Compare Garmin Approach S50 vs Garmin MARQ Gen 2

Heart rate tracking evidence was mixed: the built-in sensor enabled valuable tracking, but reviewers noted it used older Gen 4 hardware.

Heart-rate evidence was mostly positive for steady workouts and general use, with caveats around wrist-based lag, cycling strain, and short intervals.

GPS accuracy was strongly praised overall, with reviewers reporting accurate yardages, fast satellite locking, and dependable GPS data.

GPS accuracy drew strong praise across road, trail, city, golf, and multiband tests, with only minor caveats in difficult urban conditions.

Sleep tracking was praised for detailed, useful scoring and for being comfortable enough to wear overnight.

Sleep timing was praised by one reviewer as spot-on, but another reported frequent time-asleep mistakes that could skew readiness metrics.

Fitness tracking accuracy was mixed; reviewers found it broadly useful, but elevation tracking was called less accurate without a barometric altimeter.

Fitness tracking accuracy was a major strength across running, golf, swimming, indoor training, and broader performance data.

Recovery insights were useful for sleep-related recovery in one review but easy to ignore for another reviewer during daily use.

Recovery and readiness insights were repeatedly praised as useful for deciding when to train, though one reviewer noted bad sleep estimates could undermine them.

Workout tracking variety was considered enough for most golfers, though not as deep as higher-end Garmin fitness watches for specialized training.

Workout variety was consistently described as broad or complete, with one caveat that yoga mode required impractical pose/set interaction.

Guided wellness coaching evidence was positive, especially around breathing and relaxation exercises that one reviewer said they enjoyed.

Coaching features ranged from Training Readiness and suggested workouts to golf caddie guidance, and reviewers generally found them helpful or impressive.

Health tracking accuracy was supported by the Body Battery feedback, which one reviewer said closely matched how they felt during the day.

Reviewers saw broad health metrics as generally realistic when compared with daily reality, though detailed evidence appeared in only one review.

Stress tracking was useful in connection with bedtime and recovery prompts, though evidence focused on wellness reminders rather than measured precision.

Stress tracking appeared as part of a wider health-and-fitness suite that one reviewer said excelled in daily use.

Wellness insights were widely praised, especially health tracking, Body Battery, sleep, stress, and recovery-style metrics that extended the watch beyond golf.

Wellness insights such as Body Battery, sleep coach, health snapshots, and relatable metrics were widely viewed as useful and personally meaningful.

Blood oxygen tracking was viewed as adequate but not cutting edge because reviewers noted the older Gen 4 sensor platform rather than Garmin’s newest hardware.

Blood oxygen tracking was treated as useful when measured carefully, but reviewers also warned that Pulse Ox can drain battery heavily.

Comfort was one of the clearest strengths, with multiple reviewers saying the lightweight watch disappeared on the wrist or was easy to wear all day and during sleep.

Comfort was mixed: several reviewers found it comfortable or light, while others found the size and weight noticeable or bulky.

Materials quality was mixed because the silicone alternative was preferred for active use while the included nylon band was lighter and comfortable for some situations.

Materials quality was a core strength, especially grade 5 titanium, sapphire, carbon, and luxury-grade finishes.

Build quality was mostly positive for the slim, lightweight construction, though one reviewer felt the watch was a little plasticky out of the box.

Build quality was consistently premium, with reviewers highlighting robust construction, confidence, and high-end execution.

Band feedback was split: some reviewers loved the lightweight nylon comfort, while others found the strap awkward to put on or less comfortable during sweaty rounds.

Band quality was mostly positive for nylon, leather, silicone, and integrated designs, but one Athlete reviewer disliked its stiff strap.

Durability evidence was positive but narrow, with the Gorilla Glass 3 lens called very durable.

Durability was praised through scratch resistance, rugged trail use, and solid construction.

Style and design were praised for the S50’s sleek, lower-profile look and broader wearability compared with bulkier golf watches.

Style and design were a standout strength, repeatedly described as premium, stunning, stylish, and more refined than typical Garmin sports watches.

Size options were a limitation for people wanting a larger watch, since reviewers noted the S50 looks and feels small compared with larger S70 options.

Size options were a weakness because reviewers wanted smaller choices and noted the single 46mm case could be too much watch.

Fit was highly wrist-dependent: smaller and average wrists generally fared well, while larger wrists or bigger-watch preferences created concerns.

Fit evidence was split between concerns over chunky sizing and praise for straps that can shape to the wrist.

Battery life was generally praised, with reviewers reporting strong multi-day use and weeklong real-world wear, though one comparison called it modest versus the S70.

Battery life was broadly praised as strong for AMOLED and smartwatch use, though always-on display, GPS, music, and Pulse Ox reduce it.

Charging convenience was mixed: shared Garmin cable compatibility helped existing Garmin users, but the proprietary charger frustrated another reviewer.

Charging convenience was mostly improved by the magnetic cradle and fast top-ups, though the unique proprietary cable drew some concern.

Charging speed received mild praise, with one reviewer needing only a few hours for the initial charge before use.

Charging speed was a major highlight, with several reviewers praising the roughly one-hour full charge.

Display quality was a major strength across reviews, with repeated praise for the AMOLED screen’s color, resolution, and on-course usefulness.

Display quality was one of the strongest consensus positives, especially the AMOLED screen and domed lens, though older MARQ reviews criticized the first-gen display.

Outdoor visibility was generally strong thanks to the AMOLED display, but bright direct sunlight made small details harder to read for one reviewer.

Outdoor visibility was praised for direct sunlight, hikes, runs, and sunlight-readable use.

Brightness was mostly praised for AMOLED clarity, but one reviewer found the screen could be brighter in harsh Florida sunlight.

Brightness was widely praised, with reviewers emphasizing vivid AMOLED contrast and easy viewing.

Reliability was a major positive, with reviewers repeatedly saying the S50 worked as expected, inspired trust, and gave them no performance concerns.

Reliability received limited but strong praise from golfer reviews describing flawless performance and zero issues.

Value for money was mixed but generally positive: reviewers liked the feature-to-price balance, while subscription-locked features and unused fitness tracking reduced value for some.

Value for money was the most common concern: reviewers loved the watch but often said Epix, Fenix, or Approach models provide much of the same for less.

Music controls were criticized because controls did not automatically appear when music was playing on a phone.

Music controls were viewed as good or part of the premium smartwatch package, with limited deeper critique.

Contactless payments were criticized for limited bank support in the UK, making Garmin Pay much less useful for some users.

Contactless payments were appreciated for phone-free outings and setup ease, though bank support and PIN friction limited convenience.

Reviewers liked the Garmin ecosystem because devices and data transfer felt easy to manage, especially for people already using multiple Garmin products.

The Garmin app ecosystem was useful for many tasks, but reviewers said it remains behind Apple and Google app stores.

Call handling was limited because the watch could answer or reject calls but could not be used to speak through the watch.

Call handling evidence was limited to absence: one reviewer found missing call features disappointing, while another did not miss them much.

Button controls were usable but not ideal for button-first users; reviewers found navigation workable while still preferring more physical controls on higher-end models.

Button controls were repeatedly praised as intuitive, sturdy, tactile, polished, and useful alongside the touchscreen.

Watch face quality was a mild limitation because more and better customization was identified as an S70 advantage.

Watch faces were customizable, but one golfer review criticized Garmin’s default font as not premium enough.

Touchscreen responsiveness was a highlight, with reviewers calling the screen responsive, intuitive, and faultless in use.

Touchscreen responsiveness was generally strong, with reviewers praising responsiveness and flexible touch/button control.

Mapping and navigation helped golfers make better decisions, but reviewers repeatedly noted that richer maps, green details, and touch targeting were better on the S70 or behind a subscription.

Mapping and navigation were major strengths, with praise for TOPO maps, golf maps, turn-by-turn guidance, and route handling.

Customization earned light praise because reviewers liked being able to adjust round settings and score-detail preferences.

Customization was a strength, especially for activity screens, sport profiles, settings, and watch faces.

Smartwatch features were a central strength for golfers who wanted more than a golf GPS watch, especially health, fitness, and everyday watch functions.

As a smartwatch, reviewers praised the broad feature set and daily usefulness, while noting it still lacks some conventional smartwatch functions.

Companion app evidence was limited but positive where reviewers discussed Garmin’s stat reporting becoming more robust and useful after tracked rounds.

Companion app quality received limited direct evidence, with one golfer reviewer calling the app setup familiar and simple to understand.

The user interface was mostly friendly and easy to use, though one reviewer called the golf features a bit complicated until learned.

The interface was seen as increasingly user-friendly and easy to use, although some Garmin complexity remained overwhelming for newcomers.

Operating system experience was split: Garmin’s golf-watch flow was dependable, but one iPhone user found the general smartwatch experience weaker than Apple Watch.

The operating system experience was powerful but dense, with one reviewer saying the menus and features take time to learn.

Software smoothness evidence was modest but positive, with one reviewer describing operation as easy and mostly automatic.

Software smoothness had limited evidence, but one reviewer noted Garmin software quality had improved substantially.

Menu navigation was generally easy to learn and intuitive, with reviewers saying they had little trouble moving through the watch’s features.

Menu navigation was praised in golf use, with reviewers saying mode switching and course menus were simple and fast.

Pairing reliability was a strength, with reviewers describing Garmin Golf app pairing as seamless and dependable after setup.

Pairing and connectivity reliability received a strong single-review endorsement with no connectivity issues.

Smartphone notifications were polarized: they helped triage alerts for some users, but iPhone notification controls were described as limited and frustrating.

Notifications were useful for basic reading and alerts, but several reviewers criticized limited interaction or on-course interruptions.

Cross-platform compatibility was weaker for iPhone users, especially compared with the Apple Watch experience and notification controls.

Cross-platform compatibility was positively judged in one review as good for both iPhone and Android users.

Shot detection drew praise as a useful automatic tracking aid during rounds, though the evidence focused on golf shots rather than broader daily activity detection.

Activity auto-detection received limited but mixed-positive evidence: Free Train movement detection was pretty accurate, though some edits were still needed.

Onboard music storage and offline playlists were repeatedly praised as useful for phone-free workouts.

Third-party app support was mixed to weak: Connect IQ offered usable apps, but reviewers wanted richer interactive app support.

Voice assistant quality was weak because the watch did not support talking to Siri or using voice assistant functions like an Apple Watch.

Wi-Fi connectivity was only judged in one review, where map downloads over Wi-Fi were considered slow.

Safety features had limited but positive evidence around accident detection and location messaging.

Water resistance was positively judged for swimming, rain, sweat, and 10 ATM confidence.