Compare Black+Decker Programmable 12-Cup Coffee Maker, CM1160B vs OXO Brew 9 Cup Coffee Maker

Build quality is the clearest tradeoff: reviewers accept plastic at the low price, but several call out the lower-quality feel or durability limitations.

Build quality was praised as well-made and high quality, with one long-term review saying the machine still worked like new after more than three years.

Accessories are sparse: one reviewer found the missing scoop or starter filters odd, and another disliked having to buy a reusable metal filter separately.

Accessory feedback was limited but positive, with reviewers calling the included measuring spoon a convenient or nice touch.

Capacity is supported mainly by the ability to make a large shared pot, with the 12-cup format seen as useful for families, offices, or heavier coffee drinkers.

Capacity sentiment was mixed: the nine-cup size was useful, but reviewers cautioned that small pots were weaker and larger-capacity buyers may need another machine.

Pot function is divided: reviewers appreciate a full pot and two-hour warming, but one review found the hot plate can overheat coffee and damage flavor over time.

Pot brewing was seen as a strength, with reviewers praising ready-when-you-wake scheduling, strong full-carafe results, and hot coffee storage.

Heating performance is strong for the class, with high wattage and hot cups, though one review warns the hot plate can push coffee too hot and worsen taste.

Heating performance was praised for hot water, hot brewed coffee, and operation within proper brewing-temperature parameters.

Value is the strongest consensus point, with multiple reviewers praising the low price, useful programmable features, and good-enough performance for everyday use.

Value opinions were mixed: reviewers acknowledged a premium price, but some felt the convenience, coffee quality, and feature set justified the spend.

Used grounds disposal is easy when using the removable basket or paper filters, with reviewers highlighting simple dumping and easier disposal.

One reviewer specifically praised disposal because the paper filter came out quickly and cleanly into compost.

Filter handling is mixed: standard filters are available and the basket is easy to clean, but there are complaints about no included reusable filter and grounds reaching the pot.

Filter and water-dispersion feedback was favorable, with praise for pour-over-like setup, an even showerhead, and a drip-stopping filter basket.

Brewing evidence is mixed: lab-style testing found decent consistency and good-enough strength, while other reviewers reported reliable everyday results rather than refined extraction.

Most reviewers saw the brewer as consistent in flavor, temperature, saturation, and timing, though one comparison found the 9-cup less consistent than the 8-cup.

Beverage quality ranges from average to enjoyable: some reviewers call the coffee decent or even great, while one lab panel found bitterness and astringency.

Reviewers mostly praised the brewed coffee as rich, smooth, tasty, delicate, or fantastic, while one Chemex-focused reviewer found the flavor weaker than their preferred manual brew.

Recognition evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer citing its Amazon’s Choice designation as a sign of market recognition.

Certification was treated as a meaningful strength, with reviewers pointing to SCA or Gold Certification as a reason for trust and purchase interest.

Speed is context-dependent: some reviewers call it quick or efficient, while testing shows it is not among the fastest full-pot brewers.

Speed was generally positive, with reviewers reporting full pots in roughly six to eight minutes, though one nine-cup test called one cup per minute merely standard.

Ergonomics and footprint are mostly positive: reviewers like the front water window, compact body, and light weight, though cabinet clearance can be an issue.

Design feedback was strongly positive on looks and countertop appeal, but the tall body and large footprint were repeated ergonomic drawbacks.

Overall experience is strongest for low-fuss daily use: most reviewers find it easy, practical, and satisfying, while lab testing rates user-friendliness as average.

Overall experience was mostly excellent, with many reviewers recommending or enjoying the machine for simple, convenient coffee, though one reviewer found it a poor match.

Programming and initial setup are consistently praised as simple, with QuickTouch controls making scheduled brewing easy even on a cheap machine.

Setup and basic operation were described as quick, easy, intuitive, and low-effort across multiple reviews.

Automation is a strength for the price, especially auto-brew and auto shutoff, though the evidence focuses on convenience rather than advanced sensors.

Automated features were a major strength, including auto-brew scheduling, bloom/pre-infusion behavior, freshness timing, and helpful brew adjustments.

Carafe and cup handling is generally workable, with praise for pouring and Sneak-a-Cup convenience, but some reviewers note dribbles or uneven cup strength when interrupted.

The carafe often earned praise for heat retention and smooth pouring, but several reviewers reported awkward last-pour behavior, spills, or cleaning challenges.

Portability is limited to countertop movement, but the unit is light enough that one reviewer found it easy to move around the kitchen.

Portability evidence was limited to one long-term user who valued carrying the thermal carafe upstairs for shared work-from-home coffee breaks.

Maintenance is mostly easy thanks to removable parts, dishwasher-safe pieces, and visible water filling, but exterior hot-plate grime and pour-space limits remain caveats.

Maintenance feedback was mostly favorable thanks to removable parts, descaling reminders, and simple cleanup, but the carafe and small parts made cleaning harder for some reviewers.

Design flaws cluster around cleanup nooks, a non-flat filter basket, cabinet clearance, and minor warping, so the design is practical but not flawless.

Design flaws centered on the narrow or awkward carafe, tall/wide footprint, and one reviewer's early plastic-smell problem.

Warranty evidence is positive but narrow, with one reviewer pleased by the two-year limited warranty and replacement support for defects.

Warranty and support feedback was positive, especially Wirecutter's staff experience with responsive OXO service and Forbes's view of the two-year warranty supporting the investment.

Cable feedback was limited to one review, which found the cord somewhat short despite describing the routing options.

Dosing guidance was a weakness in two reviews, with recommended ratios producing coffee that testers found too strong or hard to dial in.

Popularity evidence was limited to one review noting that the model or its predecessor had been a top pick across major review blogs and websites.