Compare South of Midnight vs Doom: The Dark Ages

Value for money was generally positive when framed as a short, memorable or Game Pass-friendly experience, though some reviewers warned the $40 price may feel steep.

Value for money was criticized in the supporting review for the price and perceived lack of content.

Mission design was criticized for predictable navigation through repeated steps across the folktale chapters.

Mission design was praised in the supporting review for making the core demon-slaying missions feel exciting.

Side characters earned praise for having enough interaction and backstory to avoid feeling flat.

Side character depth was usually criticized, with reviewers calling supporting characters forgettable, unmemorable or impossible to care about.

Polish was mixed, with one review describing the gameplay as fun but still rough around the edges.

Polish was praised in the two supporting reviews as polished and technically clean.

Mission variety was limited by repeated chase and combat patterns across the short campaign.

Mission variety was praised for wider spaces, linear sections and open objectives that changed pace.

Combat was the most common weakness, praised in a few reviews for chunky or quick encounters but more often criticized as shallow, basic, or repetitive.

Combat drew the strongest agreement, with most reviewers praising shield-led, melee-heavy gunfights, while a minority felt the defensive shift weakened Doom’s flow.

Crash stability was praised in one review that reported no crashes.

Crash stability was mixed across platforms and review periods, from flawless stability to dashboard crashes and freezes.

Menu usability was praised as simple and easy to navigate.

Menu usability was mixed, with one reviewer criticizing melee switching and another wanting clearer difficulty-slider explanations.

Puzzle design drew consistent criticism for being too easy, overly guided, or lacking meaningful problem-solving.

Puzzle design was lightly covered, with reviewers describing simple exploration puzzles as enjoyable but rarely demanding.

Animation quality was praised for the stop-motion-inspired look, though a few reviewers noted it could be divisive.

Animation quality had a mixed single assessment, criticizing reduced or less refined glory-kill animations.

Narrative quality was a major strength overall, especially the folklore-driven stories, even though some reviews criticized connective tissue or messy plotting.

Narrative quality was highly divided, ranging from Doom’s strongest story to self-serious, confusing, bland or unnecessary storytelling.

Boss design was one of the stronger gameplay areas, with many reviewers praising spectacle, story integration, or variety despite some formulaic or weak fights.

Boss design was more negative than positive, with reviewers citing missed opportunities, underwhelming finales and recycled boss ideas despite one positive mention.

Responsiveness was mixed: one reviewer liked Hazel's movement feel, while others cited snappiness, lock-on, input, or attack-delay issues.

Controls were generally praised for responsive shooting and melee feel, though one reviewer criticized slow weapon switching.

Enemy variety was divisive: a few reviewers liked the mix of Haints, while others felt the small enemy pool grew old.

Enemy variety was generally positive, with many demons and variants noted, though one reviewer found some repetition.

Platforming was broadly serviceable and sometimes tight or forgiving, but several reviews found it bland, repetitive, or limited.

Platforming was judged more limited than earlier modern Doom games in the one review that assessed it.

Onboarding split reviewers: one praised the narrative framing of Hazel learning powers, while another felt the game over-explained and mistrusted the player.

Onboarding was praised for welcoming new players and easing them into the revised systems.

Fun factor was mixed, with some reviewers enjoying the journey or jumping around and others finding play tiresome or combat boring.

Fun factor was strongly positive overall, even in mixed reviews, with reviewers repeatedly calling the campaign fun, rewarding, or charismatic.

Reviewers generally found the basic systems functional or purposeful rather than ambitious, with some seeing solid adventure fundamentals and others noting familiar design.

The shield saw and revised mechanics were often praised as a major new layer, though a few reviewers found the system one-note or overly dependent on the shield.

Content variety earned praise for varied locations that broaden the Deep South beyond swamps.

Content variety was split: multiple play styles and set pieces added variety, but gimmicky diversions hurt some reviewers’ impressions.

Writing quality was mixed, with praise for the larger picture but complaints about disjointed stories or a need for more finesse.

Writing quality was mostly criticized for dull cutscenes, cliched dialogue and disjointed storytelling.

The chapter loop split reviewers: some liked its focused cadence, while others found the repeated arena-chase-boss structure predictable or stale.

Reviewers found the main loop engaging when the shield, parry and resource flow clicked, but some felt it became simpler or repetitive over time.

Art direction was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as striking, gorgeous, phenomenal, or top-notch.

Art direction was generally praised for techno-medieval style and fresh locations, though one reviewer found the direction less Doom-like.

Atmosphere was strongly praised for Deep South mood, care, and haunting charm.

Atmosphere was praised in the supporting review for dark fantasy locations with a Demon’s Souls-like feel.

Exploration was mixed: reviewers enjoyed the scenery and light secrets, but several felt linearity and simple detours limited discovery.

Exploration and secrets were commonly praised as rewarding, though some reviewers disliked backtracking or losing the old teleport/backtrack convenience.

Performance optimization was mixed, with one reviewer seeing only minor issues and another noting visible drops.

Performance optimization was mostly positive, especially on capable hardware, though some reviews noted high requirements or drops.

The learning curve was described as occasionally unclear but not severely punishing once hazards and combat expectations clicked.

The supporting review found the vehicle controls easy to grasp quickly, reflecting a low-friction learning curve.

Replay value was weak, with reviewers citing little desire to replay for combat and disappointment at no New Game+.

Replay value was mixed, with secrets and challenges helping, but some reviewers doubting long-term appeal or completionist-heavy longevity.

The soundtrack was one of the strongest consensus positives, praised for Southern genres, vocal storytelling, and memorable implementation.

Soundtrack quality was divided: several reviewers loved the metal score, while others found it less memorable or a downgrade from earlier entries.

Facial animations were praised for expressive character detail that supported the performances.

Facial animations received a positive single assessment as solid.

Pacing was often praised for momentum and concise runtime, though some reviewers criticized a slow start, rushed ending, or underwhelming finale.

Pacing was split: some liked the measured rollout and breathless campaign, while others disliked the ending, reduced momentum or open-map slowdown.

Sound design was consistently praised for environmental grounding, atmosphere, and integration with movement and effects.

Sound design was generally strong, with praise for heavy feedback and crunchy effects, though one reviewer found effects too soft.

Level design split opinion, with some praising comfort or scenery and others criticizing railroading, strict linearity, or repetitive structure.

Level design received mixed praise for larger arenas, secrets and vistas, but some reviewers found open spaces flatter, bland or less tightly paced.

Camera behavior drew negative evidence, including camera purgatory and intrusive camera-yanking moments.

Camera behavior was criticized in the supporting review for a baffling dragon-control scheme.

The upgrade system earned praise in one review for later enhancements that made positioning and cooldown management more interesting.

Upgrade systems were mixed: some liked streamlined and useful upgrades, while others wanted more depth or disliked passive-feeling progression.

Frame rate stability was praised in one review for smooth play without drops.

Frame rate stability was often praised on tested platforms, with one review reporting unstable PS5 performance.

Tutorial quality was mixed, with one review praising narrative framing and others criticizing overbearing or overly obvious guidance.

Tutorial delivery was criticized in the supporting review for interrupting pacing despite gradual mechanic introduction.

Lore depth was praised for making Southern Gothic worldbuilding feel intriguing and distinctive.

Lore depth was praised where codex material and broader Doom world-building were assessed directly.

Bug frequency was limited but not absent, with one review reporting a bug and a hard-lock scenario.

Bug frequency was mixed: some saw glitches or falling-through-world problems, while another reported no bugs.

Immersion was praised by a reviewer who felt pulled in immediately by the narrative-driven adventure.

Immersion was praised in the supporting review for subtle audio and environmental feedback.

Traversal feel was praised when momentum clicked, though one review criticized limits on chaining airborne abilities.

Movement was divisive: several reviewers liked the heavy but mobile feel, while others missed the faster, more acrobatic style of earlier entries.

Difficulty balance was uneven across reviews: some found it fair and challenging, while others saw abrupt combat spikes or a flat curve.

Difficulty balance varied widely by reviewer, with praise for parry generosity and sliders but criticism that the game could feel too easy or unfair.

Environmental detail was repeatedly praised for rich, meticulous spaces, lighting, clutter, and sense of place.

Environmental detail was strongly praised for vistas, lighting and rich scene composition.

Innovation was praised more for personality and identity than for mechanical novelty.

Innovation was broadly praised for reinventing Doom’s formula, though some reviewers saw the simplification as a tradeoff.

Graphics quality was strongly praised for gorgeous landscapes, technical visual polish, lighting, and detailed environments.

Graphics quality was consistently strong, with reviewers praising models, crisp visuals and cutting-edge presentation.

Accessibility options were praised for expansive difficulty and assistance settings that let more players tune the experience.

Accessibility options were consistently praised, especially difficulty sliders, color customization and tuning tools, with minor caveats around clarity or audio-cue gaps.

Hazel was widely liked as a charming, believable, empathetic lead even in reviews critical of the story around her.

The protagonist’s power fantasy was praised in the supporting review as strongly delivered.

Map and navigation design drew criticism from a reviewer who got turned around in similar-looking swamp areas.

Map and navigation design drew complaints about navigation difficulty, excessive map checking, or secrets already revealed on the map.

Character development was praised for making characters feel real and emotionally grounded.

The cast was praised as memorable, with many characters and monsters leaving an impression despite limited screen time.

Dialogue was praised as authentic, conversational, and grounded in Southern vernacular.

Mech/vehicle-style sections were mixed to negative overall: some enjoyed the spectacle and scale, but many found them shallow, repetitive or underpowered.

Resource balance was split between praise for easier ammo sustain and criticism that ammo pressure became irrelevant.

Emotional impact was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers highlighting empathy, sorrow, resilience, and lasting personal resonance.

Faithfulness to franchise was mixed: some reviewers felt it still felt like Doom, while others called it the least Doom-like modern entry.

Dragon and flying sections were the most repeated weak point, ranging from acceptable spectacle to dull, half-baked or mechanically thin segments.

Handheld play suitability was praised through the Steam Deck discussion, where the game was described as a fine portable fit.

Haptic feedback integration had a mixed single assessment, with DualSense features noted but controller-speaker output called obnoxious.

Horror tension was praised as part of the dramatic strength that the game cultivates around dark folklore.

HUD clarity was criticized because cooldowns lacked an explicit timer.

Semi-open design was praised for broader spaces, optional content and player choice in objectives.

Originality was praised for its fresh Southern Gothic setting, visual identity, and rarely explored cultural focus.

Progression was mostly viewed as weak or standard, with upgrades often described as unimportant to how combat actually plays.

Sandbox freedom was praised for giving players meaningful freedom in larger maps and objective order.

The skill tree was criticized as underwhelming and not meaningfully changing Hazel's abilities.

User interface design was praised for simple navigation and a fitting aesthetic touch.

Visual effects were praised in one review for complementing Hazel's abilities alongside animation and sound.

Voice acting drew very strong praise for authenticity, emotion, and performances that made characters believable.

Weapon balance was broadly praised for useful, varied weapons, though some reviewers felt guns were simplified or overshadowed by the shield.

World-building received near-universal praise for its authentic, rarely explored Deep South folklore, history, and cultural texture.

World interactivity was criticized because one review said environments mainly support only the exact required solution.