Compare SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones vs Beats 360

SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones

SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones

Overall score 4.1 / 5

Based on 18 scored reviews

vs
Beats 360

Beats 360

Overall score 4.1 / 5

Based on 42 scored reviews

How we score

Scorata scores summarize analyzed review evidence on a 1–5 scale; they are not laboratory measurements or a simple average of customer star ratings. Feature scores summarize the reviews covering that feature. The overall score averages feature scores within each review, then combines review averages. When both expert and customer evidence are available, those two groups receive equal weight. Products can have different review coverage, so small score gaps do not establish a winner.

Recommendations prioritize important features for the category, with a score of at least 3.5, a gap of at least 0.25 points and at least two supporting reviews per product. Features with widely varying scores or broad connectivity contexts are excluded from recommendations. These safeguards do not establish statistical significance.

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

The review evidence points to a tradeoff: 3.5mm analog input availability and LDAC versus Sustainability and repairability and Premium feel. Choose according to which strengths matter more to you; the overall score alone does not settle that choice.

Choose SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones for 3.5mm analog input availability and LDAC.

Choose Beats 360 for Sustainability and repairability and Premium feel.

Why these recommendations?

SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones

Where It Has the Edge

  • 3.5mm analog input availability is 4.0 vs 1.3. The 3.5mm input was generally appreciated as a practical wired option, especially because it enables analog listening despite...
  • LDAC is 4.2 vs 2.0. LDAC was a clear plus for Android and hi-res Bluetooth playback, though one reviewer warned the highest transfer...
  • Codec support is 4.0 vs 2.0. Codec support was mostly good thanks to LDAC, SBC, LC3, and AAC, but reviewers noted limits such as...

Beats 360

Where It Has the Edge

  • Sustainability and repairability is 5.0 vs 2.0. Replaceable cushions, simpler construction and available battery-service paths make the 360 notably more repairable and maintainable than many...
  • Premium feel is 4.9 vs 2.8. Although the construction uses plenty of plastic, the 360 generally feels more premium in hand than earlier Beats...
  • App is 4.6 vs 3.0. The Beats app is useful and straightforward on Android, providing firmware, button and device controls that keep the...
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones 4.1 overall score
Beats 360 4.1 overall score

Compare features

Scores are out of 5. Missing scores mean missing review evidence, not a missing feature.

Scored on both products

Performance

Sound quality
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.7

Reviewers broadly praised the XM6 for rich, clear, dynamic sound, with only a few noting rivals can sound wider or more refined.

Beats 360
4.5

Sound quality is one of the 360’s clearest strengths, with most testing describing clean, energetic and balanced playback. A minority view found the tuning thin and grating, especially without Spatial Audio.

Wear detection performance
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
5.0

Wear detection performance was excellent in the available review, with sensors described as as good as ever.

Beats 360
1.0

Wear-detection performance is effectively nonexistent because the necessary on-head sensing is absent.

Immersive audio quality
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.3

Immersive audio quality was mixed: cinema/background modes impressed some reviewers, while others called music upmixing gimmicky or poor.

Beats 360
5.0

Movies and music can sound convincingly enveloping, with head-filling presentation and strong spatial effects when the material suits them.

Audio-video sync accuracy
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.0

Latency evidence was limited but positive for wired analog use, where reviewers noted no latency through the headphone cable.

Beats 360
2.5

Wireless playback is usable for video, but the lack of a wired path means true zero-latency operation is unavailable.

Soundstage width
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.4

Soundstage was mixed: some reviewers heard nice width, while others found it restricted or weak for competitive gaming.

Beats 360
4.6

The soundstage is consistently spacious for a closed wireless headphone, with good width and room around instruments.

Spatial audio
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.9

Spatial audio was one of the most mixed areas: cinema use sometimes impressed reviewers, but music support, setup, and service availability drew criticism.

Beats 360
4.0

Spatial Audio can be highly immersive for movies and compatible music, especially with head tracking. Some listeners leave it off because it can alter bass or add an artificial echo.

Wind noise handling
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
5.0

Wind handling was praised in microphone testing, where the XM6 rejected unwanted wind noise very well.

Beats 360
4.0

Wind handling is good enough for outdoor calls, with only faint static reported in windier conditions rather than intrusive noise.

Frequency response accuracy
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

Frequency response and tuning were generally praised as balanced and well measured, especially compared with earlier Sony tuning.

Beats 360
3.6

The tuning is far more balanced than old-school Beats, but it still leans neutral-bright rather than truly reference-flat. That balance works for many listeners but not all.

Bass performance
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

Bass was usually described as punchy, controlled, and customizable, though one reviewer found Sony's low end could overpower mids and highs.

Beats 360
3.9

Bass is punchy and controlled for many listeners, but opinions vary sharply by cushion, track and listening mode. Some found it lean for workouts, while others heard plenty of weight or even occasional boom.

Noise isolation (passive)
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.9

Passive isolation was a major strength in lab and hands-on impressions, helping the headphones block substantial noise even before ANC.

Beats 360
4.3

Passive isolation benefits from the deep cushions and seal, especially with UltraPlush; the more porous Knit pads trade some isolation for breathability.

Microphone noise reduction
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
5.0

Microphone noise reduction was excellent in the evidence, especially against streets, wind, and ambient noise during calls.

Beats 360
4.6

Background-noise suppression is a standout microphone strength, often keeping street, gym and environmental noise remarkably quiet behind the speaker’s voice.

Active noise cancellation
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.9

ANC was the strongest consensus point: reviewers repeatedly called it class-leading, best-in-class, or among the best they had tested.

Beats 360
4.6

ANC is a major upgrade and repeatedly lands near the top of the premium class for steady noise, travel and gym use. Bose, Sony and Apple flagships can still do better in some situations, especially voices.

Controls and connectivity

Smart Pause performance
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
5.0

Smart Pause worked very well in the available evidence, immediately pausing and resuming playback.

Beats 360
1.0

Smart Pause is effectively missing: taking the headphones off does not automatically stop playback.

Smart listening features
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.3

Smart listening features such as Speak-to-Chat, Quick Attention, and adaptive modes were generally useful, though not universally essential.

Beats 360
2.0

The custom Beats platform omits some smarter AirPods-style features such as Adaptive Audio, Conversation Awareness and Personalized Volume.

Equalizer customization
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.7

EQ customization was one of Sony's strongest feature advantages, with repeated praise for the 10-band EQ, guided EQ, and deep tuning control.

Beats 360
2.5

Manual EQ is one of the most repeated software complaints. Adaptive tuning is automatic, but users cannot freely shape bass, mids and treble to preference.

App
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.0

The app drew mixed-to-negative reactions because it is powerful but crowded, aged, or not especially intuitive.

Beats 360
4.6

The Beats app is useful and straightforward on Android, providing firmware, button and device controls that keep the experience close to iOS.

Advanced software features
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.0

Advanced software features were plentiful and often impressive, but reviewers sometimes found them excessive, confusing, or underused.

Beats 360
2.4

The feature set feels incomplete for the price because wear detection, wired playback and several H2-era AirPods conveniences are missing.

Software/setup simplicity
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.7

Setup and software simplicity were mixed-to-negative because spatial setup, app navigation, and feature layout could feel involved or unintuitive.

Beats 360
4.0

Initial pairing and everyday setup are generally simple, though deeper software customization is more limited than some premium rivals.

Voice assistant integration
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.0

Voice assistant and voice-command features were mixed, with one reviewer saying they worked well and another finding them inconsistent.

Beats 360
4.0

Voice-assistant access works well across platforms, with hands-free Siri on Apple devices and Android assistant access through the controls.

Bluetooth
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

Bluetooth performance was discussed positively where reviewed, with connectivity described as a standout area for Sony.

Beats 360
5.0

Bluetooth connectivity proved trouble-free in the direct cross-phone test, including switching between Android and iPhone.

Microphone quality for calls
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.7

Call quality was strongly praised, with reviewers highlighting clearer voice pickup, better mics, and strong performance in noisy settings.

Beats 360
4.2

Call quality is generally very strong, with clear speech in difficult environments, but some tests heard noticeable processing and stopped short of recommending it for important conferencing.

Bluetooth version
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.2

Bluetooth version support was viewed positively in one comparison because the XM6 uses newer Bluetooth with LE benefits.

Beats 360
4.0

Bluetooth 5.3 is considered fully adequate here, with little practical benefit expected from moving to Bluetooth 6 for this use case.

Button control usability
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.3

Physical button usability improved meaningfully, with reviewers liking the distinct power and ANC buttons and easier blind operation.

Beats 360
4.3

Physical buttons are usually preferred for sweaty workouts and reliable control, though several users found the similarly shaped or flush buttons harder to identify by touch.

Other features

Auto-play/wear detection
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
5.0

Auto-play and wear detection performed very well in the available evidence, pausing and resuming immediately.

Beats 360
1.4

Wear detection is one of the clearest weaknesses. The 360 does not sense when it is put on or removed, an omission repeatedly criticized at $350.

Wear detection auto-pause
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
5.0

Wear detection auto-pause was excellent in the available review, immediately pausing and resuming playback.

Beats 360
1.5

Automatic pause is absent, so music keeps playing when the headphones come off unless the user stops it manually.

Detachable cable convenience
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.0

Detachable analog cable use was useful for low-latency wired listening, though broader cable quality drew criticism elsewhere.

Beats 360
1.0

Because the 360 has no wired playback path, there is no detachable audio-cable convenience to fall back on.

Ecosystem integration
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.0

Ecosystem integration was criticized where discussed because Sony's own ecosystem and PlayStation support felt incomplete.

Beats 360
5.0

Ecosystem integration is a major strength: iPhone users get AirPods-like pairing and switching, while Android still receives Fast Pair, Find Hub and useful native controls.

Sustainability and repairability
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.0

Repairability was criticized, especially around maintenance options and difficulty replacing parts compared with expectations for a premium product.

Beats 360
5.0

Replaceable cushions, simpler construction and available battery-service paths make the 360 notably more repairable and maintainable than many sealed premium headphones.

Water/sweat resistance rating
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.0

Water and sweat resistance were a weakness because reviewers cautioned there is no IP rating.

Beats 360
5.0

IPX4 sweat and water resistance is a defining strength, making the 360 unusually suitable for workouts and light rain among premium over-ear headphones.

Features at launch
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.8

Features at launch were viewed as very complete in the available evidence, with one reviewer saying the XM6 offers essentially everything expected from premium Bluetooth ANC headphones.

Beats 360
2.0

At launch, the 360 feels short on expected premium conveniences, particularly wear detection, wired audio and broader software personalization.

3.5mm analog input availability
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.0

The 3.5mm input was generally appreciated as a practical wired option, especially because it enables analog listening despite missing USB-C audio.

Beats 360
1.3

The lack of a 3.5mm analog path is a major recurring complaint, especially for airplane entertainment, consoles and battery-independent playback.

Connectivity options
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.3

Connectivity options were praised for convenient device switching and multipoint behavior.

Beats 360
2.0

Connectivity is flexible across Apple and Android wirelessly, but Bluetooth-only audio removes the wired fallback that many premium competitors retain.

LDAC
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.2

LDAC was a clear plus for Android and hi-res Bluetooth playback, though one reviewer warned the highest transfer rate may be unstable on some phones.

Beats 360
2.0

LDAC is absent, which matters most to Android listeners who want higher-bitrate Bluetooth audio.

Premium feel
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.8

Premium feel was one of the weaker areas because several reviewers felt the plastic build did not match the high price.

Beats 360
4.9

Although the construction uses plenty of plastic, the 360 generally feels more premium in hand than earlier Beats models and several similarly priced rivals.

Multi-platform compatibility
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.0

Multi-platform compatibility was mixed: Apple and Android playback worked, but PlayStation wireless compatibility drew criticism.

Beats 360
4.9

Cross-platform compatibility is one of the 360’s best practical advantages, delivering a near-first-class experience on both iOS and Android.

Travel friendliness
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.7

Travel friendliness was a major strength, supported by strong ANC, comfort, battery life, folding design, and the improved case.

Beats 360
2.9

Travel performance is split: comfort, ANC and long battery life are excellent on the move, but no wired seatback connection and limited foldability are meaningful drawbacks for frequent flyers.

Portability/foldability
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.6

Portability and foldability were major upgrades, with reviewers repeatedly praising the return of folding hinges and a smaller travel footprint.

Beats 360
2.8

Portability is only average: the cups swivel flat, but the frame does not collapse, so it takes more bag space than folding Sony or Bose rivals.

Replaceable earpads
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.5

Replaceable earpads were mixed: one source praised easier pad removal, another called replacement difficult, and another simply noted replaceable pads.

Beats 360
5.0

The earpads are exceptionally easy to remove and replace, making worn, sweaty or dirty contact surfaces simple to refresh.

Midrange clarity
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

Midrange and vocal clarity were a consistent strength, with reviewers calling voices clear, textured, natural, and fuller than prior models.

Beats 360
3.1

The midrange is generally clearer than older Beats tuning, though not uniformly so. Some listening found vocals full and prominent, while other testing heard recessed or thin mids.

Headband padding quality
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.8

Headband padding and shape were mixed: some reviewers found it comfortable, while others criticized thin padding or long-term pressure.

Beats 360
5.0

Headband padding reduces top-of-head pressure effectively and contributes strongly to the 360’s long-session comfort.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.0

Built-in DAC and hi-res wired playback were criticized because reviewers wanted a true digital lossless USB-C option.

Beats 360
1.1

Hi-res and lossless playback are major limitations: there is no wired lossless path and no high-resolution Bluetooth codec support.

Replaceable pads/headband
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.2

Replaceable pads or headband evidence was limited but positive for earpads, with easier pad removal described as a change for the better.

Beats 360
4.9

The modular cushion and headband system is the signature feature: parts swap quickly, support workout-to-office use and make both style changes and wear replacement unusually easy.

Treble clarity
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.3

Treble drew mostly positive comments for detail and sparkle, but lab-focused criticism noted some peaks that could need EQ.

Beats 360
3.7

Treble often comes across detailed and crisp, but the brighter tuning can become stilted, sibilant or fatiguing on certain tracks.

Aesthetics / discreet profile
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.7

Aesthetic discretion was mixed: one reviewer liked the low-profile street look, while another thought the headphones looked dorkier than competitors.

Beats 360
4.3

The slim profile is generally considered discreet and easy to wear in public, although one test found the cups stick out more than desired.

Headband adjustability
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

Headband adjustability had limited but positive evidence from a reviewer who found the fully extended fit comfortable.

Beats 360
5.0

The metal adjustment system provides enough extension to accommodate different head sizes and line the cups up comfortably.

Included accessories
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.0

Included accessories were criticized where evaluated because a reviewer expected better and more modern cables for the price.

Beats 360
2.5

The included pouch is useful, but the absence of a charging cable or charger disappoints some buyers at this price; others are happy not to receive another USB-C cable.

Integrated microphone
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

The integrated microphone setup was viewed positively in the available evidence as part of the XM6's strong mic technology.

Beats 360
5.0

The integrated microphone system is capable of excellent voice pickup, supporting the 360’s strong call performance.

Instrument separation
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

Instrument separation earned positive but limited evidence, with reviewers hearing better placement and clearer separation in the XM6.

Beats 360
4.1

Instrument separation is usually strong, helping busy arrangements stay distinct, though heavy bass can introduce some congestion.

Android compatibility
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.4

Android compatibility was a strength thanks to LDAC, Android-friendly hi-res support, and cross-device pairing advantages.

Beats 360
4.7

Android support is unusually complete for an Apple-owned product, with Fast Pair, Find Hub, Audio Switch and app-based controls repeatedly praised.

Ear cup swivel/rotation range
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.4

Ear cup swivel and rotation were praised for neck comfort, easier storage, and restoring convenience missing from the XM5.

Beats 360
4.0

The earcups rotate flat for storage, a useful compromise even though the headphones do not collapse inward.

Sensors
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
5.0

Sensors were praised in the available evidence because the wear sensors performed reliably.

Beats 360
4.7

Cushion-recognition sensors automatically retune the headphones for Knit or UltraPlush pads, a clever feature that helps preserve tuning across different seals.

Ear cup padding quality
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.3

Ear cup padding was usually praised as soft and well cushioned, though one long-use review found the earpads warm and sweaty.

Beats 360
4.6

Both cushion styles are well received: Performance Knit is breathable and workout-friendly, while UltraPlush is softer and often preferred for long listening. Knit can feel slightly rougher to some users.

Carry case quality
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.7

The carrying case was a standout strength thanks to its compact size, protection, magnetic clasp, and faster access.

Beats 360
4.4

The soft magnetic pouch is light, breathable and convenient for gym bags, but travelers wanting impact protection may prefer a hard-shell case.

USB-C
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
1.9

USB-C was the most repeated technical complaint because reviewers wanted USB-C audio or lossless digital playback, not charging-only behavior.

Beats 360
1.7

USB-C is primarily a charging connection rather than a dependable wired-audio option, a recurring frustration for travelers and lossless-audio users.

Stability
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

Fit stability was positive where evaluated, with reviewers noting snug, secure fit and consistent seal behavior.

Beats 360
4.4

The secure fit works well for cycling, lifting and most workouts, but sprints, sit-ups and bench movements can expose some movement depending on head size.

Transparency mode quality
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.4

Transparency mode improved substantially and often sounded natural, though some reviewers still found AirPods Max more realistic or Sony slightly unnatural.

Beats 360
4.5

Transparency mode is widely praised for sounding natural and usable for conversation, though a few tests found it less immediate or polished than Apple’s best implementations.

Overall recommendation
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.6

Overall recommendations were strongly positive, with reviewers frequently calling the XM6 elite, best-in-class, or worth buying despite caveats.

Beats 360
4.6

The overall recommendation is strongly positive, especially for active users wanting one over-ear pair for gym and daily life. A notable dissent centers on the tuning, wired omissions and premium price.

AptX
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.0

aptX was criticized because reviewers specifically noted the lack of aptX HD support.

Beats 360
2.0

There is no aptX Lossless support, limiting high-resolution wireless playback options.

Award recognition
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
5.0

Editorial recognition was strong, with reviewers naming the XM6 a best overall or best new headphone pick.

Beats 360
5.0

The 360 earned explicit Editors’ Choice recognition for its combination of modular design, water resistance and performance upgrades.

Smudge resistance
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.0

Smudge resistance was weak, with reviewers complaining that the darker finishes show finger grease and smudge badly.

Beats 360
2.0

The soft-touch silicone finish looks good but can attract hair and small particles, requiring occasional wiping.

Comfort and build

Durability over time
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.0

Durability over time had limited evidence, with one reviewer specifically worrying about the folding joint's long-term durability.

Beats 360
5.0

The simpler structure and replaceable wear surfaces give the 360 unusually good long-term ownership potential, with cushions easy to refresh as they age.

Hinge durability
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.5

Hinge durability was mixed: one review praised the more durable hinge, while another flagged fragile-feeling articulating hinges.

Beats 360
5.0

Dropping the traditional folding hinge simplifies a common wear point and is viewed as a durability advantage over older Beats designs.

Build quality
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.5

Build quality was mixed: one review found it very good, while another said the plastic construction felt underwhelming for the price.

Beats 360
4.9

Build quality is consistently viewed as solid and more premium than older Beats models, with sturdy sliders and little sense of flimsy plastic.

Clamping force comfort
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.4

Clamping force was generally comfortable and secure, with tighter fit improving isolation without widespread discomfort.

Beats 360
3.8

Clamp force is a tradeoff rather than a universal win. It helps keep the headphones secure for exercise, but head size can determine whether that feels reassuring or uncomfortable.

Comfort during long use
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.2

Long-use comfort was mostly strong, especially for travel, but several reviewers reported heat, pressure, or fit issues for some heads and ears.

Beats 360
4.7

Long-session comfort is one of the strongest themes, helped by soft cushions, good weight distribution and a lighter-feeling headband. Larger heads may still notice clamp pressure.

Design and Aesthetics
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

Design and aesthetics were mostly praised for a clean, modern, lightweight look, though some reviewers still found the design safe or understated.

Beats 360
4.8

The redesign is widely praised as modern, sleek and distinctly customizable, with swappable colors giving the 360 more personality than most premium ANC headphones.

Weight comfort
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.8

Weight comfort was praised where mentioned, with reviewers highlighting the XM6 as very light for premium over-ear ANC headphones.

Beats 360
4.6

Despite weighing around 294–295 g, the 360 usually feels lighter than the number suggests because its weight is distributed into the earcups and cushions.

Ownership and support

Codec support
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.0

Codec support was mostly good thanks to LDAC, SBC, LC3, and AAC, but reviewers noted limits such as missing aptX and some LDAC stability concerns.

Beats 360
2.0

Codec support is a weak point: the 360 relies on standard Bluetooth codecs and lacks the higher-resolution options offered by several rivals.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

Multipoint was viewed positively, with reviewers appreciating dual-device pairing across phones, laptops, and mixed Apple/non-Apple setups.

Beats 360
3.0

Automatic switching can work well inside supported ecosystems, but there is no true simultaneous Android-and-iPhone multipoint connection.

Value for money
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.6

Value was mixed: reviewers often said performance justified the price, but the $450 tier, discounts, and missing features were recurring caveats.

Beats 360
4.3

Value is generally considered good for a $350 premium workout-focused headphone, especially against AirPods Max, but full-price cushion kits and rival discounts can weaken the equation.

Battery and charging

Battery
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.2

Battery life was viewed as solid and travel-ready at roughly 30 hours with ANC, though not class-leading against longer-lasting competitors.

Beats 360
4.6

Battery life is a strong point at around 32 hours with ANC, and real-world tests often supported that claim. One unit showed unusually high standby drain, and Transparency can shorten endurance.

Charging
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

Charging was praised for quick-charge performance and the ability to listen while charging.

Beats 360
4.7

Fast Fuel charging is consistently useful, providing about an hour of playback from a five-minute charge.

Evidence available for one product

Other features

AI translation
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
1.0

Live Translation is missing because the 360 does not use the newer H2 feature stack.

Cable quality
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
1.5

Cable quality was criticized by one reviewer, who expected better cables for a premium headphone.

Beats 360No score yet
Detail retrieval
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
4.7

Detail retrieval is a consistent strength, with small textures and layered elements remaining easy to pick out despite the consumer-friendly tuning.

Find My
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
3.5

Find My and Find Hub add useful tracking, though one test linked always-on Find My behavior to noticeable standby drain.

Glasses and hat compatibility
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
3.5

Glasses compatibility is mixed: the softer clamp can avoid painful temple pressure, but thick arms may break the seal and reduce ANC.

Head gestures
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.0

Head gestures had limited but positive evidence, with a reviewer calling nod/shake call control a nice touch.

Beats 360No score yet
Imaging precision
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
5.0

Stereo imaging is precise, placing instruments and effects in distinct positions across the wide soundstage.

Maximum volume clarity
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
4.5

Even at high volume, distortion stays impressively low and clarity holds up well.

Overall satisfaction
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
4.7

Overall satisfaction is high across most hands-on testing, driven by the combination of workout versatility, comfort, ANC, sound and modularity.

Preset EQ profile quality
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.5

Preset or guided EQ profiles were received positively where discussed, helping users reach a preferred sound without complex manual tuning.

Beats 360No score yet
Sidetone adjustment quality
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.5

Sidetone adjustment was a weakness for one reviewer because voice amplification sounded unnatural and could not be toned down enough.

Beats 360No score yet
Streaming service integration
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
2.6

Streaming service integration for spatial audio was weak, with reviewers noting limited or lost service support despite 360 Reality Audio capability.

Beats 360No score yet
Touch control responsiveness
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.4

Touch controls divided reviewers: some found them accurate or intuitive, while others called them finicky, easy to nudge, or terrible.

Beats 360No score yet
Volume output
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
5.0

The 360 plays notably loud, with several comparisons highlighting its roughly 12 dB higher output versus Studio Pro.

Performance

ANC background noise level
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
2.0

A faint hiss or whooshing noise can be audible with ANC in otherwise quiet conditions, though it is generally described as a minor issue.

ANC effect on sound signature
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
4.0

Noise cancellation has only a small tonal effect in the direct listening test, with sound judged slightly better when ANC was off.

ANC sound impact on audio
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
4.0

ANC changes the sound slightly, with one test preferring the tonal balance when noise cancellation was switched off, though the difference was not large.

Dynamic performance
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
4.5

Dynamic performance is strong, with wide swings and energetic playback holding together well; UltraPlush can improve perceived punch further.

Gaming performance
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
2.0

Gaming flexibility is limited by Bluetooth-only audio, which rules out straightforward wired use with many consoles.

Idle static noise
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
2.0

A faint idle whoosh has been reported in quiet ANC use, so the electronics are not completely silent for every listener.

LE Audio readiness
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
4.0

LE Audio readiness was treated as a future-proofing benefit, tied to Auracast and newer Bluetooth features.

Beats 360No score yet

Controls and connectivity

Apple H2 chip support
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
2.0

Using Beats’ own chip instead of Apple’s H2 preserves cross-platform flexibility but leaves out several newer AirPods software features.

Voice prompts/feedback
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
4.0

The cushion-recognition chime provides helpful confirmation that a replacement earcup is seated and detected correctly.

Ownership and support

Auracast support
SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones
3.3

Auracast support was mixed: one reviewer saw it as future-proofing, while another could not get it working in testing.

Beats 360No score yet
Auto on/off reliability
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
2.0

Automatic power management is weak because the headphones do not reliably sleep when removed, creating avoidable battery-drain risk if left on.

Tracking and training

Dolby Atmos with head tracking
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
5.0

Dolby Atmos with head tracking can create a convincing theater-like presentation, especially for compatible movies and spatial mixes.

Workout heat and sweat buildup
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
3.7

Performance Knit can noticeably reduce sweat and heat versus leather-style pads, but over-ear coverage still gets warm during longer workouts and listening sessions.

Comfort and build

Sustainability materials
SONY WH-1000XM6 HeadphonesNo score yet
Beats 360
4.0

The use of 80% recycled plastic across key components is a meaningful sustainability benefit for the construction.

Reviews Comparing These Products

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Other Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider

#1 Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.5

Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...

Pros: Volume output, Carry case quality

Cons: Connectivity options, Noise isolation (passive)

#2 Jabra Evolve3 85
4.5

Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...

Pros: Frequency response accuracy, Clamping force comfort

Cons: Volume output, aptX

#3 Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
4.5

Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...

Pros: Codec support, aptX

Cons: Wear detection auto-pause, Wind noise handling

#4 Tribit QuietPlus 81
4.4

Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.

Pros: Maximum volume clarity, Microphone quality for calls

Cons: Idle static noise, Instrument separation