Compare Shark PowerDetect Speed vs Bissell PowerClean FurFinder

Simple controls, automatic suction, flexible reach, and self-emptying reduce both effort and cleaning time. The vacuum is particularly convenient for frequent short sessions.

Reviewers repeatedly described the vacuum as easy to use, citing simple controls, easy storage, low-effort setup, and straightforward accessory changes.

Integrated dock notches keep the included tools organized and easy to find, a small detail that testers appreciated.

The main storage omission was onboard tool storage. One reviewer specifically wanted a hook or holder so the accessory could stay attached to the vacuum.

The refined detection system, reverse cleaning, Reveal lighting, flexible wand, and self-emptying dock create a notably polished package, even though similar smart features are becoming more common.

Reviewers did not see the vacuum as especially innovative overall. The lights and pet-hair focus stand out, but one critical test said the signature FurFinder attachment missed the mark.

Despite strong carpet suction, one tester did not experience the head jamming the way a competing high-suction model did.

Carpet grip could become excessive: one tester said the roll sometimes hung up on carpet and made the vacuum difficult to push or pull.

Runtime is acceptable in Eco or Auto mode but poor at maximum power, where several testers measured only about 10–13 minutes. Long recharge times magnify that limitation.

Runtime is the clearest recurring tradeoff. Eco-mode results around 40 minutes satisfied some smaller-home and staged-cleaning users, but multiple reviewers found medium/high runtimes too short for larger jobs.

The transparent onboard bin makes each clean easy to inspect, and pairing it with the larger self-emptying dock reduces hands-on emptying.

The dirt bin drew mixed reactions. It is easy to remove and can reduce dust during cleanup, but its small capacity means frequent emptying, especially in homes with shedding pets.

Attachment opinions vary by package and region. Some testers found the tools useful and well chosen, while others considered the bundle sparse for the price or wanted a stronger motorized pet tool.

The accessory set was widely useful for upholstery, crevices, cars, and above-floor cleaning. Most reviewers praised the included tools, although one found the signature FurFinder upholstery head disappointing.

Large crumbs, rice, litter, and other debris are generally swallowed quickly on hard floors. Some rice scattered in one test, but overall intake remained strong.

Large-debris performance was mixed. One tester found cereal pieces piled up against the floorhead casing, while another successfully cleared a large hard-floor mess.

Most testers reported excellent rug handling and powerful embedded-debris pickup. One direct comparison found the Speed left substantial dust behind versus the original PowerDetect, making carpet performance the clearest point of disagreement.

Area-rug handling was positive: reviewers said the motor handled rugs with ease and that the lightweight floorhead rolled well on carpeted surfaces.

The washable HEPA filter provides strong dust containment and long-term air quality, although it must be washed and fully dried on schedule.

The sealed HEPA system was specifically appreciated by an allergy-conscious reviewer for keeping dust, pollen, and dander contained instead of recirculating them.

Short maximum-power runtime makes it a poor fit for long, uninterrupted whole-home deep cleans. It works better as a quick-cleaning cordless companion than a heavy-duty sole vacuum.

One reviewer cautioned that this cordless model does not match a heavy-duty canister or upright for sheer power, even though its everyday suction is strong.

The main brush handled pet hair and resisted tangles well, but the included pet attachments were less convincing and the strongest motorized option may cost extra.

Pet and long-hair households were a major strength: most reviewers found the vacuum highly effective at finding and collecting shed hair. The main exception was one test where the dedicated FurFinder upholstery attachment bogged down and underperformed.

The folding body and slimmer dock help with storage, but the Clean & Empty base can still feel bulky in a cramped apartment. One tester also disliked the head locking upright during normal backward motion.

Self-standing storage was one of the most frequently praised conveniences, and the compact footprint worked well in closets and spare rooms. One tester found the upright stance a little tippy, so stability is good rather than flawless.

Above-floor results are mixed: upholstery tools work well on ordinary furniture and car areas, but dense pet hair and a loosely attached dusting brush expose limitations.

Upholstery performance was usually excellent, with several reviewers removing embedded hair and fluff quickly and sometimes in one pass. One tester strongly disagreed, finding the dedicated FurFinder head underpowered and prone to stalling.

At roughly seven to eight pounds, the Speed is lighter and easier to handle than the original and several premium rivals. Some users may still find it chunky during longer sessions.

Despite published weights around seven pounds, most hands-on reviewers found the vacuum lightweight or manageable. It was especially appreciated for carrying between floors and avoiding arm fatigue.

Hard-floor fine-dust pickup is consistently strong, especially at full suction, and the blue illumination helps reveal particles that would otherwise be missed.

Fine hard-floor debris performance was excellent in direct testing, with leftover flour and sugar removed in a single pass.

The vacuum itself suits small homes and quick apartment cleaning, but the auto-empty dock requires more floor space than a simple wall charger.

The compact body stores easily and works well for many small-space tasks, but one reviewer found the handheld configuration too bulky for awkward dashboard areas.

The self-emptying dock sharply reduces direct dust contact and daily bin chores. Periodic dock emptying can still release a cloud because the system is bagless.

Emptying opinions were mixed. Several reviewers found the bin easy or hassle-free to remove, but others disliked having to pull out the top/filter instead of using a one-touch bottom release.

The blue hard-floor light reveals fine dust very effectively and is a noticeable improvement over Shark’s older white light. Some testers still prefer Dyson’s green laser, and one questioned whether blue UV adds much over standard lighting.

The lighting is not just decorative: reviewers said it exposed fine dust, hidden fur, and missed patches that looked invisible before vacuuming. This was one of the strongest points of agreement.

The cordless format is especially convenient for fast spot cleaning when pulling out a larger wired vacuum would be excessive.

Cordless operation was repeatedly praised for making room-to-room, stair, furniture, and car cleaning easier. Reviewers especially liked avoiding cords and plugs during quick sessions.

The auto-empty dock reduces daily maintenance, but the washable filter still needs periodic cleaning and complete drying to avoid odors.

Maintenance was viewed positively in the one review that addressed it directly, thanks to clear cleaning instructions and reasonably priced replacement parts.

The lighter, balanced body generally steers smoothly and is easier to handle than the original. A recurring upright-lock issue in one test can interrupt backward passes.

Handling was generally excellent thanks to low weight, swiveling movement, and easy rolling. The main drawback appeared on carpet, where stronger grip could make the head harder to push or pull.

The overall reception is strongly positive for quick daily cleaning, hard floors, and convenience. The main reservations are weak maximum-power endurance and inconsistent carpet performance versus the original model.

Overall sentiment was strongly positive in 12 of the 13 reviews, with repeated recommendations and praise for cleaning power, lights, and versatility. The main dissenting review still called it good but criticized the signature FurFinder attachment and a few missing refinements.

The combination of multi-surface pickup, handheld conversion, flexible reach, automatic suction, and auto-emptying makes it useful for varied quick-cleaning jobs.

Versatility was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers using the vacuum on floors, upholstery, stairs, cars, corners, curtains, and high areas. The modular 3-in-1 design was repeatedly highlighted as a reason to buy.

The hinged wand is a standout, letting the head reach under beds, sofas, and low cabinets without kneeling. Most testers found it highly useful, though one noted the hinge can feel slightly awkward.

The swiveling head reached under most furniture successfully, though very low sofas could still be out of reach.

Large release buttons make the attachments quick and simple to connect or remove.

Tool changes were consistently easy, with simple click-off parts, a foot-release floorhead, and quick accessory swaps. Reviewers liked being able to move from floor cleaning to handheld tasks without fuss.

The anti-wrap design handles long and pet hair unusually well, leaving little buildup on the main brush. It is not perfectly tangle-free, but it requires less manual cutting than most rivals.

Tangle resistance was another broad strength. Most testers saw little or no wrap on the main floorhead, though very long strands could occasionally wind around a roller and the small tool collected some hair.

The adaptive headlight switches to blue on hard floors and white on carpet. Its blue beam exposes dust especially well, though Dyson’s green laser remains the benchmark for some testers.

The FurFinder lights were one of the most praised features in the entire set. Reviewers repeatedly called them bright, helpful, and good enough to change how they vacuum.

The vacuum pulled a surprising amount of hidden cat hair from rugs in a short pass, making carpet hair pickup a clear strength.

Carpet hair pickup was excellent in the reviews that tested it, including thick knots and mixed pet/human hair.

A replacement battery was difficult to find at launch, and older Shark batteries suggest a spare could add a meaningful ownership cost.

Replacement parts were described as well priced, suggesting ongoing upkeep need not be unusually expensive.

Full-power pickup works in both forward and reverse passes, reducing the need to repeat the same path.

One direct test found that pickup seemed to happen mainly on the forward pass, making reverse cleaning noticeably weaker.

Edge cleaning can be excellent on high power, but another test found the main head left enough debris to require the crevice tool. Results appear dependent on power setting and debris type.

The floorhead reached closely along walls, and testers also found the machine easy to work right up against edges and baseboards.

The Speed is lighter, more convenient, and usually cheaper than premium Dyson alternatives, but it does not always match their peak suction or illumination. The original PowerDetect can also clean carpets more thoroughly.

Comparisons were mostly favorable on value and usability, and several reviewers called it a clear upgrade over older vacuums. Performance-focused testing was more mixed, finding only a small gain over the regular PowerClean and lower suction than the LG CordZero.

Most testers praised the strong suction and excellent everyday pickup, especially on hard floors. One comparative test found the slimmer Speed noticeably weaker than the original on carpet.

Reviewers consistently found the suction strong for everyday debris, pet hair, hard floors, carpets, cars, and area rugs. One comparison-focused test found it only modestly stronger than the regular PowerClean and behind the LG CordZero.

The vacuum is clearly audible at higher power, but its running noise is not unusually harsh for a cordless model. The auto-empty burst is brief.

Noise impressions were split. One reviewer’s dog was unfazed by the vacuum, while another measured 80 dB on high and considered that fairly loud for a stick vacuum of this size.

Eco and Auto modes can cover routine quick cleaning, but Boost runtime falls to roughly 10–13 minutes and a full recharge can take five to six hours.

The removable battery was widely appreciated for flexible charging and potential battery swapping. Charging was described as fast in one testimonial, but the battery system cannot fully offset the model’s short higher-power runtimes.

Automatic dirt, floor, edge, and direction detection is one of the strongest features, adjusting suction with little user input. Testers found it responsive and genuinely useful in everyday cleaning.

Smart features are limited. One reviewer specifically noted that competitors can offer automatic suction adjustment and information screens, making this model feel basic in automation and display features.

The two-button controls and color display are straightforward and useful. Minor complaints include moving the dirt indicator away from the floorhead and showing battery life as an icon instead of a percentage.

Controls were repeatedly praised for simplicity: a true power button and three suction levels are easy to understand, and reviewers liked not having to hold a trigger while cleaning.

The body converts effectively to handheld mode for spot cleaning, though the limited accessory selection can restrict specialized handheld tasks.

The modular handheld conversion was a strong practical advantage for cars, furniture, small messes, and high-reach cleaning. Reviewers repeatedly praised how easily the main body detaches and reconfigures.

The relatively low-profile floorhead slips into tighter spaces and complements the flexible wand for reaching beneath furniture.

The head fits under many tables and pieces of furniture, but it is not exceptionally low profile; one reviewer could not get it beneath very low sofas.

The vacuum feels sturdy enough for routine household cleaning despite relying heavily on molded plastic. It does not feel truly premium, but it also avoids feeling cheap.

Although the body is largely plastic, reviewers said it felt sturdy and well built. Another tester described the design as built to last.

The slimmer shape and restrained metallic finishes look polished rather than appliance-like, with the Luxe colors earning especially strong praise for fitting into home decor.

The black-and-blue finish was described as attractive, even though the construction is predominantly plastic.

The single multi-surface floorhead avoids head swaps and performs well in most tests. Its main tradeoffs are weaker deep carpet extraction than the original dual-brush head and occasional upright locking.

The standard floorhead was generally the stronger attachment and worked well for everyday cleaning. Its casing can block chunky debris, however, forcing extra passes with cereal-sized pieces.

Reviewers consistently viewed it as strong value for near-flagship cleaning and an auto-empty dock. It is still a $500-class purchase, but generally costs less than comparable Dyson setups.

Value was a standout strength across the set. Reviewers repeatedly called the vacuum competitively priced, cost-effective versus Dyson, and especially compelling when discounted.

Assembly is quick and self-explanatory, with the dock and vacuum components clicking together in only a few minutes.

Assembly was consistently effortless. Reviewers described setup as self-explanatory, plug-and-play, and intuitive enough to complete within minutes.

A warning light clearly indicates when the dock bin needs attention, reducing guesswork around emptying.

High-pile carpet grip was stronger than the standard PowerClean, helping dig into the pile, but the brush could hang up and make the vacuum harder to move.

Low-pile carpet pickup was competent but not perfect. Large cereal pieces needed an extra pass in one test, while another reviewer liked the stronger carpet grip but noted it could hinder movement.

One tester found that the powered FurFinder attachment could bog down and stop entirely when pressed into upholstery, a notable weakness in debris-flow reliability.

Crevice pickup was strong in car testing, where Turbo mode pulled lodged sand from narrow trunk spaces.

One tester found some long hair wrapping around the smaller powered tool, requiring manual removal even though the main floorhead stayed mostly clear.

Hair pickup on hard floors was consistently strong, with reviewers reporting effective removal of pet and human hair and performance comparable to much larger vacuums.

Packaging is compact and largely recyclable, using paper and cardboard instead of substantial single-use plastic or foam.

Docking is straightforward and immediately triggers emptying and charging. The slimmer simplified base was preferred to the older design, though its footprint still matters in small rooms.

Carpet testing produced a pronounced sense of cyclonic pull, helping lift embedded debris and pet hair from rugs.

The dock’s 20–30 second emptying cycle is conspicuously loud, even with Quiet Mode, though some testers considered it typical for self-emptying vacuums.

Reviewers found the lightweight cordless format well suited to stairs, and the powered upholstery tool worked especially well on carpeted stair surfaces.

One test found the handle became quite hot during sustained high-power use, which could make longer intensive sessions uncomfortable.

One reviewer explicitly felt the vacuum was built to last, adding confidence beyond its lightweight cordless construction.