The Gentlemen, Season 2 Review

Brand: Netflix
Released: September 3, 2026
Updated: 1 day ago
4.2
Overall review score
243
Review insights
59
Scored features
30
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for Theo James, Eddie-Susie chemistry, lush production and a darker crime arc. Skip it if you want Season 1’s breezier comedy, cleaner plotting or a convincing Bella romance.

Best for

Viewers who like stylish British crime drama, morally darker character arcs, sharp performances and high-end production design will get the most from Season 2.

Not for

Viewers who mainly loved Season 1 for breezy comedy, compact plotting or lighter caper energy may find this season slower, busier and more brutal.

Verdict

Season 2 pushes The Gentlemen into darker, more ambitious territory, and the strongest reviews think that evolution finally gives Eddie’s rise real dramatic weight. Theo James and Kaya Scodelario remain the core draw, backed by confident production design, glossy cinematography and several tense late-season set pieces. The tradeoff is sprawl: the Italian expansion, political maneuvering and side quests can crowd one another, leaving the first half slower and some relationships underdeveloped. Critics are especially split on whether losing some of Season 1’s comic energy is a smart maturation or a loss of charm. Even with those structural problems, the season is widely seen as entertaining and leaves strong momentum for Season 3.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

59 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    35 (59%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    9 (15%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    10 (17%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (7%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros

  • 5.0
    11 reviews strong consensus
    renewal interest: 5.0, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Interest in more episodes is high: several reviewers say they cannot wait for Season 3, and news coverage treats the early renewal as reassuring and deserved momentum.
  • 4.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Eddie and Susie are repeatedly called the show’s beating heart, with Theo James and Kaya Scodelario praised for charged, layered chemistry. Reviews are most enthusiastic when the pair share the screen.
  • 4.7
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    main cast performance: 4.7, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    The central performances are a major consensus strength, especially Theo James’s darker Eddie and Kaya Scodelario’s controlled Susie. Ray Winstone also draws repeated praise for Bobby’s authority.
  • 4.8
    8 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 4.8, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Season 2 goes deeper into ambition, class, power, legacy and moral corrosion. Even reviewers who miss the lighter comedy often acknowledge the richer thematic intent.
  • 4.6
    10 reviews low consensus
    character development: 4.6, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Eddie’s evolution from reluctant participant to ambitious crime boss is one of the most consistently praised elements. Reviewers also note stronger growth for several supporting characters.
  • 4.8
    7 reviews strong consensus
    entertainment value: 4.8, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Most reviewers find Season 2 highly entertaining despite structural complaints. The mix of crime, absurdity, style and escalation keeps even uneven episodes watchable.

Cons

  • 1.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    release schedule: 1.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The roughly two-and-a-half-year wait is widely treated as a problem, with writers linking it to weaker launch viewership and welcoming plans for a shorter gap before Season 3.
  • 2.3
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    romance quality: 2.3, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The Eddie-Bella romance is a recurring weakness, often described as rushed, underdeveloped or unconvincing. A minority view finds Bella a fitting match, but Eddie and Susie’s connection draws far stronger enthusiasm.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    screenplay quality: 1.0, 1 review
    The screenplay draws the harshest criticism from negative reviewers, who call it over-written and under-revised. Positive coverage focuses more on character arcs than script polish.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    episode length: 2.0, 1 review
    Hour-long episodes divide opinion: one review finds the series overlong, while another calls the overall commitment manageable for a weekend binge.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    family friendliness: 2.0, 1 review
    Strong language, drug-related crime, beheadings, torture and adult themes make this a poor fit for family viewing, even when the comedy is playful.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    rewatch value: 2.5, 1 review
    The darker, more brutal tone makes Season 2 less immediately rewatchable for at least one reviewer, especially compared with the lighter first season.

Cast & Creators

  • Edward Horniman
    4.6
    15 reviews low consensus
    Theo James: 4.6, 15 reviews, low consensus
    Theo James receives overwhelming praise for making Eddie’s darker transformation convincing, controlled and emotionally richer. A small minority finds his brooding too one-note or inert.
  • Susie Glass
    4.7
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    Kaya Scodelario: 4.7, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    Kaya Scodelario is widely praised for Susie’s cool precision and for her charged chemistry with Theo James. One negative review blames awkward dialogue for limiting her performance.
  • Bobby Glass
    5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Ray Winstone: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Ray Winstone is repeatedly praised for Bobby Glass’s authority, eccentricity and scene presence, with one reviewer calling him markedly better than in Season 1.
  • Jeff
    5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Vinnie Jones: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Vinnie Jones is a recurring standout, praised for Geoff’s quiet loyalty, action presence and unexpected softness. Multiple reviewers call his work among the season’s best.
  • Director
    4.6
    8 reviews low consensus
    Guy Ritchie: 4.6, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Guy Ritchie’s contribution is mostly praised for confident visual style, darker ambition and genre energy, though some critics see familiar mannerisms and reduced swagger.
  • Lord Hawthorne
    4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Hugh Bonneville: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Hugh Bonneville earns near-uniform praise as Lord Hawthorne, with reviewers calling him amusing, full-bodied, enjoyable and moving.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in product placement, age appropriateness, character consistency, near average in story quality, humor, below average in screenplay quality, release schedule, romance quality.

Comparison summary

59 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    36 (61%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    13 (22%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    10 (17%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
screenplay quality 1.0 3.5 -2.5
product placement 4.5 2.4 +2.1
age appropriateness 4.5 2.5 +2.0
character consistency 5.0 3.0 +2.0
language level 4.0 2.4 +1.6
release schedule 1.7 3.2 -1.5
character likability 5.0 3.6 +1.4
violence level 4.6 3.2 +1.4

Consider This Instead

If you want better plot clarity

Choose The Beast In Me. It scores 5.0 vs 3.1 for plot clarity, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

If you want better villain quality

Choose Run Away, Season 1. It scores 4.9 vs 3.0 for villain quality, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Breaking Bad

  • Similar: character transformation Eddie’s darker transformation is compared favorably with Breaking Bad’s character arc.

Goodfellas

  • Similar: gangster-comedy sensibility The show is likened to a comic-book-generation version of Goodfellas.

Ozark

  • Compared: crime-drama tone The reviewer contrasts the show with the grittier mob-drama mode of Ozark.

FAQ

Is Season 2 better than Season 1?

Several reviewers think the darker character work, stronger story and higher stakes improve on Season 1, while others miss the earlier season’s lighter comedy and tighter simplicity.

What is the biggest strength?

Theo James’s transformation as Eddie and his chemistry with Kaya Scodelario receive the most consistent praise, closely followed by the cinematography, costumes and production design.

What is the biggest weakness?

The most repeated complaint is overcrowded plotting and uneven pacing, especially in the first half and in side quests that either drag or rush important emotional turns.

Is it still funny?

Yes, but the humor is darker and less dominant. Some reviewers like the balance, while others specifically miss Freddy, Jimmy and the breezier comic energy of Season 1.

How violent is Season 2?

It is notably bloodier, with beheadings, torture, gunfights and a brutal finale. Positive reviewers say the gore stays exciting rather than merely excessive, but the season is clearly for mature audiences.

Does the Eddie-Bella romance work?

Mostly not for the reviewers who discuss it. Their courtship is often described as rushed or underdeveloped, especially compared with the stronger Eddie-Susie dynamic.

Is it easy to binge?

Yes. Multiple reviewers describe the eight roughly hour-long episodes as an easy weekend binge, even when they criticize the season’s pacing or complexity.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top TV Shows to Consider

#1 The Pitt, Season 2
4.7

Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.

Pros: episode structure, main cast performance

Cons: age appropriateness, plot clarity

#2 Furious, Season 1
4.6

Best for powerhouse performances, thorny character work, and a tense revenge mystery that grows richer as it goes. Skip it if abuse, trafficking, graphic violence, or deliberately messy moral questions...

Pros: episode structure, supporting cast performance

Cons: cinematography, sexual content level

#3 Hacks, Season 5
4.6

Best for sharp jokes, standout performances, and a warm, emotionally satisfying goodbye. Skip it if you most valued the pricklier Deborah-Ava conflict and biting Hollywood satire; the final season is...

Pros: plot originality, episode structure

Cons: season length, realism

#4 Slow Horses, Season 6
4.6

Best for fast, darkly funny spy thrills, standout performances, and a tightly wound six-episode run. Skip it if the familiar formula, dense callbacks, or a major cliffhanger ending are likely...

Pros: season finale quality, character development

Cons: accent authenticity, product placement