Compare Black+Decker Programmable 12-Cup Coffee Maker, CM1160B vs OXO Brew 8 Cup Coffee Maker

Accessories are sparse: one reviewer found the missing scoop or starter filters odd, and another disliked having to buy a reusable metal filter separately.

Reviewers valued the included small-batch insert and starter setup because it made single-cup brewing meaningfully better and helped the brewer feel ready to use.

Pot function is divided: reviewers appreciate a full pot and two-hour warming, but one review found the hot plate can overheat coffee and damage flavor over time.

The pot function performed well, with reviewers praising full-capacity brewing and the thermal carafe's ability to keep coffee hot without scorching.

Speed is context-dependent: some reviewers call it quick or efficient, while testing shows it is not among the fastest full-pot brewers.

Speed was a strength, with reviewers describing quick brew times, passive brewing, and full or small batches finishing in a practical morning timeframe.

Automation is a strength for the price, especially auto-brew and auto shutoff, though the evidence focuses on convenience rather than advanced sensors.

Automation feedback was mixed: one reviewer criticized the lack of auto-brew, while another liked that the machine shuts itself down after brewing.

Carafe and cup handling is generally workable, with praise for pouring and Sneak-a-Cup convenience, but some reviewers note dribbles or uneven cup strength when interrupted.

Carafe, cup, and tray handling was mostly praised for easy pouring, heat retention, drip containment, and mug support, though a few reviewers noted residual water or coffee issues.

Heating performance is strong for the class, with high wattage and hot cups, though one review warns the hot plate can push coffee too hot and worsen taste.

Temperature performance was mostly praised for SCA-range heating, though one lab review measured it slightly below the suggested brewing temperature.

Recognition evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer citing its Amazon’s Choice designation as a sign of market recognition.

SCA recognition was repeatedly treated as meaningful proof that the brewer meets serious drip-coffee performance standards.

Overall experience is strongest for low-fuss daily use: most reviewers find it easy, practical, and satisfying, while lab testing rates user-friendliness as average.

The overall user experience was strongly positive, with reviewers calling it reliable, flexible, easy, and satisfying to use day to day.

Used grounds disposal is easy when using the removable basket or paper filters, with reviewers highlighting simple dumping and easier disposal.

Used-ground disposal was praised in one review because paper filters made cleanup quick and easy.

Maintenance is mostly easy thanks to removable parts, dishwasher-safe pieces, and visible water filling, but exterior hot-plate grime and pour-space limits remain caveats.

Maintenance feedback was mostly positive thanks to removable or dishwasher-safe parts and easy descaling, although one reviewer disliked the water-tank labeling.

Capacity is supported mainly by the ability to make a large shared pot, with the 12-cup format seen as useful for families, offices, or heavier coffee drinkers.

Capacity was viewed as flexible for single cups through eight-cup batches, though one reviewer still considered the eight-cup maximum relatively small.

Build quality is the clearest tradeoff: reviewers accept plastic at the low price, but several call out the lower-quality feel or durability limitations.

Build quality was consistently praised, with reviewers calling the machine sturdy, durable, solid, and well made despite its use of plastic components.

Ergonomics and footprint are mostly positive: reviewers like the front water window, compact body, and light weight, though cabinet clearance can be an issue.

Design and ergonomics were strong points, with reviewers praising the compact footprint, clean look, simple layout, and user-focused details.

Design flaws cluster around cleanup nooks, a non-flat filter basket, cabinet clearance, and minor warping, so the design is practical but not flawless.

The recurring design complaints were minor but specific: basket-size ambiguity, difficulty emptying the carafe fully, and a loud brew-finished beep.

Brewing evidence is mixed: lab-style testing found decent consistency and good-enough strength, while other reviewers reported reliable everyday results rather than refined extraction.

Coffee quality was the clearest strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising consistent, balanced, well-extracted cups across full pots and single servings.

Filter handling is mixed: standard filters are available and the basket is easy to clean, but there are complaints about no included reusable filter and grounds reaching the pot.

The filter system earned mixed-positive feedback: the smaller basket improves small batches, but unique or limited filter sizing was a drawback for some reviewers.

Warranty evidence is positive but narrow, with one reviewer pleased by the two-year limited warranty and replacement support for defects.

Warranty coverage received limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer noting OXO backs the product with a two-year warranty.

Programming and initial setup are consistently praised as simple, with QuickTouch controls making scheduled brewing easy even on a cheap machine.

Setup and daily operation were repeatedly described as simple, intuitive, and easy to understand, with minimal controls and little learning curve.

Value is the strongest consensus point, with multiple reviewers praising the low price, useful programmable features, and good-enough performance for everyday use.

Value was generally positive for an SCA-certified brewer, but reviewers still cautioned that it is pricey for budget shoppers.

Consumable feedback centered on filter cost, with one reviewer noting that the Kalita 185 filters for small batches are not cheap.

Beverage quality ranges from average to enjoyable: some reviewers call the coffee decent or even great, while one lab panel found bitterness and astringency.

Popularity evidence was mixed: one review said it has stayed dominant in best-of lists, while another thought it might be less visible than expected.

Portability is limited to countertop movement, but the unit is light enough that one reviewer found it easy to move around the kitchen.