Compare Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Approach S50

GPS accuracy was mostly praised for everyday workouts, though reviewers noted single-band GPS can wander in dense urban or more challenging environments.

GPS accuracy was strongly praised overall, with reviewers reporting accurate yardages, fast satellite locking, and dependable GPS data.

Heart-rate tracking drew strong praise across testing, with reviewers saying it aligned well with comparison devices and remained usable even in harder workouts.

Heart rate tracking evidence was mixed: the built-in sensor enabled valuable tracking, but reviewers noted it used older Gen 4 hardware.

Fitness tracking accuracy was a clear strength, with reviewers reporting reliable workout, activity, and comparison-test results for the price.

Fitness tracking accuracy was mixed; reviewers found it broadly useful, but elevation tracking was called less accurate without a barometric altimeter.

Sleep tracking was generally useful and often accurate enough, though several reviewers felt Apple’s Sleep Score was simpler than competing systems.

Sleep tracking was praised for detailed, useful scoring and for being comfortable enough to wear overnight.

Workout variety was viewed very positively, with reviewers noting broad sport profiles and nearly the same workout options as pricier Apple Watches.

Workout tracking variety was considered enough for most golfers, though not as deep as higher-end Garmin fitness watches for specialized training.

Workout Buddy and coaching features were appreciated as helpful motivation, though reviewers often described them as basic, repetitive, or hit-or-miss.

Guided wellness coaching evidence was positive, especially around breathing and relaxation exercises that one reviewer said they enjoyed.

Recovery-related evidence was limited, but one fitness-focused review valued training-load tracking as a way to monitor workout volume over time.

Recovery insights were useful for sleep-related recovery in one review but easy to ignore for another reviewer during daily use.

Blood oxygen tracking was consistently treated as a missing premium health feature, with reviewers noting it remains reserved for higher-end Apple Watches.

Blood oxygen tracking was viewed as adequate but not cutting edge because reviewers noted the older Gen 4 sensor platform rather than Garmin’s newest hardware.

Wellness insights were considered helpful for beginners or casual users, especially Sleep Score, sleep apnea alerts, and the Vitals-style health context.

Wellness insights were widely praised, especially health tracking, Body Battery, sleep, stress, and recovery-style metrics that extended the watch beyond golf.

Reviewers described the core health basics as adequate or mostly complete, especially heart-rate alerts and general tracking, while noting that advanced sensors remain absent.

Health tracking accuracy was supported by the Body Battery feedback, which one reviewer said closely matched how they felt during the day.

Comfort was a consistent strength, especially for sleep, smaller wrists, and unobtrusive daily wear.

Comfort was one of the clearest strengths, with multiple reviewers saying the lightweight watch disappeared on the wrist or was easy to wear all day and during sleep.

Materials quality evidence was limited but positive, centered on the aluminum case, rounded body, and premium-looking construction.

Materials quality was mixed because the silicone alternative was preferred for active use while the included nylon band was lighter and comfortable for some situations.

Band quality evidence was limited but very positive, with praise for easily replaceable Apple Watch bands.

Band feedback was split: some reviewers loved the lightweight nylon comfort, while others found the strap awkward to put on or less comfortable during sweaty rounds.

Size options were viewed positively for offering 40mm and 44mm choices, especially for smaller wrists.

Size options were a limitation for people wanting a larger watch, since reviewers noted the S50 looks and feels small compared with larger S70 options.

Style and design were the main aesthetic tradeoff: reviewers liked the familiar Apple Watch look but repeatedly called it dated or bezel-heavy.

Style and design were praised for the S50’s sleek, lower-profile look and broader wearability compared with bulkier golf watches.

Durability was mixed: stronger Ion-X glass drew praise, but some reviewers noted weaker dust/scratch protection or actual scratching.

Durability evidence was positive but narrow, with the Gorilla Glass 3 lens called very durable.

Fit evidence was limited and mixed, with one reviewer saying the older body did not sit as flush as the Series 11.

Fit was highly wrist-dependent: smaller and average wrists generally fared well, while larger wrists or bigger-watch preferences created concerns.

Build quality was considered solid for the price, with reviewers calling it well made and modern enough despite the older design.

Build quality was mostly positive for the slim, lightweight construction, though one reviewer felt the watch was a little plasticky out of the box.

Battery life was the main practical compromise, ranging from excellent in some tests to daily-charge frustration in others.

Battery life was generally praised, with reviewers reporting strong multi-day use and weeklong real-world wear, though one comparison called it modest versus the S70.

Charging convenience was mixed because faster top-ups help, but sleep tracking still forces many users into a daily charging routine.

Charging convenience was mixed: shared Garmin cable compatibility helped existing Garmin users, but the proprietary charger frustrated another reviewer.

Charging speed improved substantially over the SE 2 and was usually praised, even when still slower than pricier Apple Watches.

Charging speed received mild praise, with one reviewer needing only a few hours for the initial charge before use.

Display quality was a major upgrade thanks to always-on functionality, though reviewers still noted smaller bezels and lower specs than Series models.

Display quality was a major strength across reviews, with repeated praise for the AMOLED screen’s color, resolution, and on-course usefulness.

Outdoor visibility was generally serviceable, but direct sunlight remained a repeated display limitation.

Outdoor visibility was generally strong thanks to the AMOLED display, but bright direct sunlight made small details harder to read for one reviewer.

Brightness was usually adequate and sometimes praised, but reviewers acknowledged it is below the brighter Series and Ultra screens.

Brightness was mostly praised for AMOLED clarity, but one reviewer found the screen could be brighter in harsh Florida sunlight.

Reliability evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer concluding the SE 3 has what most users need.

Reliability was a major positive, with reviewers repeatedly saying the S50 worked as expected, inspired trust, and gave them no performance concerns.

Value for money was the strongest consensus attribute, with reviewers repeatedly calling the SE 3 a standout bargain or best-value Apple Watch.

Value for money was mixed but generally positive: reviewers liked the feature-to-price balance, while subscription-locked features and unused fitness tracking reduced value for some.

Call handling was rated highly where tested, especially voice isolation and gesture-based call management.

Call handling was limited because the watch could answer or reject calls but could not be used to speak through the watch.

On-device Siri was broadly seen as a useful upgrade, making commands faster and more practical for workouts, timers, weather, and health questions.

Voice assistant quality was weak because the watch did not support talking to Siri or using voice assistant functions like an Apple Watch.

Apple Pay was positively mentioned as part of the compelling smartwatch feature set and deep Apple ecosystem integration.

Contactless payments were criticized for limited bank support in the UK, making Garmin Pay much less useful for some users.

The companion app setup drew a mixed note because managing Watch, Health, and Fitness across multiple iPhone apps can feel tedious.

Companion app evidence was limited but positive where reviewers discussed Garmin’s stat reporting becoming more robust and useful after tracked rounds.

Music controls and speaker/media features were useful additions, though reviewers were split on how often they would actually use playback from the watch speaker.

Music controls were criticized because controls did not automatically appear when music was playing on a phone.

watchOS experience received very strong marks for polish, smoothness, and making the SE 3 feel similar to pricier Apple Watches.

Operating system experience was split: Garmin’s golf-watch flow was dependable, but one iPhone user found the general smartwatch experience weaker than Apple Watch.

Notification handling was a major everyday strength, with reviewers praising call, text, and response convenience from the wrist.

Smartphone notifications were polarized: they helped triage alerts for some users, but iPhone notification controls were described as limited and frustrating.

Watch faces were viewed positively, especially the always-on versions and Apple’s high-quality built-in choices.

Watch face quality was a mild limitation because more and better customization was identified as an S70 advantage.

Software smoothness was one of the most consistent strengths, with reviewers praising the S10 chip for snappy menus, fast apps, and fluid navigation.

Software smoothness evidence was modest but positive, with one reviewer describing operation as easy and mostly automatic.

Button and gesture controls were widely praised, especially Double Tap, Wrist Flick, the Digital Crown, and side-button shortcuts.

Button controls were usable but not ideal for button-first users; reviewers found navigation workable while still preferring more physical controls on higher-end models.

The app ecosystem was one of the SE 3’s strongest advantages, repeatedly described as unmatched or far richer than competing budget watches.

Reviewers liked the Garmin ecosystem because devices and data transfer felt easy to manage, especially for people already using multiple Garmin products.

Customization was useful through watch faces, workout views, and settings, but limited by the lack of third-party watch faces.

Customization earned light praise because reviewers liked being able to adjust round settings and score-detail preferences.

The user interface was praised as easy, cohesive, and fluid, with gestures and Smart Stack improving quick interactions.

The user interface was mostly friendly and easy to use, though one reviewer called the golf features a bit complicated until learned.

Pairing/setup evidence was limited but positive, with one review calling setup quick and easy.

Pairing reliability was a strength, with reviewers describing Garmin Golf app pairing as seamless and dependable after setup.

Reviewers generally agreed the SE 3 delivers the core Apple Watch experience, making it feel much less like a compromised budget model.

Smartwatch features were a central strength for golfers who wanted more than a golf GPS watch, especially health, fitness, and everyday watch functions.

Touchscreen responsiveness had limited but very positive evidence, with PCMag saying the watch responded promptly and consistently.

Touchscreen responsiveness was a highlight, with reviewers calling the screen responsive, intuitive, and faultless in use.

Navigation evidence was limited but positive, with offline Apple Maps presented as helpful when away from the phone.

Mapping and navigation helped golfers make better decisions, but reviewers repeatedly noted that richer maps, green details, and touch targeting were better on the S70 or behind a subscription.

Menu navigation evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer describing the basic home-screen and control flow as simple.

Menu navigation was generally easy to learn and intuitive, with reviewers saying they had little trouble moving through the watch’s features.

Auto-detection was useful but not flawless; reviewers found it adequate for walks and workouts, while one later review said it still lagged rivals.

Shot detection drew praise as a useful automatic tracking aid during rounds, though the evidence focused on golf shots rather than broader daily activity detection.

Cross-platform compatibility was a clear limitation because the SE 3 remains an iPhone-only smartwatch.

Cross-platform compatibility was weaker for iPhone users, especially compared with the Apple Watch experience and notification controls.

Calorie tracking appeared as part of the useful core fitness toolkit, with one test finding calorie and distance figures matched a comparison watch exactly.

Stress tracking was useful in connection with bedtime and recovery prompts, though evidence focused on wellness reminders rather than measured precision.

ECG was the most repeated missing health feature, often framed as the main reason some higher-risk buyers might step up to the Series line.

Cellular connectivity was viewed as a useful option, with 5G improving coverage, efficiency, and phone-free use for calls, messages, and downloads.

Safety features were strongly praised, especially fall detection, crash detection, emergency features, and real family anecdotes.

Third-party app support was praised for extending the native experience, with reviewers highlighting Apple’s App Store depth and useful fitness apps.

Water resistance was considered adequate for common needs, with several reviewers accepting the 50m/swimproof rating.