with basic robot docks.

The app and automation story was mixed: the apps were solid, but yui lacked some integrations and advanced options.

The Roborock app is a major strength, with deep scheduling, per-room settings, routines, SmartPlan-style automation, voice control, and Matter support. Automation is broad enough to make day-to-day cleaning largely hands-off.

Controls were considered useful and convenient, especially the base controls for switching cleaning modes.

The app is one of the product's clearest advantages: clean, highly configurable, and approachable despite its depth. Room editing, suction, water level, pass count, schedules, and dock behavior are all easy to tune.

Docking and auto-empty reliability were strong, with reviewers reporting near-complete or complete bin emptying.

Dock operation is notably dependable: the robot returns successfully, empties packed bins, and hands off mop care with little intervention. Several tests found the station faultless or especially well thought out.

Price was a tradeoff: reviewers called it high, but also noted it undercut some competing flagships.

The premium price is easier to justify for buyers who will use the advanced chassis, automation, and carpet performance. Budget-focused shoppers can get much of the everyday cleaning capability from cheaper models.

Value-for-money was helped by a flagship price that was lower than some rival flagships.

Value is good for buyers who prioritize automation, carpet performance, and the slim adaptive chassis, but the premium is not essential for basic floor cleaning. Cheaper Roborock models deliver a large share of the core performance.

AdaptiLift is one of the standout hardware features, helping the robot cross tall thresholds and maintain better contact on thick carpets. It worked very well in most tests, with only the densest high-pile carpet exposing limits.

Thick-carpet cleaning is a major strength: strong suction plus the lifting chassis pulls out embedded grit and avoids bogging down on many deep-pile surfaces. Extremely dense carpet can still hold onto some buried hair or dust.

Low-pile carpet performance was strong in measured testing, reaching about 90% pickup in the cited test setup. It is a dependable surface for this robot.

Measured consumption was around 10 kWh per month for daily 50-square-meter vacuum-and-mop cleaning, with standby draw described as manageable at about 3.5 W.

Hard-floor seal and crevice pickup were decent rather than class-leading.

The left-side channel can collect clumps that the single brush arm fails to funnel into suction. In one test, cat hair became lodged around the opposite wheel.

Standard mixed cleaning used roughly 40% of the battery over 50 square meters, implying about 100 square meters before returning to charge.

The ultra-slim body is particularly useful in furnished apartments and low-clearance homes, cleaning under furniture that would otherwise require manual sweeping.

Setup is consistently easy, with pre-assembled hardware, app-guided pairing, and quick mapping. Even first-time robot-vacuum owners should be able to get it running without much friction.

Day-to-day reliability is strong, with the robot characterized as an efficient workhorse that should not let owners down in routine household cleaning.

Measured battery use points to roughly 100 square meters of mixed vacuuming and mopping before a recharge under standard settings. Charging takes several hours, but practical coverage is strong for typical homes.

Construction feels premium and sturdy, with thick plastics, tight fit, and consistently strong workmanship. The Curv 2 Pro gives the impression of a machine built for regular long-term use.

The compact shell feels solid and well finished, with construction described as built to last rather than merely decorative.

Side sensing keeps the robot tracking closely along skirting boards, furniture, and table legs without unnecessary contact, giving it precise edge-following behavior.

Pet-heavy homes may burn through dock bags quickly, potentially needing a replacement every couple of weeks. Lower-shedding households should get much longer between changes.

Privacy controls were a relative strength because the camera was not available as a live video feed in the app.

Stable connectivity and regular firmware updates give the software side a mature feel and improve confidence that features will continue to be refined.