Large hard-floor debris intake was strong in tests involving cereal, rice, crackers, or general spills.
Pros: Price and Value, Mopping performance
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Maintenance requirements
Large hard-floor debris intake was strong in tests involving cereal, rice, crackers, or general spills.
Pros: Price and Value, Mopping performance
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Maintenance requirements
Hard-floor large debris intake is positive based on one test where heavier popcorn kernels caused no issues.
Pros: Overall opinion, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
Cons: Carpet — High-Pile Pickup, Controls and UI
Large hard-floor debris was handled very well in testing, with no major intake limitation reported.
Pros: Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot), Overall opinion
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Mopping performance
Hard-floor large debris intake was praised, including debris of all sizes and real-world pickup without issue.
Pros: Overall opinion, Mopping performance
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Runtime
The L60 handles most larger hard-floor debris well and collected nearly all test mixtures in several trials. Side-brush scattering can delay pickup until a later pass.
Pros: Price and Value, Overall opinion
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance
Large hard-floor debris pickup is excellent, with tests showing complete or near-complete pickup of rice, Cheerios, and mixed debris.
Pros: Price and Value, Overall opinion
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Mopping performance
Large hard-floor debris pickup was strong, with near-flawless extra-large debris handling in tests.
Pros: Mopping performance, Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors)
Cons: Solution / Liquid system
Large hard-floor debris intake was praised alongside fine-dust and extra-large debris collection.
Pros: Overall opinion, Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Stuck resistance
Large hard-floor debris intake is strong in controlled debris pickup testing.
Pros: Overall opinion, Corner Cleaning (Robot)
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Price and Value
Large debris and hard-floor intake were strong overall, with high pickup and minimal side-brush scatter in test runs.
Pros: Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums), AI, Smart, App and Automation
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Stuck resistance
Large hard-floor debris intake was strong, with reviewers reporting high pickup and broad debris handling.
Pros: Mopping performance, Overall opinion
Cons: Corner Cleaning (Robot), AI, Smart, App and Automation
Hard-floor large-debris intake scored well where the brush and roller had no collection issues.
Pros: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Mopping performance
Cons: Controls and UI, Area Rug Handling
Hard-floor large-debris intake was strong across tests and demos, with rice, cereal, coffee beans, and food handled well.
Pros: AI, Smart, App and Automation, Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums)
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Dried-On Stain Removal
Hard-floor large-debris intake was a clear strength, with high rice, laminate, and tile litter pickup results.
Pros: Overall opinion, Mopping performance
Cons: Noise level, Dock noise
Hard-floor large debris intake was strong, including rice and extra-large debris, though side-brush scatter sometimes remained.
Pros: Mopping performance, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
Cons: Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance, Bin and Bag
Large hard-floor debris intake is strong overall, despite occasional missed cereal pieces.
Pros: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Suction and Airflow
Cons: Price and Value
Large debris intake was praised in pickup testing and supported by large-particle/leftover cleanup comments.
Pros: Price and Value, Value-for-money
Cons: Dried-On Stain Removal, Hair Pickup — Carpets
Hard-floor large-debris evidence was positive in one review, where the robot nearly cleared a large rice-grain pile by the second pass.
Pros: Mopping performance, Pet-Ready Features
Hard-floor large-debris pickup was generally good in group and lab testing, with basic hard-surface pickup praised.
Pros: Mopping performance, Overall opinion
Cons: Large debris handling, Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries)
Hard-floor large-debris intake was positive overall, though one comparison noted a few cornflakes left behind.
Pros: Overall opinion, AI, Smart, App and Automation
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Floorhead design
Large debris pickup is generally strong, with reviewers citing high rice pickup, effective large-debris tests, and good dirt pickup.
Pros: Suction and Airflow, Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake
Cons: Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums), AI, Smart, App and Automation
Hard-floor large-debris intake is strong, with professional tests and owners praising pickup of larger debris and quick hard-floor cleaning.
Pros: Large debris handling, Suction and Airflow
Cons: AI, Smart, App and Automation, Controls and UI
Hard-floor large debris intake is consistently positive in Cheerios, crumbs, rice, and mixed-debris examples.
Pros: Mopping performance, Overall opinion
Cons: Bin and Bag, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
Large debris intake on hard floors was mostly good but not flawless, especially when oats were scattered by the side brush.
Pros: AI, Smart, App and Automation, Overall opinion
Cons: Bin and Bag, Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup
Hard-floor large-debris pickup was usually strong, although one tester said smaller rice grains were pushed around before a later pass.
Pros: Mopping performance, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
Cons: AI, Smart, App and Automation, Price and Value
Large debris intake on hard floors was generally good but not perfect, with one reviewer seeing strong granule pickup and another seeing missed debris.
Pros: Overall opinion, Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance
Cons: Storage footprint and upright-stand stability, Noise level
Large-debris hard-floor pickup is mixed: some tests were excellent, while one hardwood rice result was notably poor due to missed coverage.
Pros: Overall opinion, Suction and Airflow
Cons: Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums), Price and Value
Large hard-floor debris pickup was mixed, with strong crumb pickup in one review and dry-oat scattering or big-debris avoidance in others.
Pros: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Suction and Airflow
Cons: Storage footprint and upright-stand stability, Aesthetic design and finish
Large debris intake on hard floors was mixed because some debris scattered, though a second run could clean it up.
Pros: Overall opinion, Price and Value
Cons: Solution / Liquid system, Controls and UI
Large hard-floor debris pickup was mixed, with one test positive over time and another showing cat food being spread.
Pros: Overall opinion, Price and Value
Cons: Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums), Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
Large hard-floor debris handling was only moderate in the tier-list test, with cornflake and oatmeal left behind.
Pros: AI, Smart, App and Automation, Mopping performance
Cons: Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot), Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance
Large hard-floor debris handling was mixed, with one broad test positive but PCMag reporting rice and sand scatter.
Pros: Overall opinion, Mopping performance
Cons: Price and Value, Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance
Large debris on hard floors was middling: oats were picked up well in one test, while another large-particle test spread remaining debris.
Pros: Overall opinion, Noise level
Cons: Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), Mopping performance
Large debris intake was mixed to weak because the robot handled some debris tests well but struggled with cereal, oatmeal-sized pieces, or tissues in critical reviews.
Pros: Mopping performance, Overall opinion
Cons: Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance, Price and Value
Hard-floor large-debris intake is weak in one measured review because rice and sand were flung beyond the cleaning area.
Pros: Mop lifting system, AI, Smart, App and Automation
Cons: Overall opinion, Mopping performance