Compare Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 SE Headphones vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 100

Sound quality is the strongest repeated praise, described as detailed, clear, engaging, and high value for the price.

Most reviewers describe the sound as enjoyable, clear, and engaging, with especially strong praise from Tom’s Guide, HiFi Oasis, and HeadphoneCheck. A minority found the stock tuning merely average or dull, so EQ can make a meaningful difference.

Wind handling is mixed: one review criticized wind noise in transparency mode, while another found ANC outdoor wind handling very good.

Wind handling is a recurring weakness outdoors, with crackling or audible wind noise reported in both ANC and transparency modes.

ANC's effect on the sound signature is mixed: one review praised the lack of tonal shift, while another found ANC-on tuning messier on the SE.

One reviewer found that engaging ANC left the core sound signature essentially unchanged, which makes switching noise cancellation on and off less disruptive.

One reviewer heard slight creaking during movement, but described it as minor.

Mechanical noise while worn is extremely low. One reviewer specifically praised the near absence of creaking or frame noise when moving the jaw.

Microphone noise reduction is weaker than some competitors, with one reviewer saying it does not filter as much background noise.

The microphone system does a good job suppressing background noise while keeping speech intelligible. Reviewers found it useful for calls in busier indoor and outdoor settings.

ANC sound impact is similarly split, with TechRadar praising tonal consistency and RecordingNow hearing a more problematic change with ANC on.

ANC’s effect on sound is mixed. One reviewer heard virtually no tonal change, while another found the sound more compressed and unnatural with ANC engaged.

Soundstage is generally wide and spacious, though one reviewer heard it as more intimate than wide.

Soundstage is the most consistent acoustic limitation: several reviewers call it narrow, closed-in, or intimate because of the on-ear form factor. A few still found respectable depth or width, and wired listening can open it up somewhat.

Background noise reduction is viewed as improved and effective, but not the quietest in the class according to comparison-focused reviewers.

ANC itself adds very little objectionable background noise in most testing. One reviewer heard no disturbing hiss at all, while another described only a subtle ambient 'air' rather than a true hiss.

Frequency-response impressions are mixed because the SE sounds warmer and less flat than the original, even though the tonal balance can be adjusted.

One measurement-focused review found the default response noticeably uneven and in need of EQ. It became much more natural after correction, but stock accuracy was not a strength there.

ANC is generally judged good or improved, though not always elite; reviewers praised effectiveness while noting Sony/Bose-class options can still outperform it.

ANC is one of the most widely praised features, cutting cafe, transit, office, and steady engine noise surprisingly well for an on-ear design. It still trails the very best flagship over-ear systems, and fit can affect both comfort and effectiveness.

Gaming/low-latency performance was judged snappy and suitable for videos and fast-paced games.

Video sync is very good, especially with the low-latency option available when needed. Reviewers reported little to no lag after enabling the appropriate mode.

Passive noise isolation is a notable strength, with reviewers praising how much noise is blocked before ANC.

Passive isolation is consistently good for an on-ear headphone and helps before ANC is even enabled. Reviewers still note that over-ear designs can seal more completely.

Bass earns strong praise for impact and EQ potential, but some reviewers found the SE tuning too bass-forward or not fully controlled.

Bass is generally a strength: powerful, full-bodied, and clean enough for pop, hip-hop, and electronic music. Some reviewers found the default low end overemphasized or muddy, while others thought it was too restrained for true bass-head impact.

Immersion is praised through wide, effortless soundstage comments, even without spatial audio.

One reviewer found the stereo presentation highly immersive, with sounds moving convincingly around the listener despite the compact on-ear design.

Voice assistant access worked cleanly in hands-on testing.

Voice assistant integration has one notable software quirk: one reviewer found the assistant toggle behaved in the opposite way expected. The feature works, but that implementation was confusing.

Voice prompts stand out positively, especially the Matt Berry/Southwark option.

Voice prompts are generally clear, pleasant, and useful for battery and mode feedback. One review noted that the spoken battery percentage could differ slightly from the app.

Advanced software features such as DynamEQ and app changes are useful but taste-dependent, with some reviewers liking the added energy and others preferring simpler original tuning.

Software features are practical rather than extravagant, covering the adjustments most people are likely to use. Reviewers liked the range, though one wanted more button-mapping flexibility for ANC controls.

Microphone quality itself is good in quiet conditions, even if background noise filtering is less strong.

Call quality is a strong point overall, with voices repeatedly described as clear, full, and easy to understand. One reviewer found it merely ordinary, but most testing was distinctly positive.

Bluetooth-related experiences were largely positive where judged through pairing and multipoint behavior.

Bluetooth performance is consistently stable, quick to pair, and reliable across normal room or office distances. No major dropouts or connection problems were reported in hands-on testing.

EQ customization is a major strength, with reviewers praising the seven-band EQ and how well the headphones respond to tuning.

EQ customization is one of the most useful features because multiple reviewers improved the stock sound with it. The five-band layout is simple and effective, though a few listeners wanted finer control.

Setup and software are generally smooth, clean, and intuitive, with fast firmware and app interactions noted.

Initial setup is very easy, with quick recognition and straightforward firmware handling. Reviewers describe the onboarding process as essentially frictionless.

The app is widely praised for EQ, controls, and clean layout, though one reviewer wanted clearer EQ frequency labeling.

The companion app is broadly praised for being clean, fast, and easy to navigate. It covers ANC, transparency, EQ, button mapping, updates, and other practical settings without becoming overly complicated.

Physical button controls are praised for usability and responsiveness.

Physical buttons are a consistent usability strength: easy to find, responsive, and more reliable than touch controls for many reviewers. A short learning period may be needed because several buttons sit close together.

Wear-detection auto-pause is fast, though the broader wear-detection behavior was not flawless.

Automatic wear-detection pause is missing, and the reviewer who called it out viewed that omission negatively.

Included accessories are appreciated, especially the case and cable management touches.

The accessory bundle is functional but not premium. Reviewers criticized the charging-only USB cable in one package and the dated USB-A termination in another.

Sidetone/voice passthrough needs improvement according to one reviewer who wanted clearer, louder self-voice feedback.

Sidetone can make calls feel more natural by feeding back enough of the wearer’s voice to reduce the sealed-off sensation.

Portability is a weakness because the headphones and case are not especially compact.

The folding on-ear design makes the Aventho 100 exceptionally portable and much easier to bag than many over-ear alternatives. Even reviewers who disliked the fit still praised the compact footprint.

Water resistance is a weakness because one reviewer warns users to be careful due to no rating.

The IP53 rating gives useful reassurance against dust, light rain, and some sweat. Reviewers still treat it as splash resistance rather than true waterproofing.

Headband padding is one of the more divisive comfort points, ranging from improved and comfortable to stiff or not meaningfully changed.

The headband padding is generous and distributes pressure well. One reviewer reported no hot spots even during extended wear.

Ear cup rotation is judged useful and flexible where reviewed.

Earcup swivel is functional but not universally intuitive. One reviewer disliked the direction the cups rotate when worn around the neck.

Feature coverage is viewed positively, with reviewers noting modern ANC-headphone features and useful app-based controls.

The feature set is deliberately streamlined rather than maximal, trading spatial-audio extras and other flagship features for a lower price and simpler experience.

Travel friendliness is mixed: battery life is excellent for long trips, but the large case and limited folding hurt portability.

Travel friendliness is a core strength: light weight, folding hinges, long battery life, and wired fallback all make the Aventho 100 easy to live with on the move.

Preset and DynamEQ-style tuning are useful but taste-dependent; some presets are usable while DynamEQ can be divisive.

At least one preset disappointed, with the bass mode described as dull and overly blunt. Custom EQ is the safer route for listeners who want to fine-tune the sound.

Headband adjustability was not evaluated directly beyond factual mechanism mentions.

Headband adjustment works, but the range and mechanism are not perfect. Larger heads may reach the end of the extension, and one reviewer found even adjustment a little stiff.

The hard case is generally sturdy and solid, but its size hurts compactness.

The included soft pouch earns mixed reactions. Some reviewers liked its material and cable pocket, while others wanted a proper hard case or felt the bag looked too basic for the price.

Aesthetics split reviewers: some liked the clean design and blue color, while another found the wide look silly when worn.

The Aventho 100 can look distinctive without becoming flashy. One reviewer specifically praised its understated styling as a good match for buyers who want something stylish but restrained.

Android setup worked smoothly in the tested pairing flow, with the reviewer connecting quickly to a Samsung foldable device.

Android support is excellent thanks to Google Fast Pair. Reviewers reported quick recognition, one-tap setup, and reliable behavior on compatible phones.

Cable quality receives a positive note for the included USB-C and 3.5mm cables.

Cable quality is mixed: the exposed braided wiring on the headphone is praised for improved durability, while one reviewer thought the included analog cable felt cheap.

Microphone quality is good in quiet conditions, but noise suppression is less impressive in background noise.

The integrated microphone array performs reliably for calls and computer meetings. It captures speech clearly without requiring a boom microphone.

Replaceable components receive praise where reviewers focus on the user-replaceable battery as a long-term ownership benefit.

The ear pads and headband pad can be replaced, which supports longer service life and easier maintenance.

Detail retrieval and instrument separation are praised in both written and hands-on listening tests.

Instrument separation is usually strong enough to keep individual parts distinct, even in busy tracks. The main exception comes from reviewers who heard congestion or weaker separation when mixes became especially dense.

Replaceable earpads and battery-related serviceability are repeatedly praised as longevity-friendly.

Earpads are easy to replace and lock securely back into place. That improves both longevity and the potential for future customization.

Treble is often praised for detail, shine, and sparkle, but DynamEQ can make the sound more aggressive for some listeners.

Treble is mostly smooth and non-fatiguing, with several reviewers praising its clarity and lack of harshness. Others found the top end slightly dull, soft, or occasionally edgy, making this one of the more taste-dependent parts of the tuning.

Mids are frequently praised as clear, rounded, and strong with vocals or instruments.

Midrange reproduction is usually clear, natural, and easy to follow, especially for vocals. A few reviews note some recession or resonance in the lower mids, particularly before EQ.

Volume output is mixed: some found it loud enough or very loud, while another wanted more Bluetooth/3.5mm loudness.

The headphones can play loudly with plenty of headroom. Reviewers who tested output level found them strong without obvious strain.

Overall recommendations are very positive, especially for sound-first buyers and value seekers, with caveats around ANC, comfort, and bulk.

Overall recommendations are strongly positive but often conditional on fit. Reviewers repeatedly advise buying for the styling, portability, battery life, and enjoyable sound, while warning that on-ear comfort should be tested if possible.

Sustainability and repairability are praised thanks to recyclable packaging, recycled materials, user-replaceable batteries, and removable pads.

Repairability is unusually strong for wireless headphones, with replaceable parts and even published disassembly guidance. Reviewers specifically praised this long-term ownership approach.

Premium feel is praised through materials, finish, and comparisons to more expensive headphones.

The Aventho 100 usually feels premium thanks to metal accents, refined styling, and solid construction. One reviewer thought the molded plastic sections kept it from fully matching its upscale appearance.

aptX Lossless support is treated as part of the impressive specification.

aptX playback receives excellent marks, including praise for clean wireless sound with no obvious compression artifacts. Compatible devices can take good advantage of the headphone’s higher-quality wireless modes.

RecordingNow gave the product a strong S-Tier expert score, reflecting award-style recognition in that review.

The 2025 Red Dot Design Award is repeatedly highlighted, and reviewers who discussed it generally felt the visual design deserved the recognition.

Wired listening options are appreciated as part of the broader connectivity package.

Connection flexibility is excellent, spanning Bluetooth, analog 3.5mm, and USB audio in supported setups. Reviewers liked being able to choose the best connection for each device.

Ear cup padding and space are generally praised for plushness, roominess, and comfort.

The memory-foam earpads are soft, thick, and comfortable in the positive fit case. Their cushioning helps offset the pressure inherent to an on-ear design.

Clarity at higher volume is praised, with reviewers noting strong clarity and no distortion at raised levels.

Clarity remains impressively intact at very high volume, with little muddiness or distortion reported. That makes the Aventho 100 unusually composed when pushed hard.

Transparency mode ranges from natural and useful to merely acceptable and less airy than competitors.

Transparency mode is generally useful and natural enough for conversations or situational awareness. Some reviewers heard muffling or wind interference outdoors, so performance is better in calm environments.

Weight comfort is mixed to negative, with one reviewer calling it among the heaviest in class while another found it substantial but acceptable.

At roughly 220 grams, the Aventho 100 feels notably light and easy to carry. Reviewers repeatedly connect the low weight with better everyday and travel comfort.

Clamping force is mostly acceptable or well judged, though one review found the fit snug compared with rivals.

Clamping force is the product’s biggest fit wildcard. Some reviewers found it secure and comfortable, while others experienced severe pressure that made extended listening difficult.

Comfort is mixed: some reviewers found it comfortable or improved, while others criticized weight, snugness, or headband pressure over time.

Comfort is highly fit-dependent. Several reviewers wore the Aventho 100 for long stretches without fatigue, while others experienced sore ears, heat, or pressure after one to three hours.

Design is usually viewed positively, especially the clean lines and color options, although the look is not universally loved.

The retro styling is one of the product’s most universal strengths, with reviewers repeatedly praising its 1970s or radio-operator aesthetic. The aluminum accents, compact proportions, and multiple finishes help it stand apart from generic wireless headphones.

Durability is judged positively through solid materials and a reviewer description of the headphones as durable overall.

Durability impressions are strong thanks to robust hinges, solid materials, and improved braided wiring. The foldable frame still feels capable of everyday commuting and travel abuse.

Build quality is consistently praised as sturdy, premium, or strong for the price, with only minor creaking noted in one review.

Build quality is consistently excellent, with sturdy metal components, robust plastics, and little creaking. Reviewers often cite construction as one of the reasons the Aventho 100 feels worth its price.

Hinge feel and arm construction are praised for tightness, friction, and premium movement.

Hinge construction inspires confidence, with metal structure and robust surrounding parts contributing to a durable folding mechanism.

Multipoint generally works, but switching can require pausing and there is no automatic switching in one test.

Multipoint works well and is usually seamless between two devices. One review found that media had to be paused on the first device before the second would play, but the broader consensus is very positive.

Value is one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly calling the P100 SE well priced or exceptional for sound quality per dollar.

Value is generally considered good to excellent for the combination of styling, battery life, ANC, build, and connectivity. A few reviewers still called the price high, especially when comfort or stock tuning did not suit them.

Codec support is praised through aptX Adaptive and aptX Lossless support, but wireless LDAC absence is a separate limitation.

Codec support is unusually strong for this class, with AAC, SBC, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless repeatedly highlighted. Reviewers see this as a meaningful advantage for compatible sources.

Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly called excellent, incredible, extraordinary, or best-in-class.

Battery life is the clearest point of consensus: reviewers repeatedly praise the roughly 60-hour ANC-off and 40-hour ANC-on endurance. Several testers went days or a full week without needing a charge.

The 3.5mm input is widely appreciated because it allows passive listening, airplane use, and continued playback when the battery dies. Several reviewers see the wired fallback as a major usability advantage.

Wear-detection auto play/pause mostly worked but showed a brief audio cutout in one hands-on test.

Channel separation is clear enough to give instruments and effects distinct left-right positioning. That helps the stereo image feel organized and precise.

Detail retrieval is good but not universally class-leading. Some reviewers heard impressive fine information, while others wanted more articulation and resolution from a Beyerdynamic headphone.

The Aventho 100 is easy to drive in normal use, with its active electronics handling amplification so a powerful source is not required.

Google account integration adds useful convenience on Android by remembering the headphones for quick reconnects across compatible devices.

Glasses can worsen clamp pressure for some users. One reviewer with thin frames became uncomfortable after roughly half an hour.

Imaging is a strength, with convincing depth, stable positioning, and clear spatial movement. Even when stage width is limited, placement within that space remains precise.

LDAC is a clear omission for reviewers who expect high-res wireless codec support.

The headphones work smoothly across phones and computers, including hassle-free use for video calls and everyday device switching.

Overall satisfaction is high, with multiple reviewers calling the Aventho 100 fantastic, very good, or among their favorites. Negative reactions are driven mainly by fit and stock tuning rather than by basic functionality.

Sensor performance is mostly positive through wear-detection testing, though resume behavior had a minor glitch in one review.

The off-white finish receives a small positive note for resisting a dirty-looking appearance over time.

The headphones stay securely in place during normal movement despite their light weight. Reviewers generally found the clamp sufficient to prevent slipping.

USB-C connectivity is positively mentioned as part of the wired-listening and cable package.

Fast charging is outstanding, with about 15 minutes repeatedly translating into roughly 15 hours of playback. Reviewers see this as especially valuable for travel and last-minute charging.

Transient and dynamic performance is good overall, with sharp articulation in one review. Another heard some smearing when very dense, heavily layered tracks became demanding.

Gaming support is solid thanks to low-latency mode and versatile multimedia performance. One reviewer still suggested Beyerdynamic’s MMX 200 Wireless as the smarter gaming-specific choice.

Idle noise is usually very low, but the experience depends on mode. One reviewer heard virtually no hiss or hum, while another noticed audible hiss in ANC or transparency with nothing playing.

Bluetooth LE support is absent, which one reviewer flagged as a disappointing omission from an otherwise modern wireless implementation.

Spatial audio is absent, which some reviewers list as a limitation, though others say the natural soundstage reduces the sting.

Wear detection performed quickly but had a resume-side glitch that the reviewer wanted fixed.

Smart listening features such as DynamEQ are useful for low-volume listening but not universally preferred.

Smart Pause works quickly in hands-on testing, though one reviewer observed a brief audio glitch when resuming.

Sustainability materials earn praise from TechRadar, especially the recycled plastic and driver material claims.

Long sessions can make ears hot for listeners who struggle with on-ear designs. Two reviewers specifically reported heat buildup becoming uncomfortable after extended wear.