Alice and Steve, Season 1

Alice and Steve, Season 1 Review

Studio: Disney+
Released: June 8, 2026
Updated: 3 months ago
3.7
Overall review score
245
Review insights
45
Scored features
25
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose Alice and Steve if you want a messy, sharp wrong-com powered by Nicola Walker and combustible friendship chemistry. Skip it if the age-gap premise, rushed romance, or chaotic back-half plotting will spoil the laughs.

Best for

Best for viewers who enjoy messy British dramedies about flawed adults, long friendships, petty revenge, and uncomfortable romantic complications. It especially suits anyone drawn to Nicola Walker’s volcanic comic-dramatic performance.

Not for

Not for viewers who need the central romance to feel plausible or comfortable. It is also a poor fit for family viewing or for anyone bothered by drug use, foul language, and morally messy characters.

Verdict

Alice and Steve Season 1 works best as a volatile friendship comedy: Nicola Walker and Jemaine Clement give the show a lived-in charge, and the revenge spiral can be sharply funny, awkward, and unexpectedly touching. The tradeoff is that the season’s provocative age-gap romance is also its weakest link for many reactions. Some found the discomfort productively complicated, while others saw the relationship as rushed, thin, or impossible to buy. Short episodes make the six-part run easy to binge, but the back half sometimes overpacks subplots and contrivances. It is a lively, divisive wrong-com with standout performances and a premise that will either hook viewers or push them away.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

45 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    5 (11%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    19 (42%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (29%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    6 (13%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (4%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.1
    20 reviews moderate consensus
    humor: 4.1, 20 reviews, moderate consensus
    Humor is one of the season’s biggest draws, with many finding the feud, zingers, and social disasters very funny. A smaller group thought the comedy was only mild, dated, or too buried under discomfort.
  • 4.5
    16 reviews moderate consensus
    main cast performance: 4.5, 16 reviews, moderate consensus
    Nicola Walker is the season’s most consistent standout, repeatedly praised for turning Alice’s fury into something funny, painful, and magnetic. Clement and the broader lead work are mostly liked, though a few felt Steve gives Clement too little room.
  • 3.7
    16 reviews low consensus
    theme depth: 3.7, 16 reviews, low consensus
    The season is most interesting when it digs into platonic love, aging, loneliness, jealousy, and the cost of emotional avoidance. Critics split over whether it explores those themes deeply enough or lets them get buried under plot chaos.
  • 3.6
    16 reviews low consensus
    writing quality: 3.6, 16 reviews, low consensus
    The writing is deeply split: admirers call it funny, emotionally alert, and bold, while detractors find it lax, overstuffed, or unwilling to fully interrogate the premise. Its best moments come from character pain rather than plot machinery.
  • 3.8
    15 reviews low consensus
    entertainment value: 3.8, 15 reviews, low consensus
    Overall enjoyment ranges from enthusiastic to hostile, but the positive side is strong: many found it funny, engaging, and hard to stop watching. The main turnoffs are the icky premise, loose plotting, and uneven romance.
  • 4.7
    12 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.7, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Walker and Clement’s lived-in best-friend chemistry is one of the show’s strongest selling points. Their comfort, sparring, and combustible history make the feud more convincing than the age-gap romance for many.

Cons highlights

  • 3.1
    15 reviews low consensus
    age appropriateness: 3.1, 15 reviews, low consensus
    The age-gap setup is the season’s defining controversy. Some felt the show handles the ick with care and uses it productively, while others found it inappropriate, evasive, or impossible to enjoy.
  • 3.3
    12 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 3.3, 12 reviews, low consensus
    The central friendship-war hook can be sharp, funny, and emotionally observant, especially when Alice and Steve are tearing at each other. The biggest weakness is the Steve-Izzy romance, which several responses found thin, rushed, or contrived.
  • 3.0
    9 reviews low consensus
    character development: 3.0, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Alice often comes across as the richest character, with rage, hurt, selfishness, and flashes of growth all in play. Izzy and the central romance are more divisive, with several complaints that they feel underwritten.
  • 2.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    episode pacing: 2.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The six-episode pace keeps the show moving, but it often rushes the Steve-Izzy relationship and major emotional turns. Several found the briskness easy to watch but damaging to believability.
  • 3.1
    5 reviews low consensus
    accountability handling: 3.1, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The show’s handling of blame and forgiveness is divisive. Stronger takes appreciate that it keeps messy people messy, while harsher ones feel Steve and Alice are not held to account convincingly enough.
  • 2.9
    4 reviews low consensus
    finale satisfaction: 2.9, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The ending drew mixed reactions, from a turbulent but successful landing to frustration with an easy off-ramp, a ridiculous finish, or an unsatisfying cliffhanger. Closure depends heavily on how much chaos a viewer is willing to forgive.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in dialogue quality, age appropriateness, plot originality, near average in humor, theme depth, below average in score quality, plot twists, cliffhanger effectiveness.

Comparison summary

45 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    8 (18%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    18 (40%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    19 (42%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
score quality 2.0 4.1 -2.1
plot twists 2.3 4.1 -1.8
cliffhanger effectiveness 2.5 4.0 -1.5
realism 2.0 3.4 -1.4
season finale quality 2.4 3.8 -1.4
continuity 2.0 3.4 -1.4
family friendliness 1.3 2.4 -1.1
language level 1.4 2.5 -1.1

Consider This Instead

If you want better main cast performance

Choose Rooster, Season 1. It scores 5.0 vs 4.5 for main cast performance, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

If you want better score quality

Choose Dark Winds, Season 4. It scores 4.8 vs 2.0 for score quality, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Beef

  • Better: revenge-comedy plotting The feud plotting is described as a familiar idea executed better in Beef.
  • Compared: malice and escalating personal revenge The revenge spiral is compared with Beef as Alice and Steve unleash increasingly destructive malice.

Fleabag

  • Compared: wrong-com tone The show is also tonally grouped with Fleabag in Decider's wrong-com comparison.

Shameless

  • Better: chaotic comedy-drama plotting The chaotic dramedy beats are said to have been handled better by Shameless.

FAQ

Is Alice and Steve Season 1 funny?

Usually, yes, if you like uncomfortable wrong-comedy. The feud, banter, and social disasters drew a lot of praise, though a few found the humor mild or too buried under the premise.

What is the biggest strength of the season?

Nicola Walker’s performance and her chemistry with Jemaine Clement are the clearest strengths. Their long, messy friendship gives the show its best scenes.

Is the age-gap romance handled well?

That is the most divisive part. Some felt the show uses the discomfort intelligently, while others thought it avoids the hardest questions or makes the romance too hard to believe.

Does the six-episode length work?

The short format makes it easy to binge, but it also rushes some relationship turns and side plots. Several reactions wished the season had more room to breathe.

Is it appropriate for family viewing?

No. The season centers on adult sexual relationships and includes drug use, foul language, and mature relationship conflict.

Should there be a second season?

Warmer reactions showed real interest in more episodes, especially because Alice and Steve’s damaged friendship still has room to evolve. Mixed reactions were less convinced unless the writing becomes more focused.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top TV Shows to Consider

#1 Colin From Accounts, Season 3
4.8

Best for sharp adult humor, magnetic chemistry and a deeply satisfying farewell. Skip it if familiar will-they-won’t-they plotting or deliberately messy leads are dealbreakers.

Pros: humor, writing quality

#2 King of the Hill, Season 15
4.7

Choose Season 15 for warm, character-driven comedy, meaningful growth, and a finale that rewards longtime fans. Skip it if the short binge format, uneven replacement voices, or occasional clumsy commentary...

Pros: franchise connection, character development

#3 The Pitt, Season 2
4.7

Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.

Pros: realism, emotional impact

#4 Furious, Season 1
4.6

Best for powerhouse performances, thorny character work, and a tense revenge mystery that grows richer as it goes. Skip it if abuse, trafficking, graphic violence, or deliberately messy moral questions...

Pros: main cast performance, character development

Cons: pilot episode quality