Compare Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds vs LG xboom Buds by will.i.am

Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
LG xboom Buds by will.i.am

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

Choose Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds for aptX and Volume output.

Choose LG xboom Buds by will.i.am for Portability/foldability and Transparency mode quality.

Comparison Takeaways

Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • aptX is 4.0 vs 1.0. aptX support is valued, especially aptX Lossless, but reviewers warn that Snapdragon Sound compatibility remains niche.
  • Volume output is 4.6 vs 2.0. Volume output is strong, with reviewers calling the earbuds louder than most, not shy about volume, and clear...
  • Maximum volume clarity is 4.8 vs 2.3. Maximum-volume clarity is a strong point, with reviewers praising clean output, crystal clarity, and low distortion even at...
  • Soundstage depth is 4.6 vs 2.2. Soundstage depth and immersion are generally strong, with reviewers describing holographic space, a bubble of music, and studio-like...

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am

Where It Has the Edge

  • Portability/foldability is 4.5 vs 3.2. Portability is strong because the case is compact and light enough to pocket easily.
  • Transparency mode quality is 4.0 vs 3.2. Transparency mode is praised as useful for letting outside sound through when needed.
  • Charging is 4.5 vs 3.8. Charging is a positive in the available review evidence, especially because the buds topped back up quickly.
  • Software/setup simplicity is 4.5 vs 3.9. Software and setup are helped by the useful fit-test function and simple pairing experience on supported platforms.
Average score
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.2
LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.4
aptX
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.0

aptX support is valued, especially aptX Lossless, but reviewers warn that Snapdragon Sound compatibility remains niche.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
1.0

aptX support is a weakness because TechRadar specifically called out the absence of aptX Adaptive as a limitation.

Volume output
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.6

Volume output is strong, with reviewers calling the earbuds louder than most, not shy about volume, and clear across lower and higher volumes.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.0

Volume output is a weakness because one reviewer found the buds quiet enough to push volume into leakage-prone levels.

Maximum volume clarity
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.8

Maximum-volume clarity is a strong point, with reviewers praising clean output, crystal clarity, and low distortion even at high volume.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.3

Maximum-volume clarity is weak, with reviewers hearing distortion, fuzziness, or quality loss at high volumes.

Soundstage depth
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.6

Soundstage depth and immersion are generally strong, with reviewers describing holographic space, a bubble of music, and studio-like presence.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.2

Soundstage depth is limited, with What Hi-Fi? describing the presentation as claustrophobic.

Soundstage width
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.7

Soundstage width earns broad praise, with multiple reviewers describing wide, open, spacious, or expansive presentation from earbuds.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.4

Soundstage width is limited, with reviewers wanting greater spaciousness and more expansive layering.

Spatial audio
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.2

Spatial audio is polarized, ranging from underwhelming in one review to immersive, excellent, and wide in several others.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.0

Spatial audio is a weakness because the product lacks the more immersive, three-dimensional focus found in pricier LG earbuds.

Instrument separation
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.6

Instrument separation is a consistent positive, with reviewers hearing clean layering, distinct elements, and better separation after calibration.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.5

Instrument separation is a limitation, with TechRadar noting that vocals, synths, and other elements were not layered enough.

Codec support
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
3.7

Codec support is a strength for compatible devices, but reviewers also note limitations with AAC, Snapdragon compatibility, and missing LDAC.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.0

Codec support is a drawback because reviewers criticized the lack of higher-resolution codec options.

Bluetooth
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.2

Bluetooth reliability is mostly positive, including quick connection and smooth switching, though a few reviewers reported stutter, slow app connection, or connectivity issues.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.5

Bluetooth setup is hurt by iOS pairing friction, with one reviewer criticizing the lack of automatic discoverability on iOS.

Multi-platform compatibility
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.8

Multi-platform compatibility was positively tested in one review through automatic switching between a tablet and phone.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.3

Multi-platform compatibility is mixed: Google and Microsoft pairing was praised, while iOS pairing was criticized.

Frequency response accuracy
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.3

Frequency balance is improved by firmware and personalization for some reviewers, but profile differences can make the tonal result uneven for others.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.8

Frequency balance needs adjustment, with TechRadar saying the buds require tuning for a more balanced sound.

Treble clarity
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.1

Treble is mostly clear and energetic, with praise for sparkle and highs, but some reviewers noted brightness, tame extension, tinny highs, or slight grain depending on profile.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.8

Treble clarity is inconsistent, sounding crisp in places but harsh or tinny without tuning.

Design and Aesthetics
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
3.5

Design splits reviewers: some like the smart, elegant, distinctive look, while others strongly dislike the oversized dinner-plate appearance.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.2

Design and aesthetics are consistently weak, with reviewers calling the buds boring, bulky, not sleek, or visually uninteresting.

Preset EQ profile quality
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.5

Personalized profile quality is a defining strength: most reviewers found AAT or personalized sound dramatically better, though one reviewer disliked the profile result.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Preset EQ quality is uneven, with some presets improving individual tracks while treble-heavy tuning could sound harsh or tinny.

Sound quality
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.6

Sound quality is the clearest strength overall: most reviewers praised clean, spacious, detailed audio, though one lab-focused review was sharply negative before firmware/tuning changes.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Sound quality is the most divisive area: some reviewers heard enjoyable or even stellar audio, while others found it muddy, unclear, or below rivals.

Portability/foldability
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
3.2

Portability is mixed because some reviewers found the case pocketable, while others called the case bulky and the earbuds themselves large.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.5

Portability is strong because the case is compact and light enough to pocket easily.

Touch control responsiveness
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.6

Touch responsiveness is strongly rated, with reviewers describing responsive taps, reliable touchpads, and working commands.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.3

Touch controls are mixed: they can be fast and responsive, but other reviewers reported accidental or phantom taps.

Midrange clarity
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.4

Midrange performance is generally strong, with reviewers praising clear vocals, layered mids, and presence; one reviewer found the default tuning too mid-forward and radio-like.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Midrange clarity improves with tuning but can become muddy when bass dominates.

Build quality
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.7

Build quality was directly praised by one reviewer, who said both the case and earbuds felt great and flagship-like.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.5

Build quality is acceptable rather than premium, with the buds described as decently built while the overall feel remains basic.

Bass performance
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.4

Bass is usually described as controlled, deep, and impactful, especially after personalization, but a few reviewers found default or customized bass either light or too boosted.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.3

Bass is a mixed strength: reviewers heard impact, depth, and fun energy, but several also connected the tuning to muddiness or reduced clarity.

Ear tip size options
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.3

Ear tip size options are well received, with praise for multiple tips, foam options, and fit flexibility.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.3

Ear tip options are mixed: one reviewer achieved a snug fit, while another considered the number of options disappointingly modest.

LDAC
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
2.5

LDAC is a weakness because multiple reviewers explicitly note that the earbuds do not support it or that LDAC competitors are easier for Android users.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
1.5

LDAC support is absent, and reviewers treated that lack of higher-end codec support as a sonic limitation.

Stability
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.5

Stability is generally good when the right tips or wings are used, with reviewers praising secure fit and reduced fall-out risk.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.7

Stability is generally good thanks to hooks, seal, and secure fit, but it can fall apart when the eartips do not suit the wearer.

Microphone noise reduction
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.0

Microphone noise reduction is solid overall, with reviewers noting wind and background-noise handling that keeps voice usable.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Microphone noise reduction is serviceable but imperfect, since higher-frequency background sounds could still get through.

Carry case quality
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
3.5

Carry case quality is mixed: reviewers praised solid construction and magnet security, while others noted bulk, difficult bud removal, or a weak case feel.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.8

Carry case impressions are modest, with reviewers describing it as basic or cheap rather than premium.

Transparency mode quality
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
3.2

Transparency or social mode is mixed: some reviewers found it gentle, useful, or convenient, while others called it basic, artificial, or ineffective.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.0

Transparency mode is praised as useful for letting outside sound through when needed.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.7

Multipoint connectivity is one of the most consistently praised usability features, with reviewers describing seamless or perfect switching between devices.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.0

Multipoint is viewed as a useful perk, though the evidence is more about convenience than stress-tested reliability.

Charging
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
3.8

Charging is mixed: reviewers praised fast, wireless, and USB-C charging, but one reported the wireless-charged case getting extremely hot.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.5

Charging is a positive in the available review evidence, especially because the buds topped back up quickly.

Software/setup simplicity
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
3.9

Setup and software are mixed: the hearing test can impress and work well, but some reviewers found tinkering slow or less polished than rivals.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.5

Software and setup are helped by the useful fit-test function and simple pairing experience on supported platforms.

Value for money
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
3.7

Value depends heavily on price: reviewers criticized the original premium cost, but sale pricing and sound quality made it compelling for several.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Value for money is highly split: the buds bring ANC, battery, and features at a moderate price, but several reviewers preferred cheaper or clearer-sounding rivals.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.1

Water and sweat resistance is viewed as adequate for light workouts, sweat, and light rain, but no reviewer treated it as rugged waterproofing.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.8

Water and sweat resistance is adequate for light rain and workouts, but review evidence does not frame it as a standout durability feature.

Integrated microphone
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.1

The integrated microphone system is generally clear and usable, with reviewers praising voice clarity and detail for calls.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.5

The integrated microphone earns praise through whisper-style use, with one reviewer saying it could pick up every word.

Equalizer customization
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.3

EQ customization is useful and often praised, especially ProEQ and immersion controls, though one reviewer wanted more targeted frequency bands.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.9

EQ customization is useful and can improve the sound, though reviewers agreed it does not fully erase the underlying tuning problems.

Microphone quality for calls
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.3

Call microphone quality is generally good, with reviewers hearing clear calls and intelligible voice pickup, though not always perfect.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.9

Call microphone quality ranges from usable to excellent, with one reviewer reporting exceptionally clear call sound and others noting some tinniness.

Battery
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.0

Battery life is acceptable to good for ANC earbuds, but reviewers vary from respectable and impressive to merely typical or could be better.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.3

Battery life receives broad praise, with reviewers calling the figures strong, competitive, or impressive for the price.

App
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.2

The app is feature-rich and important for setup and customization, but reviewers also reported crashing, slow loading, and some mandatory-app friction.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.9

The companion app is mostly praised for customization, fit testing, ANC controls, and clarity, though one short review criticized it.

Active noise cancellation
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
3.9

ANC is generally usable to good, but it is not the product’s strongest feature; reviewers often note rivals perform better or consistency varies.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.1

Noise cancellation is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers praising how effectively it dulled or blocked low-frequency and everyday noise for the price.

Eartips fit
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.0

Eartip fit is highly personal: several reviewers achieved a secure, comfortable seal, while others experienced popping out or poor fit.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.8

Eartip fit can be secure with a tight seal, but fit remains inconsistent because limited tip options and shape caused issues for some users.

Comfort during long use
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
3.3

Long-use comfort is divisive: some reviewers found the earbuds comfortable, while others reported heat, rubbing, pressure, or discomfort from the large housings.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Comfort is sharply split: multiple reviewers found the rounded, bulky fit poor for long sessions, while others reported a comfortable fit.

Android compatibility
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
2.8

Android compatibility is conditional: Snapdragon-compatible phones benefit most, while Samsung and Google users cannot access the highest-bitrate features.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.amNo score yet
Audio-video sync accuracy
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
5.0

Audio-video sync was only directly evaluated by one reviewer, who reported no lag while watching YouTube on an iPhone.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.amNo score yet
Auracast support
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless EarbudsNo score yet
LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.3

Auracast is repeatedly framed as a useful, uncommon, or unique feature that adds value if nearby broadcasts matter to the user.

Button control usability
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.5

Button/control usability is a standout because reviewers praise extensive customization, many gesture options, and easy control mapping, with only one runner disliking a gesture.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.amNo score yet
Included accessories
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.5

Included accessories are a positive because reviewers appreciated the supplied fit options, wings, and foam tips.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.amNo score yet
Interchangeable left/right bud design
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.8

Independent left/right bud use was praised in one review because either earbud could play alone while the other charged.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.amNo score yet
Lossless audio support
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.1

Lossless audio support is appreciated and sounds crisp to some reviewers, but its benefit depends on compatible devices and is not always transformative.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.amNo score yet
Noise isolation (passive)
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.6

Passive isolation benefits from the seal, foam tips, and fit options, with reviewers describing a solid seal and better noise isolation.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.amNo score yet
Smudge resistance
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
4.1

Smudge resistance was only directly assessed once, with the reviewer noting minimal fingerprints on the case.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.amNo score yet
Sound leakage
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless EarbudsNo score yet
LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.0

Sound leakage is a clear weakness in one review, especially above roughly 40% volume.

Weight comfort
Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds
2.7

Weight and size comfort is a recurring concern because reviewers repeatedly describe the earbuds as large, awkward, or uncomfortable for smaller ears.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.amNo score yet