Compare SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones vs Marshall Major V

SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
Marshall Major V

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

Choose SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones for Features at launch and Active noise cancellation.

Choose Marshall Major V for 3.5mm analog input availability and Aesthetics / discreet profile.

Comparison Takeaways

SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones

Where It Has the Edge

  • Features at launch is 4.5 vs 2.0. Feature set at launch impressed the reviewer because the specification looked unusually strong for the price.
  • Active noise cancellation is 4.3 vs 1.9. ANC was one of the strongest points, repeatedly judged effective for the price, especially against low, steady ambient...
  • Codec support is 4.5 vs 2.4. Codec support was praised mainly because LDAC appeared in such a low-priced headphone.
  • Sound leakage is 4.5 vs 2.6. Sound leakage evidence was limited but positive, with one review noting minimal leakage.

Marshall Major V

Where It Has the Edge

  • 3.5mm analog input availability is 4.2 vs 1.0. The 3.5mm input was valued for wired listening and audio sharing, with several reviewers calling the sharing trick...
  • Aesthetics / discreet profile is 4.4 vs 2.0. Reviewers praised the distinctive vintage style and compact visual identity, though one found the look inconspicuous or barebones.
  • Button control usability is 4.7 vs 2.7. Physical button controls were one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising the joystick-style knob as intuitive...
  • Treble clarity is 3.4 vs 1.8. Treble was described as crisp and detailed by some reviewers, while others found the top end harsh, exaggerated,...
Average score
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.9
Marshall Major V
3.9
3.5mm analog input availability
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
1.0

The lack of a headphone jack was a clear drawback in the one review that evaluated analog input availability.

Marshall Major V
4.2

The 3.5mm input was valued for wired listening and audio sharing, with several reviewers calling the sharing trick useful or cool.

Features at launch
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Feature set at launch impressed the reviewer because the specification looked unusually strong for the price.

Marshall Major V
2.0

Launch feature set was criticized as limited, especially compared with competitors that include ANC, transparency, cases, or richer apps.

Aesthetics / discreet profile
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.0

Discreet/aesthetic appeal was weak in Tom's Guide, which said the headphones paled next to other sub-$50 designs.

Marshall Major V
4.4

Reviewers praised the distinctive vintage style and compact visual identity, though one found the look inconspicuous or barebones.

Active noise cancellation
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

ANC was one of the strongest points, repeatedly judged effective for the price, especially against low, steady ambient noise.

Marshall Major V
1.9

Reviewers repeatedly flagged the absence of ANC as the Major V's biggest feature gap, especially for commuting, flights, and loud environments.

Codec support
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Codec support was praised mainly because LDAC appeared in such a low-priced headphone.

Marshall Major V
2.4

Codec support was mixed-to-weak: LC3/LE Audio helped, but reviewers criticized the lack of higher-quality codecs.

Button control usability
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.7

Button controls were a repeated concern, with reversed or counterintuitive mappings offset by a few comments that basic controls worked.

Marshall Major V
4.7

Physical button controls were one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly praising the joystick-style knob as intuitive and reliable.

Sound leakage
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Sound leakage evidence was limited but positive, with one review noting minimal leakage.

Marshall Major V
2.6

Sound leakage was mixed-to-negative, with some office-safe results but several warnings about leakage at higher volumes.

LDAC
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

LDAC was treated as a strong perk, improving perceived clarity or adding high-resolution capability for supported devices.

Marshall Major V
2.5

LDAC was criticized as a missing advantage versus a competing Android-focused headphone.

Android compatibility
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Android compatibility evidence was positive through LDAC use, which a reviewer said could reveal more clarity.

Marshall Major V
2.3

Android compatibility was weakened by missing higher-quality Android-friendly codecs such as aptX or LDAC.

Treble clarity
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
1.8

Treble was a recurring weakness in the critical reviews, described as blunt or over-exaggerated and sharp.

Marshall Major V
3.4

Treble was described as crisp and detailed by some reviewers, while others found the top end harsh, exaggerated, or clustered.

Weight comfort
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.4

Weight comfort was mixed, with some reviewers calling the headphones light enough and others finding the weight noticeable or heavy.

Marshall Major V
4.8

Low weight was a consistent strength, with reviewers calling the headphones light, barely noticeable, and easy to wear.

Cable quality
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.0

Cable impressions were weak because reviewers repeatedly criticized the included USB-C cable as very short or stubby.

Marshall Major V
3.3

Cable impressions were mixed: one reviewer liked the retro detail, while another disliked the tangling coiled cable.

Volume output
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.3

Volume output was split, with one reviewer saying it lacked maximum volume and another calling the volume good.

Marshall Major V
4.5

One reviewer found normal listening volume more than sufficient, with extra output available if needed.

Midrange clarity
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.0

Midrange impressions were mixed, with clear mids in one review but dipped, coarse, meh or shouty vocals in several others.

Marshall Major V
4.1

Midrange clarity was often praised for vocals and detail, but some reviewers heard recessed or deficient mids.

Ear cup swivel/rotation range
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

The rotating earcups were useful because they helped the headphones lie flat and improve portability.

Marshall Major V
5.0

One review praised the ear cups' 90-degree tilt as part of the flexible fit system.

Multi-platform compatibility
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Multi-platform compatibility was positive in the review that tested switching between iOS/macOS and Android devices.

Marshall Major V
5.0

Multi-platform use was positive where one reviewer reported seamless switching between phone and laptop.

Voice prompts/feedback
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

Voice feedback was present and usable, but the reviewer described learning the non-verbal audio cues rather than clear voice prompts.

Marshall Major V
4.5

Marshall's guitar-riff feedback tones were described as a nice brand touch by reviewers who mentioned them.

Value for money
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.6

Value was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling the headphones high-value or a strong deal for the price.

Marshall Major V
3.6

Value was split: reviewers liked the battery, design, and sound for the price, but many felt ANC competitors offered more.

Build quality
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

Build quality was mixed: many found it solid for the price, while others criticized plastic feel, wobble or budget materials.

Marshall Major V
4.3

Build quality was generally praised as rugged, tough, and durable, though not always premium-looking.

Software/setup simplicity
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Setup simplicity was positive overall, with reviewers describing the app or setup flow as simple, easy or seamless.

Marshall Major V
3.5

Setup was easy out of the box in one review, but app responsiveness and connection reliability were criticized elsewhere.

Advanced software features
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Advanced features were praised as unusually generous for the low price.

Marshall Major V
3.5

Advanced software and feature impressions were mixed: battery preservation impressed, but feature depth lagged some competitors.

Wind noise handling
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

Wind handling was mixed, with one reviewer praising wind resistance and another saying wind noise could still be an issue.

Marshall Major V
4.3

Wind handling was only discussed in microphone-test contexts and was generally positive alongside noisy-condition call performance.

Durability over time
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Long-term durability had limited but positive evidence from one reviewer who expected the construction to last normally.

Marshall Major V
4.8

Durability-over-time comments were positive where reviewers expected the headphones to survive years of use or abuse.

Headband adjustability
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Headband adjustment received limited but positive evidence for helping achieve a good fit.

Marshall Major V
4.8

Headband adjustment was praised for smooth sliding rails and flexible adjustability.

Clamping force comfort
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.9

Clamp force divided reviewers, ranging from secure and well balanced to tight enough to cause discomfort.

Marshall Major V
3.6

Clamp force feedback was mixed, ranging from gentle or moderate to too tight or uncomfortable depending on head shape and use.

Frequency response accuracy
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.7

Frequency balance varied by reviewer, from a pleasant non-harsh V-shape to unbalanced, dull overall tonality.

Marshall Major V
2.0

Measured frequency-response commentary was negative, with one review saying the tuning deviated drastically from the preferred curve.

Portability/foldability
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.4

Portability was strong thanks to folding or flat-rotating earcups and compact storage.

Marshall Major V
4.9

Portability and foldability were consistently praised because the headphones collapse very small and fit easily in bags.

Ear cup padding quality
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.1

Ear cup padding was consistently positive, with reviewers describing the pads as soft, cushiony or well covered.

Marshall Major V
4.6

Ear cup padding was consistently praised as thick, soft, plush, or squishy enough to help the on-ear fit.

Connectivity options
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Connectivity options were useful where reviewed, especially wired fallback and simple USB-C plug-and-play use.

Marshall Major V
4.5

Connectivity options were praised for wired listening, sharing audio, and useful device switching.

Hinge durability
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.0

Hinge durability evidence was negative in the one review that judged the hinged earcups too wobbly.

Marshall Major V
2.5

One reviewer disliked the way the metal hinges stick out when folded, making hinge design a minor caveat.

Integrated microphone
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

The integrated microphone received positive limited evidence from one reviewer who found the captured voice good enough for calls.

Marshall Major V
4.5

The integrated mic array was praised in one review as working well for clear recordings.

Microphone quality for calls
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.8

Call microphone quality was inconsistent but often positive, ranging from average or weak in cars/noise to excellent in several reviews.

Marshall Major V
4.2

Call quality was usually praised, with reviewers hearing loud, clear, understandable voice capture; one found it noisy but usable.

Microphone noise reduction
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Microphone noise reduction was praised by some reviewers for cutting background noise, but one review noted robotic or distant voice artifacts.

Marshall Major V
4.4

Microphone noise reduction received positive comments for cleaning up office, cafe, and ambient noise around speech.

Design and Aesthetics
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Design opinions leaned positive for a simple, modern or premium look, though one review found the aesthetics weak versus budget rivals.

Marshall Major V
4.6

The retro Marshall design was widely praised as distinctive, classic, stylish, and aligned with the brand's rock identity.

Comfort during long use
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.6

Comfort was highly split: some reviewers wore them comfortably for long sessions, while others found clamp, weight or pressure tiring.

Marshall Major V
4.0

Long-wear comfort was highly divided, with many praising light padding and hours-long comfort while others reported pressure, heat, or glasses discomfort.

App
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

The app was polarizing: reviewers liked its controls and simplicity, but others found it buggy, laggy, crash-prone or poorly translated.

Marshall Major V
3.8

App opinions were mixed: support and customization were major upgrades, but some reviewers found the app buggy, basic, or limited.

Premium feel
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.3

Premium feel was divided, from clearly not premium to surprisingly premium depending on the reviewer.

Marshall Major V
3.0

Premium feel was mixed: the design could look special, but some reviewers said the materials did not feel expensive.

Noise isolation (passive)
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

Passive isolation was decent overall, but one reviewer noted an imperfect seal while another praised low leakage and passive isolation.

Marshall Major V
3.2

Passive isolation was mixed: the pads muffled some office chatter and ambient sound, but on-ear fit still let plenty through.

Headband padding quality
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.5

Headband padding evidence was mixed, with one reviewer finding it too soft and another liking the padded feel.

Marshall Major V
3.3

Headband padding feedback was mixed, with one review praising full soft coverage and another calling it thin.

Sound quality
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.8

Reviewers split on sound: several called it warm, balanced or very good for casual listening, while others found it dull, average or uneven.

Marshall Major V
4.0

Most reviewers liked the lively Marshall-leaning sound, but several found it average, treble-heavy, distant, or not competitive for audiophiles.

Bass performance
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Bass was often praised as punchy, warm and adjustable, though one reviewer felt the low-end emphasis contributed to an unbalanced sound.

Marshall Major V
4.2

Bass impressions skewed positive for punch and warmth, though a few reviewers found the low end light or uneven depending on tuning.

Soundstage width
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.6

Soundstage evidence was mixed: spatial processing and some tuning added width, but other reviewers found the stage narrow or unimpressive.

Marshall Major V
3.4

Soundstage ranged from surprisingly wide and dynamic to compact, intimate, or under-imaged depending on the reviewer.

Stability
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.7

Stability was mostly good and snug, though one reviewer reported sliding during gym bench use.

Marshall Major V
3.5

Fit stability was mixed: some reviews praised secure fit, while others found head movement could shift or dislodge the headphones.

Travel friendliness
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.2

Travel friendliness was positive, with reviewers tying the headphones to commuting, on-the-go use and long battery life.

Marshall Major V
4.0

Travel friendliness was mixed-to-positive: small size and battery helped, while no ANC and no case limited flights and loud travel.

USB-C
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.2

USB-C was viewed positively for charging and plug-and-play wired use, though cable length remained a separate complaint.

Marshall Major V
4.0

USB-C charging was viewed positively, especially as a more reliable option than fiddly wireless charging.

Included accessories
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
2.2

Included accessories were a weakness because reviewers noted the bare-bones box, no case and limited included cable.

Marshall Major V
2.0

Included accessories were criticized as skimpy because reviewers expected more protection or extras for the price.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Multipoint and dual-device switching were judged reliable and seamless where tested.

Marshall Major V
4.2

Multipoint generally worked well, though one reviewer noted playback must be paused on one device before switching.

Equalizer customization
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.1

EQ customization was a strength, with reviewers valuing custom EQ and preset controls despite one review noting no custom EQ option.

Marshall Major V
3.9

EQ customization was useful and often praised, though some reviewers said its effect was subtle or insufficient.

Preset EQ profile quality
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.9

Preset EQ quality was generally useful, although Tom's Guide found only about half worth selecting.

Marshall Major V
4.0

Preset EQ feedback was limited but positive when reviewers singled out balanced or useful presets.

Charging
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.5

Charging was praised for useful fast-charge behavior, especially five-minute top-ups that add hours of listening.

Marshall Major V
4.6

Charging was mostly praised for fast, USB-C, and wireless charging, though several reviewers found wireless placement fiddly or unreliable.

Battery
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.9

Battery life had the strongest agreement, with reviewers repeatedly calling 60-90 hour playback excellent, outstanding or top-tier.

Marshall Major V
5.0

Battery life was the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the 100-hour class endurance and real-world longevity.

Overall recommendation
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.1

Overall recommendations leaned positive for budget buyers, though one critical review advised saving money for another option.

Marshall Major V
4.1

Overall recommendations were mixed-to-positive: many reviewers recommended the headphones for battery, design, and casual use, but with clear caveats.

Audio-video sync accuracy
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Audio-video sync was mostly strong, with several reviewers reporting no lag, while one reviewer heard no meaningful low-latency difference.

Marshall Major V
4.3

Reviewers who discussed sync reported no noticeable delay or expected LE Audio benefits for video use.

Bluetooth
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Bluetooth behavior was praised for strong range, solid connection and fast pairing across multiple reviews.

Marshall Major V
4.3

Bluetooth was described positively where reviewers referenced modern or useful wireless capabilities rather than just listing the version.

Spatial audio
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Spatial audio was mostly seen as a pleasant width or immersion booster, with caveats that it is not flagship-level or can sound artificial.

Marshall Major V
4.0

One review said Dolby Atmos playback still had kick despite the lack of noise cancelling.

Voice assistant integration
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Voice assistant use was positive where evaluated, with reliable speech recognition and swift interactions.

Marshall Major V
4.0

Voice assistant use was positive in the review that tested Google Assistant and Siri.

ANC background noise level
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.0

ANC background noise was present in one review, but it was not considered disturbing once music played.

Marshall Major VNo score yet
ANC effect on sound signature
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.8

ANC's effect on the sound signature was favorable where tested because the tonal balance stayed essentially unchanged.

Marshall Major VNo score yet
ANC sound impact on audio
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.8

ANC did not meaningfully harm audio in the reviews that evaluated it, with sound staying consistent across ANC modes.

Marshall Major VNo score yet
aptX
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
1.3

aptX support was criticized because reviewers specifically noted that aptX or aptX Adaptive was missing.

Auracast support
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
4.3

Auracast support was praised as rare and forward-looking, though some comments depended on future firmware or ecosystem adoption.

Bluetooth version
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Bluetooth 5.4 was praised for range, efficiency and current-generation capability.

Marshall Major VNo score yet
Carry case quality
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
1.9

Carry protection was a consistent weakness because reviewers repeatedly complained that no case, pouch, or tote was included.

Detachable cable convenience
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
4.5

The detachable analog cable was praised for enabling the music-sharing trick with another pair of headphones.

Immersive audio quality
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
3.0

Immersive audio quality was mixed, as one reviewer liked vocal heightening but disliked artificial movie effects.

Marshall Major VNo score yet
Instrument separation
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
4.4

Reviewers who focused on separation generally praised stereo placement, detail visibility, and the ability to follow individual sound elements.

LE Audio readiness
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
4.2

LE Audio readiness was treated as a forward-looking advantage for streaming, sync, and Auracast-related future use.

Maximum volume clarity
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
4.5

Reviewers noted that the headphones could play loudly without obvious strain and still had headroom.

Replaceable earpads
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
4.5

Replaceable earpads were a plus in reviews that noted removable pads or replacement cups.

Smart listening features
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
3.9

Smart listening features were useful for quick Spotify, EQ, or assistant access, though one reviewer found the M button nonessential.

Smudge resistance
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.0

Smudge resistance had limited but positive evidence from the matte finish resisting fingerprints.

Marshall Major VNo score yet
Streaming service integration
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
4.8

Spotify integration was praised by Spotify users as genuinely useful for starting or cycling music quickly.

Sustainability and repairability
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
3.8

Repairability was viewed as a plus because reviewers noted battery replacement through Marshall's repair program.

Transparency mode quality
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless Headphones
4.3

Transparency mode was generally useful and sometimes excellent, though one reviewer heard some distortion in ambient sound.

Marshall Major VNo score yet
Water/sweat resistance rating
SonoFlow SE HQ31 Wireless HeadphonesNo score yet
Marshall Major V
1.5

Reviewers treated the lack of IP or water resistance as a real limitation for rain, sweat, hikes, and outdoor use.