Compare Lockly Visage Zeno Series Smart Lock vs eufy Video Smart Lock S330

Camera and doorbell feedback was mostly about absence: reviewers liked the lock but wished the price included video surveillance, package awareness, or doorbell-style features.

Camera and doorbell performance was generally strong, especially video clarity, but motion timing, distance, and visitor button clarity were recurring caveats.

Wi-Fi was a recurring caveat, including failed syncing, 2.4GHz-only support, spotty remote access, and battery-drain tradeoffs.

Wi-Fi performance had limited but strong evidence, with one reviewer reporting no live-view latency.

Remote access was divided, with quick on-demand actions in one review and Wi-Fi inaccessibility in another.

Remote access was a clear strength, with reviewers valuing lock control from the app while away.

Smart-home integration was broadly praised, especially Apple HomeKit/Home Key and Alexa routines, though one reviewer noted Matter and Thread were absent.

Smart-home integration was mixed because Alexa/Google support was useful, but reviewers noted the lack of Apple HomeKit, IFTTT, or Matter.

Security evidence was strong for anti-spoofing and privacy, with reviewers unable to fool face unlock using photos and one citing encryption as a strength.

Security/encryption evidence was limited but noted an encryption message before streaming, alongside privacy caution.

Touchscreen evidence was limited but positive, with PCMag reporting touchpad entries were processed immediately.

Touchscreen feedback was split between responsive operation and needing repeated taps to wake it.

The app drew mixed reactions: reviewers liked the newer interface or slick setup tools, but several found it undercooked, confusing, or only mostly reliable.

The app was usually described as smooth, easy, useful, or user-friendly across reviews.

Reviewers split on the design: one called it Lockly's least attractive smart lock, another saw the newer design as more attractive, and a video reviewer still found it not especially attractive.

Design was generally liked for its sleek or elegant look, though its large size stood out as a drawback.

User access management was generally strong after app updates, but initial user setup could be confusing.

User management evidence was positive, especially around quickly adding additional users.

Deadbolt fit was mostly manageable as a direct swap, but reviewers warned that the door and bolt need to move smoothly or the lock may struggle to auto-lock.

Door fit was context-dependent: some installations worked smoothly, while shallow strike plates, alignment, and size constraints caused problems.

Guest access was useful for family or visitors, with reviewers praising custom codes, iCloud sharing, and easier guest entry.

Guest access was a standout use case, with reviewers liking temporary access, contractor use, and removable access.

Notifications worked, but reviewers could find them excessive when both lock and smart-home platforms sent alerts.

Notifications were mostly praised as quick and useful, but some reviewers reported missed or delayed motion events.

Review evidence for hub requirement was positive: TechRadar specifically liked not needing a separate hub.

The required bridge/chime was viewed positively when it improved chime, storage, or camera-feed experience.

Overall locking reliability was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers saying the lock worked perfectly, performed well, or kept working every time.

Reliability was mixed, ranging from flawless and better-than-prior locks to failures when alignment or one-touch locking was imperfect.

Feature-update evidence was limited to ZDNET, which said app updates improved user management and usability.

A post-review feature addition impressed one long-term reviewer by making live-view unlocking more convenient.

Voice control worked well in the reviews that tested it, with PCMag and Tom's Guide reporting responsive or snappy results.

Voice control performed well in the one review that tested it directly.

Auto-lock worked well in favorable installs, but one reviewer warned it becomes unreliable when the deadbolt does not slide smoothly.

Auto-lock was valued for peace of mind, though one reviewer cautioned against using timed auto-lock without reliable door-position awareness.

Value opinions were context-dependent: reviewers saw strong feature value, but the high price, missing video, and battery caveats kept it from being an easy buy for everyone.

Most reviewers considered the price fair for the combined lock, camera, doorbell, fingerprint, and no-extra-fee package.

Door-sense was the most consistent hardware complaint: it worked accurately for some reviewers, but many disliked the exposed wired sensor or complicated sensor alternatives.

Door-sense evidence was mixed: departure detection was useful, but one reviewer criticized the lock for not knowing whether the door was open.

Battery impressions were split between praise for the two rechargeable packs and complaints about short life under always-on scanning or default settings.

Battery life was generally praised as long-lasting, though full charging can take several hours.

Build quality was generally praised as sturdy, sleek, and more substantial than some alternatives.

Reviewers consistently praised the heavy, metal-feeling construction and durable build.

Lock and unlock speed was a major strength, especially facial recognition, with reviewers repeatedly describing access as nearly instant, quick, or within seconds.

When working well, unlocking was described as instant or very fast, especially through fingerprint recognition.

The keypad was viewed as secure thanks to PIN Genie, though reviewers also said it can slow entry or make code entry less convenient.

Keypad and touchpad feedback was mostly positive, though one reviewer had wake-up/tap responsiveness issues.

Motor feedback was mixed: one reviewer praised the quieter operation, while another said the deadbolt mechanism was not as smooth as a cheaper alternative.

Motor feedback was split: one long-term reviewer found it solid, while another warned that small alignment resistance could stop locking.

Access-log evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer valuing real-time lock-activity monitoring.

Access logs were useful for seeing who came and went and which credential unlocked the door.

Fingerprint performance was mostly strong, but not universal: several reviewers found it fast and accurate, while others disliked placement or had hit-and-miss scans.

Fingerprint performance was strongly positive in most reviews, but one reviewer had repeated failed reads.

Installation was usually described as easy, painless, or straightforward, but several reviewers noted setup pain from cabling, Bluetooth timing, or deadbolt alignment.

Installation was often described as easy or manageable, but door fit and alignment created trouble for some reviewers.

Bluetooth feedback was mixed, with complaints about short setup windows and Bluetooth 4.2 alongside one Apple Home user finding response times surprisingly good.

Facial recognition was the clearest consensus win, with reviewers repeatedly describing it as fast, accurate, reliable, and difficult to fool.

One reviewer found jam reporting annoying because a calibration issue made the app keep showing the lock as jammed.

The physical keys were a reliable backup in the reviews that discussed them, with one saying they were easy to use and another saying they turned smoothly.

Keyway quality evidence was limited to one reviewer who said rekeying was possible but harder and more time-consuming than expected.

Physical security impressions were positive, centered on wanting a sturdier alternative to flimsy plastic doorbells.