#1
Medium-pile carpet pickup is excellent in formal tests, including 96% embedded-sand removal and near-complete debris pickup with few passes.
Pros: Overall opinion, AI, Smart, App and Automation
Cons: Comparative performance, Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)
#2
Medium-pile or general carpet testing was positive, including deep-cleaning praise and perfect scores in reviewer tests.
Pros: Suction and Airflow, Overall opinion
Cons: Noise level, Storage footprint and upright-stand stability
#3
Carpet pickup and deep-clean results were excellent, with awards-level scores and praise for soft-floor performance.
Pros: Mopping performance, Suction and Airflow
Cons: Price and Value, Battery and Charging
#4
Medium-pile carpet deep cleaning was excellent in Vacuum Wars testing, including a perfect embedded-sand result.
Pros: Overall opinion, Runtime
Cons: Weight, Accessories and Tools
#5
Medium-pile and deeper carpet pickup evidence was very strong, especially embedded debris and deep-clean results.
Pros: Suction and Airflow, Mopping performance
Cons: Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums), Runtime
#6
Medium-pile carpet evidence was strong in Vacuum Wars-style testing, where embedded debris scores were well above average.
Pros: Mopping performance, Overall opinion
Cons: Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums), Price and Value
#7
Medium carpet evidence was positive, with reviewers reporting one-pass carpet pickup and strong loop-pile hair-and-dust removal.
Pros: Maintenance requirements, Suction and Airflow
Cons: Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake, Bin and Bag
#8
Medium-pile carpet evidence was excellent, including perfect deep-clean scores and strong user praise for deep cleaning.
Pros: Overall opinion, Emptying and Mess Control
Cons: Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance, Area Rug Handling
#9
General carpet pickup evidence was mixed-to-positive: one review praised carpet cleaning, while lab comparisons showed weaker deep-clean performance than the P10.
Pros: Mopping performance, AI, Smart, App and Automation
Cons: Noise level, Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)
#10
Medium-carpet pickup is strong, with reviewers reporting good sand/debris scores, dense-carpet improvement, and strong visible results.
Pros: Overall opinion, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
#11
Medium/general carpet pickup was strong in testing, including above-average deep-clean scores and thorough carpet cleaning claims from reviewers.
Pros: Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance, Suction and Airflow
Cons: Noise level
#12
Medium-pile carpet is a relative strength, with strong deep-clean test results and good pet-hair pickup in several reviews. A few reviewers still needed higher power for embedded debris.
Pros: Ease of use, Overall opinion
Cons: Weight, Bin and Bag
#13
Medium-pile carpet performance is generally strong and often above average, but a few controlled tests found weaker deep-debris pickup than cheaper Dreame alternatives.
Pros: Overall opinion, Mopping performance
Cons: Value-for-money, Price and Value
#14
Carpet deep-cleaning results were stronger than expected, scoring above the reviewer’s average despite middling airflow and pressure numbers.
Pros: Overall opinion, Mopping performance
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Adaptive chassis lift
#15
Carpet pickup evidence was strong, with above-average deep-clean results and good crumb pickup on carpeted areas.
Pros: Mopping performance, Overall opinion
#16
Medium-pile carpet evidence was strong, with Vacuum Wars reporting better-than-average embedded-sand pickup in its deep-clean test.
Pros: Adaptive chassis lift, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
Cons: Price and Value, Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors)
#17
Medium-pile carpet performance is usually strong, with excellent or above-average pickup, though one benchmark found deep cleaning below premium expectations.
Pros: Mopping performance, Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums)
Cons: Stuck resistance, Storage footprint and upright-stand stability
#18
Medium-pile carpet pickup was generally strong, but one reviewer said carpet pickup was only somewhat better than hard-floor limitations.
Pros: Emptying and Mess Control, Suction and Airflow
Cons: Price and Value, Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance
#19
Reviewers leaned positive on Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup, but some lower-scoring evidence flagged situational limits or inconsistency.
Pros: Mopping performance, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
Cons: Runtime, Bin and Bag
#20
Medium-pile carpet and rug pickup was above average, though not quite as dominant as hard-floor performance.
Pros: Overall opinion, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
#21
Medium or thicker-carpet suitability was supported by reviewers who described the wider brush bar and flooring range as appropriate for thicker or medium pile.
Pros: Suction and Airflow, Overall opinion
Cons: Weight, Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake
#22
Carpet performance was above average in testing and praised in real-world carpet/mopping use.
Pros: Overall opinion, Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance
Cons: Stuck resistance, Emptying and Mess Control
#23
Carpet pickup was mixed: several reviewers found carpet vacuuming easy or best-in-class, while one measured underwhelming deep-cleaning results.
Pros: Mopping performance, Overall opinion
Cons: Noise level, Solution / Liquid system
#24
The stronger suction makes the S20 competent with heavier debris on medium-pile carpet, improving meaningfully over the S10.
Pros: Mopping performance, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
Cons: Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors), Noise level
#25
Medium-pile and deep-carpet results are mixed: lab-style reviews found strong embedded-sand pickup, while other testing placed carpet pickup below average.
Pros: Mopping performance, Overall opinion
Cons: Stuck resistance, Solution / Liquid system
#26
Medium-pile and deeper carpet evidence was mixed: lab results showed strong sand removal, but one technician saw substantial debris left behind.
Pros: Suction and Airflow, Overall opinion
Cons: Carpet — High-Pile Pickup, Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake
#27
Medium/deeper carpet evidence was good but not class-leading, with above-average or solid scores tempered by stubborn sand and pet-hair caveats.
Pros: Mopping performance, Overall opinion
Cons: Low-profile design, Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries)
#28
Medium-pile carpet feedback ranged from strong lab scores to weaker results that required higher suction or multiple passes.
Pros: Overall opinion, Value-for-money
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Mopping performance
#29
Medium-pile or deep-carpet pickup was only average to below average in test-heavy reviews, especially with embedded sand.
Pros: Overall opinion, Weight
Cons: Runtime, Bin and Bag
#30
Medium-pile or deep-carpet pickup is split, with Vacuum Wars finding below-average embedded debris results while other testing reported strong sand pickup.
Pros: Mopping performance, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
Cons: Mechanical arm object-moving feature, Overall opinion
#31
Medium-pile carpet deep cleaning was average in the one test that embedded sand into carpet.
Pros: Price and Value, Overall opinion
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Runtime
#32
Medium or fluffy carpet performance was poor enough that one reviewer said it did not make sense to use there.
Pros: Self-propel feature, Self-cleaning cycle
Cons: AI, Smart, App and Automation, Heating element
#33
Medium-pile carpet pickup was consistently poor, with reviewers reporting stalling, weak agitation, and unsuitable carpet performance.
Pros: Maneuverability and Handling, Overall opinion
Cons: Price and Value, Bin and Bag