Compare Dyson Ball Animal 3 Upright Vacuum vs Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752

Ease of use is highly mixed: some reviewers find setup and controls simple, while others dislike the weight, cord, hose, and pushing effort.

Ease of use is mostly strong thanks to Lift-Away, handle controls, and easy emptying, but weight and hose issues create exceptions.

Hair-removal maintenance is strong because reviewers reported little need for cutting wrapped hair away.

Hair-removal channel and brush-cleaning access are notable weaknesses for long pet hair, with owners reporting lengthy brush-head cleaning.

Crevice and groove pickup are strong, with reviewers citing successful crevice or crumb pickup.

Crevice and grouted-floor pickup has negative customer evidence, especially on grouted tile where grit required repeated passes.

Under-furniture pickup is a repeated weakness because the ball and body height limit reach.

Under-furniture pickup is a major advantage because Powered Lift-Away lets the head or wand reach under beds and furniture.

Innovation feedback is negative in one review because the manual suction slider felt behind vacuums with automatic adjustment.

Innovation is tied to Powered Lift-Away; reviewers and customers describe the configuration as unusually flexible compared with other uprights.

Hair-wrap resistance is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers praising minimal tangles and automatic detangling.

Hair-wrap resistance is one of the most mixed attributes: some reviewers report minor tangles, while pet-hair tests and long-hair owners report serious wrapping.

Small-space suitability is limited by bulk, under-furniture reach, and a preference for more open floor plans.

Small-space usefulness is positive when using the portable pod and tools for stairs, pantries, and tight spaces.

Clogging and debris prevention were strong in the Reviewed pet hair test, where dog hair caused no clogs or noticeable wrap.

Clogging evidence is mixed-negative: one CNET test found large carpet debris did not clog, but pet-hair and head-clog complaints recur elsewhere.

Hard-floor hair pickup performed very well in the Just A Dad hands-on demonstrations.

Hard-floor hair pickup is mixed, with one test favoring the Shark over Bissell and CNET/customer evidence showing weakness without the right tool.

Tool changes are usable but not seamless; reviewers repeatedly describe the wand or hose connection process as tricky or awkward.

Tool changes are generally easy, with click-on accessories and a removable handheld piece praised for quick transitions.

The floorhead seal is useful when adjusted correctly, though an overly tight seal contributed to pushing debris in one test.

Hard-floor seal and intake are weak in some evidence, especially where the head struggles with large debris or sounds rough on hard floors.

Cord length is praised for giving long cleaning reach.

Cord length is mixed: some reviewers call it long, while customers often want several more feet.

Cord management is a clear annoyance in the TechRadar review, especially manual winding and unwinding.

Cord management is a downside because the cord is manual, non-retractable, and can get in the way.

The bagless bin receives strong feedback for capacity and reduced emptying frequency, with reviewers also describing the canister as easy to manage.

Dust-bin feedback is mixed: reviewers like easy emptying and size in some tests, while Amazon customers complain the usable capacity can feel low.

Packaging was positively described as secure and recyclable in the TechRadar hands-on review.

Packaging has limited but positive customer evidence, with one buyer saying it was packed well and worked as described.

Storage and upright stability are mixed: it stayed stable during hose use, but its large, bold body was criticized as hard to store discreetly.

Upright stability is a weakness in customer feedback, especially when the pod or wand is used and the unit tips easily.

Handling is the most divided usability area: some reviewers praise the ball steering, while several others find it heavy, stiff, or tiring.

Maneuverability is generally good thanks to swivel steering, but the top-heavy pod and strong pull make handling mixed for some users.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning are strong when the tools are used, especially on sofas and cushions.

Upholstery and above-floor cleaning are generally good with pet and upholstery tools, but some reviewers find the pet tool weak or prone to resistance.

Weight is a repeated concern across reviews, especially for carrying, stairs, and extended use.

Weight is a repeated drawback, with reviewers calling the unit hefty, heavy on the wrist, or difficult for some users.

Included tools are useful when present, especially stair and combination tools, but the base package is limited and upgraded tool bundles were viewed as costly.

The accessory package is valued for crevice, upholstery, pet, dusting, and hard-floor tools, though some customers wished more tools were included or stored onboard.

Area rug handling is mixed: it can glide when gates are opened, but other reviewers saw dragging, mat pull-up, or rug-transition trouble.

Area-rug handling is mixed: settings help some rugs, but several customers say suction is too strong for smaller rugs.

Medium-pile carpet deep cleaning scored very strongly in the Vacuum Wars sand-embedding test.

Medium-pile or shag-style rug feedback is positive in customer evidence, with one user saying it revived a mid-cut shag area rug.

Hard-floor fine-debris pickup is mostly strong in lab-style tests, though one reviewer saw flour streaks that needed extra attention.

Fine-dust hard-floor pickup is split: CNET found excellent sand pickup, while other reviewers and customers mention fine-particle or bare-floor weaknesses.

Low-pile carpet pickup is generally strong for small and medium debris in objective tests.

Low-pile carpet performance is broadly positive, though heavy debris can require extra passes.

Pet-focused performance is one of the strongest themes: reviewers praise pet hair pickup, anti-tangle behavior, and filtration for homes with shedding animals.

Pet performance is a major strength in most sources, with reviewers praising pet-hair pickup, though tool and tangle issues appear in some use cases.

Emptying and mess control are repeatedly praised as simple or easy.

Emptying is usually praised as easy and mess-controlled, though bin capacity and packed pet hair create some complaints.

Carpet hair pickup is consistently praised, especially for pet hair and fur.

Hair pickup on carpets is a strength across tests and customer reviews, with many reviewers saying it pulls up pet hair effectively.

Hard-floor large-debris intake is mixed to weak: adjustable gates can help, but several reviewers saw cereal or oats pushed around.

Large-debris hard-floor intake is mixed, with strong customer pellet pickup but CNET criticism that Cheerios were too tall for the head.

The hose offers long reach, but reviewers often criticize it for stiffness, retraction pull, or awkward use.

Hose length is mixed to negative: one reviewer measured useful reach, but others say the hose is short and limits range.

Maintenance is mixed-positive: routine bin and filter care is simple, but monthly filter washing and drying can feel tedious.

Maintenance is generally easy for filters and dust-bin cleaning, but brush-roll hair maintenance can be frustrating for pet owners.

Versatility is praised where the adjustable cleaner head helps the vacuum handle multiple floor and debris types.

Versatility is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the ability to clean floors, stairs, furniture, cars, corners, and under-furniture areas.

Overall opinion is positive but not unanimous: reviewers praise deep cleaning and pet performance, while the heaviest critiques focus on weight, corded use, and awkward handling.

Overall opinion is strongly positive across professional and customer sources, with caveats around hard floors, weight, hose length, and tangles.

The vacuum is well suited to deep or whole-house cleaning because reviewers repeatedly highlight strong suction and deep carpet performance.

Heavy-duty suitability is favorable, with professional and customer reviewers describing it as appropriate for pets, kids, carpets, and cleaning-house use.

High-pile and general carpet pickup are powerful but uneven: some tests were excellent, while large debris on high pile caused trouble.

High-pile carpet performance is positive in review and customer evidence, with suction and settings helping rugs and high-pile carpet.

Filtration and dust containment are generally praised, with sealed-system or strong filtration comments tied to allergen and pet-dander control.

Filtration is one of the strongest consensus points, with sealed HEPA performance and smoke-test results keeping dust and allergens contained.

Self-propel feel is lightly positive in Reviewed's test because the motor helped the vacuum move forward.

The self-propelled feel helps carpet cleaning for many users, though the pull can feel too strong in tight spaces.

Onboard tool storage was criticized because clipped-on attachments were not easy to remove.

Onboard tool storage is a weakness because the vacuum cannot hold all attachments and tools can fall or require the bag.

Low-profile performance is weak because the ball design prevents easy access under furniture.

Low-profile reach is praised when the detachable head or wand gets under beds, chairs, and furniture.

Durability impressions are mixed: one reviewer worried about plastic and moving parts, while another felt the heavy build gave robustness.

Longevity evidence is mixed-positive, with warranty praise and several long-term owner reports balanced against isolated failures.

The floorhead is both a strength and a weakness: adjustable gates improve suction control, but low gates can push larger debris.

Floorhead design is mixed: it helps carpet pickup and maneuverability, but its lip and size cause hard-floor and width complaints.

The finish and styling are praised as elegant or vibrant, although bulk affects where users may want to leave it out.

Design impressions are mostly positive, with reviewers noting modern styling, appealing color, and a premium-looking finish.

Build quality feedback is mixed, with one reviewer calling parts flimsy and another crediting the heavy body with robustness.

Build quality is mixed: professional reviewers often call it solid, while some customers report flimsy parts, broken lids, or cheaper-feeling plastics.

Warranty support is praised in the review that discusses it, specifically for the lengthy parts-and-labor coverage.

Reliability and support are mixed: one review praises the long warranty, while a customer describes a poor warranty/support experience.

Value is divided: some reviewers see strong Dyson power for the money, while others point to high accessory costs, high price, or better-value competitors.

Value is a strong theme: reviewers repeatedly say the Shark delivers high-end flexibility and suction for a midrange or reasonable price.

Setup is mixed: one review says it can be assembled quickly, while video and hands-on reviewers found weight or confusing assembly frustrating.

Assembly and setup are praised as easy, with convenient clips and customer comments that it is simple to put together.

Stair feedback is split by tool versus machine: the stair tool is useful, but carrying the full vacuum up stairs is repeatedly criticized.

Stair cleaning is a consistent benefit because Lift-Away mode and attachments make stairs easier than with a fixed upright.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is consistently strong, with multiple reviewers reporting good cleanup along walls and edges.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is mostly positive, though one review notes some debris may remain in corners or along walls.

Ongoing costs are viewed favorably because washable filters and the bagless sealed design reduce replacement needs.

Ownership costs are favorable where discussed because the vacuum is bagless with washable filters and little routine replacement.

Comparative performance is mixed-positive overall: it ranks near the top in some tests, but some competitors beat it for hardwood, usability, or value.

Comparative performance is strong overall, with reviewers often favoring the NV752 over similarly priced uprights while noting pricier models can beat it in some tests.

Reviewers consistently describe the vacuum as extremely powerful, with class-leading suction; the main tradeoff is that the suction can make carpets harder to push across.

Reviewers consistently describe the NV752 as a strong-suction corded upright with high airflow, especially through the hose and on carpets.

Noise feedback is mixed: one lab found it surprisingly quiet for a high-performance upright, while another reviewer found it loud enough to be frustrating.

Noise feedback is moderate: one reviewer found it quieter than a Dyson DC65 but not truly quiet overall.

Controls are generally simple and useful, especially brushroll and suction controls, but one hands-on reviewer found the switches unusual and less refined.

Controls are praised for being on the handle and intuitive, though isolated customer feedback says the power button can be hard to keep engaged.

Airflow blowback is positively addressed in customer evidence where the Shark avoids spitting debris back at the user.

Automatic obstruction shutoff has positive customer evidence because it protects the motor and warns when the brush stops or clogs.

Automatic brush/standby behavior is praised where mentioned, with the roller stopping when upright or locked.

Cordless convenience is a weakness because a corded upright felt inconvenient compared with cordless habits.

Debris illumination is a standout practical feature, with users saying the lights reveal crud and missed dirt.

Headlights are strongly praised for showing debris on floors, dark corners, and attachment work.

Surface safety is generally positive where addressed, especially brush-roll shutoff and soft hard-floor use, though some hard-floor concerns remain.

Hard-floor residue is a weakness in the TechRadar flour test, which left visible streaking.

Stuck resistance is mixed: it improves over earlier Dyson uprights on thick carpet, but strong suction can still pull into carpets or mats.

The Lift-Away/convertible design is one of the product’s core strengths, making it easier to use as an upright, pod, canister-like, or handheld-style cleaner.