Compare Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds vs JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds

Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Overall score 4.3 / 5

Based on 19 scored reviews

vs
JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds

Overall score 4.4 / 5

Based on 19 scored reviews

How we score

Scorata scores summarize analyzed review evidence on a 1–5 scale; they are not laboratory measurements or a simple average of customer star ratings. Feature scores summarize the reviews covering that feature. The overall score averages feature scores within each review, then combines review averages. When both expert and customer evidence are available, those two groups receive equal weight. Products can have different review coverage, so small score gaps do not establish a winner.

Recommendations prioritize important features for the category, with a score of at least 3.5, a gap of at least 0.25 points and at least two supporting reviews per product. Features with widely varying scores or broad connectivity contexts are excluded from recommendations. These safeguards do not establish statistical significance.

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

The review evidence points to a tradeoff: Portability/foldability and Button control usability versus Carry case quality and Water/sweat resistance rating. Choose according to which strengths matter more to you; the overall score alone does not settle that choice.

Choose Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds for Portability/foldability and Button control usability.

Choose JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds for Carry case quality and Water/sweat resistance rating.

Why these recommendations?

Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Portability/foldability is 4.5 vs 3.1. Portability is strong because the case is repeatedly described as pocketable, small, and easy to carry.
  • Button control usability is 4.5 vs 3.2. Control remapping is praised as unusually flexible and useful across the app and earbuds.
  • Maximum volume clarity is 5.0 vs 3.8. Maximum-volume clarity is praised for staying clean and distortion-free even at high levels.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Carry case quality is 4.6 vs 3.5. The smart charging case was the standout feature across reviews, praised for touchscreen controls, transmitter utility, and overall...
  • Water/sweat resistance rating is 4.5 vs 3.5. Water and sweat resistance was evaluated favorably for workouts, rain, sweat, and daily use confidence.
  • Software/setup simplicity is 4.8 vs 3.9. Setup and software stability were usually positive, with quick pairing and later app stability, though one review flagged...
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds 4.3 overall score
JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds 4.4 overall score

Compare features

Scores are out of 5. Missing scores mean missing review evidence, not a missing feature.

Scored on both products

Performance

Sound quality
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the AZ100's sound as clear, detailed, musical, and high-end, though one review found the stock tuning odd.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.6

Reviewers widely praised the overall sound as clear, exciting, and flagship-level, with only a few caveats about tuning preferences.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Video sync is mostly strong, with two reviewers reporting zero or no visible lag, while one notes a slight delay with some codecs.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.4

Latency evidence was mixed: one review found low latency for video, while others criticized gaming or LDAC/video-mode latency.

Spatial audio
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Spatial audio is mixed: reviewers appreciate Dolby/head-tracking support, but several find it merely decent, distracting, or less clear than stereo.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.1

Spatial audio drew mixed-to-positive reactions, with several reviewers loving head tracking while others found it inconsistent or track-dependent.

Microphone noise reduction
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0

Microphone noise reduction is polarized: several reviewers praise wind and background suppression, while one reports failed clarity and cutouts.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Microphone noise reduction was usually praised for suppressing train, traffic, wind, and office noise, though one reviewer found wind-city performance weaker.

Noise isolation (passive)
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Passive isolation is viewed positively when the tips seal well, with reviewers noting isolation even before ANC is active.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.7

Passive isolation was praised, especially with the included tips and foam tips improving the seal.

Soundstage width
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Soundstage width receives strong praise, with reviewers describing the presentation as spacious, broad, expansive, and room-like.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Soundstage width earned positive comments for left-right separation and a clear sense of space.

Frequency response accuracy
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Frequency response impressions are mixed: one review calls it strange, while others praise accuracy, balance, and low distortion.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.8

Frequency response was judged generally listenable but somewhat off the reviewer’s preferred target.

Bass performance
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Bass is widely praised for depth, control, punch, and low distortion, with only one review criticizing the default balance as too boomy.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Bass was consistently described as punchy, deep, textured, and fun, though a few reviewers noted a bass-forward balance.

Soundstage depth
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Soundstage depth is usually strong, with reviewers praising depth, immersion, and layering, though one long-term reviewer wanted more depth.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Soundstage depth evidence was positive but limited, with comments about full engagement and an immersive concert-like effect.

Active noise cancellation
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

ANC is broadly strong and often near flagship level, though several reviewers say it still falls short of the very best Bose-style silence.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.3

ANC was broadly rated good to excellent, though several reviewers said it still trails the very best Bose, Sony, or Apple options.

Sound leakage
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5

Sound leakage is a weakness in the one scored review, which says loud music can be heard in a quiet room.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
2.5

Sound leakage had limited negative evidence tied to one reviewer’s poor seal and passive-isolation issue.

Ownership and support

Auracast support
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0

Auracast support is a concern in one scored review because the reviewer criticizes its absence.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.7

Auracast support was treated as a major future-facing strength, though some reviewers noted limited current device compatibility.

Codec support
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Codec support is praised for LDAC/LC3 breadth, but the absence of aptX is called a mild limitation.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.9

Codec support was praised for LDAC and high-resolution wireless options, especially by Android-focused reviewers.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8

Multipoint is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising reliable switching and three-device connectivity.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.2

Multipoint was useful and often smooth, but one reviewer reported source-switching mistakes that hurt reliability.

Value for money
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Value is mixed-to-positive: reviewers like the premium feature set and sound, but several note the high price and strong competition.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.1

Value was highly context-dependent: many reviewers liked the feature set or sale pricing, while others criticized the premium price and cheaper JBL alternatives.

Other features

Included accessories
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5

Included accessories draw criticism where reviewed because foam tips are missing despite multiple silicone tip sizes.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Included accessories received limited but positive evidence because one reviewer appreciated the useful cable bundle.

Portability/foldability
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Portability is strong because the case is repeatedly described as pocketable, small, and easy to carry.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.1

Portability was mixed to negative because the smart case adds useful features but is often bulkier than average.

Find My
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Find My support is useful for peace of mind, though one reviewer is disappointed by the location behavior.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.0

Find My evidence was mixed-to-negative because the earbuds had useful locating features but the case could not be pinged in one review.

Maximum volume clarity
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Maximum-volume clarity is praised for staying clean and distortion-free even at high levels.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.8

Maximum-volume clarity was mixed: one reviewer heard flatness at loud volume, while another found distortion remained low.

Carry case quality
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Case quality is mixed: it is compact and pocketable, but multiple reviewers criticize weak magnets, rattle, scratches, or bland styling.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.6

The smart charging case was the standout feature across reviews, praised for touchscreen controls, transmitter utility, and overall usefulness despite size complaints.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Water and sweat resistance is adequate for workouts or rain, but one reviewer cautions against heavier rain exposure.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Water and sweat resistance was evaluated favorably for workouts, rain, sweat, and daily use confidence.

Midrange clarity
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Midrange and vocals are generally described as clear, detailed, warm, and more forward than the previous model.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.3

Midrange comments were mostly positive for vocals and clarity, but a few reviewers heard recessed or underpowered mids in some tracks.

Stability
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Stability is mixed: several reviewers found the fit secure, while others would not trust it for vigorous movement.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.9

Fit stability was split: some reviewers found a secure workout-ready seal, while others struggled with looseness or smaller-ear fit.

Volume output
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Volume output is praised as top-tier and very loud in the reviews that discuss it.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.7

Volume output was considered strong, with reviewers noting headroom and loud playback even around moderate settings.

Instrument separation
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.9

Instrument separation is a standout strength, with reviewers hearing layers, voices, and complex arrangements as distinct and clearly placed.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Instrument separation and imaging were frequently praised, especially with comments about clear placement, cohesive mixes, and detailed separation.

Touch control responsiveness
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Touch controls are generally responsive and customizable, though sensitivity and personal preference create some mixed reactions.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.9

Touch responsiveness was mixed, ranging from reliable sensors and useful controls to laggy or temperamental case/touch behavior.

LDAC
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

LDAC is received positively for higher-quality playback and better sound from compatible Android or hi-res sources.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.7

LDAC was repeatedly treated as a meaningful advantage for compatible Android or hi-res listening setups.

Transparency mode quality
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Transparency mode is mixed: some find it natural or useful, while others hear hiss, over-processing, or weaker situational awareness.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.9

Transparency mode was generally usable to good, but reviewers varied from strong praise to merely acceptable or digitally recreated impressions.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8

Hi-res playback is praised in the one scored review, where LDAC/FLAC listening brought more detail, solidity, and space.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.6

Hi-res playback was praised through LDAC, LE Audio, and high-quality transmitter-mode listening; DAC-specific evidence was not separately evaluated.

Preset EQ profile quality
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Preset EQ quality is mostly positive, especially Direct, Dynamic, and Treble+ modes, though SuperBass+ is too heavy for one reviewer.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Preset EQ evidence was limited but positive, especially for the Studio preset’s bass adjustment.

Treble clarity
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Treble is usually considered clear, airy, detailed, and non-harsh, though one review says the default tuning lacks high-end content.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Treble was usually praised for clarity, crispness, and control, with only limited concern about brightness or EQ tweaking.

Multi-platform compatibility
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Multi-platform compatibility is praised because the app and customization work across iOS and Android.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.9

Multi-platform compatibility was praised because the transmitter case and feature blend expand use beyond standard phone pairing.

Android compatibility
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Android compatibility is praised for LDAC, fast pairing, and strong ANC value with Android phones.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Android compatibility was praised mainly through LDAC support and Android hi-res advantages.

Controls and connectivity

Button control usability
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Control remapping is praised as unusually flexible and useful across the app and earbuds.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.2

Control usability was a recurring compromise because reviewers had to choose among playback, volume, and ANC control groups.

Software/setup simplicity
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Setup and software simplicity are mostly positive, but the lack of a physical pairing button adds friction for one reviewer.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.8

Setup and software stability were usually positive, with quick pairing and later app stability, though one review flagged app moodiness.

Microphone quality for calls
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.7

Call quality is mixed, ranging from serviceable or excellent in some reviews to choppy, robotic, or poor in others.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Call microphone quality was a major strength across reviews, with several reports of clear calls in offices, traffic, or windy settings.

Equalizer customization
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

EQ customization is a clear strength, with many reviewers praising the eight-band control and meaningful tuning options.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.7

Equalizer customization was one of the most consistently praised features, often described as powerful, robust, or highly configurable.

Bluetooth
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Bluetooth reliability is consistently praised, with reviewers reporting stable connections and no meaningful dropouts.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.9

Bluetooth connectivity was described as stable and easy, with high marks in reviews that scored or tested pairing and connection behavior.

App
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.4

The app is mostly praised for useful controls, customization, stability, and EQ access, despite some complaints about layout.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

The JBL app was usually praised for depth, EQ, settings, and control, though one review noted occasional bugs.

Comfort and build

Design and Aesthetics
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Design and aesthetics are generally praised as premium, sleek, compact, or classy, though a few reviewers find the look plain.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.9

Design opinions were mixed: some liked the premium smart-case look and unique design, while one reviewer felt the buds looked cheap.

Comfort during long use
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Comfort trends positive thanks to smaller, lighter ergonomics, but fit fatigue and bulk remain concerns for some ears.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.1

Comfort was strong for many reviewers over long sessions, but fit problems for smaller ears and foam-tip discomfort created a clear caveat.

Build quality
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6

Build quality is praised as premium, tactile, mature, and a substantial step forward.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Build quality was generally praised as solid, rugged, or well-made, with positive long-term durability evidence.

Weight comfort
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Weight comfort is praised because the earbuds feel better distributed, light, and easier to forget during use.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Weight comfort was positive in the reviews that discussed it, with light-feeling buds and minimal suction.

Eartips fit
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Eartip fit is generally good with the right size, but some reviewers report looseness, bulk, or falling out.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.0

Eartips fit was highly user-dependent, ranging from easy fit and better seals to trouble staying put for smaller ears.

Ear tip size options
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Ear tip options are considered useful and generous, especially for finding the right fit across ear sizes.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Ear tip options were praised for the generous selection and included foam tips, with some reviewers finding them especially useful.

Battery and charging

Battery
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Battery life is consistently a strength, with reviewers praising long ANC runtime and major improvement over the AZ80.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Battery life was widely praised as competitive or impressive, with some long-term evidence of normal capacity decline.

Charging
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Charging is viewed positively where evaluated, especially wireless charging and case convenience.

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.6

Charging was praised for quick-charge usefulness, fast charging, USB-C, and wireless charging convenience.

Evidence available for one product

Other features

AptX
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0

aptX support is a weakness because one reviewer specifically wished Qualcomm aptX codecs were included.

JBL Tour Pro 3 EarbudsNo score yet
Dongle
Technics EAH-AZ100 EarbudsNo score yet
JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.9

The case transmitter/dongle function was repeatedly praised as a major convenience for flights, gyms, wired sources, and low-latency playback.

Integrated microphone
Technics EAH-AZ100 EarbudsNo score yet
JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.1

Integrated microphone hardware was viewed positively, with dependable microphones and strong mic clarity when using the case connection.

Sensors
Technics EAH-AZ100 EarbudsNo score yet
JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Sensors were praised for reliable wear detection and auto-pause behavior.

Sidetone adjustment quality
Technics EAH-AZ100 EarbudsNo score yet
JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.5

Sidetone/Voice Aware adjustment had limited mixed evidence because one reviewer found it fiddly despite liking transparency overall.

Smudge resistance
Technics EAH-AZ100 EarbudsNo score yet
JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.3

Smudge resistance was mixed: one review liked the case’s fingerprint resistance, while another said a glossy case picked up fingerprints.

Comfort and build

Hinge durability
Technics EAH-AZ100 EarbudsNo score yet
JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Long-term case hinge durability had limited but positive evidence from a 12-month review.

Interchangeable left/right bud design
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Independent left/right earbud use is praised as convenient and useful when scored.

JBL Tour Pro 3 EarbudsNo score yet

Controls and connectivity

Voice assistant integration
Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Voice assistant integration is limited in coverage but works reliably where tested or described.

JBL Tour Pro 3 EarbudsNo score yet

Other Top Earbuds to Consider

#1 Activo Scoop
4.7

Best for detailed, natural wired sound, three connector options, and standout value around $99. Skip it if you need wireless features, stronger bass, softer treble, or a compact fit for...

Pros: Value for money, Multi-platform compatibility

#2 Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 5
4.5

Choose these for excellent, balanced sound, a comfortable redesign, deep EQ tools and uniquely replaceable batteries. Skip them if you need class-leading ANC, consistently great calls or the smoothest treble...

Pros: User-replaceable batteries, Overall satisfaction

Cons: Auracast support, Sensors

#3 Apple AirPods 5
4.4

Choose the AirPods 5 for strong open-ear ANC, clearer sound, easy Apple-device switching, and excellent value. Skip them if you need all-day battery, a very secure workout fit, or full...

Pros: Overall satisfaction, Sound quality

Cons: Battery, Eartips fit

#6 Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4 Earbuds
4.3

Choose these for excellent sound, deep app control, strong codec support, and a premium true-wireless package. Skip them if call quality, best-in-class ANC, iPhone integration, or a compact case matters...

Pros: Sound quality, Bass performance

Cons: Microphone quality for calls, Microphone noise reduction