Compare Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752 vs Kenmore Featherlite Lift-Up Vacuum

Hard-floor seal and intake are weak in some evidence, especially where the head struggles with large debris or sounds rough on hard floors.

Reviews praised the hard-floor seal, especially the fabric squeegee that helped reduce scattering with the brushroll on.

Cord management is a downside because the cord is manual, non-retractable, and can get in the way.

The cord hook was praised because it kept the cord from tangling around the user's feet.

Weight is a repeated drawback, with reviewers calling the unit hefty, heavy on the wrist, or difficult for some users.

Weight was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly describing the vacuum as very light or feather light.

Reliability and support are mixed: one review praises the long warranty, while a customer describes a poor warranty/support experience.

One owner-style review recommended it for someone wanting a cleaner home and something reliable.

Onboard tool storage is a weakness because the vacuum cannot hold all attachments and tools can fall or require the bag.

Onboard tool storage was presented as useful because accessories stay on the upright for quick access.

Hard-floor hair pickup is mixed, with one test favoring the Shark over Bissell and CNET/customer evidence showing weakness without the right tool.

Hard-floor hair pickup was praised, particularly when the brushroll stayed on without scattering debris.

Clogging evidence is mixed-negative: one CNET test found large carpet debris did not clog, but pet-hair and head-clog complaints recur elsewhere.

Dustbin and open-design comments were positive about keeping the vacuum free from clogs.

Build quality is mixed: professional reviewers often call it solid, while some customers report flimsy parts, broken lids, or cheaper-feeling plastics.

Build quality was mostly praised as solid, durable, or well-made, with the main caveat being limited long-term evidence.

Longevity evidence is mixed-positive, with warranty praise and several long-term owner reports balanced against isolated failures.

Build impressions were positive, but long-term durability remained only cautiously assessed because the model was relatively new.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is mostly positive, though one review notes some debris may remain in corners or along walls.

Project Farm rated the Kenmore as the best in its test for cleaning close to a wall.

Floorhead design is mixed: it helps carpet pickup and maneuverability, but its lip and size cause hard-floor and width complaints.

The floorhead design was praised for efficiency and a balanced gate-size tradeoff between large-debris pickup and sealing.

Hose length is mixed to negative: one reviewer measured useful reach, but others say the hose is short and limits range.

TechGearLab listed hose length as a drawback.

Dust-bin feedback is mixed: reviewers like easy emptying and size in some tests, while Amazon customers complain the usable capacity can feel low.

The bagless dust bin was praised because the container is easy to dump and reuse.

Packaging has limited but positive customer evidence, with one buyer saying it was packed well and worked as described.

Packaging was praised by one reviewer as neat, intact, and well protected.

Large-debris hard-floor intake is mixed, with strong customer pellet pickup but CNET criticism that Cheerios were too tall for the head.

Hard-floor large-debris pickup was often praised, including perfect rice pickup and better large-debris handling, though TechGearLab reported cereal plowing.

Comparative performance is strong overall, with reviewers often favoring the NV752 over similarly priced uprights while noting pricier models can beat it in some tests.

Comparative evidence was split but mostly favorable: several reviews put Kenmore ahead of budget rivals, while TechGearLab preferred Shark alternatives.

The accessory package is valued for crevice, upholstery, pet, dusting, and hard-floor tools, though some customers wished more tools were included or stored onboard.

Reviewers considered the included accessories decent to nice, especially the upholstery and combination tools, without calling them premium.

Maneuverability is generally good thanks to swivel steering, but the top-heavy pod and strong pull make handling mixed for some users.

Handling was a clear strength, with reviewers praising the light feel, swivel, low effort, and easy maneuvering around furniture.

The Lift-Away/convertible design is one of the product’s core strengths, making it easier to use as an upright, pod, canister-like, or handheld-style cleaner.

Lift-up or detachable-canister use was usually praised for portability and above-floor cleaning, though one lab review criticized the lack of a true lift-away feature.

Debris illumination is a standout practical feature, with users saying the lights reveal crud and missed dirt.

Debris illumination was praised for helping users see under furniture, in dark areas, or during everyday cleaning.

Pet performance is a major strength in most sources, with reviewers praising pet-hair pickup, though tool and tangle issues appear in some use cases.

The pet-focused review praised the vacuum for a pet-friendly home, tying that to pet hair pickup and dust containment.

Noise feedback is moderate: one reviewer found it quieter than a Dyson DC65 but not truly quiet overall.

Noise evidence was mixed: one comparison called it relatively quiet, while another review found it a little louder than average.

Upholstery and above-floor cleaning are generally good with pet and upholstery tools, but some reviewers find the pet tool weak or prone to resistance.

Above-floor and upholstery use was praised with the canister, wand, and included tools for couches and other surfaces.

Reviewers consistently describe the NV752 as a strong-suction corded upright with high airflow, especially through the hose and on carpets.

Most reviews described suction or airflow as strong, with test evidence ranging from solid water-lift results to owner praise for high suction.

Crevice and grouted-floor pickup has negative customer evidence, especially on grouted tile where grit required repeated passes.

Crevice and groove pickup was a repeated weakness, with Project Farm and Vacuum Wars describing below-average or struggling results.

Surface safety is generally positive where addressed, especially brush-roll shutoff and soft hard-floor use, though some hard-floor concerns remain.

One reviewer valued the hard-floor mode because stopping the brushroll helps avoid scratching wood floors.

Value is a strong theme: reviewers repeatedly say the Shark delivers high-end flexibility and suction for a midrange or reasonable price.

Most reviewers framed the Kenmore as a strong budget value, though TechGearLab argued similarly priced models performed better.

Hair pickup on carpets is a strength across tests and customer reviews, with many reviewers saying it pulls up pet hair effectively.

Carpet pet-hair pickup was praised in both a lab review and a pet-household owner review.

Stair cleaning is a consistent benefit because Lift-Away mode and attachments make stairs easier than with a fixed upright.

The lift-up layout was praised for stair cleaning because it made carrying and using the vacuum easier.

Maintenance is generally easy for filters and dust-bin cleaning, but brush-roll hair maintenance can be frustrating for pet owners.

Maintenance evidence was positive where reviewers discussed easy filter changes and simple cleaning.

Versatility is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the ability to clean floors, stairs, furniture, cars, corners, and under-furniture areas.

Reviewers described the vacuum as versatile, with many ways to use it and a broad budget feature set.

Assembly and setup are praised as easy, with convenient clips and customer comments that it is simple to put together.

Assembly was consistently described as easy or straightforward across reviews.

Controls are praised for being on the handle and intuitive, though isolated customer feedback says the power button can be hard to keep engaged.

The roller-off control was praised as handy for hard floors because suction continues without the brushroll spinning.

Overall opinion is strongly positive across professional and customer sources, with caveats around hard floors, weight, hose length, and tangles.

Overall opinion leaned positive across most reviews, but TechGearLab offered a notably more negative verdict.

Tool changes are generally easy, with click-on accessories and a removable handheld piece praised for quick transitions.

Tool changes were generally described as easy, including a removable wand, snap-together pieces, and convenient switching on attachments.

Small-space usefulness is positive when using the portable pod and tools for stairs, pantries, and tight spaces.

Small-space usefulness was supported by comments about a narrower head and attachments for tight spaces.

Filtration is one of the strongest consensus points, with sealed HEPA performance and smoke-test results keeping dust and allergens contained.

The sealed HEPA filtration drew strong praise for trapping dust inside the vacuum rather than releasing it back into the room.

Ownership costs are favorable where discussed because the vacuum is bagless with washable filters and little routine replacement.

Reviewers liked the bagless and washable-filter setup because it reduced the need to buy bags or replacement filters frequently.

Headlights are strongly praised for showing debris on floors, dark corners, and attachment work.

LED/headlight comments were positive, with reviewers calling the lighting useful and appreciated.

Ease of use is mostly strong thanks to Lift-Away, handle controls, and easy emptying, but weight and hose issues create exceptions.

Ease of use was a major positive in most reviews thanks to light handling and ergonomics, but TechGearLab scored ease of use below average.

Cord length is mixed: some reviewers call it long, while customers often want several more feet.

Cord length was adequate to good: some reviews called it plenty or long enough, while Vacuum Wars treated 25 feet as neutral.

Emptying is usually praised as easy and mess-controlled, though bin capacity and packed pet hair create some complaints.

Emptying and mess control were consistently praised as easy, with reviewers noting simple dumping and cleaning.

Medium-pile or shag-style rug feedback is positive in customer evidence, with one user saying it revived a mid-cut shag area rug.

Medium-pile carpet evidence was generally strong, including perfect or high sand/deep-clean results, while TechGearLab rated carpet only slightly above average.

Hair-wrap resistance is one of the most mixed attributes: some reviewers report minor tangles, while pet-hair tests and long-hair owners report serious wrapping.

Hair-wrap resistance was the most repeated drawback, with several reviewers reporting long hair wrapping around the brushroll, though one reviewer claimed strong anti-tangle behavior.

Innovation is tied to Powered Lift-Away; reviewers and customers describe the configuration as unusually flexible compared with other uprights.

Vacuum Wars praised the Kenmore for bringing premium-style upright features into a budget price range.

The lift-up chassis/canister function was praised for making stair-type cleaning easier.

Design impressions are mostly positive, with reviewers noting modern styling, appealing color, and a premium-looking finish.

Airflow blowback is positively addressed in customer evidence where the Shark avoids spitting debris back at the user.

Area-rug handling is mixed: settings help some rugs, but several customers say suction is too strong for smaller rugs.

Automatic obstruction shutoff has positive customer evidence because it protects the motor and warns when the brush stops or clogs.

Automatic brush/standby behavior is praised where mentioned, with the roller stopping when upright or locked.

High-pile carpet performance is positive in review and customer evidence, with suction and settings helping rugs and high-pile carpet.

Low-pile carpet performance is broadly positive, though heavy debris can require extra passes.

Hair-removal channel and brush-cleaning access are notable weaknesses for long pet hair, with owners reporting lengthy brush-head cleaning.

Fine-dust hard-floor pickup is split: CNET found excellent sand pickup, while other reviewers and customers mention fine-particle or bare-floor weaknesses.

Low-profile reach is praised when the detachable head or wand gets under beds, chairs, and furniture.

Reverse-pass cleaning was strong in Project Farm’s plastic-ball test, where the Kenmore picked up remaining debris on the return pass.

The self-propelled feel helps carpet cleaning for many users, though the pull can feel too strong in tight spaces.

Upright stability is a weakness in customer feedback, especially when the pod or wand is used and the unit tips easily.

Heavy-duty suitability is favorable, with professional and customer reviewers describing it as appropriate for pets, kids, carpets, and cleaning-house use.

Under-furniture pickup is a major advantage because Powered Lift-Away lets the head or wand reach under beds and furniture.