Monster: The Lizzie Borden Story Review

Brand: Netflix
Released: September 17, 2026
Updated: 2 hours ago
3.1
Overall review score
142
Review insights
53
Scored features
26
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for bold performances, gothic period style, and unapologetic camp. Skip it if you want a historically grounded Borden retelling or a restrained eight-episode drama; several reviewers found the inventions, gore, and detours excessive.

Best for

Best for viewers who enjoy performance-driven gothic melodrama, dark camp, bold visual style, and speculative true-crime retellings that prioritize mood over strict history.

Not for

Not for viewers seeking a careful historical reconstruction, subtle treatment of female rage, or a tightly paced season focused only on the Borden case.

Verdict

Monster: The Lizzie Borden Story earns its strongest notices for performance and presentation. Rebecca Hall and Sarah Paulson are repeatedly singled out, while Ella Beatty and Vicky Krieps also draw substantial praise; reviewers likewise respond to the ornate production design, vivid period textures, sound work, and adventurous soundtrack. The central tradeoff is historical credibility. Many sources object to invented relationships, altered events, the Aileen Wuornos detour, and a tendency to turn an unresolved case into blood-soaked feminist melodrama. That same excess is exactly what some reviewers enjoy, finding the season energetic, funny, gothic, and highly watchable. The result is a sharply mixed season: visually confident and strongly acted, but often criticized as overlong, tonally unstable, and far removed from the known record.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

53 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    18 (34%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    9 (17%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    10 (19%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    15 (28%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros

  • 4.2
    9 reviews low consensus
    acting quality: 4.2, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Acting is the clearest consensus strength. Multiple reviews praised the cast as excellent or able to sell the heightened material, though a few felt the writing limited what performers could do.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    production design: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Ornate interiors, haunted textures, and convincing period presentation earned strong praise across several reviews.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    plot originality: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The cross-era, female-killer framing struck several reviewers as fresh and unusual, with one calling the project unique on television.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    casting quality: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Casting drew strong praise, from Beatty's immediate fit for Lizzie to broader comments about an impressive ensemble.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    bingeability: 5.0, 1 review
    Audience reactions reported in one article included viewers finishing all eight episodes in a single sitting.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    makeup quality: 5.0, 1 review
    Sarah Paulson's Aileen Wuornos transformation was praised for hair and makeup work that convincingly nails the look.

Cons

  • 1.7
    11 reviews strong consensus
    faithfulness to source material: 1.7, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Historical faithfulness is the most consistent weakness. Reviews repeatedly faulted fabricated relationships, altered events, and major liberties with an unresolved case.
  • 1.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    realism: 1.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Realism is a major weakness, with several reviews describing the series as salacious, implausible, or far removed from known history.
  • 2.0
    6 reviews low consensus
    sexual content level: 2.0, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Sexual content drew some of the strongest disagreement: critics often saw fetishistic or misplaced sexualization, while one reviewer enjoyed its bold directness.
  • 1.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    season length: 1.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Multiple reviewers felt eight episodes was too much for the material, citing padding, side quests, and a format that feels longer than necessary.
  • 2.2
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    violence level: 2.2, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    The gore is similarly divisive. Several critics found it lurid, fetishistic, or unnecessary, while another embraced the blood-soaked excess as part of the fun.
  • 1.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    season pacing: 1.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The eight-episode run was repeatedly criticized for padding, tonal impatience, and detours that slow the central story.

Cast & Creators

  • Aileen Wuornos
    4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Sarah Paulson: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Paulson receives some of the season's strongest praise for her committed Aileen Wuornos, though one review says the performance adds little new despite that commitment.
  • Abby Borden
    4.4
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    Rebecca Hall: 4.4, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Hall is one of the strongest points of agreement, repeatedly described as a scene-stealer and top performer even when one review faults the material for limiting her character.
  • Elizabeth Báthory
    4.1
    7 reviews low consensus
    Vicky Krieps: 4.1, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Krieps is widely praised as Bridget, including 'superb' notices, while one review is much cooler on her Elizabeth Báthory performance.
  • Lizzie Borden
    3.9
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    Ella Beatty: 3.9, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Beatty is often praised as engaging and capable of carrying the story, though some reviewers find her blankness hard to read or her range limited.
  • Emma
    4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Billie Lourd: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Lourd is part of an ensemble praised for understanding the show's heightened register, and another article includes her in an explicitly impressive cast.
  • Andrew Borden
    3.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Charlie Hunnam: 3.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Hunnam draws mixed notices: one review praises the ensemble's heightened-register work, another calls him understated, and a third says the writing leaves his character underdeveloped.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in makeup quality, villain quality, plot originality, near average in character development, casting quality, below average in faithfulness to source material, educational value, realism.

Comparison summary

53 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    12 (23%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    11 (21%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    30 (57%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
faithfulness to source material 1.7 3.9 -2.3
educational value 2.0 4.5 -2.5
realism 1.4 3.5 -2.1
episode pacing 1.5 3.4 -1.9
accent authenticity 1.5 3.4 -1.9
makeup quality 5.0 3.2 +1.8
writing quality 1.8 3.4 -1.7
character likability 2.0 3.6 -1.6

Consider This Instead

If you want better sexual content level

Choose The Seduction. It scores 4.6 vs 2.0 for sexual content level, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better accent authenticity

Choose The Beast In Me. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for accent authenticity, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

2003 film Monster

  • Compared: Sarah Paulson's Aileen Wuornos performance Sarah Paulson's Aileen Wuornos performance is favorably compared with Charlize Theron's Oscar-winning turn in the 2003 film Monster.

American horror story

  • Similar: fictionalized storytelling style The reviewer says the season increasingly resembles American horror story as the Monster franchise becomes more fictionalized.

FAQ

Is Monster: The Lizzie Borden Story historically accurate?

Reviewers repeatedly say no. The season uses the real case as a starting point but invents relationships, changes events, and takes major liberties with unresolved history.

What do reviewers like most about the season?

Acting and presentation lead the praise, especially the performances, period production design, visual texture, sound work, and some of the music choices.

How are the performances?

The cast is the clearest strength. Rebecca Hall and Sarah Paulson receive especially strong praise, while Ella Beatty and Vicky Krieps are also frequently highlighted.

Is the series very graphic?

Yes, and reactions are split. Several reviewers criticize the gore and sexual material as excessive or fetishistic, while others enjoy the deliberately lurid, blood-soaked style.

Does the Aileen Wuornos storyline work?

Opinions are divided. Some call the detour refreshing or narratively expansive, while others find it heavy-handed and distracting from the stronger Borden-family story.

Is the eight-episode season well paced?

Several reviewers think it is too long, citing filler, side stories, and tonal detours. Others still find the show highly watchable or bingeable despite the sprawl.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top TV Shows to Consider

#1 The Pitt, Season 2
4.7

Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.

Pros: episode structure, main cast performance

Cons: age appropriateness, plot clarity

#2 Furious, Season 1
4.6

Best for powerhouse performances, thorny character work, and a tense revenge mystery that grows richer as it goes. Skip it if abuse, trafficking, graphic violence, or deliberately messy moral questions...

Pros: episode structure, supporting cast performance

Cons: cinematography, sexual content level

#3 Hacks, Season 5
4.6

Best for sharp jokes, standout performances, and a warm, emotionally satisfying goodbye. Skip it if you most valued the pricklier Deborah-Ava conflict and biting Hollywood satire; the final season is...

Pros: plot originality, episode structure

Cons: season length, realism

#4 Slow Horses, Season 6
4.6

Best for fast, darkly funny spy thrills, standout performances, and a tightly wound six-episode run. Skip it if the familiar formula, dense callbacks, or a major cliffhanger ending are likely...

Pros: season finale quality, character development

Cons: accent authenticity, product placement