Compare TCL D1 Pro Smart Lock vs Desloc D110 Plus Smart Lock

Palm vein recognition is the standout strength, repeatedly praised as fast, reliable, accurate, touchless, and useful, with only a few accuracy and convenience caveats.

Palm vein recognition was not included, and one reviewer missed that faster, convenient method from another lock.

Door fit evidence is positive: reviewers reported no door modification and confirmed the deadbolt functioned properly after installation.

One reviewer cautioned that very thick doors may require modification even though standard doors worked well.

Motor and lock mechanics are a strength, with reviewers praising smooth movement and a motor that did not struggle.

Motor feel was mixed: one reviewer found it smooth and quiet, while another warned that over-tightening could make the bolt struggle.

Access logs are mixed because one review praised logging personal access, while another criticized missing closing and failed-attempt records.

Access logs were useful for seeing lock history, entry timing, and who entered.

Guest access is useful but uneven, with NFC sharing praised and temporary access described as robust yet needlessly complex.

Guest access was praised for one-pass, scheduled, IC-card, and Airbnb-style temporary access options.

User access management is mixed: the lock supports multiple and temporary users, but Smart Life makes member setup feel clunky or confusing for some.

User access management was a strong point, with praise for simple schedules, temporary codes, and control over different users.

Door-sense is a clear weakness in the evidence because one reviewer specifically wanted a sensor to know whether the door was open or closed.

Door-sense was a clear weakness because reviewers noted there is no door sensor and the bolt can extend while the door is open.

Security-feature evidence is limited but positive, centered on palm-vein spoof resistance rather than encryption-specific review testing.

Security features such as anti-peeping and anti-hijacking were viewed as useful or reassuring, with PCMag also noting enhanced security options.

Auto-lock is useful and configurable, though one reviewer wanted scheduling so it would not always lock during repeated coming and going.

Auto-lock was praised for peace of mind and convenience, but multiple reviewers flagged limits around timing and open-door behavior.

Remote access is viewed positively overall, with reviewers noting remote unlock and app-based lock/unlock control.

Remote access was a major convenience, especially for managing the lock away from home or unlocking for guests.

The keypad is mixed: one reviewer found it responsive, another found the small, crowded pad error-prone, and another said the PIN worked when needed.

Keypad impressions were mixed: PCMag found it responsive and well-lit, PCWorld found it slow to wake, and another liked the soft glow.

The no-hub design is a positive point, with built-in Wi-Fi removing the need for an external hub.

Reviewers consistently liked that no separate hub or gateway is required.

Weather resistance has limited but positive support, with one reviewer saying the IP54-rated build was ready for varied climates.

Weather resistance was generally viewed positively, including rain/outdoor use, though one reviewer called the IP54 rating tame.

Unlocking is consistently described as fast, with palm, NFC, app, and general access methods often responding within seconds or less.

Speed was mostly positive for voice and remote response, though one reviewer found it fast but slower than pricier locks.

The app is the most repeated complaint, with reviewers calling Smart Life clunky, rough, unintuitive, or difficult despite one easier pairing experience.

The app was generally described as simple, easy, and user-friendly, with good access controls and setup flow.

Touchscreen impressions are split between responsive, well-lit operation and complaints that the small pad made accurate entry delicate.

The touch surface/keypad was praised as responsive, well lit, and visually integrated into the front panel.

Smart-home integration is limited: Alexa and Google support are useful, but reviewers repeatedly criticize the lack of HomeKit, Matter, Home Assistant, or broader integrations.

Smart-home integration was the main limitation: Alexa and Google were supported, but reviewers missed HomeKit, Matter, IFTTT, or broader security-system support.

Wi-Fi evidence is limited but positive, tied to built-in connectivity that enables remote control without extra accessories.

Built-in Wi-Fi was praised for direct connectivity and remote use, and one follow-up noted updates that improved Wi-Fi stability and power use.

Voice control has limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer saying the lock immediately responded to voice commands.

Voice control worked well in the reviews that tested it, especially with Alexa and Google Assistant.

Notifications are mixed: reviewers valued real-time activity alerts, but one criticized wording that could make important events easy to miss.

Notifications were useful for awareness and security, but one reviewer wanted push notifications instead of emergency emails that went to spam.

Industrial design is mixed: some reviewers liked the sleek look, while others found it bulky or less elegant than competitors.

Industrial design was praised as sleek, ergonomic, modern, and premium-looking rather than overly bulky.

Build quality is generally favorable, with reviewers calling it sturdy or well-built, though one noted plastic in the construction.

Most reviewers described the lock as solid, sturdy, or durable for the price, while one found the construction quality questionable.

Physical installation is often described as easy or straightforward, but reviewers split once setup moves into app pairing and small hardware quirks.

Installation was usually described as quick and simple, but one reviewer had jammed bolts and another noted a short cord and over-tightening sensitivity.

Value is generally favorable, especially for palm recognition and sale pricing, though one reviewer recommended more established alternatives for many buyers.

Value was the broadest strength because most reviewers saw a lot of features for the price, although PCWorld rejected the value claim after testing.

The backup keys received a positive functional check in one review, with the key override working as expected.

Backup mechanical keys were valued as a practical fallback, especially for power loss.

Locking reliability is one of the strongest areas, with multiple reviewers reporting flawless, consistent, or every-time operation.

Reliability was a strength across several reviews, with reports of perfect testing, stable 90-day use, and natural daily fit.

Battery feedback is mostly positive for rechargeability and maintenance, but reviewers note caveats around battery-life claims and the single rechargeable pack.

Battery impressions were good overall but not exceptional, ranging from solid and efficient to fine but not incredible.

Failed-attempt lockout drew criticism from one reviewer because the settings and behavior were not clearly adjustable or explained.

The 90-day follow-up praised Desloc for frequent firmware updates and meaningful improvements.

Fingerprint access was one of the most praised areas, with many fast and accurate reports, though PCWorld found it hit-and-miss.

Geofencing is a weak point because one reviewer specifically called the missing geolocation feature a pain.

One reviewer specifically reported no jamming during several days of testing.

Physical resistance evidence was moderate: reviewers cited BHMA certification and durability, but one emphasized it is the lowest acceptable commercial level.

Reviewers repeatedly liked the small on-lock display, describing it as helpful for setup, status, battery, alerts, and local control, though one saw it as basic rather than groundbreaking.