Compare Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752 vs Bissell MultiClean Vacuum

Ease of use is mostly strong thanks to Lift-Away, handle controls, and easy emptying, but weight and hose issues create exceptions.

Ease of use varied, with users praising light rolling and simple handling while lab testing found harder pushing and floor transitions.

Onboard tool storage is a weakness because the vacuum cannot hold all attachments and tools can fall or require the bag.

Onboard tool storage was explicitly liked in the cord-rewind review.

Hair-wrap resistance is one of the most mixed attributes: some reviewers report minor tangles, while pet-hair tests and long-hair owners report serious wrapping.

Hair-wrap resistance was mostly positive, especially in Vacuum Wars testing, though TechGearLab still found some long hair wrapped around the brushroll.

Under-furniture pickup is a major advantage because Powered Lift-Away lets the head or wand reach under beds and furniture.

Under-furniture cleaning was mixed: the body could get fairly flat, but Lift-Off mode could not use the powered floorhead for easier reach.

Weight is a repeated drawback, with reviewers calling the unit hefty, heavy on the wrist, or difficult for some users.

Weight impressions were mostly manageable, described as lightweight by one user and medium-weight by another first-look reviewer.

Hose length is mixed to negative: one reviewer measured useful reach, but others say the hose is short and limits range.

The hose earned positive comments for stretch and reach, including a clear stretch hose and a useful long-reach handle setup.

Cord management is a downside because the cord is manual, non-retractable, and can get in the way.

Cord management was convenient with automatic rewind, but the same reviewer questioned long-term reliability.

Hard-floor seal and intake are weak in some evidence, especially where the head struggles with large debris or sounds rough on hard floors.

The hard-floor seal was a tradeoff: the larger front gates helped large debris but let in more air and reduced seal strength.

Maintenance is generally easy for filters and dust-bin cleaning, but brush-roll hair maintenance can be frustrating for pet owners.

Maintenance feedback was split: tangle-free design reduced hair work in positive reviews, but one lab review found roller hair removal frustrating.

Tool changes are generally easy, with click-on accessories and a removable handheld piece praised for quick transitions.

Tool changes were mostly straightforward, especially where no tools were needed, but the fixed handle-and-wand setup limited convenience in some versions.

Debris illumination is a standout practical feature, with users saying the lights reveal crud and missed dirt.

Debris illumination was praised because the LED bank helped visibility more than expected.

High-pile carpet performance is positive in review and customer evidence, with suction and settings helping rugs and high-pile carpet.

High-pile and shag results were mixed: Vacuum Wars supported thick-rug use, while TechGearLab found deep debris remained in shag fibers.

The accessory package is valued for crevice, upholstery, pet, dusting, and hard-floor tools, though some customers wished more tools were included or stored onboard.

Attachment feedback was mixed-to-positive: reviewers liked the included turbo/crevice/dusting tools, but one lab review found the motorized brush underpowered.

Area-rug handling is mixed: settings help some rugs, but several customers say suction is too strong for smaller rugs.

Area-rug handling was mixed, helped by suction adjustment and strong pickup in some tests but hurt by mat-climbing difficulty in another.

Packaging has limited but positive customer evidence, with one buyer saying it was packed well and worked as described.

Packaging was rated positively in the first-look review, with the box arriving undamaged and the product wrapped well.

Versatility is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the ability to clean floors, stairs, furniture, cars, corners, and under-furniture areas.

Versatility was a major pro across positive reviews because of Lift-Off use, attachments, pet features, and hard-floor/carpet adaptability.

Heavy-duty suitability is favorable, with professional and customer reviewers describing it as appropriate for pets, kids, carpets, and cleaning-house use.

In a user test with a large carpet mess, the vacuum was judged to do a very good job, though heavier-duty limits appeared in lab suction and hard-floor findings.

Maneuverability is generally good thanks to swivel steering, but the top-heavy pod and strong pull make handling mixed for some users.

Maneuverability varied by reviewer: some found it light and easy to turn, while lab testing found turning and mat transitions harder.

Overall opinion is strongly positive across professional and customer sources, with caveats around hard floors, weight, hose length, and tangles.

Overall opinion was mixed-to-positive: multiple reviewers strongly recommended it, while one lab review rated it only average and limited by suction and hard-floor results.

Large-debris hard-floor intake is mixed, with strong customer pellet pickup but CNET criticism that Cheerios were too tall for the head.

Large hard-floor debris pickup was generally strong in Vacuum Wars and user tests, but TechGearLab found overall hardwood pickup below average.

Upholstery and above-floor cleaning are generally good with pet and upholstery tools, but some reviewers find the pet tool weak or prone to resistance.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning were usable, with Lift-Off flexibility and tools, but lab upholstery pickup was only about average.

Cord length is mixed: some reviewers call it long, while customers often want several more feet.

Cord length was a mild drawback on the Slim model, repeatedly described as a little below average.

Hair pickup on carpets is a strength across tests and customer reviews, with many reviewers saying it pulls up pet hair effectively.

Carpet hair pickup was a relative strength, with reviewers reporting clean low-pile results and easy pet-hair pickup.

Headlights are strongly praised for showing debris on floors, dark corners, and attachment work.

LED headlights were praised as useful and a nice touch rather than just a spec-sheet feature.

Fine-dust hard-floor pickup is split: CNET found excellent sand pickup, while other reviewers and customers mention fine-particle or bare-floor weaknesses.

Fine hard-floor pickup was sharply split: Vacuum Wars praised broad debris pickup, while TechGearLab found sand left behind on hardwood.

Medium-pile or shag-style rug feedback is positive in customer evidence, with one user saying it revived a mid-cut shag area rug.

Medium-pile/rug pickup was strong in the comparison review, where the Lift-Off picked up large debris in a solid pass.

Dust-bin feedback is mixed: reviewers like easy emptying and size in some tests, while Amazon customers complain the usable capacity can feel low.

The bagless bin was easy to clean and empty, though bin size was called a little below average in Slim-model testing.

Emptying is usually praised as easy and mess-controlled, though bin capacity and packed pet hair create some complaints.

Emptying was easy in user reviews, with debris dropping from the bagless canister and minimal complication.

Filtration is one of the strongest consensus points, with sealed HEPA performance and smoke-test results keeping dust and allergens contained.

Filtration was one of the clearest strengths, with fog and air-quality testing showing no meaningful leakage or particle spikes.

Crevice and grouted-floor pickup has negative customer evidence, especially on grouted tile where grit required repeated passes.

Crevice and groove pickup was a consistent weakness in formal tests, tied to lower suction and large front gates.

Small-space usefulness is positive when using the portable pod and tools for stairs, pantries, and tight spaces.

The Slim version received positive small-space feedback because its narrower head was easier to maneuver in tight areas.

Hair-removal channel and brush-cleaning access are notable weaknesses for long pet hair, with owners reporting lengthy brush-head cleaning.

Hair-removal maintenance was frustrating in one lab review because the roller could not be removed from the head.

Innovation is tied to Powered Lift-Away; reviewers and customers describe the configuration as unusually flexible compared with other uprights.

Reviewers treated some features as uncommon for the category, especially the tangle-free brushroll and sealed filtration system.

Pet performance is a major strength in most sources, with reviewers praising pet-hair pickup, though tool and tangle issues appear in some use cases.

Pet usefulness was a recurring strength, driven by pet-hair pickup, HEPA filtration, tangle resistance, and pet-focused attachments, though tougher pet messes had stronger competitors.

Low-pile carpet performance is broadly positive, though heavy debris can require extra passes.

Low-pile carpet pickup ranged from decent to very good, with some reviewers praising carpet results and one noting inefficient reverse passes.

Low-profile reach is praised when the detachable head or wand gets under beds, chairs, and furniture.

Low-profile usefulness was limited in one review because the canister mode could not connect to the powered floorhead for under-furniture cleaning.

Longevity evidence is mixed-positive, with warranty praise and several long-term owner reports balanced against isolated failures.

Long-term confidence was limited by concern over how well the automatic cord rewind would hold up.

Build quality is mixed: professional reviewers often call it solid, while some customers report flimsy parts, broken lids, or cheaper-feeling plastics.

Build feedback was sparse but positive where mentioned, especially around the sealed HEPA filter's rubber-sealed design.

The Lift-Away/convertible design is one of the product’s core strengths, making it easier to use as an upright, pod, canister-like, or handheld-style cleaner.

The Lift-Off canister design improved above-floor flexibility, though it could not attach to the wide floor head in one review's testing.

Floorhead design is mixed: it helps carpet pickup and maneuverability, but its lip and size cause hard-floor and width complaints.

The floorhead's large front gates helped debris intake, but the design could also trap material or make pushing harder depending on surface.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is mostly positive, though one review notes some debris may remain in corners or along walls.

Edge cleaning was a weakness in lab and user testing, especially along walls or wood edges where it failed to collect or glide smoothly.

Reviewers consistently describe the NV752 as a strong-suction corded upright with high airflow, especially through the hose and on carpets.

Reviews split on suction: some users praised strong real-world pickup, while lab reviews found below-average sealed suction, hose airflow, and crevice results.

Noise feedback is moderate: one reviewer found it quieter than a Dyson DC65 but not truly quiet overall.

Noise impressions were generally favorable, with reviewers describing it as not very loud, not screaming, and more pleasant than some alternatives.

Comparative performance is strong overall, with reviewers often favoring the NV752 over similarly priced uprights while noting pricier models can beat it in some tests.

Comparative performance depended on the outlet: Vacuum Wars found it competitive with pricier vacuums, while TechGearLab found several similarly priced alternatives stronger.

Stair cleaning is a consistent benefit because Lift-Away mode and attachments make stairs easier than with a fixed upright.

Stair cleaning benefited from the Lift-Off canister and attachments, although the inability to use the wider powered head in canister mode limited coverage.

Value is a strong theme: reviewers repeatedly say the Shark delivers high-end flexibility and suction for a midrange or reasonable price.

Value was polarized: Vacuum Wars saw strong performance for the price, while TechGearLab considered it expensive for its performance tier.

Assembly and setup are praised as easy, with convenient clips and customer comments that it is simple to put together.

Assembly and setup were easy in the first-look review, with no tools required and the unboxing described as straightforward.

Controls are praised for being on the handle and intuitive, though isolated customer feedback says the power button can be hard to keep engaged.

Controls were useful, including brushroll on/off and floor-transition settings, but they were not as seamless as automatic systems.

Design impressions are mostly positive, with reviewers noting modern styling, appealing color, and a premium-looking finish.

Airflow blowback is positively addressed in customer evidence where the Shark avoids spitting debris back at the user.

Ownership costs are favorable where discussed because the vacuum is bagless with washable filters and little routine replacement.

Automatic obstruction shutoff has positive customer evidence because it protects the motor and warns when the brush stops or clogs.

Automatic brush/standby behavior is praised where mentioned, with the roller stopping when upright or locked.

Clogging evidence is mixed-negative: one CNET test found large carpet debris did not clog, but pet-hair and head-clog complaints recur elsewhere.

Hard-floor hair pickup is mixed, with one test favoring the Shark over Bissell and CNET/customer evidence showing weakness without the right tool.

Surface safety is generally positive where addressed, especially brush-roll shutoff and soft hard-floor use, though some hard-floor concerns remain.

The self-propelled feel helps carpet cleaning for many users, though the pull can feel too strong in tight spaces.

Upright stability is a weakness in customer feedback, especially when the pod or wand is used and the unit tips easily.

Stuck resistance was a weak point in one lab review, where the vacuum struggled to climb onto a bamboo test mat.

Attachment surface safety was a caveat because the dusting brush bristles were described as stiff and unsuitable for delicate surfaces.

Reliability and support are mixed: one review praises the long warranty, while a customer describes a poor warranty/support experience.