If you want better Auracast support
Choose JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds. It scores 4.7 vs 2.0 for Auracast support, with a 4.4 overall score.
Nothing Ear (a) Earbuds Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Nothing Ear (a) for standout value, comfortable fit, strong ANC, and a polished app. Skip it if you need elite transparency, wireless charging, repairable batteries, or the most refined sound.
Best for
Best for shoppers who want stylish, comfortable ANC earbuds under $100 with strong app controls, bass-friendly sound, LDAC support, and easy everyday use across devices.
Not for
Not for buyers who need class-leading transparency, wireless charging, repairable batteries, deep EQ control, or the absolute best audio performance versus newer budget rivals.
Verdict
Across the reviews, the Nothing Ear (a) comes across as a rare budget earbud that feels more complete than its price suggests. Reviewers repeatedly praised its comfortable fit, distinctive transparent design, effective ANC, strong app, useful EQ, and lively sound with satisfying bass. The main tradeoff is that its strengths are not absolute: sound quality ranges from excellent-for-the-money to merely good, transparency mode is inconsistent, call quality can sound processed, and the compact case draws complaints about scratches or fiddly handling. Fast charging and LDAC add value, but the lack of wireless charging and replaceable batteries keeps it from feeling fully premium.
Current model
Nothing Ear (3a)
View current model
Product generations
Nothing Ear Earbuds- Nothing Ear (3a)
- Nothing Ear (a)This product
Feature Scorecards
Summary
50 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.011 (22%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.429 (58%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.45 (10%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.45 (10%)
Pros highlights
-
Reviewers generally found the Ear (a) sound strong for the price, with several calling it excellent or impressive, though one lab-style review described it as only mediocre and a 2025 comparison found newer rivals can match or beat it.
-
Long-use comfort was one of the strongest consensus points, with reviewers repeatedly saying the earbuds stayed comfortable for commutes, work, and hours of wear.
-
ANC earned broad praise for the price, often described as effective or impressive, but it was not consistently top-tier and struggled more with mid/high frequencies.
-
Value was a major strength, with many reviewers calling the Ear (a) unusually competitive or hard to beat, though one later review argued cheaper rivals now close the gap.
-
Bass was usually praised as strong, fun, and adjustable, but a few reviewers found the default tuning bass-heavy or said it was not the strongest.
-
Battery life was generally solid to impressive, especially with ANC off, but ANC use and newer competition made it only midrange in some reviews.
Cons highlights
-
Transparency mode drew split reactions: some found it useful or above average, while others said it was merely acceptable or too weak for conversation.
-
Sensor-related evidence was mixed: wearer recognition impressed in one review but ear detection misfired in another.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Earbuds, this product is above average in LDAC, Find My, Soundstage depth, near average in Treble clarity, Comfort during long use, below average in Sustainability materials, Voice assistant integration, Auracast support.
Comparison summary
50 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher17 (34%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts22 (44%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower11 (22%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainability materials | 2.4 | 4.5 | -2.1 |
| Voice assistant integration | 2.0 | 3.6 | -1.6 |
| Auracast support | 2.0 | 3.5 | -1.5 |
| Spatial audio | 2.0 | 3.2 | -1.2 |
| LDAC | 4.2 | 3.2 | +1.0 |
| Frequency response accuracy | 2.8 | 3.9 | -1.1 |
| Find My | 4.5 | 3.6 | +0.9 |
| Smudge resistance | 2.4 | 3.2 | -0.8 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Frequency response accuracy
Choose Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE Earbuds. It scores 4.5 vs 2.8 for Frequency response accuracy, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better Sustainability materials
Choose Sony WF-1000XM6 Earbuds. It scores 5.0 vs 2.4 for Sustainability materials, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better Equalizer customization
Choose Soundcore by Anker Space A40 Earbuds. It scores 4.5 vs 3.8 for Equalizer customization, with a 4.1 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Nothing Ear
- Worse: build quality One reviewer felt the Ear (a) was actually built better than the more expensive Nothing Ear.
- Better: sound quality and charging features The regular Nothing Ear was said to offer better sound quality and more app/charging perks for extra money.
AirPods Pro
- Better: listening refinement The Ear (a) was praised, but the reviewer still found AirPods Pro more elegant to listen to.
Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC
- Alternative: sub-$100 alternatives The Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC was presented as another strong option in the same budget range.
FAQ
Are the Nothing Ear (a) comfortable for long listening sessions?
Yes. Most reviewers described them as comfortable for hours, commutes, work, or everyday use, with lightweight buds that generally stay secure.
How good is the noise cancellation?
Reviewers generally found ANC strong for the price and useful for commute, office, and street noise. It is not consistently at the level of pricier flagship earbuds, especially for some mid and high frequencies.
Do the Nothing Ear (a) sound good?
Most reviews praised the sound as lively, detailed, and strong for the money, especially with bass and LDAC. A few reviewers found the tuning merely good or said newer rivals can match it.
Is the transparency mode good enough for conversations?
It depends. Some reviewers called it good or acceptable, while others preferred removing an earbud because voices did not come through openly enough.
How is call quality?
Call quality is mixed. Some reviewers reported clear voices and good noise filtering, but others heard compression, artificial tone, or obvious earbud processing.
What are the biggest drawbacks?
The most repeated drawbacks are no wireless charging, a case that can feel fiddly or scratch easily, limited EQ compared with stronger apps, and non-replaceable batteries.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Phones and Trains
YouTube - RandoTechInfo
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.1
Article Reviews
techradar.com
- Review score
- 4.5
Top Earbuds to Consider
Best for detailed, natural wired sound, three connector options, and standout value around $99. Skip it if you need wireless features, stronger bass, softer treble, or a compact fit for...
Pros: Value for money, Multi-platform compatibility
Choose these for excellent, balanced sound, a comfortable redesign, deep EQ tools and uniquely replaceable batteries. Skip them if you need class-leading ANC, consistently great calls or the smoothest treble...
Pros: User-replaceable batteries, Overall satisfaction
Cons: Auracast support, Sensors
Choose the AirPods 5 for strong open-ear ANC, clearer sound, easy Apple-device switching, and excellent value. Skip them if you need all-day battery, a very secure workout fit, or full...
Pros: Overall satisfaction, Sound quality
Cons: Battery, Eartips fit
Choose the JBL Tour Pro 3 if you want feature-packed earbuds with strong sound, ANC, LDAC and a genuinely useful smart case. Skip them if you have smaller ears, want...
Pros: Sound quality, Carry case quality
Cons: Portability/foldability, Button control usability