Compare Black+Decker Programmable 12-Cup Coffee Maker, CM1160B vs Mr. Coffee 12-Cup Coffee Maker

Automation is a strength for the price, especially auto-brew and auto shutoff, though the evidence focuses on convenience rather than advanced sensors.

Automation is limited and divisive: Auto Pause is useful, but reviewers repeatedly disliked the lack of automatic shut-off because the hot plate can remain on.

Speed is context-dependent: some reviewers call it quick or efficient, while testing shows it is not among the fastest full-pot brewers.

Speed is a weakness, with reviewers calling it slower than many competitors and finding brew time inconsistent or messy.

Pot function is divided: reviewers appreciate a full pot and two-hour warming, but one review found the hot plate can overheat coffee and damage flavor over time.

The hot plate keeps coffee warm, but reviewers warn that leaving it on can scorch flavor and raises safety concerns without auto shut-off.

Carafe and cup handling is generally workable, with praise for pouring and Sneak-a-Cup convenience, but some reviewers note dribbles or uneven cup strength when interrupted.

Carafe handling earns strong praise in comparative pour testing and the pause feature is useful for grabbing a cup mid-brew.

Overall experience is strongest for low-fuss daily use: most reviewers find it easy, practical, and satisfying, while lab testing rates user-friendliness as average.

Overall experience is polarized: some reviewers love the no-fuss routine, while others do not recommend it because performance and safety limitations matter.

Recognition evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer citing its Amazon’s Choice designation as a sign of market recognition.

The strongest recognition evidence is a reviewer naming it a best simple coffee maker, not a formal certification.

Maintenance is mostly easy thanks to removable parts, dishwasher-safe pieces, and visible water filling, but exterior hot-plate grime and pour-space limits remain caveats.

Cleaning is generally easy, though one lab review noted that descaling was straightforward but took longer than expected.

Heating performance is strong for the class, with high wattage and hot cups, though one review warns the hot plate can push coffee too hot and worsen taste.

Heating performance is acceptable for the price in one comparison, but not a standout strength.

Beverage quality ranges from average to enjoyable: some reviewers call the coffee decent or even great, while one lab panel found bitterness and astringency.

Beverage quality is mixed: reviewers praised smooth, pleasant coffee in casual use, while lab testing found the cup fine but lacking body and complexity.

Capacity is supported mainly by the ability to make a large shared pot, with the 12-cup format seen as useful for families, offices, or heavier coffee drinkers.

Capacity is viewed positively for basic household use, with one reviewer noting it can make a large amount of coffee.

Brewing evidence is mixed: lab-style testing found decent consistency and good-enough strength, while other reviewers reported reliable everyday results rather than refined extraction.

Brewing consistency is one of the weakest areas: one taste test found surprisingly good results, but repeated testing criticized uneven water distribution, weak extraction, and wildly inconsistent brew temperatures.

Filter handling is mixed: standard filters are available and the basket is easy to clean, but there are complaints about no included reusable filter and grounds reaching the pot.

The lift-out filter basket is praised for making spent-ground disposal and cleaning easier.

Build quality is the clearest tradeoff: reviewers accept plastic at the low price, but several call out the lower-quality feel or durability limitations.

Durability evidence is concerning because one follow-up review reports a failed power button after about three months.

Design flaws cluster around cleanup nooks, a non-flat filter basket, cabinet clearance, and minor warping, so the design is practical but not flawless.

Design complaints center on uneven water distribution, the need to move the showerhead, and reported power-switch issues.

Ergonomics and footprint are mostly positive: reviewers like the front water window, compact body, and light weight, though cabinet clearance can be an issue.

Ergonomics vary by reviewer: some praised the water opening and water-window guidance, while another found the rear water marks difficult to see.

Warranty evidence is positive but narrow, with one reviewer pleased by the two-year limited warranty and replacement support for defects.

Warranty sentiment is moderate: one reviewer says it is not the best warranty but acceptable for a basic model.

Value is the strongest consensus point, with multiple reviewers praising the low price, useful programmable features, and good-enough performance for everyday use.

Reviewers agree the low price is attractive, but the value depends on tolerance for basic features and inconsistent performance.

Programming and initial setup are consistently praised as simple, with QuickTouch controls making scheduled brewing easy even on a cheap machine.

Setup and operation are a clear strength because reviewers describe the one-button interface as very simple and easy to use.

Accessories are sparse: one reviewer found the missing scoop or starter filters odd, and another disliked having to buy a reusable metal filter separately.

Cord storage receives a positive mention for helping save counter space.

Used grounds disposal is easy when using the removable basket or paper filters, with reviewers highlighting simple dumping and easier disposal.

Popularity is strong in reviewer evidence, with mentions of thousands of five-star ratings and a near-five-star average.

Portability is limited to countertop movement, but the unit is light enough that one reviewer found it easy to move around the kitchen.