Compare Spartacus: House of Ashur vs IT: Welcome To Derry

Spartacus: House of Ashur

Spartacus: House of Ashur

Overall score 3.6 / 5

Based on 42 scored reviews

vs
IT: Welcome To Derry

IT: Welcome To Derry

Overall score 3.6 / 5

Based on 49 scored reviews

How we score

Scorata scores summarize analyzed review evidence on a 1–5 scale; they are not laboratory measurements or a simple average of customer star ratings. Feature scores summarize the reviews covering that feature. The overall score averages feature scores within each review, then combines review averages. When both expert and customer evidence are available, those two groups receive equal weight. Products can have different review coverage, so small score gaps do not establish a winner.

Recommendations prioritize important features for the category, with a score of at least 3.5, a gap of at least 0.25 points and at least two supporting reviews per product. Features with widely varying scores or broad connectivity contexts are excluded from recommendations. These safeguards do not establish statistical significance.

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

The available evidence supports the recommendation below, but does not establish an overall winner. Check the remaining features against your priorities.

Choose Spartacus: House of Ashur for entertainment value and bingeability.

There is not enough comparable review evidence to recommend IT: Welcome To Derry over the other product.

Why these recommendations?

Spartacus: House of Ashur

Where It Has the Edge

  • entertainment value is 4.8 vs 4.1. Even reviewers who acknowledge excess often find the series extremely entertaining, fun, or addictive. The strongest positive coverage...
  • bingeability is 5.0 vs 4.5. Reviewers who connect with the show repeatedly describe it as addictive, hooked them by the first half, or...
  • world-building is 5.0 vs 4.6. Moving deeper into Roman politics while rebuilding Capua’s social and gladiatorial ecosystem is praised for expanding the franchise...

IT: Welcome To Derry

Where It Has the Edge

No clear scored advantage over the other product.

Spartacus: House of Ashur 3.6 overall score
IT: Welcome To Derry 3.6 overall score

Compare features

Scores are out of 5. Missing scores mean missing review evidence, not a missing feature.

Scored on both products

Other features

Modern political framing
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.5

Professional reviews often praise the emphasis on class, power, exclusion, and Roman political maneuvering, describing it as sharp and relevant rather than decorative.

IT: Welcome To Derry
1.0

Some embedded audience commentary strongly rejects the show's perceived contemporary political framing.

Drama quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.5

Relationship-driven developments and character losses give later episodes potent melodrama, with one episode review praising how effectively evolving bonds drive the story.

IT: Welcome To Derry
2.0

Some relationship drama is viewed as forced rather than organically earned.

Sexual content level
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.3

Sex and nudity are intentionally extreme. Supportive critics argue the eroticism serves character, power, and atmosphere, while content-focused and negative reviews find it gratuitous, excessive, or less effectively handled than before.

IT: Welcome To Derry
1.0

One family-oriented review strongly objects to explicit bodily imagery and nudity in the horror material.

Screenplay quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

One enthusiastic video review singles out the script writing as a major strength, praising the franchise’s distinctive verbal style.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.0

Script reactions are mixed, ranging from a strong pilot to complaints about contrivance and implausible dialogue.

Writing quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.3

Most positive critics praise the writing as dynamic, tightly constructed, or even better than the original in places. The major dissent is a long-form full-season review that finds consistency deteriorates badly despite some strong episodes.

IT: Welcome To Derry
2.5

Writing is one of the most divisive areas: strong concepts and emotional beats coexist with clunky exposition, weak dialogue, and contrived plot turns.

Suspense
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.6

Political maneuvering, betrayals, and high stakes keep the show tense even away from the arena, with several reviewers praising its unpredictability.

IT: Welcome To Derry
2.9

Suspense is inconsistent; the best sequences build real dread, but weak CGI and fragmented plotting often break tension.

Violence level
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.5

Graphic violence is among the show’s defining pleasures and strongest action selling points for many reviewers. Others find the gore nauseating, excessive, or far beyond what they want to watch.

IT: Welcome To Derry
1.8

The violence is extremely graphic and can be effective horror for some viewers, while others find it excessive or hard to watch.

Character likability
Spartacus: House of Ashur
2.8

Ashur remains intentionally difficult to root for, and that limits emotional investment for several reviewers. Others find his corruption magnetic, while later episode coverage shows strong affection for characters such as Celadus.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.5

The core kids are often easy to root for, and several reviewers became emotionally attached to them quickly.

Dialogue quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.8

The faux-Latin, Shakespearean cadence is a signature pleasure for many reviewers, who enjoy its poetic vulgarity and distinctive rhythm. Others find the syntax overly elaborate, difficult for newcomers, or distracting.

IT: Welcome To Derry
2.3

Dialogue is a recurring weakness, with complaints about clunky exposition, wooden exchanges, and overly obvious monologues.

Practical effects quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.0

Physical spectacle gets mixed reactions: one critic praises realistic gore, while another finds explicit prosthetics distractingly fake.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.5

Where practical creature work is used effectively, it is praised as more convincing than the weakest CGI.

Tone consistency
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.5

The show’s cheerfully hedonistic identity feels confident to supporters, but one long-form critic argues comic slow-motion spectacle can undercut scenes meant to feel serious or heroic.

IT: Welcome To Derry
2.0

The show can swing abruptly between serious horror, emotional drama, and sillier spectacle, creating tonal friction.

Period authenticity
Spartacus: House of Ashur
2.5

Historical plausibility is contested. One article defends female gladiators and mixed matchups as grounded enough for the period, while a history-focused video strongly objects to dialogue, equipment, and combat presentation.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.9

Cars, clothing, sets, and social context often sell the 1960s setting, though one critic found the era artificial and unlived-in.

Season finale quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
2.9

Finale response is split. One full-season fan is highly satisfied and eager for season two, while detractors call parts of the ending melodramatic or, in the harshest case, an unmitigated disaster.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.1

The later episodes and finale earn substantial praise for spectacle and payoff, though a few critics found the ending bland or disappointing.

Power scaling
Spartacus: House of Ashur
1.0

Several negative YouTube reviews reject the physical logic of Achillia’s rapid success against experienced men and criticize other characters’ strength as plot-dependent.

IT: Welcome To Derry
2.3

Added rules and weaknesses around Pennywise sometimes make the entity feel less unknowable or less threatening.

Renewal interest
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

Every review that directly addresses future viewing is enthusiastic: several critics want the next episodes immediately, and full-season viewers express clear interest in season two.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.8

Interest in more seasons is positive overall but not universal; some reviewers are eager for more lore while others fear repetition.

Episode pacing
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.5

Pacing varies by reviewer and episode: some early non-action stretches invite fast-forwarding, while later coverage praises focused momentum and brisk movement.

IT: Welcome To Derry
2.3

Individual episodes are unevenly paced, with slow stretches, rushed revelations, and a frequently criticized midseason lull.

Editing quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
2.5

The recurring slow-motion action style is a nostalgic franchise hallmark, but one longtime fan now finds it dated.

IT: Welcome To Derry
1.5

Editing draws unusually sharp criticism for jarring transitions and weak rhythm.

Episode structure
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

Episode 7 is praised for concentrating its many storylines around a clear emotional center, producing a focused and driven hour.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.0

The dual child/adult structure can broaden Derry effectively, while the strongest pilot uses its setup and reversals especially well.

Genre satisfaction
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.5

For viewers seeking a pulpy sword-and-sandal drama, the show is described as an enticing, exciting entry likely to satisfy diehard genre and franchise fans.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.7

Horror effectiveness is highly uneven: some critics found the series terrifying and inventive, while others found many scares silly, repetitive, or too CGI-heavy.

Villain quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.5

Ashur’s toxic charisma and Cossutia’s scheming make villainous or antihero figures highly watchable even for reviewers who dislike them morally.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.8

Bill Skarsgård's Pennywise is usually a highlight when present, but many critics complain that the clown is held back too long or underused.

Cinematography
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

Dramatic lighting and the restored visual atmosphere are singled out as part of the revival’s polished, instantly recognizable look.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.4

Cinematography is usually praised for making Derry picturesque, eerie, and cinematic, though one review found it bland.

Story quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.3

Story response is mixed. Supporters praise sturdy storytelling, political intrigue, character-driven plotting, and meaningful consequences; detractors see thin purpose, repetition, weak investment, or outright bad plotting beneath the spectacle.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.8

The season earns praise for ambitious lore and emotional stakes, but the military plot and overloaded structure divide critics.

Bingeability
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

Reviewers who connect with the show repeatedly describe it as addictive, hooked them by the first half, or left them eager to continue.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.5

Several critics found the expanding mystery easy to get hooked on and were eager to continue once the story gained momentum.

Language level
Spartacus: House of Ashur
1.5

Profanity is extremely frequent, and multiple reviews warn that the combination of f-bombs, sexual vocabulary, and stylized syntax can be challenging or excessive.

IT: Welcome To Derry
1.0

Frequent strong profanity is treated as a major content concern rather than a neutral detail.

CGI quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
1.5

CGI is one of the weaker production areas in the negative coverage, with critics objecting to over-the-top effects and conspicuous green-screen use.

IT: Welcome To Derry
2.0

CGI is the clearest technical weakness: multiple critics found creature work obvious, cartoonish, or distracting even when the underlying scare ideas were strong.

Emotional impact
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.4

The series is often more entertaining than moving in its early stretch, but later deaths—especially Celadus and Opiter-related material—land with considerably stronger emotion.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.9

When the character bonds land, the series can be moving and heartbreaking; weaker reviews say some intended emotional beats fail to resonate.

Season pacing
Spartacus: House of Ashur
2.8

Some critics appreciate the patient build because developments feel earned, but others find the first half slow or believe major character milestones arrive too quickly relative to their setup.

IT: Welcome To Derry
2.4

A slow or uneven first half is a common complaint, with many full-season reviews saying the back half improves substantially.

Realism
Spartacus: House of Ashur
2.1

The show is intentionally stylized, and some critics accept that bargain completely. Others strongly object to combat physics, historical behavior, and Achillia’s accelerated fighting credibility.

IT: Welcome To Derry
1.7

Some military logic, character decisions, and plot mechanics strain credibility even within the supernatural premise.

Theme depth
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.2

Many critics see substantive themes about class, enslavement, power, consent, exclusion, race, and survival beneath the gore. A smaller group misses the original rebellion’s moral purpose and finds this season thematically thinner.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.8

Themes of fear, racism, collective apathy, and cycles of violence can add real weight, though some critics find the treatment too broad or didactic.

Character balance
Spartacus: House of Ashur
1.8

Several negative reviews feel too much attention goes to combat or selected leads while other gladiators and supporting characters remain thin, creating an uneven ensemble.

IT: Welcome To Derry
1.5

The large ensemble can feel overstuffed, with too many characters and subplots competing for attention.

Spin-off quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.5

Professional critics frequently call the revival a fitting, dynamic, or triumphant return, but several full-season and YouTube reviews question why the spinoff exists at all. The result is a genuine split between successful reinvention and unnecessary retread.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.2

The prequel's value is contested: some call it essential or worthy, while others see it as unnecessary franchise extension.

Acting quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.3

Performances are one of the clearest strengths, with many critics calling the cast spectacular, top-notch, or phenomenal. A few dissenters find the style unsubtle or uneven, but the overall acting response is strongly positive.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.0

Performances are one of the most dependable strengths, with frequent praise for both the child ensemble and key adult leads despite a few complaints about stilted moments.

Franchise connection
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.2

Most professional critics say the revival recaptures the Spartacus look, language, action, and pulpy energy with impressive fidelity. Dissenting reviewers argue it copies the aesthetics without restoring the original’s soul or heroic purpose.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.4

Connections to the films and wider King universe are a major draw, although the Easter eggs can become overbearing for some viewers.

Directing quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

Direction is praised for maintaining craft across the production and, in later episode coverage, for delivering a focused and driven installment even without arena games.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.8

Direction earns strong praise for atmosphere, visual control, and the show's most effective horror sequences.

Lore depth
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.5

The deeper focus on Capua’s politics and social hierarchy expands the franchise world beyond arena combat and gives the revival a broader canvas.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.4

The deeper history of Derry, Pennywise, and the wider King universe is one of the most consistently praised elements.

Character consistency
Spartacus: House of Ashur
1.9

Ashur’s characterization is a major fault line: some see a believable alternate-timeline evolution, while harsher reviews say he behaves far less cunningly and consistently than the original character.

IT: Welcome To Derry
2.0

A few critics flag inconsistent character behavior and logic as part of the show's uneven writing.

Score quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

The sweeping score is praised for instantly transporting the viewer back into the ludus and restoring the franchise atmosphere.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.9

The music is repeatedly praised for heightening dread without overwhelming the drama.

Character development
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.9

Achillia, Korris, Tarchon, and Ashur receive substantial praise for growth and added depth, especially as the season progresses. Critics who dislike the show argue some arcs arrive too quickly or leave too many supporting characters underdeveloped.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.0

Many critics connect with the layered fears, grief, and friendships, although some reviews find portions of the ensemble underwritten.

Cultural representation
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.5

Achillia’s role, queer relationships, and the show’s treatment of race and gender earn strong praise from many professional critics for adding depth and historical texture. Several YouTube reviewers reject the same choices as forced or implausible, making representation one of the most polarized aspects.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.4

The focus on racism, civil rights, and Indigenous history is often seen as meaningful, but some critics call parts of the treatment shallow, stereotyped, or heavy-handed.

Cast chemistry
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.9

Chemistry is strongest in selected pairings, especially Ashur with Achillia and Korris with Opiter, while some reviewers find other romances or ensemble bonds shallow or inconsistent.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.0

The young ensemble often sells the friendships and group dynamics, though some critics feel the chemistry falls short of the 2017 film.

Pilot episode quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.1

The opening earns mostly positive reactions for re-establishing the world, characters, and conflicts quickly, though one recap calls it flashy and hollow and another dislikes the resurrection mechanism.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.2

The premiere is widely seen as bold and memorable, with its opening and late twist frequently singled out even by otherwise negative critics.

Plot twists
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.5

Unpredictability is a recurring strength for positive reviewers, who praise the way the show sets up expected outcomes and then redirects the story.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.6

Early shocks and later reveals are among the most widely praised storytelling moves, especially the premiere's major reversal.

Special effects quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.3

Effects are uneven across the coverage: some VFX and set work look artificial, while the combat-injury effects receive strong praise for shockingly realistic detail.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.3

Effects quality varies sharply by episode, improving late in the season but suffering from conspicuous digital work earlier.

Plot originality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
2.6

The alternate-history premise divides reviewers almost completely: supporters call it fresh, clever, and audacious, while detractors see an unnecessary retread or fan-fiction-style resurrection.

IT: Welcome To Derry
2.5

Opinions split between fresh expansion of King lore and the sense that the show is repeating the Losers Club formula.

Plot clarity
Spartacus: House of Ashur
1.8

The alternate-history setup and stylized world can be difficult for newcomers, and one long-form critic also objects to convoluted or incoherent information delivery.

IT: Welcome To Derry
1.8

Multiple storylines and dense lore can make the narrative feel scattered, overloaded, or difficult to track.

Family friendliness
Spartacus: House of Ashur
1.0

Graphic violence, explicit sex, full-frontal nudity, and pervasive profanity make this a very poor fit for family viewing.

IT: Welcome To Derry
1.0

The show is emphatically not family-friendly because of graphic violence, disturbing imagery, and strong language.

Controls and connectivity

Audience appeal
Spartacus: House of Ashur
2.4

Longtime Spartacus fans are often described as the natural audience, while newcomers may find the lore, dialogue, or excess difficult to enter. Several YouTube reviewers were sharply resistant to the revival’s premise, making broader appeal unusually divisive.

IT: Welcome To Derry
5.0

The series is presented as accessible even to newcomers who have not read King or watched the films.

Critic appeal
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

The critical response is described as exceptionally strong, even as audience reaction is much more divided.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.0

Critical response is visibly divided, with rave notices for craft and terror alongside sharp complaints about plotting and scares.

Age appropriateness
Spartacus: House of Ashur
1.0

The content-focused review considers the series emphatically adult, citing graphic gore, explicit sex, full-frontal nudity, and harsh profanity.

IT: Welcome To Derry
1.0

The graphic horror and disturbing material are viewed as inappropriate for children.

Comfort and build

Costume design
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.3

Costuming draws sharply different reactions: one review calls it lush and highly crafted, while a historically focused trailer critique objects to specific armor and wardrobe choices.

IT: Welcome To Derry
5.0

Period clothing is consistently praised for helping transport the show convincingly into the early 1960s.

Production design
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.4

The gritty Roman look and lighting earn praise, but green-screen use, variable sets, and limited open-air scale draw criticism from several reviews.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.9

Sets and overall production design are major strengths, giving Derry a polished, period-specific identity.

World-building
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

Moving deeper into Roman politics while rebuilding Capua’s social and gladiatorial ecosystem is praised for expanding the franchise without abandoning its familiar foundations.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.6

The episodic format gives Derry, its history, and its mythology more room to breathe, which many critics see as a major advantage.

Visual style
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.4

The gritty lighting, stylized blood, scenery, and operatic presentation are widely praised for restoring the franchise identity, though a few critics find individual shots or effects visibly fake.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.2

Derry often looks polished and striking, especially in credits and period design, but flat lighting or artificial backdrops occasionally undermine the look.

Performance

Supporting cast performance
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.7

The supporting ensemble is a major asset, with Korris, Cossutia, Achillia, and the gladiator group often described as increasingly compelling and sometimes stronger than the central lead.

IT: Welcome To Derry
3.0

Adult supporting work is generally respected, even when critics feel the material gives those actors too little to do.

Main cast performance
Spartacus: House of Ashur
3.0

The lead performance is seen as capable of anchoring the narrative, though one mixed review feels the conception of Ashur as central hero remains difficult to embrace.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.5

The main ensemble, especially the younger cast, receives broad praise for carrying fear, grief, and emotional stakes.

Ownership and support

Entertainment value
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.8

Even reviewers who acknowledge excess often find the series extremely entertaining, fun, or addictive. The strongest positive coverage treats its unapologetic spectacle as a feature rather than a flaw.

IT: Welcome To Derry
4.1

Even mixed reviews often find stretches fun or entertaining, especially when the horror, lore, and Pennywise material are working together.

Evidence available for one product

Other features

Accountability handling
Spartacus: House of Ashur
1.5

One full-season critic felt the revival avoids seriously confronting Ashur’s past crimes, leaving his potential redemption underdeveloped.

IT: Welcome To DerryNo score yet
Action quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.5

Arena fights and combat choreography are widely praised as creative, brutal, and thrilling, with several reviews calling them a major reason to watch. A small number of critics question the physical credibility of some matchups.

IT: Welcome To DerryNo score yet
Casting quality
Spartacus: House of AshurNo score yet
IT: Welcome To Derry
4.8

Casting, especially among the younger performers, receives strong praise and is repeatedly treated as a major asset.

Cliffhanger effectiveness
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.5

One critic specifically praises the patient plotting for letting developments feel earned instead of forcing artificial cliffhangers.

IT: Welcome To DerryNo score yet
Continuity
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

The premiere’s recreation of the ludus and familiar world is so seamless for one longtime fan that it feels as if the franchise never left.

IT: Welcome To DerryNo score yet
Episode length
Spartacus: House of AshurNo score yet
IT: Welcome To Derry
1.5

Long episodes can feel bloated when the story slows down or repeats information.

Ethical sensitivity
Spartacus: House of AshurNo score yet
IT: Welcome To Derry
1.0

A small number of critics strongly object to the use of real-world trauma and prejudice as shock material.

Faithfulness to source material
Spartacus: House of AshurNo score yet
IT: Welcome To Derry
3.7

The expansion feels King-like to some critics, while others question creative liberties or fan-fiction-like additions.

Finale satisfaction
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

One strongly positive full-season reviewer enjoyed the finale enough to immediately look forward to the next season.

IT: Welcome To DerryNo score yet
Humor
Spartacus: House of Ashur
4.0

The lighter, deliberately silly register works for at least one critic, who enjoys the show’s refusal to take its lizard-brain pleasures too seriously.

IT: Welcome To DerryNo score yet
Makeup quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
1.0

One YouTube critic strongly dislikes Achillia’s wig and styling, calling it distracting and unflattering.

IT: Welcome To DerryNo score yet
Season length
Spartacus: House of Ashur
2.0

One negative review feels the prolonged epic approach does not fit the miniseries-style format well.

IT: Welcome To DerryNo score yet

Ownership and support

Rewatch value
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

One highly positive critic explicitly says the series is fun enough to deserve a second viewing.

IT: Welcome To DerryNo score yet
Value for money
Spartacus: House of AshurNo score yet
IT: Welcome To Derry
4.0

The physical 4K release is described as economical and well stocked with extras for committed fans.

Comfort and build

Sound design
Spartacus: House of AshurNo score yet
IT: Welcome To Derry
5.0

Sound design and immersive audio are praised for making quiet scenes threatening and big sequences more enveloping.

Performance

Soundtrack quality
Spartacus: House of Ashur
5.0

The music is included among the elements one enthusiastic reviewer calls phenomenal.

IT: Welcome To DerryNo score yet

Other Top TV Shows to Consider

#1 Colin From Accounts, Season 3
4.8

Best for sharp adult humor, magnetic chemistry and a deeply satisfying farewell. Skip it if familiar will-they-won’t-they plotting or deliberately messy leads are dealbreakers.

Pros: season pacing, episode structure

Cons: none

#2 King of the Hill, Season 15
4.7

Choose Season 15 for warm, character-driven comedy, meaningful growth, and a finale that rewards longtime fans. Skip it if the short binge format, uneven replacement voices, or occasional clumsy commentary...

Pros: episode structure, season finale quality

Cons: release schedule, bingeability

#3 The Pitt, Season 2
4.7

Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.

Pros: episode structure, main cast performance

Cons: age appropriateness, plot clarity

#4 Furious, Season 1
4.6

Best for powerhouse performances, thorny character work, and a tense revenge mystery that grows richer as it goes. Skip it if abuse, trafficking, graphic violence, or deliberately messy moral questions...

Pros: episode structure, supporting cast performance

Cons: cinematography, sexual content level