Black+Decker Dustbuster AdvancedClean Handheld Vacuum

Black+Decker Dustbuster AdvancedClean Handheld Vacuum Review

Brand: BLACK+DECKER
Released: May 16, 2012
Updated: 4 months ago
3.8
Overall review score
131
Review insights
43
Scored features
16
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for convenient quick pickups, built-in tools, small-space storage, and easy emptying. Skip it if you need strong pet-hair removal, fine-dust containment, quiet operation, long runtime, or heavy-duty car/detailing performance.

Best for

Best for quick dry messes in small homes, apartments, cars, and around tables where built-in tools and easy emptying matter more than deep cleaning.

Not for

Not for pet owners needing reliable hair removal from carpet or upholstery, fine-dust-sensitive users, or anyone expecting heavy-duty car detailing, quiet operation, or long runtime.

Verdict

The Black+Decker Dustbuster AdvancedClean comes across as a convenience-first handheld vac: reviewers liked its built-in crevice and brush tools, simple controls, light feel, and easy emptying, and several long-term users said it stayed useful for years. The tradeoff is that measured and real-world cleaning results were inconsistent. Some reviewers praised the suction on crumbs, ash, rocks, and quick car messes, while lab-style testing found weak dusting, poor pet-hair pickup, loud operation, short runtime, and dust escaping through or from the bin/filter. Its best evidence is for small, everyday debris and quick grab-and-go use, not demanding carpet, pet hair, or fine-dust cleanup.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

43 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    13 (30%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    11 (26%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (30%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (9%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (5%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.3
    12 reviews low consensus
    Suction and Airflow: 4.3, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Suction evidence is split: several hands-on reviewers called it powerful for quick debris, while testing found weak or inconsistent cleaning on flour, carpet, and crevices.
  • 3.9
    12 reviews low consensus
    Overall opinion: 3.9, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Overall opinion is mixed, ranging from five-star and repeat-buy praise to poor lab results and one strongly negative ownership rant.
  • 4.2
    8 reviews low consensus
    Accessories and Tools: 4.2, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Reviewers liked the built-in brush and crevice tools and not having loose attachments, though one comparison test criticized the missing small crevice attachment.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Emptying and Mess Control: 4.3, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Emptying is generally praised as easy and neat, though one reviewer found the process a little tricky.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Weight: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Weight is generally favorable, described as average, not heavy, lightweight, and portable.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Maintenance requirements: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Maintenance is mostly positive because reviewers found the washable filter and routine cleaning manageable.

Cons highlights

  • 3.3
    7 reviews low consensus
    Battery and Charging: 3.3, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Battery and charging are split: some users liked the ready-on-dock charging, while others reported poor runtime, long waits, or battery failure.
  • 3.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    Price and Value: 3.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Value opinions vary: some called it a good deal or worth the upgrade, while critical reviews said stronger options cost about the same or repairs were not worth it.
  • 2.5
    4 reviews low consensus
    Noise level: 2.5, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Noise feedback is mixed: formal and user reviews often called it loud, while one household found it less alarming than expected.
  • 3.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    Tool-change simplicity: 3.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Tool changes are usually simple, but there are complaints that the rotating/extendable tool can be tricky or fail to stay locked.
  • 1.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Filtration / Dust Containment: 1.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Dust containment is a weak point, with reports of leaking sand, no HEPA-level reassurance, and fine dust passing through the filter.
  • 2.8
    3 reviews low consensus
    Comparative performance: 2.8, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Comparative evidence is mixed but leans weak in formal tests, while one household comparison favored it over a Shark hand vac.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Handheld Vacuums, this product is above average in Onboard tool storage, Bin and Bag, Hair Pickup — Hard Floors, near average in Accessories and Tools, Battery and Charging, below average in Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries), Runtime, Filtration / Dust Containment.

Comparison summary

42 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    10 (24%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    12 (29%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    20 (48%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries) 1.0 3.6 -2.6
Runtime 1.5 3.6 -2.1
Filtration / Dust Containment 1.5 3.5 -2.0
Hair Pickup — Carpets 1.5 3.5 -2.0
Airflow blowback 1.0 2.7 -1.7
Pet-Ready Features 2.5 4.2 -1.7
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup 2.5 4.1 -1.6
Area Rug Handling 2.0 3.5 -1.5

Consider This Instead

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

shark

  • Worse: emptying and cleanup The reviewer disliked cleaning the Shark and found cleanup easier with the Dustbuster.
  • Worse: power The reviewer framed the Dustbuster as having noticeably more power than the Shark hand vac it replaced.

Hoover

  • Compared: small cleanup convenience Even after getting a Hoover for larger cleanups, the reviewer still kept reaching for the Dustbuster.

Ryobi

  • Better: carpet mat flour pickup The review says the Dustbuster did not clean the mat nearly as well as the Ryobi.

FAQ

Is the Black+Decker Dustbuster AdvancedClean good for quick cleanups?

Yes. Positive reviewers repeatedly used it for small household and car messes, and several praised its easy operation, built-in tools, and grab-and-go convenience.

How well does it handle pet hair?

The evidence is mixed but leans weak. One long-term user vacuumed pet hair from car seats, while testing found it severely struggled on a couch cushion and automotive carpet.

Is the suction strong?

Some reviewers called it powerful and showed it picking up debris like cereal, ash, rocks, and crumbs. Comparative testing was less flattering, especially for flour, carpet mats, and demanding crevice cleanup.

Is it easy to empty and clean?

Mostly yes. Reviewers often praised the easy-empty bin, neat canister, washable filter, and onboard tools, though one owner found emptying or rotating parts a little tricky.

How is the battery life?

Battery feedback is split. Some users liked the charging dock and ready-to-use convenience, but negative tests and ownership reports mentioned short runtime, charging waits, and battery failure.

Is it quiet?

Not consistently. One household found it quieter than expected, but other reviews called it loud and measured or described high noise levels.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Handheld Vacuums to Consider

#1 Bissell Pet Hair Eraser Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.4

Best for quick pet-hair cleanup on upholstery, stairs, cars, and tight spots. Skip it for long sessions, large areas, or shoppers who need replaceable batteries and stronger upright-level suction.

Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Overall opinion

Cons: Battery and Charging, Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake

#2 Bissell AeroSlim Cordless Handheld Vacuum
4.4

Choose the AeroSlim for fast spot-cleaning in cars, kitchens, desks, dorms, and small homes. Skip it if you need a whole-house vacuum, long runtime, or a large debris cup.

Pros: Overall opinion, Suction and Airflow

Cons: Bin and Bag, Suitability for heavy-duty use

#3 Saker Car Vacuum Portable Cordless 3 in 1 Handheld Car Vacuum
4.3

Best for quick car, keyboard, craft-room, and small-space cleanups with strong suction and blower versatility. Skip it for full-size SUV deep cleans, shop-vac jobs, or users who dislike short battery...

Pros: Overall opinion, Reverse cleaning performance

Cons: Controls and UI, Suitability for heavy-duty use

#4 BLACK+DECKER dustbuster Cordless Pet Handheld Vacuum
4.3

Best for quick pet-hair cleanups, upholstery, cars, and small spaces where cordless grab-and-go use matters. Skip it for long sessions, large messes, heavy carpet hair, or anyone who needs a...

Pros: Suction and Airflow, Emptying and Mess Control