Oasis: Don’t Look Back in Anger Feature Scores
Explore all 37 feature scores for Oasis: Don’t Look Back in Anger, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
37 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.027 (73%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.44 (11%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.45 (14%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.41 (3%)
Pros
Sort
-
Emotional response is the clearest consensus strength: critics describe tears, goosebumps, catharsis, euphoria, and a powerful sense of communal release throughout the film.
-
Liam and Noel’s humor is a consistent strength, from caustic one-liners to Mick Jagger jokes and relaxed sibling banter that repeatedly breaks through the sentiment.
-
Reviewers repeatedly praise the concert photography for balancing stadium scale with intimate faces, using close-ups and huge crowd shots to make the reunion feel both massive and personal.
-
The sound is one of the film’s biggest technical strengths: reviewers praise the live mix, roaring guitars, stadium-scale impact, and IMAX/Dolby immersion. Even mixed reviews agree that a loud theater suits it.
-
The film’s message of forgiveness, reconciliation, collective joy, and music as a unifying force resonates strongly with most reviewers. A few find the religious framing and brotherly-love emphasis overly sentimental or too neatly packaged.
-
The Oasis songs remain the film’s engine, repeatedly described as thrilling, thunderous, timeless, and powerful live. The only notable complaint is that one reviewer wanted more complete performances instead of abbreviated songs.
-
Will Lovelace and Dylan Southern are widely praised for translating the reunion tour into an immersive cinema experience while keeping the brothers’ reconciliation and fan stories emotionally legible.
-
Hidden cameras, unobtrusive rehearsal coverage, and genuine sibling interactions give the film a strong sense of authenticity. Reviewers often respond to moments that feel unguarded rather than staged.
-
The film lands most strongly with Oasis devotees and reunion-tour attendees, but several critics say its crowd energy can also win over agnostics. A minority warn that non-fans and casual listeners may tire of the sentiment, repetition, or long setlist.
-
As a concert film and rock documentary, the film earns very strong marks for spectacle, music, and feeling. The main genre-level criticism is that it sometimes behaves more like a celebratory tour film than a probing documentary.
-
Most reviewers find the film highly entertaining, especially in a theater, thanks to the music, humor, scale, and crowd energy. Even several mixed reviews still describe it as exciting or enjoyable.
-
Editing is often praised as subtle, snappy, and effective at moving between eras, cities, performers, and fans. Some reviewers push back when the cut leans too heavily on crying crowds or makes later concerts feel repetitive.
-
The visual approach favors large-format spectacle, expressive crowd imagery, and polished concert photography. Most reviewers love the scale, though one critic thinks the slickness sometimes tips into corporate polish.
-
The documentary is praised for showing Oasis as a working-class Manchester phenomenon that now reaches across ages, nationalities, and generations, while also touching on the band’s Irish roots.
-
The first joint Liam-Noel interview in decades is frequently praised as funny, warm, candid, or moving. The recurring complaint is that the film does not push the brothers hard enough on how the feud ended or why the reunion happened.
-
The documentary does not reinvent the concert-film form for everyone, but several reviewers praise its fan-centered focus, blend of backstage intimacy and spectacle, and refusal to follow a standard rock-doc formula.
-
Liam and Noel’s revived chemistry is a major pleasure: reviewers highlight their comic timing, mutual respect, and the sense that their old sibling rapport has returned in a gentler form.
-
Fans are repeatedly told they will want to relive the reunion, and some expect superfans to return multiple times to catch details or re-experience the concert euphoria.
-
The film finds depth in music as community, escape, memory, healing, and intergenerational connection. Several reviewers see those ideas as more important than the mechanics of the Gallagher feud itself.
-
The rehearsal-room uncertainty and first Cardiff show retain real tension even though viewers know the tour succeeded, giving the early film an unusually strong sense of jeopardy for a concert documentary.
-
The brothers’ gradual softening toward each other is one of the film’s most affecting arcs, moving from awkward rehearsals to visible affection and a joint interview.
-
Critical reception is presented as overwhelmingly positive, with the film repeatedly described as moving, nostalgic, and technically accomplished even when critics want more depth.
-
Archival material is used to bridge the 2009 breakup and the 2025 reunion, with reviewers praising the way old and new footage is blended into the film’s larger emotional timeline.
-
The closing stretch is generally satisfying because it leaves the brothers visibly closer and the audience on a high, although one reviewer would have preferred the title song as the final musical statement.
-
The brothers’ revived banter is a highlight, with quick jokes and affectionate sparring giving the film much of its comic personality.
-
The strongest dramatic material comes from the uncertainty around the brothers’ first rehearsals and opening show, where even a known outcome still feels tense and high-stakes.
-
One review explicitly treats the brothers’ heavy profanity as part of the fun, finding their foul-mouthed irreverence hilariously entertaining rather than distracting.
-
The central onstage performances are praised as masterful, with the reunion shows retaining the authority, confidence, and scale fans hoped for.
-
The structure is praised for misdirecting expectations away from a conventional backstage exposé and toward a broader story about fandom, healing, and what the music means to people.
-
The wider band is praised as being in excellent form, helping the reunion sound polished and forceful rather than like a nostalgia exercise.
-
One reviewer goes as far as saying Liam’s comic Mick Jagger riff is worth the price of admission by itself.
Cons
Sort
-
The two-hour length works for committed fans but draws criticism from casual viewers, especially when fan interviews repeat similar emotional beats. One reviewer felt the film could have been closer to 90 minutes.
-
One recurring weakness is explanatory clarity: the film communicates the emotional result of the reunion far better than the practical reasons the brothers reconciled or the details of what changed.
-
Pacing is one of the more divided areas. Some find the film light, propulsive, and never boring, while others say repeated fan stories and post-Cardiff concert patterns make the middle and later sections drag.
-
The written structure supports a clear forgiveness-and-reconciliation theme, but at least one critic finds the sermon material too scripted and heavy-handed.
-
The film’s unusually soft, peace-and-love tone is a deliberate break from Oasis’s combative image. One critic finds that coziness a little strange, even while acknowledging the brothers’ familiar wit.
-
The central reunion and fan story is often praised as moving, redemptive, and well constructed, but this is also the film’s biggest recurring weakness: many reviewers wanted far more about the 2009 split, the years apart, and the mechanics of reconciliation.
Cast & Creators
-
Lead SingerLiam is repeatedly praised as vocally strong, physically commanding onstage, effortlessly funny, and fully at home in the reunion. Reviewers also note the cool, nonchalant frontman persona that still connects powerfully with crowds.
-
DirectorSouthern is praised alongside Lovelace for shaping the tour into an immersive, emotionally coherent film that balances spectacle, fan stories, and the brothers’ reconciliation.
-
Rhythm GuitaristBonehead is repeatedly described as a crucial ingredient in Oasis’s sound, with reviewers echoing Noel’s view that his rhythm guitar is central to the band’s wall of sound.
-
DirectorLovelace is praised for helping turn the tour into an immersive, emotionally coherent film, especially in the way the camera connects stadium spectacle with intimate human moments.
-
EditorCragg’s editing draws both strong praise and criticism: several reviewers call it snappy or even the film’s star, while others think it cuts too often to fans or flattens later concerts into a repeated pattern.
-
CinematographerZambarloukos’s concert photography is praised for giving the live footage a dynamic glow and for finding expressive faces within the scale of the crowds.
-
CinematographerCrawley’s camera work is praised for reverent, emotionally charged framing that captures both chaos and cathartic release.
-
WriterKnight’s contribution is praised for giving the film an unexpectedly touching emotional frame and for choices that help the audience footage carry much of the story’s feeling.
-
CinematographerLaxton’s work is praised for emotionally charged close-ups and awe-inspiring wide shots that heighten the concert spectacle.
-
GuitaristNoel’s rehearsal leadership is singled out as riveting, especially when he is shaping arrangements and directing the band before the tour begins.
-
CinematographerLavelle is part of the cinematography team praised for continually finding fresh ways to capture teary, grinning faces in the crowd.
-
EditorZamolo’s editing is received more ambivalently: one review praises the restraint in fan storytelling, while another says the later concert footage becomes too homogeneous.