Cupertino Review

Studio: CBS
Released: October 8, 2026
Updated: 5 days ago
3.9
Overall review score
193
Review insights
51
Scored features
14
Expert reviews
Content guidance
Scorata recommended age 14+

Cases involve fatal drone incidents, sexual harassment, and a teenager encouraged by a seductive chatbot to kill his father. Threats, surveillance and alarming AI scenarios add sustained unease.

Official rating TV-14

Bottom Line

Choose Cupertino for witty courtroom underdogs, timely AI questions and a lively ensemble. Skip it if convincing Silicon Valley atmosphere or deeply developed leads matter more than entertaining weekly cases.

Best for

Viewers who enjoy witty legal procedurals, supportive underdog teams and thought-provoking cases about AI and powerful technology companies.

Not for

Viewers seeking an authentic portrait of Cupertino or consistently deep character studies. Those wanting the darker edge of the creators’ earlier dramas may find the lighter approach less satisfying.

Verdict

Cupertino turns anxiety about AI and tech-company power into an unusually enjoyable legal dramedy. Its strongest assets are tightly plotted cases, quirky humor and a warm ensemble led by Mike Colter and Rachel Keller, with Ella Stiller, Busy Philipps and Renée Elise Goldsberry providing memorable support and opposition. The pilot gets moving quickly, and the longer first season offers room for the team to grow. The tradeoff is depth and authenticity: one critical assessment finds the leads thin and the ongoing mystery weaker than the weekly plots, while several accounts question the Silicon Valley setting and demographic representation. The early enthusiasm is substantial, but it concerns opening episodes rather than a completed season.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

51 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    27 (53%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    14 (27%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    6 (12%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (8%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.4
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    entertainment value: 4.4, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Smart courtroom battles and an energetic ensemble make the technology warnings surprisingly enjoyable. Enthusiasm for the episodes outweighs a dull first impression from one advertising viewer.
  • 4.4
    9 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 4.4, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    AI harms, surveillance, copyright theft and the power of tech companies give the cases unusual urgency. Some find the critique less refined or more repetitive than the creators’ earlier work.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    casting quality: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The leads, scene-stealing supporting players and memorable guest judges are major attractions. Local criticism focuses on how poorly the apparent ensemble reflects Cupertino’s predominantly Asian population.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    character likability: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The central lawyers are easy to root for, and the supporting characters bring distinctive charm. Even a critique of thin characterization still finds the leads likable.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    main cast performance: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Colter’s authority and Keller’s warmth make the lawyers an engaging pair, with Stiller strengthening the central team. One assessment finds Keller slightly less settled because Olivia’s characterization varies.
  • 4.1
    8 reviews strong consensus
    story quality: 4.1, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The underdog firm supplies a strong foundation for purposeful, timely cases. The ongoing Bo mystery draws less enthusiasm from one critic than the weekly legal plots.

Cons highlights

  • 3.0
    7 reviews low consensus
    realism: 3.0, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Several AI scenarios feel plausible enough to anticipate actual developments. The substitute filming locations and questions about repeated wins against tech giants make other aspects harder to believe.
  • 3.4
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    plot originality: 3.4, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Specific characters, oddball details and a strange AI mystery help the format feel fresh. Repeated headline-inspired targets and familiar Silicon Valley satire can also feel redundant.

Cast & Creators

  • Creator
    4.6
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Michelle King: 4.6, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Smart, timely cases and a deft balance of commentary and humor draw repeated praise for the creative work. Some find the early material less refined than the creators’ strongest series.
  • Creator
    4.6
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Robert King: 4.6, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The creative work earns praise for precise, witty legal storytelling that makes difficult technology questions entertaining. Reservations concern the refinement of the critique, character depth and the overall visual execution.
  • Natalie Boutella
    4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Busy Philipps: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The financier’s outsized personality brings big laughs, but the performance also finds vulnerability and heart beneath the zany behavior.
  • Michael Price
    4.5
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Mike Colter: 4.5, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    A commanding, likable presence and an easy rapport with his fellow leads anchor the series. Swagger and comic looseness work well, though one critic wants more emotional range early on.
  • Nicole
    4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Renée Elise Goldsberry: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    An enticing, scene-dominating courtroom rival and charged chemistry with Colter make her appearances a highlight.
  • Christy Palladino
    4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Ella Stiller: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Spirited comic timing and a sassy, resourceful presence make the assistant a scene-stealer. Her rapport with the lawyers strengthens the central trio.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in season length, protagonist agency, writing quality, near average in audience appeal, acting quality, below average in cinematography, cultural representation, directing quality.

Comparison summary

51 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    28 (55%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    14 (27%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    9 (18%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
cinematography 2.0 4.3 -2.3
cultural representation 1.5 3.7 -2.2
directing quality 2.5 4.2 -1.7
season length 4.5 2.9 +1.6
protagonist agency 4.5 3.0 +1.5
casting fairness 2.0 3.5 -1.5
writing quality 4.6 3.4 +1.2
season pacing 4.3 3.0 +1.3

Consider This Instead

If you want better product placement

Choose Chad Powers, Season 2. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for product placement, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better cultural representation

Choose War. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for cultural representation, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better directing quality

Choose Line of Fire. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for directing quality, with a 3.7 overall score.

Compare

If you want better plot originality

Choose Youth (2026). It scores 5.0 vs 3.4 for plot originality, with a 4.6 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Compared: view of Silicon Valley The article groups Cupertino among new works that take a darker view of Silicon Valley.

Evil

  • Compared: dark edge The early legal drama is said to lack the earlier series’ dark edge.
  • Compared: unsettling effect Some of its technology stories are described as more stomach-churning than the supernatural series.
  • Similar: blend of legal drama and unease Its legal drama and offbeat unease are praised as part of a blend with the earlier series.

The Good Fight

  • Similar: blend of legal drama and unease The series is praised as a blend of the creators’ legal and supernatural modes.
  • Compared: darkness and anger Its existential technology stories have less of the earlier drama’s dark, angry edge.
  • Compared: serialized ambition The broadcast series feels narrower in ambition than the heavily serialized streaming drama.

FAQ

What is Cupertino about?

Two fired lawyers start a small firm to represent people harmed or exploited by Silicon Valley technology companies.

Is it mainly a procedural or a continuing story?

Weekly legal cases run alongside a continuing mystery involving an unusual whistleblower named Bo.

Is the show grim or funny?

The AI implications can be frightening, but quirky judges, running gags and lively supporting characters keep the legal drama playful.

What are its biggest strengths?

Intelligent case writing, brisk early pacing and the chemistry of the growing legal team draw the most praise.

What are the main drawbacks?

Some find the characters thin or the ongoing mystery less compelling than the cases. The geographic and demographic portrayal of Cupertino also draws criticism.

How many episodes are in the first season?

The supplied coverage describes a twenty-episode first season, welcomed as room for character growth.

What content should parents consider?

The cases include murder, fatal drone incidents, sexual harassment and a seductive chatbot encouraging a teenager to kill his father. Surveillance and threats contribute to an unsettling atmosphere.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Top TV Shows to Consider

#1 Colin From Accounts, Season 3
4.8

Best for sharp adult humor, magnetic chemistry and a deeply satisfying farewell. Skip it if familiar will-they-won’t-they plotting or deliberately messy leads are dealbreakers.

Pros: humor, writing quality

#2 King of the Hill, Season 15
4.7

Choose Season 15 for warm, character-driven comedy, meaningful growth, and a finale that rewards longtime fans. Skip it if the short binge format, uneven replacement voices, or occasional clumsy commentary...

Pros: franchise connection, character development

#3 The Pitt, Season 2
4.7

Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.

Pros: realism, emotional impact

#4 Furious, Season 1
4.6

Best for powerhouse performances, thorny character work, and a tense revenge mystery that grows richer as it goes. Skip it if abuse, trafficking, graphic violence, or deliberately messy moral questions...

Pros: main cast performance, character development

Cons: pilot episode quality