Compare Marshall Major V vs Beyerdynamic Aventho 100

Most reviewers liked the lively Marshall-leaning sound, but several found it average, treble-heavy, distant, or not competitive for audiophiles.

Most reviewers describe the sound as enjoyable, clear, and engaging, with especially strong praise from Tom’s Guide, HiFi Oasis, and HeadphoneCheck. A minority found the stock tuning merely average or dull, so EQ can make a meaningful difference.

Reviewers repeatedly flagged the absence of ANC as the Major V's biggest feature gap, especially for commuting, flights, and loud environments.

ANC is one of the most widely praised features, cutting cafe, transit, office, and steady engine noise surprisingly well for an on-ear design. It still trails the very best flagship over-ear systems, and fit can affect both comfort and effectiveness.

Wind handling was only discussed in microphone-test contexts and was generally positive alongside noisy-condition call performance.

Wind handling is a recurring weakness outdoors, with crackling or audible wind noise reported in both ANC and transparency modes.

LE Audio readiness was treated as a forward-looking advantage for streaming, sync, and Auracast-related future use.

Bluetooth LE support is absent, which one reviewer flagged as a disappointing omission from an otherwise modern wireless implementation.

Passive isolation was mixed: the pads muffled some office chatter and ambient sound, but on-ear fit still let plenty through.

Passive isolation is consistently good for an on-ear headphone and helps before ANC is even enabled. Reviewers still note that over-ear designs can seal more completely.

Measured frequency-response commentary was negative, with one review saying the tuning deviated drastically from the preferred curve.

One measurement-focused review found the default response noticeably uneven and in need of EQ. It became much more natural after correction, but stock accuracy was not a strength there.

Reviewers who discussed sync reported no noticeable delay or expected LE Audio benefits for video use.

Video sync is very good, especially with the low-latency option available when needed. Reviewers reported little to no lag after enabling the appropriate mode.

Microphone noise reduction received positive comments for cleaning up office, cafe, and ambient noise around speech.

The microphone system does a good job suppressing background noise while keeping speech intelligible. Reviewers found it useful for calls in busier indoor and outdoor settings.

Soundstage ranged from surprisingly wide and dynamic to compact, intimate, or under-imaged depending on the reviewer.

Soundstage is the most consistent acoustic limitation: several reviewers call it narrow, closed-in, or intimate because of the on-ear form factor. A few still found respectable depth or width, and wired listening can open it up somewhat.

Bass impressions skewed positive for punch and warmth, though a few reviewers found the low end light or uneven depending on tuning.

Bass is generally a strength: powerful, full-bodied, and clean enough for pop, hip-hop, and electronic music. Some reviewers found the default low end overemphasized or muddy, while others thought it was too restrained for true bass-head impact.

aptX support was criticized because reviewers specifically noted that aptX or aptX Adaptive was missing.

aptX playback receives excellent marks, including praise for clean wireless sound with no obvious compression artifacts. Compatible devices can take good advantage of the headphone’s higher-quality wireless modes.

Android compatibility was weakened by missing higher-quality Android-friendly codecs such as aptX or LDAC.

Android support is excellent thanks to Google Fast Pair. Reviewers reported quick recognition, one-tap setup, and reliable behavior on compatible phones.

One review praised the ear cups' 90-degree tilt as part of the flexible fit system.

Earcup swivel is functional but not universally intuitive. One reviewer disliked the direction the cups rotate when worn around the neck.

Reviewers treated the lack of IP or water resistance as a real limitation for rain, sweat, hikes, and outdoor use.

The IP53 rating gives useful reassurance against dust, light rain, and some sweat. Reviewers still treat it as splash resistance rather than true waterproofing.

Headband padding feedback was mixed, with one review praising full soft coverage and another calling it thin.

The headband padding is generous and distributes pressure well. One reviewer reported no hot spots even during extended wear.

Premium feel was mixed: the design could look special, but some reviewers said the materials did not feel expensive.

The Aventho 100 usually feels premium thanks to metal accents, refined styling, and solid construction. One reviewer thought the molded plastic sections kept it from fully matching its upscale appearance.

Preset EQ feedback was limited but positive when reviewers singled out balanced or useful presets.

At least one preset disappointed, with the bass mode described as dull and overly blunt. Custom EQ is the safer route for listeners who want to fine-tune the sound.

Headband adjustment was praised for smooth sliding rails and flexible adjustability.

Headband adjustment works, but the range and mechanism are not perfect. Larger heads may reach the end of the extension, and one reviewer found even adjustment a little stiff.

Carry protection was a consistent weakness because reviewers repeatedly complained that no case, pouch, or tote was included.

The included soft pouch earns mixed reactions. Some reviewers liked its material and cable pocket, while others wanted a proper hard case or felt the bag looked too basic for the price.

Fit stability was mixed: some reviews praised secure fit, while others found head movement could shift or dislodge the headphones.

The headphones stay securely in place during normal movement despite their light weight. Reviewers generally found the clamp sufficient to prevent slipping.

Repairability was viewed as a plus because reviewers noted battery replacement through Marshall's repair program.

Repairability is unusually strong for wireless headphones, with replaceable parts and even published disassembly guidance. Reviewers specifically praised this long-term ownership approach.

Launch feature set was criticized as limited, especially compared with competitors that include ANC, transparency, cases, or richer apps.

The feature set is deliberately streamlined rather than maximal, trading spatial-audio extras and other flagship features for a lower price and simpler experience.

Travel friendliness was mixed-to-positive: small size and battery helped, while no ANC and no case limited flights and loud travel.

Travel friendliness is a core strength: light weight, folding hinges, long battery life, and wired fallback all make the Aventho 100 easy to live with on the move.

The 3.5mm input was valued for wired listening and audio sharing, with several reviewers calling the sharing trick useful or cool.

The 3.5mm input is widely appreciated because it allows passive listening, airplane use, and continued playback when the battery dies. Several reviewers see the wired fallback as a major usability advantage.

Treble was described as crisp and detailed by some reviewers, while others found the top end harsh, exaggerated, or clustered.

Treble is mostly smooth and non-fatiguing, with several reviewers praising its clarity and lack of harshness. Others found the top end slightly dull, soft, or occasionally edgy, making this one of the more taste-dependent parts of the tuning.

Connectivity options were praised for wired listening, sharing audio, and useful device switching.

Connection flexibility is excellent, spanning Bluetooth, analog 3.5mm, and USB audio in supported setups. Reviewers liked being able to choose the best connection for each device.

Overall recommendations were mixed-to-positive: many reviewers recommended the headphones for battery, design, and casual use, but with clear caveats.

Overall recommendations are strongly positive but often conditional on fit. Reviewers repeatedly advise buying for the styling, portability, battery life, and enjoyable sound, while warning that on-ear comfort should be tested if possible.

Cable impressions were mixed: one reviewer liked the retro detail, while another disliked the tangling coiled cable.

Cable quality is mixed: the exposed braided wiring on the headphone is praised for improved durability, while one reviewer thought the included analog cable felt cheap.

Included accessories were criticized as skimpy because reviewers expected more protection or extras for the price.

The accessory bundle is functional but not premium. Reviewers criticized the charging-only USB cable in one package and the dated USB-A termination in another.

Reviewers noted that the headphones could play loudly without obvious strain and still had headroom.

Clarity remains impressively intact at very high volume, with little muddiness or distortion reported. That makes the Aventho 100 unusually composed when pushed hard.

One reviewer found normal listening volume more than sufficient, with extra output available if needed.

The headphones can play loudly with plenty of headroom. Reviewers who tested output level found them strong without obvious strain.

Ear cup padding was consistently praised as thick, soft, plush, or squishy enough to help the on-ear fit.

The memory-foam earpads are soft, thick, and comfortable in the positive fit case. Their cushioning helps offset the pressure inherent to an on-ear design.

Reviewers who focused on separation generally praised stereo placement, detail visibility, and the ability to follow individual sound elements.

Instrument separation is usually strong enough to keep individual parts distinct, even in busy tracks. The main exception comes from reviewers who heard congestion or weaker separation when mixes became especially dense.

Reviewers praised the distinctive vintage style and compact visual identity, though one found the look inconspicuous or barebones.

The Aventho 100 can look distinctive without becoming flashy. One reviewer specifically praised its understated styling as a good match for buyers who want something stylish but restrained.

Midrange clarity was often praised for vocals and detail, but some reviewers heard recessed or deficient mids.

Midrange reproduction is usually clear, natural, and easy to follow, especially for vocals. A few reviews note some recession or resonance in the lower mids, particularly before EQ.

Portability and foldability were consistently praised because the headphones collapse very small and fit easily in bags.

The folding on-ear design makes the Aventho 100 exceptionally portable and much easier to bag than many over-ear alternatives. Even reviewers who disliked the fit still praised the compact footprint.

The integrated mic array was praised in one review as working well for clear recordings.

The integrated microphone array performs reliably for calls and computer meetings. It captures speech clearly without requiring a boom microphone.

Multi-platform use was positive where one reviewer reported seamless switching between phone and laptop.

The headphones work smoothly across phones and computers, including hassle-free use for video calls and everyday device switching.

Replaceable earpads were a plus in reviews that noted removable pads or replacement cups.

Earpads are easy to replace and lock securely back into place. That improves both longevity and the potential for future customization.

Codec support was mixed-to-weak: LC3/LE Audio helped, but reviewers criticized the lack of higher-quality codecs.

Codec support is unusually strong for this class, with AAC, SBC, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless repeatedly highlighted. Reviewers see this as a meaningful advantage for compatible sources.

Value was split: reviewers liked the battery, design, and sound for the price, but many felt ANC competitors offered more.

Value is generally considered good to excellent for the combination of styling, battery life, ANC, build, and connectivity. A few reviewers still called the price high, especially when comfort or stock tuning did not suit them.

Multipoint generally worked well, though one reviewer noted playback must be paused on one device before switching.

Multipoint works well and is usually seamless between two devices. One review found that media had to be paused on the first device before the second would play, but the broader consensus is very positive.

One reviewer disliked the way the metal hinges stick out when folded, making hinge design a minor caveat.

Hinge construction inspires confidence, with metal structure and robust surrounding parts contributing to a durable folding mechanism.

Build quality was generally praised as rugged, tough, and durable, though not always premium-looking.

Build quality is consistently excellent, with sturdy metal components, robust plastics, and little creaking. Reviewers often cite construction as one of the reasons the Aventho 100 feels worth its price.

Long-wear comfort was highly divided, with many praising light padding and hours-long comfort while others reported pressure, heat, or glasses discomfort.

Comfort is highly fit-dependent. Several reviewers wore the Aventho 100 for long stretches without fatigue, while others experienced sore ears, heat, or pressure after one to three hours.

The retro Marshall design was widely praised as distinctive, classic, stylish, and aligned with the brand's rock identity.

The retro styling is one of the product’s most universal strengths, with reviewers repeatedly praising its 1970s or radio-operator aesthetic. The aluminum accents, compact proportions, and multiple finishes help it stand apart from generic wireless headphones.

Clamp force feedback was mixed, ranging from gentle or moderate to too tight or uncomfortable depending on head shape and use.

Clamping force is the product’s biggest fit wildcard. Some reviewers found it secure and comfortable, while others experienced severe pressure that made extended listening difficult.

Low weight was a consistent strength, with reviewers calling the headphones light, barely noticeable, and easy to wear.

At roughly 220 grams, the Aventho 100 feels notably light and easy to carry. Reviewers repeatedly connect the low weight with better everyday and travel comfort.

Durability-over-time comments were positive where reviewers expected the headphones to survive years of use or abuse.

Durability impressions are strong thanks to robust hinges, solid materials, and improved braided wiring. The foldable frame still feels capable of everyday commuting and travel abuse.

Setup was easy out of the box in one review, but app responsiveness and connection reliability were criticized elsewhere.

Initial setup is very easy, with quick recognition and straightforward firmware handling. Reviewers describe the onboarding process as essentially frictionless.

Voice assistant use was positive in the review that tested Google Assistant and Siri.

Voice assistant integration has one notable software quirk: one reviewer found the assistant toggle behaved in the opposite way expected. The feature works, but that implementation was confusing.

EQ customization was useful and often praised, though some reviewers said its effect was subtle or insufficient.

EQ customization is one of the most useful features because multiple reviewers improved the stock sound with it. The five-band layout is simple and effective, though a few listeners wanted finer control.

App opinions were mixed: support and customization were major upgrades, but some reviewers found the app buggy, basic, or limited.

The companion app is broadly praised for being clean, fast, and easy to navigate. It covers ANC, transparency, EQ, button mapping, updates, and other practical settings without becoming overly complicated.

Bluetooth was described positively where reviewers referenced modern or useful wireless capabilities rather than just listing the version.

Bluetooth performance is consistently stable, quick to pair, and reliable across normal room or office distances. No major dropouts or connection problems were reported in hands-on testing.

Call quality was usually praised, with reviewers hearing loud, clear, understandable voice capture; one found it noisy but usable.

Call quality is a strong point overall, with voices repeatedly described as clear, full, and easy to understand. One reviewer found it merely ordinary, but most testing was distinctly positive.

Marshall's guitar-riff feedback tones were described as a nice brand touch by reviewers who mentioned them.

Voice prompts are generally clear, pleasant, and useful for battery and mode feedback. One review noted that the spoken battery percentage could differ slightly from the app.

Physical button controls were one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising the joystick-style knob as intuitive and reliable.

Physical buttons are a consistent usability strength: easy to find, responsive, and more reliable than touch controls for many reviewers. A short learning period may be needed because several buttons sit close together.

Advanced software and feature impressions were mixed: battery preservation impressed, but feature depth lagged some competitors.

Software features are practical rather than extravagant, covering the adjustments most people are likely to use. Reviewers liked the range, though one wanted more button-mapping flexibility for ANC controls.

Charging was mostly praised for fast, USB-C, and wireless charging, though several reviewers found wireless placement fiddly or unreliable.

Fast charging is outstanding, with about 15 minutes repeatedly translating into roughly 15 hours of playback. Reviewers see this as especially valuable for travel and last-minute charging.

Battery life was the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the 100-hour class endurance and real-world longevity.

Battery life is the clearest point of consensus: reviewers repeatedly praise the roughly 60-hour ANC-off and 40-hour ANC-on endurance. Several testers went days or a full week without needing a charge.

ANC itself adds very little objectionable background noise in most testing. One reviewer heard no disturbing hiss at all, while another described only a subtle ambient 'air' rather than a true hiss.

One reviewer found that engaging ANC left the core sound signature essentially unchanged, which makes switching noise cancellation on and off less disruptive.

ANC’s effect on sound is mixed. One reviewer heard virtually no tonal change, while another found the sound more compressed and unnatural with ANC engaged.

Transient and dynamic performance is good overall, with sharp articulation in one review. Another heard some smearing when very dense, heavily layered tracks became demanding.

Mechanical noise while worn is extremely low. One reviewer specifically praised the near absence of creaking or frame noise when moving the jaw.

Gaming support is solid thanks to low-latency mode and versatile multimedia performance. One reviewer still suggested Beyerdynamic’s MMX 200 Wireless as the smarter gaming-specific choice.

Idle noise is usually very low, but the experience depends on mode. One reviewer heard virtually no hiss or hum, while another noticed audible hiss in ANC or transparency with nothing playing.

One reviewer found the stereo presentation highly immersive, with sounds moving convincingly around the listener despite the compact on-ear design.

Sound leakage was mixed-to-negative, with some office-safe results but several warnings about leakage at higher volumes.

One review said Dolby Atmos playback still had kick despite the lack of noise cancelling.

Auracast support was praised as rare and forward-looking, though some comments depended on future firmware or ecosystem adoption.

The 2025 Red Dot Design Award is repeatedly highlighted, and reviewers who discussed it generally felt the visual design deserved the recognition.

Channel separation is clear enough to give instruments and effects distinct left-right positioning. That helps the stereo image feel organized and precise.

The detachable analog cable was praised for enabling the music-sharing trick with another pair of headphones.

Detail retrieval is good but not universally class-leading. Some reviewers heard impressive fine information, while others wanted more articulation and resolution from a Beyerdynamic headphone.

The Aventho 100 is easy to drive in normal use, with its active electronics handling amplification so a powerful source is not required.

Google account integration adds useful convenience on Android by remembering the headphones for quick reconnects across compatible devices.

Glasses can worsen clamp pressure for some users. One reviewer with thin frames became uncomfortable after roughly half an hour.

Imaging is a strength, with convincing depth, stable positioning, and clear spatial movement. Even when stage width is limited, placement within that space remains precise.

LDAC was criticized as a missing advantage versus a competing Android-focused headphone.

Overall satisfaction is high, with multiple reviewers calling the Aventho 100 fantastic, very good, or among their favorites. Negative reactions are driven mainly by fit and stock tuning rather than by basic functionality.

The ear pads and headband pad can be replaced, which supports longer service life and easier maintenance.

Sidetone can make calls feel more natural by feeding back enough of the wearer’s voice to reduce the sealed-off sensation.

Spotify integration was praised by Spotify users as genuinely useful for starting or cycling music quickly.

Transparency mode is generally useful and natural enough for conversations or situational awareness. Some reviewers heard muffling or wind interference outdoors, so performance is better in calm environments.

USB-C charging was viewed positively, especially as a more reliable option than fiddly wireless charging.

Automatic wear-detection pause is missing, and the reviewer who called it out viewed that omission negatively.

Smart listening features were useful for quick Spotify, EQ, or assistant access, though one reviewer found the M button nonessential.

Long sessions can make ears hot for listeners who struggle with on-ear designs. Two reviewers specifically reported heat buildup becoming uncomfortable after extended wear.