Kenmore PM3020

Kenmore PM3020 Air Purifier Review

Brand: Kenmore
Released: May 5, 2023
Updated: 3 months ago
3.8
Overall review score
296
Review insights
54
Scored features
73
Customer reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Kenmore PM3020 for quick cooking-smell, smoke, dust, and allergen cleanup in living areas. Skip it for bedrooms or unattended remote homes if rattles, bright display behavior, power-button failures, or no Wi-Fi are dealbreakers.

Best for

Best for buyers who want visible air-quality feedback and fast cleanup of cooking smells, smoke, dust, and allergens in living rooms, kitchens, or open areas. It suits users who are comfortable leaving auto mode running.

Not for

Not ideal for light-sensitive bedrooms, remote homes that need Wi-Fi or power-loss recovery, or shoppers who want a remote/app-controlled smart purifier. Cautious buyers should also weigh the reported rattles and failure cases.

Verdict

The Kenmore PM3020 earns enthusiastic praise for practical air cleaning: owners repeatedly report faster removal of cooking smells, smoke, dust, and allergens, plus helpful real-time readouts and a useful auto mode. It also looks modern and often runs quietly enough for living areas. The tradeoff is quality consistency. Several unhappy owners describe rattling fans on low or sleep speeds, power-button failures, dimming displays, missing filters, weak airflow, or total shutdowns after months of use. The display is informative but can be too bright, and the lack of Wi-Fi, app control, and remote control limits convenience. It is best viewed as a strong-performing purifier when you get a good unit, not a risk-free bedroom or smart-home pick.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

54 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    22 (41%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    9 (17%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    8 (15%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    8 (15%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    7 (13%)

Pros highlights

  • 3.8
    38 reviews low consensus
    overall satisfaction: 3.8, 38 reviews, low consensus
    Overall satisfaction is polarized but leans positive: many owners love the purifier, recommend it, or bought more units. Severe failures, rattles, and support problems create a vocal dissatisfied minority.
  • 4.5
    29 reviews moderate consensus
    air purification performance: 4.5, 29 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most owners say the PM3020 noticeably cleans the air, with repeated praise for fresher rooms and fast improvement. A few units lost effectiveness or felt underpowered, so performance is strongest in the positive reports but not universal.
  • 3.9
    25 reviews low consensus
    noise level: 3.9, 25 reviews, low consensus
    Noise is the most divided attribute: many owners call it quiet or whisper quiet, while others report rattles on low or sleep settings. Bedroom and office users are the most likely to notice the bad units.
  • 3.8
    12 reviews low consensus
    display readability: 3.8, 12 reviews, low consensus
    The display is both loved and criticized: many like the bright, information-rich panel, while others find it too bright or prone to dimming. It is useful by day but can be annoying in dark rooms.
  • 4.6
    11 reviews strong consensus
    real-time air quality monitoring: 4.6, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    The real-time readouts are a major attraction, with owners liking air-quality numbers, temperature, humidity, color changes, and visible status. A few display complaints exist, but the monitoring concept itself is widely appreciated.
  • 4.9
    10 reviews strong consensus
    value for money: 4.9, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Value is usually praised, with owners calling the cost fair, a good buy, or worth the money. Missing filters and expensive replacements can sour the value for unlucky buyers.

Cons highlights

  • 1.3
    11 reviews strong consensus
    reliability: 1.3, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Reliability is the biggest warning sign: sensors, buttons, fans, motors, and complete power failures appear across negative owner reports. Positive performance can be excellent, but bad units are costly and frustrating.
  • 2.7
    9 reviews low consensus
    fan speed options: 2.7, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Fan speeds are useful when auto mode ramps up, but low-speed rattles and weak high-speed impressions create a real tradeoff. Several owners like the control range, while others found particular speeds noisy or ineffective.
  • 1.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    customer support: 1.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Customer support is a repeated frustration, including no replies, filter confusion, refund delays, and difficulty reaching the company. Support issues become especially painful when a unit fails or arrives incomplete.
  • 2.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    condition on arrival: 2.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Arrival condition is mixed: some units worked right away or arrived with good packaging, but others arrived with missing filters or nonworking fans. Quality control appears inconsistent.
  • 2.5
    6 reviews low consensus
    sleep mode: 2.5, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Sleep mode is useful when it turns off lights and quiets the machine, but it also frustrates owners who want auto mode with the display off. Rattle complaints make sleep use risky for noise-sensitive buyers.
  • 2.8
    6 reviews low consensus
    control placement: 2.8, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Controls are easy and modern for some owners, especially the touch interface, but power-button failures are a repeated complaint. The controls feel good when they work and aggravating when they do not.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in listing accuracy, filter replacement alarm, value for money, near average in air purification performance, noise level, below average in washable pre-filter, CADR rating, filter availability.

Comparison summary

54 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    20 (37%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    11 (20%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    23 (43%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
washable pre-filter 1.0 4.0 -3.0
CADR rating 1.0 3.7 -2.7
filter availability 1.0 3.5 -2.5
listing accuracy 5.0 2.5 +2.5
filter replacement alarm 4.3 1.9 +2.4
reliability 1.3 3.0 -1.8
durability 1.5 3.3 -1.8
sleep mode 2.5 4.2 -1.7

Consider This Instead

If you want better filter availability

Choose Kenmore PM2010. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for filter availability, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better durability

Choose Shark HP201. It scores 4.7 vs 1.5 for durability, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better washable pre-filter

Choose Honeywell HPA3100. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for washable pre-filter, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

50250

  • Better: air movement The owner felt the PM3020 moved too little air and recommended buying a 50250 instead.

Blue Air models

  • Compared: planned replacement and reliability The owner originally hoped the PM3020 could replace older Blue Air models, but repeat rattling defects ended that plan.

Levoit 600s

  • Better: noise and reliability After returning the Kenmore for button and noise issues, the owner switched to a Levoit 600s.

FAQ

Does the Kenmore PM3020 remove cooking odors and smoke well?

Yes. Cooking smells and smoke are among its most praised jobs, with owners saying it ramps up automatically and clears odors or smoke quickly.

Is it quiet enough for a bedroom?

It depends on the unit and your sensitivity. Many owners call it quiet, but several report rattles on low or sleep mode and complain that the display can be too bright.

Does auto mode work well?

Auto mode is a highlight. Owners say it reacts to cooking, smoke, smells, and contaminants, then adjusts fan speed as air quality improves.

Are replacement filters affordable and easy to get?

Cost feedback is split: some owners call filters cheap or affordable, while others say they are expensive. Availability is more concerning because some owners struggled to find filters or received units without them.

Does it have Wi-Fi, an app, or a remote?

No owner feedback supports Wi-Fi, app control, or remote control. In fact, users specifically complain about missing Wi-Fi, no app controls, and no remote.

What reliability problems show up most often?

The main issues are rattling fans, power-button failures, sensor failure, fading displays, missing filters, and units that stop working after months.

Top Air Purifiers to Consider

#1 GoveeLife H7124
4.6

Choose the H7124 if you want a quiet smart purifier for odors, dust, pets, and app control. Skip it if you need foolproof Wi-Fi, wall-facing intake, UV light, or strong...

Pros: air purification performance, noise level

Cons: control placement

#2 PuroAir 240
4.6

Best for quiet, simple cleaning in bedrooms or apartments. Skip it if you need verified large-room CADR value, app control, or guaranteed neighbor-smoke removal.

Pros: noise level, air purification performance

Cons: filter replacement cost, air quality sensor accuracy

#3 AirDoctor AD3500
4.6

Best for strong room cleaning, allergy relief, odor control, and simple operation. Skip it if high filter costs, a larger footprint, or possible nighttime fan noise would bother you.

Pros: air purification performance, overall satisfaction

Cons: filter replacement cost

#4 Nuwave Forever, 47265
4.6

Choose this if you want strong odor, dust, smoke, and pet-air cleanup with washable filters. Skip it if turbo noise, Wi-Fi setup, or a high upfront price will bother you.

Pros: overall satisfaction, air purification performance