YAGA Review

Studio: AMC Plus
Released: October 23, 2026
Updated: 1 minute ago
3.8
Overall review score
579
Review insights
84
Scored features
40
Expert reviews
Content guidance
Scorata recommended age 18+

Graphic genital mutilation, a person burning alive, frightening hallucinations, sexual scenes and nudity make this adult viewing. Drug use and frequent strong language add to the mature content.

Official rating TV-MA

Bottom Line

Carrie-Anne Moss and the eerie coastal atmosphere make YAGA an enticing, strange mystery. The detective pairing and uneven storytelling divide opinion, especially for viewers wanting stronger horror or a more focused investigation.

Folklore enthusiasts and attentive mystery solvers who enjoy dark humor, strange clues and Halloween atmosphere. The compact episodes also suit viewers who want to follow the puzzle in a concentrated binge.

Viewers avoiding frequent sexual material, seeking sustained serious horror or wanting a straightforward police procedural. Williams fans expecting him to dominate the series should also moderate that expectation.

Verdict

YAGA is an intriguing choice for viewers who enjoy folklore, dark humor and mysteries that invite close attention. Carrie-Anne Moss's commanding professor, the misty coastal setting and Slavic-language pop covers provide its most reliable attractions, while the short episodes make the unusual mixture easy to try. Reactions become more divided around Rapp: his flirtation and banter are charming to some and exhausting to others, with the central romance drawing equally different responses. Supporters find carefully planted clues and a thoughtful treatment of female power; critics see familiar themes, underdeveloped characters and insufficient horror. Try it for its atmosphere and performances if that combination appeals, but approach the mystery with measured expectations. Most longer assessments stop before the final episode, so a satisfying conclusion remains unproven.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

84 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    26 (31%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    30 (36%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (15%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    15 (18%)

Pros highlights

  • 3.9
    26 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 3.9, 26 reviews, low consensus
    The missing-person case can be an engrossing puzzle of conflicting identities, hidden relationships and witchcraft. Reactions split between an intricately assembled mystery and a familiar, unfocused story that loses urgency.
  • 3.7
    25 reviews low consensus
    suspense: 3.7, 25 reviews, low consensus
    Strange clues, unstable identities and uncertain visions keep many viewers eagerly theorizing. Critics find the central case loses urgency or that information arrives before enough tension has been built.
  • 3.9
    22 reviews low consensus
    cast chemistry: 3.9, 22 reviews, low consensus
    The investigators' banter and Katherine's charged encounters are major pleasures for many viewers. Others find little believable chemistry, or feel abrupt changes in temperament manufacture friction.
  • 3.5
    22 reviews low consensus
    character appeal: 3.5, 22 reviews, low consensus
    Katherine and the formidable women are reliable attractions, while Rapp divides opinion sharply. His mischievous charm delights some viewers and feels exhausting or implausible to others.
  • 3.9
    21 reviews low consensus
    Genre blending: 3.9, 21 reviews, low consensus
    The blend of detective work, eroticism, folk horror and comedy is central to the appeal. Supporters find it nimble and distinctive, while detractors experience a grab bag of ideas that never coheres.
  • 3.8
    20 reviews low consensus
    entertainment value: 3.8, 20 reviews, low consensus
    For many, the strange clues, campy humor and charismatic cast make an addictive watch. The same mixture leaves others cold, especially when Rapp's antics or uneven plotting dominate.

Cons highlights

  • 3.3
    16 reviews low consensus
    genre satisfaction: 3.3, 16 reviews, low consensus
    The eerie, erotic detective mixture works best for viewers who enjoy strange mysteries with humor. Horror-focused responses are more divided, with repeated wishes for stronger witchcraft and more sustained fear.
  • 3.1
    14 reviews low consensus
    character development: 3.1, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Supporters find layered women, evolving partnerships and conflicting accounts that gradually deepen the mystery. Critics particularly miss fuller insight into Henry, Logan and Carson.
  • 3.3
    13 reviews low consensus
    witchcraft portrayal: 3.3, 13 reviews, low consensus
    The modern Baba Yaga framework offers unsettling imagery and a compelling way to explore female power. A recurring reservation is that the show hints at more witchcraft than it delivers or treats the mythology too superficially.
  • 2.3
    11 reviews low consensus
    romance quality: 2.3, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Some viewers enjoy the sparks and growing trust between the investigators, along with Katherine's seductive exchanges. Others find the central pairing forced and reject the show's assumption that Rapp is irresistible.
  • 3.3
    11 reviews low consensus
    originality: 3.3, 11 reviews, low consensus
    The folkloric framing, double role and playful tone can give familiar detective ingredients a distinct identity. Detractors still see well-worn crime tropes and conventional witch imagery beneath the surface.
  • 2.2
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    realism: 2.2, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    The human relationships can ground the supernatural story, but Rapp's near-universal romantic success frequently strains credibility. Some viewers also question Carson's tolerance of him and the town's response to the lookalikes.

Use Cases

Best for

  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Focused viewing: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Small conversations, recurring symbols and seemingly minor clues reward close attention. The mystery is most satisfying when viewers actively track those connections.
  • 4.3
    11 reviews low consensus
    Mystery-solving viewing: 4.3, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Repeated symbols, conflicting accounts and concealed relationships give attentive viewers plenty to investigate. Most enjoy connecting the pieces, although one negative assessment recommends it only conditionally to mystery devotees.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Weekend binge viewing: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The compact chapters and ongoing puzzle suit a concentrated binge. Several viewers would rather continue immediately than wait between small portions of the story.

Not ideal for

  • Background viewing
    1.5
    1 review
    Background viewing: 1.5, 1 review
    This is a poor choice for distracted watching: small conversations and apparently unrelated details are central to the eventual connections.
  • Sexual-content-sensitive viewing
    1.5
    1 review
    Sexual-content-sensitive viewing: 1.5, 1 review
    Frequent steamy scenes make this a poor match for viewers who regularly fast-forward sexual material or worry about others walking in.

Cast & Creators

  • Katherine
    4.7
    26 reviews strong consensus
    Carrie-Anne Moss: 4.7, 26 reviews, strong consensus
    Moss is the most consistently praised presence, making Katherine seductive, authoritative and difficult to read. A rare dissent finds her disengaged, but most reactions describe a magnetic scene stealer.
  • Rapp
    4.4
    23 reviews moderate consensus
    Noah Reid: 4.4, 23 reviews, moderate consensus
    Reid often makes Rapp's smugness, flirtation and hidden intensity entertaining, with several viewers praising his range beyond gentler roles. Others find the performance grating or struggle to believe the character's irresistible appeal.
  • Carson
    4.4
    17 reviews strong consensus
    Clark Backo: 4.4, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    Backo earns praise for dry reactions, restrained interiority and the tension she brings to Carson's partnership with Rapp. Her competence and evolving character are frequent strengths even when the writing gives her less room.
  • Logan
    4.1
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    Hudson Williams: 4.1, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Williams usually wins praise for making Henry and Logan feel distinct, unsettling and far removed from his earlier breakout role. A minority finds Logan one-note or the two performances insufficiently differentiated.
  • Writer / Creator
    4.1
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    Kat Sandler: 4.1, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    Sandler's expansion of her play is often admired for sharp dialogue, modern folklore and compact storytelling. Detractors think the wider television canvas exposes thin characterization and uneven execution.
  • Gina
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Megan Follows: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Follows makes a strong impression with limited material, delivering a diner scene that one viewer says she steals outright. Her performance adds depth to the ensemble.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in episode length, class commentary, Topical relevance, near average in story quality, entertainment value, below average in Narrative stakes, marketing appeal, Investigative procedure.

Comparison summary

76 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    28 (37%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    28 (37%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    20 (26%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Narrative stakes 1.8 3.6 -1.7
marketing appeal 2.0 3.7 -1.7
Investigative procedure 1.5 3.1 -1.6
romance quality 2.3 3.6 -1.3
LGBTQ+ representation 2.0 3.5 -1.5
realism 2.2 3.3 -1.2
genre satisfaction 3.3 4.2 -0.9
Genre blending 3.9 4.7 -0.8

Consider This Instead

If you want better genre satisfaction

Choose Sterling Point. It scores 4.9 vs 3.3 for genre satisfaction, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Compared: possible supernatural misdirection The viewers wonder whether apparently supernatural events might resolve more mundanely, as in Below.
  • Similar: coastal setting The coastal setting recalls Below, but the reviewer says the resemblance largely ends there.
  • Better: coastal mystery and power dynamics Below is judged the more exciting new coastal-town story with overlapping themes.
  • Similar: overall disappointment The reviewer dismisses both this series and Amazon’s Carrie as unnecessary disappointments.
  • Similar: wealth and gender themes The thematic path through wealth and female rage is compared with territory other shows have already explored.

FAQ

Is YAGA frightening?

It favors eerie imagery, disturbing visions and occult uncertainty over constant scares. Some horror fans find it too restrained, but the graphic violence can still be upsetting.

Is it another romance like Heated Rivalry?

It is primarily a supernatural detective mystery with substantial sexual material and flirtation. The central romantic chemistry divides opinion.

Does Hudson Williams lead the show?

He plays Henry and Logan, but the investigators carry most of the story. Several responses wish his characters had more screen time.

Are the episodes easy to binge?

The roughly half-hour chapters and recurring cliffhangers make consecutive viewing appealing. Several viewers find the weekly wait frustrating.

Is it suitable for children or younger teens?

No. Graphic injury, sex, nudity, disturbing hallucinations, drugs and strong language make it appropriate for adults.

Will knowing the play spoil everything?

The adaptation retains the play's spirit and much of its dialogue while adding characters and rearranging the structure. Readers still have new details and uncertainties to explore.

Do the assessments establish that the ending works?

Most longer assessments cover seven of the eight episodes, while several cover only the opening. They support judgments about the setup and development, but do not establish the final episode's payoff.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top TV Shows to Consider

#1 Colin From Accounts, Season 3
4.8

Best for sharp adult humor, magnetic chemistry and a deeply satisfying farewell. Skip it if familiar will-they-won’t-they plotting or deliberately messy leads are dealbreakers.

Pros: humor, writing quality

#2 Widow’s Bay
4.8

Choose Widow’s Bay for its dark laughs, richly haunted island and memorable ensemble. Skip it if you need straightforward scares, rapid answers to every mystery or a completely resolved finale.

Pros: humor, genre satisfaction

Cons: ending satisfaction, season pacing

#3 King of the Hill, Season 15
4.7

Choose Season 15 for warm, character-driven comedy, meaningful growth, and a finale that rewards longtime fans. Skip it if the short binge format, uneven replacement voices, or occasional clumsy commentary...

Pros: franchise connection, character development

#4 The Pitt, Season 2
4.7

Best for sharply acted, compassionate, high-pressure hospital drama. Skip it if graphic procedures unsettle you or you need a neatly resolved season finale.

Pros: character development, acting performance

Cons: character consistency, dialogue quality