Compare Apple Watch SE 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5

Heart-rate tracking drew strong praise across testing, with reviewers saying it aligned well with comparison devices and remained usable even in harder workouts.

Heart rate accuracy is mixed: some tests were close to chest straps, while other reviewers found lag, high readings, or odd spikes.

GPS accuracy was mostly praised for everyday workouts, though reviewers noted single-band GPS can wander in dense urban or more challenging environments.

GPS accuracy is mixed-positive: many reviewers found it accurate or reliable for casual runs, but some saw overreporting or slight inaccuracies.

Fitness tracking accuracy was a clear strength, with reviewers reporting reliable workout, activity, and comparison-test results for the price.

Fitness tracking accuracy is mixed: some casual and heart-rate workout results impressed reviewers, while others found it basic or not ideal for serious tracking.

Sleep tracking was generally useful and often accurate enough, though several reviewers felt Apple’s Sleep Score was simpler than competing systems.

Sleep tracking accuracy is mixed: some reviewers found it close for sleep duration, while others saw inconsistent sleep stages and overestimated deep sleep.

Workout Buddy and coaching features were appreciated as helpful motivation, though reviewers often described them as basic, repetitive, or hit-or-miss.

Coaching features are useful for budget fitness guidance, including running courses, guided workouts, breathing exercises, and export options.

Workout variety was viewed very positively, with reviewers noting broad sport profiles and nearly the same workout options as pricier Apple Watches.

Workout tracking variety is strong, with reviewers praising broad activity coverage, many sports, and useful running/workout modes.

Recovery-related evidence was limited, but one fitness-focused review valued training-load tracking as a way to monitor workout volume over time.

Recovery insights received limited positive evidence through beneficial breathing and running features tied to training and recovery.

Blood oxygen tracking was consistently treated as a missing premium health feature, with reviewers noting it remains reserved for higher-end Apple Watches.

Blood oxygen tracking received limited but positive accuracy evidence, with one reviewer saying readings were close in testing.

Wellness insights were considered helpful for beginners or casual users, especially Sleep Score, sleep apnea alerts, and the Vitals-style health context.

Wellness insights are mixed: Vitality and sleep routine suggestions are appreciated, but deeper personalized advice is scarce.

Reviewers described the core health basics as adequate or mostly complete, especially heart-rate alerts and general tracking, while noting that advanced sensors remain absent.

Health tracking accuracy is adequate for general use but not advanced, with reviewers warning against medical-grade expectations while noting some improvements.

Comfort was a consistent strength, especially for sleep, smaller wrists, and unobtrusive daily wear.

Comfort is broadly praised because the watch is light and wearable day and night, though its size can still matter for smaller wrists.

Materials quality evidence was limited but positive, centered on the aluminum case, rounded body, and premium-looking construction.

Materials quality is budget-appropriate: reviewers noted aluminum alloy and better materials, but not a fancy feel.

Size options were viewed positively for offering 40mm and 44mm choices, especially for smaller wrists.

Size options are a weakness because the large one-size design can feel overwhelming or bulky on smaller wrists.

Band quality evidence was limited but very positive, with praise for easily replaceable Apple Watch bands.

Band feedback is mostly positive for comfort, swapping, and optional materials, though some reviewers disliked proprietary straps or unremarkable fit.

Style and design were the main aesthetic tradeoff: reviewers liked the familiar Apple Watch look but repeatedly called it dated or bezel-heavy.

Style and design are mostly praised for looking modern, smart, and not cheap, although several reviewers criticized the Apple-like originality.

Durability was mixed: stronger Ion-X glass drew praise, but some reviewers noted weaker dust/scratch protection or actual scratching.

Durability evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers reporting no scratches or scuffs after use.

Fit evidence was limited and mixed, with one reviewer saying the older body did not sit as flush as the Series 11.

Fit is split: one reviewer found alternative straps did not fit well, while another found the watch balanced on the wrist.

Water resistance was considered adequate for common needs, with several reviewers accepting the 50m/swimproof rating.

Water resistance is reassuring for swimming and showers, with reviewers noting 5ATM support and successful pool/shower use.

Build quality was considered solid for the price, with reviewers calling it well made and modern enough despite the older design.

Build quality is mixed-positive: several reviewers praised the aluminum feel, while one felt the casing was plasticky.

Battery life was the main practical compromise, ranging from excellent in some tests to daily-charge frustration in others.

Battery life is the strongest consensus point, with most reviewers reporting unusually long endurance for a budget smartwatch despite one heavier-use outlier.

Charging speed improved substantially over the SE 2 and was usually praised, even when still slower than pricier Apple Watches.

Charging speed is generally acceptable to strong, with reviewers noting quick top-ups, one-hour charging, or reasonable full-charge times.

Charging convenience was mixed because faster top-ups help, but sleep tracking still forces many users into a daily charging routine.

Charging convenience is mixed: the magnetic connection can be secure and cable-sharing helps, but several reviewers disliked the proprietary pogo-pin cable.

Display quality was a major upgrade thanks to always-on functionality, though reviewers still noted smaller bezels and lower specs than Series models.

Display quality is one of the most praised areas, with reviewers consistently highlighting the large, vibrant, sharp AMOLED screen.

Outdoor visibility was generally serviceable, but direct sunlight remained a repeated display limitation.

Outdoor visibility is strongly praised thanks to the bright AMOLED panel and readable screen in direct sunlight.

Brightness was usually adequate and sometimes praised, but reviewers acknowledged it is below the brighter Series and Ultra screens.

Brightness is widely praised, with reviewers repeatedly calling the AMOLED panel bright enough for outdoor use and high peak brightness.

Reliability evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer concluding the SE 3 has what most users need.

Reliability evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no stutters or hiccups in use.

Value for money was the strongest consensus attribute, with reviewers repeatedly calling the SE 3 a standout bargain or best-value Apple Watch.

Value for money is a major strength, but not universal: most reviewers call it excellent value, while one felt it was overpriced against cheaper alternatives.

Apple Pay was positively mentioned as part of the compelling smartwatch feature set and deep Apple ecosystem integration.

Contactless payments are a clear limitation because global reviewers repeatedly noted the lack of NFC payment support.

Third-party app support was praised for extending the native experience, with reviewers highlighting Apple’s App Store depth and useful fitness apps.

Third-party app support is weak because reviewers noted no native major music/map apps, no third-party apps, and limited accessory support.

The app ecosystem was one of the SE 3’s strongest advantages, repeatedly described as unmatched or far richer than competing budget watches.

Reviewers found the app ecosystem limited, citing missing major apps and only a small number of add-on apps.

On-device Siri was broadly seen as a useful upgrade, making commands faster and more practical for workouts, timers, weather, and health questions.

Voice assistant quality is poor because the reviewer noted effectively no voice assistant support.

Notification handling was a major everyday strength, with reviewers praising call, text, and response convenience from the wrist.

Smartphone notifications are a common weakness because messages can be viewed but usually cannot be acted on or replied to.

Navigation evidence was limited but positive, with offline Apple Maps presented as helpful when away from the phone.

Mapping and navigation are weak because reviewers noted no native map apps, offline maps, or GPX-style navigation.

watchOS experience received very strong marks for polish, smoothness, and making the SE 3 feel similar to pricier Apple Watches.

The operating system is smooth and functional for basics, but reviewers criticized HyperOS limitations and missing richer smartwatch integrations.

The companion app setup drew a mixed note because managing Watch, Health, and Fitness across multiple iPhone apps can feel tedious.

The Mi Fitness companion app is generally viewed as clean, visual, and easy to use, but some reviewers found it basic or behind stronger rivals.

Software smoothness was one of the most consistent strengths, with reviewers praising the S10 chip for snappy menus, fast apps, and fluid navigation.

Software smoothness is mostly good, with smooth navigation in several reviews, but some reported stutters, lag, or touch delays.

Reviewers generally agreed the SE 3 delivers the core Apple Watch experience, making it feel much less like a compromised budget model.

Smartwatch features cover the basics well for the price, but reviewers repeatedly frame them as limited compared with richer smartwatch platforms.

Call handling was rated highly where tested, especially voice isolation and gesture-based call management.

Call handling is mostly good for quick wrist calls, but reviewers noted limits such as modest loudness, occasional lag, or uneven clarity.

Touchscreen responsiveness had limited but very positive evidence, with PCMag saying the watch responded promptly and consistently.

Touchscreen responsiveness is positive, with reviewers praising swipes, taps, and even wet-screen responsiveness.

Customization was useful through watch faces, workout views, and settings, but limited by the lack of third-party watch faces.

Customization is mixed: photo faces, watch faces, and UI options are praised, but some reviewers wanted deeper watch-face customization.

Menu navigation evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer describing the basic home-screen and control flow as simple.

Menu navigation is generally easy, with praise for app finding, crown scrolling, and text-labeled icon layouts.

Button and gesture controls were widely praised, especially Double Tap, Wrist Flick, the Digital Crown, and side-button shortcuts.

The rotating crown and button controls are generally liked for tactile feedback and navigation, though one reviewer wished for more button functionality.

Watch faces were viewed positively, especially the always-on versions and Apple’s high-quality built-in choices.

Watch face quality is strong, with reviewers praising the large, stylish, free, and varied watch-face library.

Music controls and speaker/media features were useful additions, though reviewers were split on how often they would actually use playback from the watch speaker.

Music controls are basic but useful for quickly pausing, resuming, skipping tracks, and changing volume.

The user interface was praised as easy, cohesive, and fluid, with gestures and Smart Stack improving quick interactions.

The user interface is generally easy and smooth, with straightforward layouts and good navigation for a budget watch.

Pairing/setup evidence was limited but positive, with one review calling setup quick and easy.

Pairing reliability has limited but positive evidence, with no issues reported for pairing and syncing.

Cellular connectivity was viewed as a useful option, with 5G improving coverage, efficiency, and phone-free use for calls, messages, and downloads.

LTE connectivity is a drawback on the global model, with reviewers noting the lack of global LTE/eSIM support.

Cross-platform compatibility was a clear limitation because the SE 3 remains an iPhone-only smartwatch.

Cross-platform compatibility is useful but compromised, with reviewers noting broader phone support alongside reduced functionality on some platforms.

Safety features were strongly praised, especially fall detection, crash detection, emergency features, and real family anecdotes.

Safety features received limited positive evidence from the SOS function, which the reviewer considered useful for emergencies.

Auto-detection was useful but not flawless; reviewers found it adequate for walks and workouts, while one later review said it still lagged rivals.

Auto-detection is useful but basic: one reviewer saw workout prompts work well, while another liked the feature but wanted more control.

ECG was the most repeated missing health feature, often framed as the main reason some higher-risk buyers might step up to the Series line.

ECG functionality is missing, and one reviewer treated the absent advanced sensors as nice-to-have but not expected at the price.

Bluetooth connectivity was praised in limited evidence for stable, lower-latency calling and audio support.

Onboard music storage is useful for phone-free workouts but inconsistent across phones and hurt by slow Bluetooth transfers.

Voice notes are useful but mixed: reviewers liked recording and audio notes, while others noted loudness, access, or sharing limitations.

Wi-Fi connectivity is absent and criticized because file transfers depend on slower Bluetooth methods.

Body temperature tracking is effectively absent; the reviewer grouped the missing temperature sensor with features that would have been nice to have.

Calorie tracking appeared as part of the useful core fitness toolkit, with one test finding calorie and distance figures matched a comparison watch exactly.

Step counting accuracy received limited but very positive evidence, with one reviewer finding exercise-mode counts nearly exact.

Stress tracking was criticized in one review as slow and sensitive to movement, making continuous tracking less reliable.

The flashlight received a brief positive usefulness mention as a handy quick setting.