Compare UWANT D100 Wet Dry Vacuum Cleaner vs Bissell PowerClean FurFinder

Ease of use was a major positive, with reviewers repeatedly describing the vacuum as simple, intuitive, or quick to use.

Reviewers repeatedly described the vacuum as easy to use, citing simple controls, easy storage, low-effort setup, and straightforward accessory changes.

Reviewers saw the D100 as unusually innovative for its class, especially its lay-flat body, push-in dock, washable motor, and feature depth at the price.

Reviewers did not see the vacuum as especially innovative overall. The lights and pet-hair focus stand out, but one critical test said the signature FurFinder attachment missed the mark.

The combined clean/dirty tank design was generally liked because it reduced the number of tanks to handle, though it still requires cleaning after use.

The dirt bin drew mixed reactions. It is easy to remove and can reduce dust during cleanup, but its small capacity means frequent emptying, especially in homes with shedding pets.

Low-pile carpet evidence was limited and weak, with one reviewer saying it only kinda worked and was not designed for carpet.

Low-pile carpet pickup was competent but not perfect. Large cereal pieces needed an extra pass in one test, while another reviewer liked the stronger carpet grip but noted it could hinder movement.

Large debris intake was mixed: it handled eggshells, cereal, and chunks in several tests, but one reviewer saw Cheerios fling and another said eggshell was missed.

Large-debris performance was mixed. One tester found cereal pieces piled up against the floorhead casing, while another successfully cleared a large hard-floor mess.

Emptying and mess control were mostly positive thanks to easy tank emptying and solid-liquid separation, though one reviewer wanted two hands for part of the cleaning process.

Emptying opinions were mixed. Several reviewers found the bin easy or hassle-free to remove, but others disliked having to pull out the top/filter instead of using a one-touch bottom release.

Included accessories were viewed positively where reviewers commented on them, especially the cleaning tool, spare brush roll, and extra filter.

The accessory set was widely useful for upholstery, crevices, cars, and above-floor cleaning. Most reviewers praised the included tools, although one found the signature FurFinder upholstery head disappointing.

Small-space suitability was strong because reviewers liked the compact body and ability to reach low furniture.

The compact body stores easily and works well for many small-space tasks, but one reviewer found the handheld configuration too bulky for awkward dashboard areas.

Clogging evidence was negative but context-specific: one reviewer clogged the machine during an unrealistic flour-and-liquid stress test.

One tester found that the powered FurFinder attachment could bog down and stop entirely when pressed into upholstery, a notable weakness in debris-flow reliability.

Filtration feedback was limited but positive, with one reviewer saying the air filter caught a meaningful amount of debris and dog hair.

The sealed HEPA system was specifically appreciated by an allergy-conscious reviewer for keeping dust, pollen, and dander contained instead of recirculating them.

Fine debris pickup on hard floors was positive, with reviewers saying dust, crumbs, hair, seasoning, or similar small debris were reliably sucked up.

Fine hard-floor debris performance was excellent in direct testing, with leftover flour and sugar removed in a single pass.

Storage-related feedback was positive: one reviewer liked the compact base, and another noted the unit could stand on its own.

Self-standing storage was one of the most frequently praised conveniences, and the compact footprint worked well in closets and spare rooms. One tester found the upright stance a little tippy, so stability is good rather than flawless.

Under-furniture pickup was a major strength, with many reviewers praising the lay-flat design for reaching under chairs, tables, sofas, and other low areas.

The swiveling head reached under most furniture successfully, though very low sofas could still be out of reach.

Heavy-duty suitability was limited; reviewers warned against large households, chunky mess expectations, and lots of dry flour-type substances.

One reviewer cautioned that this cordless model does not match a heavy-duty canister or upright for sheer power, even though its everyday suction is strong.

Pet-related feedback was favorable, with one reviewer recommending it especially for pets and another showing it picked up dog hair in a shedding household.

Pet and long-hair households were a major strength: most reviewers found the vacuum highly effective at finding and collecting shed hair. The main exception was one test where the dedicated FurFinder upholstery attachment bogged down and underperformed.

Cordless convenience was praised because reviewers liked not dragging a cable and found the cord-free setup more convenient for regular use.

Cordless operation was repeatedly praised for making room-to-room, stair, furniture, and car cleaning easier. Reviewers especially liked avoiding cords and plugs during quick sessions.

Hard-floor hair pickup was praised in dog- and cat-hair households, with reviewers seeing meaningful hair capture.

Hair pickup on hard floors was consistently strong, with reviewers reporting effective removal of pet and human hair and performance comparable to much larger vacuums.

Weight was repeatedly praised as light or easy to handle, with one reviewer noting it could feel heavier once filled with water.

Despite published weights around seven pounds, most hands-on reviewers found the vacuum lightweight or manageable. It was especially appreciated for carrying between floors and avoiding arm fatigue.

Runtime was mixed but generally adequate: reviewers found it sufficient for normal cleaning, while one comparison called it lower than average and another noted limits for larger homes.

Runtime is the clearest recurring tradeoff. Eco-mode results around 40 minutes satisfied some smaller-home and staged-cleaning users, but multiple reviewers found medium/high runtimes too short for larger jobs.

Maintenance was considered easier than many wet vacs thanks to self-cleaning and washable parts, but reviewers stressed that tanks, filters, and debris still need manual care.

Maintenance was viewed positively in the one review that addressed it directly, thanks to clear cleaning instructions and reasonably priced replacement parts.

Tool and roller changes were considered easy, with reviewers noting simple roller removal and no-screw access for deeper cleaning.

Tool changes were consistently easy, with simple click-off parts, a foot-release floorhead, and quick accessory swaps. Reviewers liked being able to move from floor cleaning to handheld tasks without fuss.

Handling was broadly praised for lightness, pivoting, and wrist comfort, but one review found the forward pull tiring during longer sessions.

Handling was generally excellent thanks to low weight, swiveling movement, and easy rolling. The main drawback appeared on carpet, where stronger grip could make the head harder to push or pull.

Overall sentiment was strongly favorable across reviews, with most recommending or praising the D100 despite specific caveats around charging, noise, and heavy dry messes.

Overall sentiment was strongly positive in 12 of the 13 reviews, with repeated recommendations and praise for cleaning power, lights, and versatility. The main dissenting review still called it good but criticized the signature FurFinder attachment and a few missing refinements.

Hair-wrap resistance evidence was limited to one detailed test, but that reviewer found no hair tangled on the brush in a realistic scenario.

Tangle resistance was another broad strength. Most testers saw little or no wrap on the main floorhead, though very long strands could occasionally wind around a roller and the small tool collected some hair.

Reviewers liked the D100's versatility across wet, dry, liquid, and mixed messes, helped by its modes and lay-flat reach.

Versatility was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers using the vacuum on floors, upholstery, stairs, cars, corners, curtains, and high areas. The modular 3-in-1 design was repeatedly highlighted as a reason to buy.

Smart automation worked well where tested, with reviewers appreciating automatic power adjustment from dirt detection.

Smart features are limited. One reviewer specifically noted that competitors can offer automatic suction adjustment and information screens, making this model feel basic in automation and display features.

Controls were generally easy and useful, especially mode access, volume control, and separate water output, though one review wanted better visual water-level indication and fuller voice muting.

Controls were repeatedly praised for simplicity: a true power button and three suction levels are easy to understand, and reviewers liked not having to hold a trigger while cleaning.

The low-profile lay-flat form was consistently praised as a standout way to reach under furniture.

The head fits under many tables and pieces of furniture, but it is not exceptionally low profile; one reviewer could not get it beneath very low sofas.

Build quality evidence was limited to one review, which judged the construction solid but not premium.

Although the body is largely plastic, reviewers said it felt sturdy and well built. Another tester described the design as built to last.

Design opinions were mostly positive for a sleek or attractive look, with one more measured review calling it functional and timeless rather than premium.

The black-and-blue finish was described as attractive, even though the construction is predominantly plastic.

Battery and charging feedback was split: one reviewer liked the battery life, while another called the six-hour recharge problematic.

The removable battery was widely appreciated for flexible charging and potential battery swapping. Charging was described as fast in one testimonial, but the battery system cannot fully offset the model’s short higher-power runtimes.

Comparative performance was favorable, especially in value and feature completeness versus many competitors, though one review treated it as a solid device rather than a category winner.

Comparisons were mostly favorable on value and usability, and several reviewers called it a clear upgrade over older vacuums. Performance-focused testing was more mixed, finding only a small gain over the regular PowerClean and lower suction than the LG CordZero.

Suction impressions were positive overall: reviewers said dry vacuuming worked well, wet/dry messes were pulled up confidently, and one review specifically praised the high suction rate.

Reviewers consistently found the suction strong for everyday debris, pet hair, hard floors, carpets, cars, and area rugs. One comparison-focused test found it only modestly stronger than the regular PowerClean and behind the LG CordZero.

Edge and baseboard cleaning was consistently strong, with reviewers saying it got close to walls, cabinetry, and baseboards, though one measured review noted it missed the advertised margin.

The floorhead reached closely along walls, and testers also found the machine easy to work right up against edges and baseboards.

Drying noise was split: two reviews measured or described the brush drying as fairly quiet, while another found turbo operation and repeated drying beeps noticeably louder.

Noise impressions were split. One reviewer’s dog was unfazed by the vacuum, while another measured 80 dB on high and considered that fairly loud for a stick vacuum of this size.

Reverse cleaning evidence was limited and negative, with one review saying cleaning was only really effective when moving forward.

One direct test found that pickup seemed to happen mainly on the forward pass, making reverse cleaning noticeably weaker.

Value was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly calling the D100 a strong price-performance or best-value option versus pricier wet/dry vacuums.

Value was a standout strength across the set. Reviewers repeatedly called the vacuum competitively priced, cost-effective versus Dyson, and especially compelling when discounted.

Assembly and setup were consistently described as easy, with tool-free setup and simple handle insertion.

Assembly was consistently effortless. Reviewers described setup as self-explanatory, plug-and-play, and intuitive enough to complete within minutes.

Area-rug handling was positive: reviewers said the motor handled rugs with ease and that the lightweight floorhead rolled well on carpeted surfaces.

High-pile carpet grip was stronger than the standard PowerClean, helping dig into the pile, but the brush could hang up and make the vacuum harder to move.

Crevice pickup was strong in car testing, where Turbo mode pulled lodged sand from narrow trunk spaces.

The lighting is not just decorative: reviewers said it exposed fine dust, hidden fur, and missed patches that looked invisible before vacuuming. This was one of the strongest points of agreement.

Dried-on stains were handled, but not effortlessly; reviewers said they sometimes needed a second pass or many passes before fully clearing.

Floor drying feedback was positive, with reviewers saying floors were already dry or would not take long to dry after cleaning.

Fresh liquid pickup was a strength, with multiple reviews reporting one-pass or quick cleanup of water, drinks, milk, and wet messes.

One tester found some long hair wrapping around the smaller powered tool, requiring manual removal even though the main floorhead stayed mostly clear.

Carpet hair pickup was excellent in the reviews that tested it, including thick knots and mixed pet/human hair.

The FurFinder lights were one of the most praised features in the entire set. Reviewers repeatedly called them bright, helpful, and good enough to change how they vacuum.

Heated drying was repeatedly praised as useful for drying the roller and reducing bacteria, mildew, mold, or odor risks.

Odor control was a clear positive theme, with reviewers praising brush drying, deodorizing, and reduced dirty-tank smells.

The main storage omission was onboard tool storage. One reviewer specifically wanted a hook or holder so the accessory could stay attached to the vacuum.

Reviewers liked the push-in dock because it avoided lifting the vacuum into place and made parking or charging easier, though coverage came from convenience impressions rather than long-term reliability testing.

The self-propel effect was helpful for most reviewers, but one review found the traction tiring during longer sessions.

The liquid system drew mixed feedback: separate water output and smart water supply were praised, but missing automatic solution dispensing, reservoir filling, and minor leakage were drawbacks.

Residue feedback was limited but positive, with one reviewer saying a chocolate milk cleanup was not sticky after using regular mop mode.

Carpet grip could become excessive: one tester said the roll sometimes hung up on carpet and made the vacuum difficult to push or pull.

Upholstery performance was usually excellent, with several reviewers removing embedded hair and fluff quickly and sometimes in one pass. One tester strongly disagreed, finding the dedicated FurFinder head underpowered and prone to stalling.

Water tank feedback was mostly positive for capacity, easy removal, filling, and washing, though one review wanted an easier reservoir-filling method.

The modular handheld conversion was a strong practical advantage for cars, furniture, small messes, and high-reach cleaning. Reviewers repeatedly praised how easily the main body detaches and reconfigures.

The standard floorhead was generally the stronger attachment and worked well for everyday cleaning. Its casing can block chunky debris, however, forcing extra passes with cereal-sized pieces.

One reviewer explicitly felt the vacuum was built to last, adding confidence beyond its lightweight cordless construction.

Dock noise evidence was limited but negative, with one reviewer calling the repeated drying-phase beeping annoying.

Mopping performance was strongly positive, with reviewers reporting impressive hard-floor cleaning, effective mud pickup, and good results on wet and mixed messes.

Replacement parts were described as well priced, suggesting ongoing upkeep need not be unusually expensive.

Sanitizing feedback was mixed: one review could not verify the claimed disinfection, while another home test saw visible bacteria reduction after cleaning.

Self-cleaning was one of the most praised features, with reviewers valuing roller washing and drying, though one reviewer said expectations should stay realistic.

Reviewers found the lightweight cordless format well suited to stairs, and the powered upholstery tool worked especially well on carpeted stair surfaces.